I have used 170-500mm with my D70. A non AFS lens and AF while not the best worked wonderfully to track birds.
Later on I upgraded to 50-500mm and the quality improved, with slight improvement in AF w/D70
NOTE: with both above combination I am able to decently zoom in AF-C mode.
Now I mostly use 300-800mm and the D200. AF-C is definitely an improvement plus all focus point seem to react very well, until the D70 which would be a bit quirky at times. I use the dynamic area with center point and I can still move my lens around the subject while it keep it in focus. Helps a lot during compositional and directional shots of birds
Then of course getting away with 21+ raws in focus is something in itself!
So, if you really think that you are consistently hitting the limitations of AF-C, then assume that D200 is indeed an improvement. Weigh down other limitations that you are hitting and see if D200 meets up with your demands. For me AF was one important reason... apart from others.
try this for AF explanation in a D2x, but the D200 carries most of them:
http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources/nikon_articles/body/multi-cam2000_af/index.html
Hi
I'm currently using D70 & Sigma 100-300mm F4 for shooting motorsport.
In focus hit rate isn't too bad using AF-C with centre focus point
only.
I'm trying to decide to upgrade to D200 or not and besides the
extra MP the AF tracking capability is my biggest priority.
Has anyone made the same jump and can offer a fair comparison -
even better if you have the same lense.
Thanks in advance
Mark
--
use DXKA303DH for 70 off @ dreamhost
use vJJCnQ7CbIPCM to sign up @ smugmug