You are right here, but for a superzoom camera, it's right there among the fastest.The S3/S5 are fast, but nor super fast compared to today's digicams.Donna,
If you are talking about start-up speed, time to focus, easeness of
focus during dim situations, zooming speeds and shot-to-shot times
with mounted ext flash, then nothing will come close to the S3/S5,
IMO.
I've handled the G7/G9 (at the shops), the Ixus series (many models
over 3 years) and Panasonic FZ-18 (at the shops), and the closest I
will ever get to the performance of my 350D is the S5/ FZ18.
Check the numbers as measured by Imaging Resources for the S5:
But if you compare this to a G9/G7 or even other Canon models eg. Ixus, A series, under the same situations, you'll know what I mean. It also depends on the overall power storage capabilities, and for the S5, it's a set of 4x AA batts.http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/S5IS/S5ISA6.HTM
It's more of a function of how much charged you used in the previousWith freshly charged batteries (Powerex 2700 mhA), I get a less than
a second shot to shot times with internal flash on my S5.
flash shot than the charge or capacity of the batteries. Check the
Imaging Resources measurements cited above and you will see if you
deplete fully the charge it's longer than 1 second.
--For some reason the G7/G9 takes a long time to measure the exposureThe zooming speed is absolutely fantastic by my standards.
I still don't understand why the slightly longer shutter lag on the
G7/G9 series as compared to the S3/S5, and worse, with the ext flash
unit
after the pre-flash. That caused the extra shutter lag. It's a
mystery as to why Canon programmed it that way when, as you say, it
not that way on the S3/S5.
--mamallama
Yus.
'Photography is the Art or Process of Producing Images,
The Art of Photography is Another Story.'