FZ28 - Face washed out - any new fixes ?

That's a tough fix. I imagine part of that area is clipped, with nothing to get back. The more you try and offset it in post processing, the worse it will probably look.

In mixed lighting like that, I'd do two things...shoot RAW and use either -1/3 or -2/3 exposure compensation. I find there's around a good 1/2 to 2/3rd's of a stop of leeway in FZ28 RAW files to get some detail back in overexposed areas.

One other thing you could do would be to use spot metering, which will give you better control over the effect of highlights on your subjects as you shoot. You do have to be more careful in taking your meter reading when using spot, but it does work very well.
 
Keeping the histogram visible while you're shooting will help a lot. You want to be sure to keep the right edge of the graph at zero - you can do that by adjusting the exposure compensation down a bit, for example.

This is a very high contrast picture - with deep shadows and brightly lit face - so "average" won't help you avoid the blowouts.

Much easier to get details out of shadows than out of blown highlights.

Sherm
 
I would start at -2/3 exposure and bring up the shadows in post processing. You'll be surprised how much is there when you use CS3's "levels" properly.
Djedi
--
Old timer
 
i'm really a novice at this... but see if you think this is better.. the program i used is stamped on the bottom of the pic... i'm having lot of fun with it...



--
LiviusSteven
Kodak P712 & P880.. Panasonic FZ28
 
i'm really a novice at this... but see if you think this is better..
the program i used is stamped on the bottom of the pic... i'm having
lot of fun with it...
The clipped areas on her face, her light-colored top, legs and on the horses face are actually more pronounced with this adjustment than they are on the original.

Once an area is devoid of detail to bring back, increasing the overall contrast, which this looks to have done to me, only makes blown/clipped areas look worse.
 
the standard techniques for dealing with high contrast scenes.

No camera can capture extreme lighting conditions without a scrim or fill lighting. So dial down EV and contrast and/or add fill flash.

The FZ28 offers the incredibly, valuable feature of being able to check for blown-highlights in the review mode. In auto-review or manual review (not playback) just look for blinking highlights.

OTOH, if your only concern is exposing for the face, then face detection mode, or spot metering may help.
--
John
 
It looks a simple case of over exposure to me. It's not a particulary bad example of extreme contrast and I would expect the camrera to be able to cope with that perfectly well without the need for PPing.

Next time you get a nice stationary subject I would just try taking half a dozen pictures of the same subject starting at what you think is well underexposed and step up for each subsequent picture. One of them will be fine. Generally in pictures like this slight underexposure will be better than the other way.

--



eFZed50, Oly TeeCON17, RaynoxDCR150 DCR250
My Galleries are at
http://picasaweb.google.com/trevorfcarpenter
 
Imagine your light-accepting surface
as a thin, tile-shaped slab of soft clay.

If you put your hand on it lightly, it
leaves an imprint of the lines on your
palm.

Push down firmly and you get the
dimensionality of the fingers and side
of the hand.

Push too hard and you get to the flat
surface under the clay.

That is what has happened on the two faces:
too much 'photon pressure.' Where the pressure
is too strong, the white formica worktop is all
you can see.

You have let the photons generate too strong a signal
at photosites in some parts of the sensor.

The thickness of the slab of of clay is dynamic range.
The sensors in compact cameras do not have a very
wide dynamic range.

When highlights are clipped (whited out) or colors
are oversaturated, you can not boost or reduce
the values for those pixels, they are an irreducible
100%. For naturalistic repair, the only thing you
can do is overlay data where those patches of 100%
pixels appear. In other words, the solution is deft
retouching using a photo editor or paint program.

Pixel values below 100% can be manipulated. That is why
you can bring out detail from shadows.

Using a different camera, my son once brought home
some almost black shots. I wondered what they were
and played with the brightness and contrast controls
in Paintshop Pro. I was surprised to find quite clear shots
of Buddhist images.

But as values approach zero, stray signals generated by
the circuitry comprise a proportionally greater part of
the recorded photosite data. When you boost the signals
(increase the ISO) this noise also gets amplified. The
smaller the photosite, the greater effect of this noise
has on the signals generated.

After you have used a camera for a while,
you get a feeling for good shooting conditions.
Contrasty light is tough. Overcast days are easier.

People here have given you good advice.

Use spot metering.
Put the spot on bright part of the face,
half press the shutter button, then compose
the shot, and shoot.

You could also try full-stop bracketing.
Press (twice) the top button on the navigation pad.
^ [+ -]
press > to adjust
press the center button (set)


You have to hold the camera steady while it takes
three shots.

These three shots let different amounts of light reach
the sensor -- using the clay slab analogy:
light pressure, calculated ideal pressure, and heavy pressure.

If you can dial down the exposure and auto bracket you may
get a couple of workable shots.

The manual has a section called Compensating the Exposure.
It's page 55/152 of the pdf downloaded from the UK site.
It's worth a look.

--
No rocks impede thy dimpling course.
 
Mark,

Correcting blown-highlights, unless you shot these in a RAW format, are difficult to correct. Photoshop or an simular prograpm would be required. In the future one simple rule of thumb will correct 99% of the overexposure problems you are having with this camera while photographing equine activities in bright sun...keep your back to the sun. I scrolled through your equine portfolio. The photographs with your back to the sun have no blowen highlights. When you are shooting into the sun / backlit situations your camera's chip is having a difficult time compensating for the vast exposure variance. If you have to shoot into bright light meter for the highlights in the composition. It is much easier to lighten dark subject matter then retreive detail from blown hightlighted areas.

This is my $0.02 worth. It works for me and I photograph show horse for a living.

http://www.pbase.com/tnc_photography/

TC
 
My thanks to everyone for their kind suggestions. All are very helpful.

I'm more of a portrait photographer, so taking pictures of a moving horse and rider is challenging at many different levels.

Keeping my back to the sun is exactly what I summized during the last show. Doing so eliminated all kinds of "sun" problems.

I'm also going to try underexposing things a stop or so on those very bright days.

Thanks again!
 
I just looked at your photos! Wow! I'm betting you have more than a FZ28! Simply wonderful and enjoyable to watch your slide show. My daughter is on a college equestrian team. As a dad, I try to get as many shots of her and her team. I suspect though that I would do better at choosing the best jump angles and spending more time getting the focus perfect. As it is, I follow the horse and shoot 100's of pictures. Yes, I get some ok shots, but very few "Wow" shots. I suspect too (though I haven't told my wife) that I'll be saving my $ for a new DSLR. I thoroughly despise the digital view finder image and the momentary freeze frame picture that occurs after every shot.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top