Happy with the G-1?

Just look at this site: http://studio-on-the.net/photography/G1/index.html
It think the G1 pictures are really great--provided you shoot RAW.
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 
extremely, I've got the G1 + 340Mb drive, never had any problems really - touch wood! I get a couple of green pixels at long exposure's at night but that's fixable with Photoshop....

excellent camera....
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 
Jimmy i have just bought the g1 and am trying to find the hard case to which you referred. Please tell me where you got the case. Thanks
Hey George, sorry to misslead you. I have only read about the case but am in the process of ordering one. Everything I have read has been very good about the case. One thing though, you will not be able to close the case if you use the adapter for the lense. I do not, therefore I will get the case.....G1, No One Does It Better!!!!!!!!

Jimmy
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
Both are great cameras however when you add up the swivel lcd and
compact flash plus microdrive and extemely long battery
life....plus a camera case lets you use a regular neck strap and
protects the camera I own and do prefer the Canon G1. I am
extremely pleased with this camera. I also own a 2500L and have
owned a 3030 so I am not brand loyal. I believe the Canon G1 is the
best sub $1K camera out there today!!!!!

Hope I helped,
JImmy
 
The hard case is not very good. U can not get to compact flash card r battery without removing camera from case. When u open the top and let it hang so u can use the camera it is in ur way. Hard to get to optical viewfinder with it down and I am scared to have LCD open as the case could break it off.Also have to remove camera to attach USB cable. But then this is only my story some may like it I have one and I dont.

Allan
Jimmy i have just bought the g1 and am trying to find the hard case to which you referred. Please tell me where you got the case. Thanks
Hey George, sorry to misslead you. I have only read about the case
but am in the process of ordering one. Everything I have read has
been very good about the case. One thing though, you will not be
able to close the case if you use the adapter for the lense. I do
not, therefore I will get the case.....G1, No One Does It
Better!!!!!!!!

Jimmy
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
Both are great cameras however when you add up the swivel lcd and
compact flash plus microdrive and extemely long battery
life....plus a camera case lets you use a regular neck strap and
protects the camera I own and do prefer the Canon G1. I am
extremely pleased with this camera. I also own a 2500L and have
owned a 3030 so I am not brand loyal. I believe the Canon G1 is the
best sub $1K camera out there today!!!!!

Hope I helped,
JImmy
 
Yes, it helps and hurts. I will be new to digital photography. I
have used a Canon AE-1 Program and used to have a darkroom, buy my
film in bulk and test it. Those days are long gone. My most recent
and disappointing camera is a Canon APS Elph. If I get a nice
snapshot, I can't do anything with it. I'd like a convenient camera
... digital ... that can grab those special moments with family,
handle informal posed portraits and be capable of going to ie
Alaska and capturing bear, moose, etc.
Any recommendations? I'm just learning thru these forums what CA
is, but I will be new to using my Dell notebook to manipulate
photos.
I don' t think you'll want to be using a notebook to manipulate any of your photos. Unfortunately LCD screens are the world's worst at establishing the right gamma, contrast, and color values. What you get to look good on your machine might well not print well or look good anywhere else. Though these screens, (I'm on a Powerbook right now.) are marvelously sharp with text, they distort and pixilate photographs and give you something quite different from what is really there. Use your desktop with its good quality monitor for image adjusting.
Thanks,
Linda
I own a G1, and my friend owns a 3030, so we decided to have our
own little shoot out. Here's what we found:

The 3030 exposes better than the G1. The G1 needs exposure
compensation often in order to take well exposed shots.

They both have chromatic aberrations; more obvious on the G1 but
mostly when shots are overexposed. Lowering exposure (or flash)
compensation makes the G1 about equal to the 3030.

The G1's photos have a subtle magenta cast and less contrast than
the 3030. Using Auto Levels (in Photoshop) is a quick way to
correct a G1 photo and make it look like a 3030 photo.

The G1 takes cleaner pictures with ISO 50. Shadow detail is
amazingly clean. G1 photos have less contrast which also helps
keep images clean. Haven't tried different contrast settings in
the G1.

The G1 brings out more fine detail than the 3030.

The 3030 is more consistent at getting good exposure with minimum
fuss.
The G1 requires more experience to get good shots.

The internal flash on the 3030 is superior to the internal G1
flash. The G1 with external flash (I have a 420ex) is superior to
the 3030 internal flash.

Don't bother asking for samples; we didn't save any of our
"experimental shots" cuz they sucked. Sorry.

Hope this helps.
 
I've bought the G1, and I'm really happy with the speed and picure quality.

The built in flash is not the strong point of the G1, but you can't really expect a lot from the built in flashes anyways. I find the built in flashes (even on my Nikon N70) to be useful for fill-ins on sunny days, or when you don't have a nice external flash handy.

