Fastest image viewer!

tonyx

Leading Member
Messages
536
Reaction score
0
Location
Tartu, EE
I've been looking for the fastest image viewer for years now. I usually need to sort through a batch of hundreds, sometimes even thousands of photos in a hurry and so I need the fastest tools out there. upgrading the CPU is only half the equasion, the other half being having the fastest software.

I started out with QPEG (Quick-JPEG) in DOS back during the 486 days. then moved to SuperJPEG on Celeron, Pentium II and Duron. unfortunately development on that was stopped and it fell behind. for my previous Athlon 1700+ I tried out Compupic Pro 6.23, IrfanView 3.85, Thumbs Plus Pro 7 and ACDsee 7.0, and decided on ACDSee 7.0 as the fastest of the bunch. but now that I moved to Sempron 3000+, I thought I'd give a couple of the latest offerings a try to find the fastest browser for skimming through images.

FastStone Viewer 2.12beta - very nice full-screen features, gliding menus everywhere, skinnable interface, handy commands and tools, looks very neat overall. one problem though - for skimming through images in full screen, it is unacceptably SLOW (I used 8Mpix 1MB-2MB JPEGs for testing)! even on a Sempron 3000+ it can't keep up with me. if I stop and look at one picture, it does prerender the next one, so that when I skip to the next one, it displays it immediately. but if I keep moving forward, it lags and falls behind quite terribly. I may even be pressing the tenth "next" key, while the program still renders the third picture on the screen and when I stop pressing "next" keys, it slowly works its way up to the tenth picture, rendering each picture from inbetween way too slow. all in all, terrible lag and quite unacceptable.

Picasa2 (from Google) build 1884 - this program blew me away with easy features and beautiful looks! sliding and gliding menus, fade-ins and fade-outs, beautifully designed interface, easy cataloguing of pictures, handy one-button fixes for retouching pics or applying special effects, beautiful slide-shows, writing gift CDs, a dazzling picture time-line feature and more. granted, none of the options are very customizable so some experts may frown, but the features that are there look and act BEAUTIFUL, and pretty much cover the needs of most non-experts. I witnessed first-hand, how the automatic cataloguing of pictures from all over the computer was like a gift from heaven to a girl, who had thousands of pictures in dozens of folders on various drives, so that she no longer knew, what was what and were - Picasa2 gathered up all her pictures into a timeline and showed them to her in a super-slick attractive interface.

about the speed though - it is moderately speedy and it does prerender the next image, but it can fall behind if skimming through pictures fast and it doesn't prerender pictures if you go backwards, so that makes things quite slow overall.

ACDsee 7.0 (build 102) - on my Athlon 1700+, it used to lag and fall behind if I went through the pictures a bit too fast, but now... it is just AMAZING fast! skipping forward or backward through 2MB JPEG pictures in full screen is LIGHTNING fast, practically instantaneous. it doesn't seem to matter how fast I go, through how many pictures I skim or which way I move, ACDSEE prerenders in both directions and keeps up with me without even breaking a sweat (unlike the two other current favourites I tried). granted, this time I didn't try Thumbs Plus, IrfanView or CompuPic Pro, but the last time I tried them they ALREADY lost big to ACDsee, so I can't imagine it being much different this time around.

long story short - I challenge anyone to find a faster full screen JPEG image viewer (for skimming through full-screen pics in a hurry) than ACDsee 7.0. I certainly couldn't.

PS I have no affiliation with ACDsee or whoever makes that software.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
Have you tried Windows Picture and Fax Viewer which comes with XP?

--
Korsair
'Nobody knows the weirdness I've seen'

 
long story short - I challenge anyone to find a faster full screen
JPEG image viewer (for skimming through full-screen pics in a
hurry) than ACDsee 7.0. I certainly couldn't.
Maybe you could take some apps like XnView, cPicture, IrfanView or Fastone and compare them (Load time, startup time, ...)? Would be interesting!
 
I set the Cam2PC viewer up as a default program for opening jpg etc. Now, I just double-click from the explorer and have a full-screen view at once. I cannot imagine anything faster.

If I want to open with anything else, I just use "open with..." or else, I open the file from within cam2pc viewer with a right-click.

http://www.nabocorp.com/cam2pc/

no affiliation, just like it.
 
long story short - I challenge anyone to find a faster full screen
JPEG image viewer (for skimming through full-screen pics in a
hurry) than ACDsee 7.0. I certainly couldn't.
I've been using ACDSee for Lord knows how long on computers going back to the year dot - and STILL to find a better prog to use as a VIEWER. Never use ANY other functions - done mostly better by other specialised progs .. but for GOOD and EASY viewing, ACDSee takes one Helluva lot to beat.

Still in fact using ACDSee ver 3 (THREE!!) as I've found no better advantages for viewing in any later version ..

--
ericN

 
Have you tried Windows Picture and Fax Viewer which comes with XP?
ah yes, I forgot to mention that one. it is in fact quite adequate, but I have 3 major problems with it.

