Canon, Nikon get trounced by Oly in tele-zoom test.

Almost as sharp as Nikon's own prime supertele.

http://www.imagepower.de/IMAGES/imgEQUIPMENT/AFS200400.htm
"More recently Nikon has caught up to Canon with VR, its own version
of image stabilization. In addition, Nikon has the superb 200-400mm
f/4 lens, which surpasses anything Canon currently offers".
quoted from:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/Safari-Tips.shtml

--
Rapick
Old Glory Ninetynine-five, New Companion E-Threehundred
PBase supporter
http://www.pbase.com/rapick
--
Regards
Matthew Lin

My photo gallery:
http://www.matthewlin.com
 
well i have a 50-200 which is excellent, but also canon 70-200 f4 l which is excellent if not excellenter!!!
 
It would be great to see a straight-up thorough and well executed test of the ZD 90-250 and Nikkor 200-400. At that $5k US price point, they really could push a camera purchase one direction or the other.

--
Rob Davies
Searun
http://www.pbase.com/searun
 
well i have a 50-200 which is excellent, but also canon 70-200 f4 l
which is excellent if not excellenter!!!
oh, I've had both of those, and yes the 70-200 f/4 just may be excellent'er ;-P. I did find the 50-200 to be more useful with the 4/3 sensor size.

I've owned a few Canon lenses 17-40 (for 3 days) 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4 and 70-200 f/4. The 70-200 was the only one that got mad respect from me.



--
http://www.highsee3.smugmug.com

'A camera maker that simply copies others' idea has no right to call itself an original
maker in the first place.' -Mr. Maitani, creator of the OM photographic system.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top