To get nice portrait shots you will need an external flash with swivel head to be able to do bounce. The 420ex is a perfect flash for this purpose (can find it as cheap as $189 on pricegrabber.com).

I don't know how much an external flash for the Oly is. For the Oly you also have to get some cable which costs at least $50 (if I remember correctly).

You can't go wrong with either of these great cameras. However for portrait shooting I would get the G1 because you can get an awesome external flash for decent price.

CipoFuzo
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 
Wow, quite a bit of response here and I would have to concur with all the info provided on-topic so far.

I would believe you can summarize the issues mentioned as follows;

The G-1 provides great potential in image quality and creativity, provided you have the expertise, interest and/or patience to tweak the camera settings and/or tweak the images in software regularly.

The Olympus camera's offer an off-the-shelf point-and-shoot almost worry free ease of use to accomplish good well balanced and focused images.

So really the decision here is not which camera, but what kind of photographer you want to be. Do you want to take quick spontaneous snaps? Or do you want to deliberately adjust things before and after for every image that is important?

Personally I bought a G-1 cause I fancied myself as a amatuer photgrapher with aspirations of something better someday. It may have been a poor choice. I'm rarely satisfied with the first shot and I am always forced to tweak the image in Software (when I'm going to print it). I guess I'm a "grass is greener on the otherside" kinda guy. But I have to say from my experience with my friends Olympus cameras (360L, C-3030, E-10) they are all 99% worry free.

And in my efforts to try to acheive this high level of worry free use, I've spent almost as much in accessories as I have on the camera.
420ex Flash
BP-511 (extra batt)
LA-DC58
TC-DC58
64MB CompactFlash
340MB MicroDrive

If you'll be taking a lot of photo's of the kids, you'll want to be able to catch the moment quick. And when you're indoors and the lighting isn't great, the Olympus built-in flash fills in much better than the G-1. While my buddy just grabs his trusty 360L and shoots, I grab my G-1 and 420ex (which makes me look like a paparazi) carefully pick my settings and watch the moment pass. Or I just hold the monstrosity in my lap powered up (or autosleep) and try to carry on conversation like there's nothing to see.

So yes my next digital camera will probably be an Olympus. Sure there may be more of a learning curve with the menu's and navigation initially. But when you're shooting there's only one button that you really need to concern yourself with.
 
I saw the case at Penn Camera and it is very nice. You can even put it on a tripod with the case still on.
Jimmy i have just bought the g1 and am trying to find the hard case to which you referred. Please tell me where you got the case. Thanks
Hey George, sorry to misslead you. I have only read about the case
but am in the process of ordering one. Everything I have read has
been very good about the case. One thing though, you will not be
able to close the case if you use the adapter for the lense. I do
not, therefore I will get the case.....G1, No One Does It
Better!!!!!!!!

Jimmy
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
Both are great cameras however when you add up the swivel lcd and
compact flash plus microdrive and extemely long battery
life....plus a camera case lets you use a regular neck strap and
protects the camera I own and do prefer the Canon G1. I am
extremely pleased with this camera. I also own a 2500L and have
owned a 3030 so I am not brand loyal. I believe the Canon G1 is the
best sub $1K camera out there today!!!!!

Hope I helped,
JImmy
 
Dear Linda,
(bad English sorry)
I have the G1: Very good but not fast at start up.

I use a microdrive (400 pictures in RAW!!! ) and the camera works the day on. You can't kiill the battery in one day!

Not to havy, easy and rotating!!!! LDC very good picutures, easy and good soft, and like dprevieuw wrote in the test: best price for this camera.
And not to expensive big angle and tele.
Minus: no protection of the lens!
I'm very happy with G1
succes
Miel
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 
Adrian,

are you happy with the 380EX ? I read some reviews on it and it seems to be a good flash, however, they do not give any info on the 380EX together with the G1. Does it solve the problems with the internal indoor flashing?

I read that it is not possible to manually override the settings, is this needed?

Michel
  • support for Canon E-TTL flashes (I bought a 380EX)
 
Hi Linda,

I can't say that I've tried photographing bear or moose, but if you are talking about the wild variety, I think I would want a camera with a BIG zoom! The Canon Pro90 (10x zoom) would be a lot more attractive to me than having to creep up close with my G1. There again, I can't run that fast!
Regards,
Alan
I own a G1, and my friend owns a 3030, so we decided to have our
own little shoot out. Here's what we found:

The 3030 exposes better than the G1. The G1 needs exposure
compensation often in order to take well exposed shots.

They both have chromatic aberrations; more obvious on the G1 but
mostly when shots are overexposed. Lowering exposure (or flash)
compensation makes the G1 about equal to the 3030.