1) speed of thumbnail generation is not very good

2) after returning from full screen to normal view it doesn't remember, what full-screen picture I was at, so I have to scroll down the list of pictures to find the one I was last looking at. this can get very tiresome very quickly

3) it has no in-built move/copy features. when I look at hundreds of pictures, I need to move/copy those that I want to save. since the XP viewer has no in-built functionalities for that, I have to exit full sceen, locate picture, copy/paste (or right-click "Send To"), then return to full screen. quite a hassle.

other than that, it is adequate for just looking at pictures.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
long story short - I challenge anyone to find a faster full screen
JPEG image viewer (for skimming through full-screen pics in a
hurry) than ACDsee 7.0. I certainly couldn't.
Maybe you could take some apps like XnView, cPicture, IrfanView or
Fastone and compare them (Load time, startup time, ...)? Would be
interesting!
well I did compare with FastStone this time and IrfanView last time (on Athlon 1700+) and they both lost out in speed to ACDsee quite a lot. haven't heard of the other ones you mention, I might check them out, but since ACDsee is finally quicker than me (used to be the other way around and it STILL is with other programs), I'm not in a hurry to switch:)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
I set the Cam2PC viewer up as a default program for opening jpg
etc. Now, I just double-click from the explorer and have a
full-screen view at once. I cannot imagine anything faster.
ACDsee does the same - double-click in windows and instant full-screen in ACDsee (with EXIF data if you setup ACDsee to display that alongside the picture).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
I've been using ACDSee for Lord knows how long on computers going
back to the year dot - and STILL to find a better prog to use as a
VIEWER. Never use ANY other functions - done mostly better by other
specialised progs .. but for GOOD and EASY viewing, ACDSee takes
one Helluva lot to beat.
yes exactly, I forgot to mention - whereas Picasa2 and FastStone seemed to have a lot of nice and quite usable features built into them, I don't even know that much about ACDsee's other features. it is a lightning fast image viewer, most likely the fastest out there, and that's what I use it for exclusively (alongside with copy/move picture from within full-screen and little custom EXIF data display in the bottom corner of each picture). but the few times I tried it's photo editing, I didn't like it. for editing, cataloguing and all the other chores besides viewing a lot of images in a hurry, a lot of the other programs may be better.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
forgot to mention, I also tried BreezeBrowser, both last and this time. on both occasions I deleted it almost immediately after installing. can't even remember what irked me, but it definetly was NOT fast and probably the presentation didn't make much of an impact either. I understand some RAW shooters swear by it, but for JPEG browsing I'd rather pass.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
Your post got me interested so I just compared XNView180rc5, Irfanview397, FSViewer212beta and BreezebrowserPro113. This is what I found out:

FSviewer was slightly slower in browsing jpegs than the rest. But it was MUCH SLOWER in browsing tiffs! Irfan and BB were the fastest .tiff browsers.

I also had a few Pentax .pef raw files at hand. FSviewer does not support .pef files at the moment, but the rest do. BreezeBrwsrPro was MUCH FASTER than XN or Irfan in browsing those .pef files!

Finally, it would be interesting to know how well does FSViewer perform on .nef and .cr files, since it does support them.
 
But, the two fastest browsers that I used a lot until my last PC upgrade were Epson Film Factory (got it free with an Epson product some years back, but they still sell the software separately), and Image Expert from Sierra Imaging (older version). JASC acquired the Iimage Expert Product a few years back. But, I don't think they ever marketed it.

--
JimC
------
http://www.pbase.com/jcockfield
 
I am unfamiliar with image viewers. Are you talking about sequentially displaying images with display sizes fit to screen? My software has that capability, but to do this rapidly, you need to change some parameters from their default settings.

1. File> No Floating Point Buffers on Read

2. Press F9 and select multiple files to read in dialog box. The first of many will appear.

3. Hold Control key down starting before engaging menu and click Options> Sized to Fit Screen. In Dialog Box set interpolation method to ColorOnColor. There are seven methods to choose and this is the fastest, but lowest quality.
4. Press F5 for full screen.

5. Press F6 to fit image to screen.

6. Press F9 repeatedly to sequentially display images that where selected in (2.).

7. For large lists of images, as determined by the the total number of characters in their names, you may need to increase the buffer size. Press Q> Image Saving> Batch Operations> Maximum Characters and increase.
--
Author of SAR Image Processor and anomic sociopath
http://www.general-cathexis.com
 
what software are you talking about? seems awfully complicated. I just press right arrow, page down or scroll wheel down to see next picture, that's it. I think that's how most picture viewers do it, I'm just talking about which of these is able to display pictures in full screen and made to "fit to screen" the fastest.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
I can't imagine anything faster than Irfanview which fully renders pix as fast as you can hit the space bar or Enter for full screen. I mainly have .jpgs though.

-
midnight2, FCAS Member #14
cp7 7 5, 4 5 0 0, Portland, Or.
 
Irfanview still the fastest pure viewer out there. And its free.

I use FastStone viewer becuase I like the slide-out menu's better, but if speed is the issue then Irfanview is stilll hands down the best out there.

Fastone is only slow IMO on the first picture. If you keep it open its fine. ACDSee 7 has the same problem, even worse in fact.
 
I can't imagine anything faster than Irfanview which fully renders
pix as fast as you can hit the space bar or Enter for full screen.
I mainly have .jpgs though.
how about doing "next"-"next"-"next" for say 10 consecutive pictures WHILE you're viewing them full-screen? let's say 2MB 8Mpix JPEGs? is IrfanView still instantaneous?

almost all viewers can display the first or even second image instantaneously since they usually have it prerendered. but don't give the viewer enough time to prerender the next image, keep pressing "next" and then all displayed images will have to be rendered in real-time and "on-the-go". most viewers are quite slow on that, the only one that I found to be close to instantaneous in ALL pictures was ACDSee. it looks like their "on-the-go" JPEG rendering engine is currently the fastest on the market (at least from those that I've tried).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 
I tried IrfanView the last time around and found it to be slower than ACDSee. ok, I will give it another try and will let you know.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my amateur nightclub photo gallery: http://antonipildid.net
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top