Reading mode: Light Dark

1DS-mkII rumor verified

Go to last post
P

prozack

Member
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name. He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be fairly close with description but he has never know what the name will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in production now.

It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
 
can someone please tell me the caculation if you take the Mark II and use the same pixel density, what would the MP count be??
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
 
If you're asking what I think you're asking...

Then wouldn't it be 8.2 MP * 1.3 = 10.66...

Hmm... doesnt' seem right to me as I type it out...

GAD
Masterdeath said:
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
How about 8.2*1.3*1.3 (square function) =13.858. Considering that 8.2 megapixels represents the used portion of an 8.5 megapixel sensor, the density of the aforementioned 14.3 might be the same as the 1D II.

8.5*1.3*1.3=14.365. Hmmmmmmm.....

This is all speculation, of course. Time will tell...
GAD said:
Then wouldn't it be 8.2 MP * 1.3 = 10.66...

Hmm... doesnt' seem right to me as I type it out...

GAD
Masterdeath said:
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
Tom
 
FYI, I think the "new" 1Ds-MkII is based on 1D-MkII processor and it is

1Ds-Mk II = 14.3Mp x 5fps = handling 71.5 Mp per sec

this is similar to

1D-MkII = 8.2Mp x 8.5fps = handling 69.7 Mp per sec
PhotoTom said:
8.5*1.3*1.3=14.365. Hmmmmmmm.....

This is all speculation, of course. Time will tell...
GAD said:
Then wouldn't it be 8.2 MP * 1.3 = 10.66...

Hmm... doesnt' seem right to me as I type it out...

GAD
Masterdeath said:
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
Tom
Click to expand...
--
Billy
 
why not to say what is it called and if it's really going to be here soon i think it's not a big deal not to say it ... i think if canon really done with wahtever they are working on either the 10D or the 1ds replacement so it will be be good idea to say that coz i'm from those ppl if it's ganna take too long to know about a new camera i'm ganna go for something else maye nikon or fujifilm or whatever good and available so they might lose too many customers coz of that .. i hope they think in the same we do ;)
 
sensor in 1Ds ? Maybe Canon is buying Kodak sensors and Kodak is making Pro C with Canon mount?
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
--
Eugene

Canon is the best when it is working.

 
Go with Nikon or Fuji just because Canon isn't announcing their specs now. The only people that do this usually are ones that don't have commitments to lenses.

Teski
alonprint said:
why not to say what is it called and if it's really going to be
here soon i think it's not a big deal not to say it ... i think if
canon really done with wahtever they are working on either the 10D
or the 1ds replacement so it will be be good idea to say that coz
i'm from those ppl if it's ganna take too long to know about a new
camera i'm ganna go for something else maye nikon or fujifilm or
whatever good and available so they might lose too many customers
coz of that .. i hope they think in the same we do ;)
Click to expand...
 
Then maybe the new camera will be 14mp
PhotoTom said:
8.5*1.3*1.3=14.365. Hmmmmmmm.....

This is all speculation, of course. Time will tell...
GAD said:
Then wouldn't it be 8.2 MP * 1.3 = 10.66...

Hmm... doesnt' seem right to me as I type it out...

GAD
Masterdeath said:
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
Tom
Click to expand...
 
Would Canon make such a small improvement though? Only 3mp more???

OR will the NEW camera be cheap.. Meaning less then 6K, maybe only 5K with the Mark II selling for 3500...
Billy said:
1Ds-Mk II = 14.3Mp x 5fps = handling 71.5 Mp per sec

this is similar to

1D-MkII = 8.2Mp x 8.5fps = handling 69.7 Mp per sec
PhotoTom said:
8.5*1.3*1.3=14.365. Hmmmmmmm.....

This is all speculation, of course. Time will tell...
GAD said:
Then wouldn't it be 8.2 MP * 1.3 = 10.66...

Hmm... doesnt' seem right to me as I type it out...

GAD
Masterdeath said:
prozack said:
Believe it or dont.......

The same guy that told me about the 10d, 1dmk2 is not telling me
about the in-production 1ds-mk2 (although he doesnt know the name.
He is my salesman at my rental camera shop. I have know him to be
fairly close with description but he has never know what the name
will be.

He states the 1DS-mk2 (or whatever the name will be) is in
production now.
It will be 14.3 megapixel and 5 frames per second. It will also
have the digic mark2 processor. Of course it will be full frame.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
Tom
Click to expand...
--
Billy
Click to expand...
 
It's not a matter of just how MANY pixels are being used. It's what they are doing in combination with the glass.

For example, this one is full frame. And though the pixel count may not be staggering (I've never bought the 18MP thing that some were claiming... that's at least 1.5 years away), the allure of another truly full-frame camera is not to be denied, particularly if the quality of those pixels is such that noise becomes a true non-issue.

It's not how many you've got; it's what you're doing with 'em. :-)
Masterdeath said:
Would Canon make such a small improvement though? Only 3mp more???
OR will the NEW camera be cheap.. Meaning less then 6K, maybe only
5K with the Mark II selling for 3500...
Click to expand...
--
Ulysses
http://www.ulyssesphotography.com
 
Ulysses said:
It's not a matter of just how MANY pixels are being used. It's what
they are doing in combination with the glass.

For example, this one is full frame. And though the pixel count may
not be staggering (I've never bought the 18MP thing that some were
claiming... that's at least 1.5 years away), the allure of another
truly full-frame camera is not to be denied, particularly if the
quality of those pixels is such that noise becomes a true
non-issue.
Click to expand...
I would think they could achieve 16MP @ 4.5fps for 72MB/s. I would also think they wopuld like to jump past Kodak not barely move past them. 16MP gives same pixel pitch as 10D. Can they get the noise as low as the Pope was saying with that pixel pitch?
 
Eugene Powers said:
sensor in 1Ds ? Maybe Canon is buying Kodak sensors and Kodak is
making Pro C with Canon mount?
Click to expand...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO. ISO 80-200!

Canon will develop their own sensor.

Hmm 14.3MP only yields a 14% bigger print than a 11MP camera all others things being equal. But if noise is much lower then the Mk II images could be uprezed a lot more.

Ok then let's put the old 11MP chip along with digic II etc into an EOS 3D shooting at 5fps and with improved noise for full ISO 50-1600 and say $2500 :o)
 
since we are about mindless speculation...

try 20MP, using same Sensor type as Mark II, sized up to FF and then at the same density as the Mark II

Image: 4555 x 3036
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cogito ergo sum
Caveat Lector
http://www.1ds.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top