I'm mentaly down

Thanks Kurt for the kind words..But someone compared features with
the EOS 400 D and they did upset me :( . I was told by them that
all pros use only canon and not Nikon...aarrgh...
That is a strong statement for someone to make, and it's wrong. While MORE pros may use Canon, that's because they just have a larger market share. They put more money into marketing, have more products and are a larger company. I find Nikon to be more passionate about photography.
Many pros use Nikon stuff, too.

The fact is, anybody who is a good photographer , pro or not, is going to be able to get a good picture out of any of the dSLRs, or even a P&S. It's not that the equipment doesn't matter, but I think the photographic skill is far more important.
 
There are plenty of pros shooting Nikon. The person you talked to
knows nothing. I was out shooting with a pro yesterday and he was
in awah of what I was able to do with the SB800. He was tempted to
switch from Canon for this alone. The cameras and lenses are very
close. The Nikon flash system is the best.
Funny you should mention this. I met with a photographer with my fiance for our wedding next year and he got into digital last year. He has two Canon 20D bodies and a 5D. I asked why he chose Canon (his film stuff is all MF Hassys) and he said he went to local photographer's association meetings and dinners over the course of a few years, and decided on Canon based on popularity. The funny part is, we were talking about flashes, and he was saying he doesn't like the way the flash pictures come out on his Canons. He said it seemed too harsh. I took the liberty of mentioning Nikon but I'm not sure he really is going to research further.
 
Thanks Kurt for the kind words..But someone compared features with
the EOS 400 D and they did upset me :( . I was told by them that
all pros use only canon and not Nikon...aarrgh...
That's an absurd comparison anyway. Compare the D70s to the 350D or 300D then see how it comes out.
 
Thanks rook.You have really taken pain in marking out the improvements i would have done.My kind thanks for that.

NN
You have some interesting photos, some aren’t what I particularly
care for, but that is one of the great things about photography,
you might like buildings and I might like birds, and we can both
pursue our own preferences. In the picture of the rose the reds are
over saturated; something that can be a major PIA with digital
cameras. That is virtually the case with all digital cameras, so
don’t go blaming Nikon and wishing you had a Canon because they
suffer too. The dog is underexposed and there isn’t any detail in
the picture. In fact I noticed a tendency to underexpose, I have
the same problem.

Look at this histogram for the landscape photo with the water and
the rocks.



Notice how the histogram is all bunched up on the left? The left is
your shadows (dark tones) with pure black being the left edge.
There is nothing on the right side, the highlights side. Ideally
you want the histogram to look like a big mound, or a series of
peaks between the right and left sides, tapering off as you get
close to either side. Anything of the chart is either lost detail
in the shadows – pure black, or lost highlights, pure white. The
really cool thing about your camera is that you can look at the
histogram right after you take the photo (page 117 in your manual).

You could adjust the Levels and the Shadows/Highlights and end up
with something like this.



Notice how the histogram has moved to the right, and there are more
details visible in the photo.

I like your hanging lights inside too, but again I think the shot
is too dark (underexposed). It does convey a certain mood, I will
grant you that, but I think there is a tremendous loss of detail.
I’d rather see something more like this.



That is just my opinion, you may well prefer the darker version for
the mood it conveys.

While some of your photos are not to my liking content wise, I
think they show a lot of talent. I don’t think you are going to
have any problems with having gone with Nikon; I don’t think you
would have had any problem if you had gone with Canon either, for
that matter, or Sony, or Pentax. The camera is just the tool, like
a hammer, it’s the person wielding the tool that makes the
difference. Just remember, it’s not the hammer that bends the nail,
it’s the guy swinging the hammer, and it’s not the tools that build
a house, it’s the men holding those tools.

--
Brooks

http://www.bmiddleton.smugmug.com

I daresay one profits more by the mistakes one makes off one's own
bat than by doing the right thing on somebody's else advice.
— W. Somerset Maugham
--
Trying Hard to Master This ART :)
 
Yeah, right. Saying that Canon is far [better] than Nikon in all aspects is a very subjective statement.

There are times when I would prefer photos out of a Nikon, and then there are others when I would prefer them out of a Canon. From my standpoint it has to do with colors that each camera produces.

In your case, it's not a bad decision to have gone with Nikon. The D70 does have some quirks, but it's a very workable camera, and definitely still competitive. Getting a camera which gives you so much manual control in such an intuitive fashion at this price, is probably impossible from other manufacturers.

I've got into some CLS shooting lately with multiple flashes and my D70, and I'm having a lot of fun.

Przemek
Ok got my D70s. Now people say...its a bad decision and I should
have gone for Canon which is far good than Nikon in all aspects:(
--
Trying Hard to Master This ART :)
 
I think it's ludicrous to assume one camera is better than the other, especially when compared to your old point and shoot. Both NIkon and Canon take exceptional photos, it's really up to the photographer.