The G1's photos have a subtle magenta cast and less contrast than
the 3030. Using Auto Levels (in Photoshop) is a quick way to
correct a G1 photo and make it look like a 3030 photo.

The G1 takes cleaner pictures with ISO 50. Shadow detail is
amazingly clean. G1 photos have less contrast which also helps
keep images clean. Haven't tried different contrast settings in
the G1.

The G1 brings out more fine detail than the 3030.

The 3030 is more consistent at getting good exposure with minimum
fuss.
The G1 requires more experience to get good shots.

The internal flash on the 3030 is superior to the internal G1
flash. The G1 with external flash (I have a 420ex) is superior to
the 3030 internal flash.

Don't bother asking for samples; we didn't save any of our
"experimental shots" cuz they sucked. Sorry.

Hope this helps.
 
I think anyone who ventures into digital photography will want to learn Photoshop or other image manipulation tool. While it's great to capture a perfect photo straight out of the camera, having a "digital darkroom" is where the other half of the fun begins. It's not just about image correction, but the creative potential that you have at your disposal.

BTW, what the other Dave said is true - a CRT monitor will bring out detail in your photos that an LCD screen will simply gloss over. But that shouldn't stop you from using a "digital darkroom"; you can get a lot of quality work done on an LCD screen. Your laptop may even have an external monitor jack.

As far as trying to pick a camera, I'd say go for the G1 if you value fine detail and low noise images above all else. You'll need to put up with exposure adjustments; however, I have exposure and flash compensation set low as a default, so it's hardly an issue anymore. Also, if you decide to shoot in RAW mode, exposure can be set in software.

If you value consistent exposures and predictable results, you want good flash photos without having to lug an external unit, and you want to take pictures fast, then go with the 3030 or 3040.

Features such as battery life, microdrive support, etc. are secondary to the most important two criterias, image quality and photo taking experience.
I own a G1, and my friend owns a 3030, so we decided to have our
own little shoot out. Here's what we found:

The 3030 exposes better than the G1. The G1 needs exposure
compensation often in order to take well exposed shots.

They both have chromatic aberrations; more obvious on the G1 but
mostly when shots are overexposed. Lowering exposure (or flash)
compensation makes the G1 about equal to the 3030.

The G1's photos have a subtle magenta cast and less contrast than
the 3030. Using Auto Levels (in Photoshop) is a quick way to
correct a G1 photo and make it look like a 3030 photo.

The G1 takes cleaner pictures with ISO 50. Shadow detail is
amazingly clean. G1 photos have less contrast which also helps
keep images clean. Haven't tried different contrast settings in
the G1.

The G1 brings out more fine detail than the 3030.

The 3030 is more consistent at getting good exposure with minimum
fuss.
The G1 requires more experience to get good shots.

The internal flash on the 3030 is superior to the internal G1
flash. The G1 with external flash (I have a 420ex) is superior to
the 3030 internal flash.

Don't bother asking for samples; we didn't save any of our
"experimental shots" cuz they sucked. Sorry.

Hope this helps.
 
You know Jack, I've been starting to lean toward the Oly-3040 as my first digital experience, especially after reading your very honest response. I usually tend to overdo, with fantasy aspirations as well, but, I have had responses from people who have both and are happy having each of them for different purposes. I'm not going to do studio work, at this point, if ever. Perhaps if I actually get past this indecision and buy a camera, I'll be ready for the G-2 if and when they make it.
Thanks!
Wow, quite a bit of response here and I would have to concur with
all the info provided on-topic so far.

I would believe you can summarize the issues mentioned as follows;

The G-1 provides great potential in image quality and creativity,
provided you have the expertise, interest and/or patience to tweak
the camera settings and/or tweak the images in software regularly.

The Olympus camera's offer an off-the-shelf point-and-shoot almost
worry free ease of use to accomplish good well balanced and focused
images.

So really the decision here is not which camera, but what kind of
photographer you want to be. Do you want to take quick spontaneous
snaps? Or do you want to deliberately adjust things before and
after for every image that is important?

Personally I bought a G-1 cause I fancied myself as a amatuer
photgrapher with aspirations of something better someday. It may
have been a poor choice. I'm rarely satisfied with the first shot
and I am always forced to tweak the image in Software (when I'm
going to print it). I guess I'm a "grass is greener on the
otherside" kinda guy. But I have to say from my experience with my
friends Olympus cameras (360L, C-3030, E-10) they are all 99% worry
free.

And in my efforts to try to acheive this high level of worry free
use, I've spent almost as much in accessories as I have on the
camera.
420ex Flash
BP-511 (extra batt)
LA-DC58
TC-DC58
64MB CompactFlash
340MB MicroDrive

If you'll be taking a lot of photo's of the kids, you'll want to be
able to catch the moment quick. And when you're indoors and the
lighting isn't great, the Olympus built-in flash fills in much
better than the G-1. While my buddy just grabs his trusty 360L and
shoots, I grab my G-1 and 420ex (which makes me look like a
paparazi) carefully pick my settings and watch the moment pass. Or
I just hold the monstrosity in my lap powered up (or autosleep) and
try to carry on conversation like there's nothing to see.

