I know Im new here, but I've noticed an awful lot of speculation
and conjecture regarding replacing this and improving that... and
that said I'm fine with Canon replacing the 10-D. But I feel
compelled to say that I really feel the more stuff they cram into
the cameras they sell us, the less photographic knowledge and skill
the people behind the camera need to take great pics. I remember
when a good photographer got between 3 and 5 "hits" on a roll of 36
exposures. I think that with the advent of Digital, we have moved
into an era of what I call "saturation photography"... just shoot
1000 shots on your 2GB card and delete 998 of them later. I for
one am going to keep my 10-D, Im going to study it in depth, learn
its nuances, shortcomings, and limitations, and teach myself to
take great pics using its strengths AND weaknesses. Anyone agree
or think Im an idiot?