One photographer (amature) who really inspired me to return this hobby is Todd Klassy, from Madison. He shoots a Canon 20D and 5D. His photos are fantastic. I didn't get a Canon just because he shoots a Canon, I grabbed a Nikon D50 because A) it fit my budget. B) it had the best ergonomics and feel for my hands. and C) It was far better than anything I've ever had previously. I It's like arguing between 50" DLP vs LCoS HDTV. They're both far better than your old Zenith 20" 480i console CRT sitting on the floor.

--
***************************
You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
  • Mark Twain
***************************

http://flickr.com/photos/61368918@N00/

********
 
A friend of mine shoots a Canon 20D, and he commented on my photos, and how they inspired him. I shoot the D50, which is supposedly a step down from the D70s. I guarantee, you can take photos with your D70s that will WOW your canon loving friend if you take inspired photos. You just have to enjoy what you have and forget buyer's remorse. Both Canon and Nikon are good cameras. They both take exceptional photos. BUT, the photographer behind the lens is what truly makes the photo stellar.

--
***************************
You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus.
  • Mark Twain
***************************

http://flickr.com/photos/61368918@N00/

********
 
it's not the camera - it is you who takes the pictures - There was a guy on pbase who took pictures with nikon 2100 that would blow you away.
 
What did you have before?

If it was a P&S then take a picture with your new camera and compare them.

OMG, the P&S pics look just as good if not better than your new camera pictures. Talk about buyers remorse. Why did I spend $600 (d50) for a new camera and $600 for flash and lenses and stuff????? Help!

I went through this when I got my D50 in Feb 06.

Well, 3 weddings and over 4,000 pics later I am thrilled with the D50. The capabilities of my entry level DLSR are almost endless. The pic quality is great. Look at the images from the masters on this sight and there is nothing wrong with a Nikon.

Take pictures, enjoy. Pictures talk and Bull%$&# walks!!!!
--
http://ahha1991.smugmug.com/
 
All the measurebators and the rude replies to your post and consider this......

1) I can appreciate your concerns.....we put a lot of hard earned money into our hobby/craft and want to be assured it was well spent.

2) However.....the camera is only a tool. Certainly there is no ONE tool that is incredibly better in ALL respects than another. Each have their strengths and weaknesses. You're likely better served by disregarding all the tests, measurebating and discussion and instead focusing on learning how to master and get the most of the tool CURRENTLY in your possession. I can't imagine artists going into such debate over which brush, oil and canvas should be used to paint a masterpiece.

3) I had the same reservations after purchasing my D70 just prior to the release of the D200, D70s, D50 group of cameras. I decided to put all my concerns aside and instead concentrate on improving my creative/technical skills. I know that I'm the one that can better benefit from a "firmware" upgrade....lol.

4) I still own and occasionally use my outdated Coolpix 5000. I held onto this "tool" because eventhough it's technology is dated....it at times can still be the best tool for the job.

5) It's funny.....film shooters will choose among a variety of films to get the look that they want. They understand that no ONE film is the "best." They like and appreciate the amount of grain (noise) in high speed films and will select a film to use because of this. Yet so many w/ film roots forget this and enter in the constant debate of what is and is not the best camera out there.

6) I've seen shots taken w/ P&S cameras, pinhole cameras and other lowtech devices where I marvel at the artistic result....not for one moment considering what device captured the image.

7) Feel good that you have at your disposal a wonderful tool that's capable of creating breathtaking images. The technology built into this "oft maligned" camera at such a pricepoint is un-imagineable just a few years ago!

So go out and prove the naysayer's wrong! Show them it's the photgrapher that makes the picture not the camera. If the cam your using is really that bad and your able to impress them with your work then certainly they should bow to your artistic and technical abilities. Maybe then they'll concentrate on what's really important in this craft.
--
WSSA Member #73!
CATS Member#41

Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself.
 
Looks as though your well on your way to proving the naysayers wrong!
--
WSSA Member #73!
CATS Member#41

Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make all of them yourself.
 
NikonNovice wrote:
I was told by them that
all pros use only canon and not Nikon...aarrgh...
NikonNovice - Believe me: MANY pros use Nikon. My college's newspaper staff almost all use Nikon including myself, and the newspaper's equipment is all Nikon (except for one of the editors who uses a Canon 20D). At sporting events, all I've seen the local newspaper photographers using are Nikon cameras. Nikon cameras perform very well, and pros around the world know them for their durability and great performance. Your D70s will likely outlast any Canon in the same price range - even the D50 (I think) has a better build than the Canon 350D and 400D. You made a fine choice.
 
I'm a canonist

Camera does not make pictures, YOU make them. YOU can make a better picture with eos 300D than someone else with 1d mk2 (or D50 vs. D2Xs)...

Simply forget it and enjoy D70. I have used for a while, and it's a great camera......

--
autoportrait

 
Take a look at some of the other really great photographers here on this site....

you will quickly see that the D70/D50 line is VERY capable.

The rest is up to you.

And in the future ....may we see your gallery as a great example to the next scared new owner of their DXX camera (insert new future model in the XX).

: )

Don't worry....start snappin.

Roman
--

Photoshop is like bondo. Use it to smooth out and polish your work, not to compensate for your lack of body work skills.

http://www.pbase.com/romansphotos/
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top