Abeer Megahed
Forum Enthusiast
I had the 28-135 IS and i think it is the best lens for the money. But it is not that wide for a 1.6 factor. Also, the F/5.6 is not that fast. I switched to Sigma 24-70 F/2.8 Macro because it is wider and faster and $80 cheeper. I am missing the USM and IS. But think I did the right decision since I cover the 70-135 with my 70-200 F/2.8.
So, if you can cover the 70-135 part ( or will not use) Go with the Sigma. It is much faster and has Macro..
MA
So, if you can cover the 70-135 part ( or will not use) Go with the Sigma. It is much faster and has Macro..
MA