Thomas,
Part of the confusion is probably because of the way Minolta used the term "fill Flash" compared with how many others use the term.
Back when I learned on a manual camera, Fill Flash ment that I was trying to capture the ambient lighting (another poster discribed it as 'giving priority to the ambient lighting') and just put a tweak of flash light on the subject usally to fill in shadows.
Minolta used the term Fill Flash to mean that the photographer is
forcing the flash to fire even though the ambient lighting is bright enough, usually to put a bit of fill on the subject. The other mode was called 'auto flash', because the camera decided that flash was needed because ambient lighting was too low.
The amount of flash vs ambient lighting doesn't that the Minolta AF cameras select doesn't depend on the "Fill" vs "Auto" setting (in fact most of their later cameras used auto flash only in unmodified green P mode. The lighting selected depends on how the camera interprets the subject and background ambient lighting (for example a person in shade with a bright sunlit background or a person in sun with shadows with the background almost the same brightness.)
The one thing that the Minolta cameras do with flash turned on in either P or A modes is allow a shutter speed no slower than 1/60sec. They also tend to favor large apertures (to maximize flash range) except in bright ambient light where the aperture has to stop down. Slow Sync is the way that you force the camera to set a shutter speed based on ambient.
Other cameras such as Canons (not sure about the newest ones) will automatically select slow sync when the camera is set to aperture priority, I assume that's because the designers assumed that if you Ap, you know what you are doing. I have read a number of posts from novices, however, who when using Ap ended up handholding shots at 1 sec because they didn't understand how that camera worked.
There are some Minolta users who hate how slow sync is implemented and would prefer the Canon approach. Personaly, it doesn't bother me, but I can understand their point.
Tom
Thanks Tom. I noted on my 5D when I use slow synch, the exposure
with flash is the same as without (i.e. it doesn't go to 1/60). But
I still don't understand the difference to fill-flash - doesn't the
latter do the same, i.e. use available light as much as possible +
flash to highlight the closer subjects?
--
KM 5 D, kit lens, fifty 1.7, beercan, 35-7 0/3.5-4. 5, TC 1.4&2.0