... predominantly B+W high quality printing in a conventional darkroom, with of course associated quality exposing/processsing of films from 35mm to 5x4 and who taught these techniques to keen photographers, both amateur and professional - of course I miss the darkroom.
To be honest, the only reason I changed, eventually, was an ever increasing back problem, plus I moved to digital when the Foveon sensor appeared, as that, to me, was then the only sensor to offer film-like quality. I had been scanning negs - and still using the darkroom - for several years, so I had sussed out the right techniques for digital image files and printing to achieve equally high quality - had I not, I would still have been presevering in the conventional darkroom.
However, one comment I would make is that in my experience, those with conventional darkroom experience and techniques easily adapt to digital workflow - why? - because when they work, they simply adapt what they had in terms of technique in the darkroom to the digital darkroom.
That, in essence, means they only use in PhotoShop what they would have used previously - and in all honesty, that's all that is needed for anyone with experience to achieve quality prints that can match what a good practitioner produced in the chemical darkroom.
My eldest son, working in London for many years as a Pro, still works with film for all his own (exhibition) work and prints (B+W) in his darkroom and will not have it any other way. He also still uses film for his Pro wrk, although in the main, the prints (mostly colour) are via conventional means in a Pro Lab, negs being laser scanned and printed on to conventional colour materials.
He uses Apple Mac computers and prints some but all for pre-production via method mentioned, so he is well aware of digital methods to high standards but as said, sticks to conventional - totally for his B+W and I fully respect that.
--
Zone8
The photograph isolates and perpetuates a moment of time: an important and revealing moment, or an unimportant and meaningless one, depending upon the photographer's understanding of his subject and mastery of his process. -Edward Weston