Thank you Canon!

the scarcity of D60s. I finally got one in October, and what does Canon do but bring out the 10D at a much lower price with new features the following February. That was really source of my consternation having spent $2500 for the D60 only to see the 10D come out about $1500.
--
Juli
http://www.pbase.com/julivalley/galleries
Canon 2oD, Canon Gee3, and Canon S7o.

I keep trying to find an artist's eye in the B & H catalog

 
the scarcity of D60s. I finally got one in October, and what does
Canon do but bring out the 10D at a much lower price with new
features the following February. That was really source of my
consternation having spent $2500 for the D60 only to see the 10D
come out about $1500.
--
Juli
http://www.pbase.com/julivalley/galleries
Canon 2oD, Canon Gee3, and Canon S7o.

I keep trying to find an artist's eye in the B & H catalog

Me too, Juli! Its a shame that lenses don't plummet the same way cameras do!

Sheila Smart
Sydney, Australia
http://www.pbase.com/sheila

All the technique in the world doesn't compensate for the inability to notice - Elliott Erwitt
 
Ouch! That hurts!

Joel
the scarcity of D60s. I finally got one in October, and what does
Canon do but bring out the 10D at a much lower price with new
features the following February. That was really source of my
consternation having spent $2500 for the D60 only to see the 10D
come out about $1500.
--
Juli
http://www.pbase.com/julivalley/galleries
Canon 2oD, Canon Gee3, and Canon S7o.

I keep trying to find an artist's eye in the B & H catalog

--
; http://vegasschmoe.smugmug.com/
 
You have EFS lenses which wont work on a 1.3 FOV crop?
--
Rodney Gold

The nicest thing about smacking your head against the the wall is.......The feeling you get when you stop
 
If the next generation camera that replaces the 20D does not have a
1.3 crop sensor and greater dynamic range (at least 2 stops), then
I say thank you to Canon!

Why?
Thank you because:
  • They'll have squashed all the "I told you so" people that GUESSED at the new specs?
  • They'll have let us folks who upgraded to (or first buys) enjoy their 20D for at least few months longer before feeling the pangs of "I wish I waited for the next thing" ?
  • Us folks who laid down the moolah for EF-S lenses won't feel gypt?
--

 
If the next generation camera that replaces the 20D does not have a
1.3 crop sensor and greater dynamic range (at least 2 stops), then
I say thank you to Canon!

Why?
The 10D> 20D> 30D> 40D, etc., line is probably going to remain 1.6x indefinitely. It's not going to suddenly go 1.3x, leaving EF-S lenses to the Rebel line of DSLR cameras. That's not going to happen.

And I think 1.3x will remain too, at least for one more generation, or as a generation of sub-1-series pro bodies, along with the ultra-level full frame at the top end.

So basically, nothing is going to change except that all the sensors, cameras, and performance of all these respective bodies is going to climb up another notch. Same story, different year.
 
Remember I told you so. Don't worry the 20D replacenet will take them but the 1D2 replacement won't and boy that will be the camera to get, 1.3x 12Mpix 8.5 FPS.
If the next generation camera that replaces the 20D does not have a
1.3 crop sensor and greater dynamic range (at least 2 stops), then
I say thank you to Canon!

Why?
Thank you because:
  • They'll have squashed all the "I told you so" people that GUESSED
at the new specs?
  • They'll have let us folks who upgraded to (or first buys) enjoy
their 20D for at least few months longer before feeling the pangs
of "I wish I waited for the next thing" ?
  • Us folks who laid down the moolah for EF-S lenses won't feel gypt?
--

--

'Silence! What is all this insolence? You will find yourself in gladiator school vewy quickly with wotten behaviour like that.'
 
the 10D is obsolete, as far as I can tell it still takes the same pictures as when I bought it. To me obsolete would be when you cannot buy film (for your film camera) or batteries or CF cards to fit your digital camera...

if the D30, D60, 10D, 1D and the 1Ds are obsolete feel free to send them to me I will even pay the postage to get rid of your old junk....

Cal

--
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity....

http://funshots.smugmug.com/
 
I have a 10D and I skipped the 20D because I did not think it was a large enough upgrade to warrant spending the $$ for it.

I am going to wait another year and see what is up Canon's sleeve. If they don't come out with something substantially faster ( I would like to see a Digic III processor myself) to record more shots quicker, more pixels, and a lesser crop ratio, then I will continue to work on my lens collection and forgo the camera purchase.

Well, either that or I will upgrade to the successor of the 1D Mark II. 8mp is not enough to pay $4,000 or whatever it costs, so I will hold off.
--
DeeDee G.
http://www.pbase.com/deedee_g/root
 
Robert D. Mcgee1 in the post above got it right.

The only real improvements that Canon can make to warrant an upgrade for 20D (maybe even the 10D) owners is to improvement the sensor by going larger and increasing it's dynamic range by a noticeable difference.

Whoever goes after this market for sub $2,000 camera with 1.3 crop sensors will win the next war.

It’s no longer a megapixel war and consumers need to wise up about this. It’s about improving the quality of the images where we are at. A 12 MP camera is only going to make it more difficult to get good low noise images and Canon will have to come up with some way to reduce the noise in the camera like they are doing with software noise reduction. I would rather have a 1.3 size sensor with 8MP and improved dynamic range and lower noise at a higher ISO than to have 12MP with the same old story.

A 12 MP camera for most of us just means larger files to deal with and the images quality differences (if any) will not be noticeable for the majority of us.

