David SL
Senior Member
This is a unique situation for photographic bodies in the digital space considering how quickly the sensor technologies are being updated. It would behoove the manufacturers to find a way to allow the costs of body development to "stand still" in comparison to the development costs of the likely far more expensive to produce image sensors. Allowing body to have upgradable sensors would be a good way to get this, it would especially be useful to the pro market IMO. However, it also seems to me that a prerequisite to swappable sensors is maintaining sensor consistency across the SLR lines using the same process size as Nikon and Canon have started to go in this direction. (300D/10D/20D and D70/ D100 use nearly identical process chips, respectively) Apparently, the niche nature of the LBCAST 4mp sensor may not be replicated into a body with a different feature set if it's costs can't be returned from sale of the final body. (This explains IMO why we haven't seen a D2h "lite"..say a D100 body with a 2h sensor)I'm not an expert but if Kodak did it then Nikon certainly can. If
Nikon has the courage to offer this upgrade route then IMHO it will
recieve applause from all the photographic community. Just look at
how many excelent and expensive bodies are simply discarded because
of upgrades that consist only in a few chips! Only a few years ago
nobody would have considered to trash an F4 or F5 just because of a
new shutter or metering module! Those days, camera took years or
decades to become obsolete- now we have come down to two years
until the sensor becomes obsolete, while the mechanics are still
pretty much up to date in most cases.
Recall though the persistent rumor that Nikon may be releasing a new Nikon film/digital hybrid with a removable digital back. This would allow them to swap sensors and keep the body costs relatively fixed over time..but there hasn't been much to this but the rumor, so I'm not holding my breath on seeing anything substantiative on it.
I would be dissapointed if the D2x doesn't have an LBCAST sensor in it, it would mean Nikon's optimism on the technology espoused up to the release of the D2h has deflated somewhat. Considering the scalability that is obviously seen in Canon's CMOS process it's disconcerting if Nikon's technology (also a MOS technology) lacks the same potential to scale. I am holding out hope that this part of the rumor is wrong as I was hoping Nikon would have recognized how important using their own sensors in the bodies could be assuming the production costs were reduced in comparison to buying chips from a third party at whatever production schedule they have set up.
Hoping to be happily suprised come September.
Regards,
--The D2body is the most modern Pro SLR body and most certainly the
inner electronics upgrade route was considered (and maybe made
possible) since its conception.
Regards
João Salvador
While I would certainly welcome a new sensor of 8mpx for the D2h,
surely this has to be pure speculation. I would love to hear from
the experts on this on though, because having it hanging out there
is setting up a lot of people for a huge disappointment if it
doesn't happen.
I can see the logic in a hardware upgrade IF the D2x comes out at
13mpx, 3 times that of the D2h, but can it be done, has it been
done in the past, and it is logical from their (Nikon) point of
view to do it?
I await replies from those experts who frequent this board ;-)
--
John Manzione
Publisher
MacNETv2
Digital Camera Arts
http://www.macnet2.com
http://digitalcameraarts.com