So yes my next digital camera will probably be an Olympus. Sure
there may be more of a learning curve with the menu's and
navigation initially. But when you're shooting there's only one
button that you really need to concern yourself with.
 
Michael,

Have you even consider the Sony S70/ S75. they are within the same price range as G1? Did you try them and did not like them?

I am considering to buy a digital cam and my choice has been narrowed down to G1 or S70 or S75. I posed on the Sony Talk Forum to seek for comments about these dig. cameras but I have only received very few responses so far.

Regards,

KW Tse
In my opinion, one should not consider to buy a camera at this
price range if you don't intend to use an external flash. Internal
flash on any camera that I know of are simply not good enough for
most indoor/night situations. For outdoor only, a cheaper point
and shoot will do fine most of the time.

I just bought a G1 myself, and must say I'm have VERY MIXED emotion
about it -- nearly at the point of regret. The hotshoe, battery,
swivel LCD, fast focus, slide show, etc. the feature set so rich
it's hard to complaint. On the other hand, color balance is so
finicky that I'm about to be fed up with it. I tried a flash scene
in my house (20 ft ceiling w/ external bounce flash) over 200 times
and still could find a decent shot; with the same flash & technique
I could get perfect colors on Toshiba PDR-M70 nearly every time.
As I just discovered, shuter speed on G1 affect the color balance
of the flash shot tremendously - heavy yellow cast at 1/125 and
much better at 1/50. This is very weird, because at lower speed
the incandescent light should play a stronger role and make it
slightly more yellow at lower speed. It's like take the
convensional rule, reverse it and amplify by 10!!! And for some
strange reason I don't see this mentioned anywhere on the countless
reviews I read. On top of that, even on outdoor pictures color is
slightly off. Sigh.

With the G1 being touted as the best under $1,000 by most, I'm not
sure if it's a good time yet to get into digital. Though I like
color balance from Toshiba PDR-M70 I'm not keeping it either due to
focus problems, lost of details, short battery life, lack of hot
shoe (to use external flash you'll have to use one of those clunky
brackets).

I can't speak for the C3040, but if I were to buy one, I'd get it
where I can return just in case.

Wish I can have the perfect cam: G1 + Grip + M70 color balance &
histogram -- don't ask me to pay more though.

Hope this help. Michael.
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 
My G1 is on Ebay as I write this, it was an excellent camera but I couldnt stand the design ergonomics. I also couldnt stand taking 200 pics with my micro drive and having to convert them to Tiff them correct them in photoshop. I am waiting for Phils review on the 3040 to see how it performs next to the G1. I dont care about the battery because NiMh batteries are cheap and I can carry a few extra sets. As far as the Smart media goes it doesnt really bother me, at least its not sony memory stick. I think that the new fast lens on the 3040 will be a big improvement on the sharpness of the photos. From what I have seen on A-Digital-Eye the picture are pretty damn good. This is just my opinion, the G1 is in fact a great camera but expect to take some time to correct the white balance in RAW and use the Manual focus because I sure had to on most of my pics but the results were excellent.
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 
I agree, there is room for improvement on the software front. One thing to bear in mind is the fact that Canon is good enough to give the user the file in RAW format to play with. As I understand it, other than the Nikon D1 and Canon/Kodak pro stuff they are the only ones to do it with an "affordable" camera. If it really is a big problem then superfine jpeg is good enough for most.

The closest the Olympus comes to Canon RAW is uncompressed TIFF. According to their website a 128mb Smartmedia card will hold 12 images, not exactly a days shooting. Add to that AA batteries and you no longer have an easy to use solution. One of the biggest plus points with the Canon is it's ability to do everything with minimum hassle, I can comfortably go away on vacation with the camera alone, no need for additional batteries, memory cards etc. No need to even take the charger.
I'm down to choosing between the G-1 and the Olympus C-3040.
both seem to have different attributes.
There aren't a lot of reviews on the G-1 out there yet.
CNET hasn't reviewed it yet, and I need some encouragement!
There are a lot of happy 3040 users.
I am concerned about the G-1's delay of 3 seconds? I want to take
pix of the grandkids, and want the ability of rapid shots.
Also, I have read some disappointment with the built in flash. I do
not want to have to put on an external flash.
The flip screen, long battery life and stronger memory card seem
positive.
the G-1 is not as comfortable to hold, nor does it have a neck strap.
The 3040 can take AA batteries, which might be a plus since you can
find them anywhere.
Advice please.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top