STOP buying larger MP cameras and demand larger sensors and improved dynamic range, IMO.

My .02 cents.

--
EOSMan

http://www.pbase.com/eosman

 
is something that processes things fast.. faster than anything on the market.. i'll take 8MP .. it's enough.. but make the RAW buffer unlimited.. oh.. and a weaker AA filter won't hurt.. scale back on that NR Canon..

--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
3 0 0 D + 1 8 - 5 5 m m
5 0 m m f / 1 . 4 U S M
7 5 - 3 0 0 m m U S M I S

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
 
from http://www.dictionary.com
2) Obsolete: Outmoded in design, style, or construction: an obsolete locomotive.
the 10D is obsolete, as far as I can tell it still takes the same
pictures as when I bought it. To me obsolete would be when you
cannot buy film (for your film camera) or batteries or CF cards to
fit your digital camera...
if the D30, D60, 10D, 1D and the 1Ds are obsolete feel free to send
them to me I will even pay the postage to get rid of your old
junk....

Cal

--
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity....

http://funshots.smugmug.com/
--
http://www.meucciphotographic.com
 
Forgive my technical ignorance, I've never been very pre-occupied with the technicals of photography, but doesn't a higher resolution offer greater latitude of exposure? I was under the impression this is a linear relationship, to a point...
Robert D. Mcgee1 in the post above got it right.

The only real improvements that Canon can make to warrant an
upgrade for 20D (maybe even the 10D) owners is to improvement the
sensor by going larger and increasing it's dynamic range by a
noticeable difference.

Whoever goes after this market for sub $2,000 camera with 1.3 crop
sensors will win the next war.

It’s no longer a megapixel war and consumers need to wise up about
this. It’s about improving the quality of the images where we are
at. A 12 MP camera is only going to make it more difficult to get
good low noise images and Canon will have to come up with some way
to reduce the noise in the camera like they are doing with software
noise reduction. I would rather have a 1.3 size sensor with 8MP and
improved dynamic range and lower noise at a higher ISO than to have
12MP with the same old story.

A 12 MP camera for most of us just means larger files to deal with
and the images quality differences (if any) will not be noticeable
for the majority of us.

STOP buying larger MP cameras and demand larger sensors and
improved dynamic range, IMO.

My .02 cents.

--
EOSMan
http://www.pbase.com/eosman

--
http://www.meucciphotographic.com
 
if a newer camera comes out. Does that do anything to the quality of your pictures? I guess I need to get a new car since they have since changed the design rendering my car useless. Should Canon send letters to all 20D owners asking if it's OK or should they give us all free upgrades since they have the audacity to come out with newer, better models? I guess I should also buy a new computer every 3 months.
 
The only real improvements that Canon can make to warrant an
upgrade for 20D (maybe even the 10D) owners is to improvement the
sensor by going larger and increasing it's dynamic range by a
noticeable difference.
The 20D replacement will not have a larger sensor. That doesn't mean there won't be a new camera with a larger sensor.
It’s no longer a megapixel war and consumers need to wise up about
this. It’s about improving the quality of the images where we are
at.
True.
A 12 MP camera is only going to make it more difficult to get
good low noise images
This is not true. A 1.3x 12mp sensor will have the same size pixels as the 20D (roughly).
and Canon will have to come up with some way
to reduce the noise in the camera like they are doing with software
noise reduction.
Canon does not do software noise reduction in the 20D.
I would rather have a 1.3 size sensor with 8MP and
improved dynamic range and lower noise at a higher ISO than to have
12MP with the same old story.
I'd rather have the 12MP so I have the same pixel density as the 20D for cropping shots with long lenses. More noise per pixel doesn't necessarily mean more noise per image. Making bigger pixels is similar to making smaller pixels and doing a size reduction on the image. This reduces noise by about the same amount. What I want is good noise performance on a per-area basis.
A 12 MP camera for most of us just means larger files to deal with
and the images quality differences (if any) will not be noticeable
for the majority of us.
If file size is important to you, you can always do in-camera size reduction. This will result in a sharper shot than if the sensor had fewer pixels because it removes much of the effect of the AA filter and the Bayer mask from the sharpness equasion. So you have a sharper shot with the same noise at the same size.
STOP buying larger MP cameras and demand larger sensors and
improved dynamic range, IMO.
Larger sensors definitely helps everything. Better noise performance on a per-area basis helps as well. Better dynamic range is always welcome. Smaller pixel count is not a help to anything except the size of RAW files assuming the smaller pixels don't lose performance due to more per-pixel area being taken up by the amplifiers. This is where deep wells and microlenses come in.

--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)
 
is something that processes things fast.. faster than anything on
the market.. i'll take 8MP .. it's enough.. but make the RAW buffer
unlimited.. oh.. and a weaker AA filter won't hurt.. scale back on
that NR Canon..
Canon does not do in-camera noise reduction in the 20D other than the standard dark-frame subtraction (long exposure noise reduction) when that feature is on.

--
Lee Jay
(see profile for equipment)
 
When I'm talking about 12MP cameras, I'm refering to a 1.6 crop 12MP.

I don't want a 12MP 1.6 crop. This is what I believe to be Canon's next move and it will not be enough for me to upgrade. I would rather have a 8MP 1.3 or full size sensor.

And yes Canon does have software noise reduction for long exposures.

--
EOSMan

http://www.pbase.com/eosman

 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top