DaSonyGuy
Forum Pro
Yes, and it looks like it too, terribly soft and VERY noisy!!!You left this one out Dom -- from the same batch:
http://www.pbase.com/image/30576370
SHOT AT ISO 800!!!
I suggest you check your eyesight!(check your facts)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, and it looks like it too, terribly soft and VERY noisy!!!You left this one out Dom -- from the same batch:
http://www.pbase.com/image/30576370
SHOT AT ISO 800!!!
I suggest you check your eyesight!(check your facts)
From the EXIF, this was shot at F5.6@300mm. Almost certainly it was shot using one of the Canon 75-300 (or 100-300) inexpensive consumer lenses wide-open at maximum telephoto. It also appears to have been processed by Adobe CS with unknown settings.Yes, and it looks like it too, terribly soft and VERY noisy!!!
Well, show us your SD10 photos taken under similar circumstances. Alas, you don't list one of the Sigma 70-300's in your profile, but do the best you can.I suggest you check your eyesight!
Ok Eric, I will.Well, show us your SD10 photos taken under similar circumstances.
Alas, you don't list one of the Sigma 70-300's in your profile,
but do the best you can.
Ouch. I can see why.Its not in my profile because I just did not want to admit having one!
Your photo certainly seems to exhibit the SD10 desaturation at high ISO noted by Phil in his review (e.g., noise reduction at work.)If you feel the noise is worse than in that Canon 10D Squirrel shot
at ISO400,
Leave the sock in the drawer; that should be shady enough to satisfy all of us.then I will gladly bend over and accept Jarvics
revoltingly smelly sock, up where the sun dont shine!
I'm afraid thats incorrecte Eric, that 10D Squirrel shot was taken at ISO400.The 10D squirrel was at ISO 800. Here's a hint. Resize the
squirrel down to a Sigma-size 2268x1512 and take another look.
We must be looking at different photos. I'm referring to the one in the first "Re: Dom-in-denial" post (because that's the sub-thread we are in.)I'm afraid thats incorrecte Eric, that 10D Squirrel shot was taken
at ISO400.
You left this one out Dom -- from the same batch:
http://www.pbase.com/image/30576370
SHOT AT ISO 800!!!
For the photo mentioned above it says:Here is the exact text written under the photo:
Yes, we are talking about completely different photos as you would know if you had read the first posts in this thread:We must be looking at different photos. I'm referring to the one in
the first "Re: Dom-in-denial" post (because that's the sub-thread
we are in.)
I read the other posts, but you (and I) were replying to the "Dom-in-denial" post.Yes, we are talking about completely different photos as you would
know if you had read the first posts in this thread:
I see less than optimal lens and processing choices. But if makes you feel better about your own camera, go ahead and assume this is the best a DR can do.As you can see, nothing but noise and Nutella!
--We must be looking at different photos. I'm referring to the one inI'm afraid thats incorrecte Eric, that 10D Squirrel shot was taken
at ISO400.
the first "Re: Dom-in-denial" post (because that's the sub-thread
we are in.)
Quote:
You left this one out Dom -- from the same batch:
http://www.pbase.com/image/30576370
SHOT AT ISO 800!!!For the photo mentioned above it says:Here is the exact text written under the photo:
1/3000s f/5.6 at 300.0mm iso800 (and the full exif agrees.)
But anyway all of the same points apply to both images (e.g.
resizing, Adobe CS processing, etc.)
--
Erik
Why do you think that there are so many that advise to desaturate
color?
And wow dominic: that 3D sharpness was mind-blower on the (hyper
selected) shots you submitted.
(my unaltered shots were from a few days ago -- and shot within 1-2
hours of each other -- just walking the dog -- nothing special)
http://www.pbase.com/jarvic7/domndenial
D.n.D: how sad...
--We must be looking at different photos. I'm referring to the one inI'm afraid thats incorrecte Eric, that 10D Squirrel shot was taken
at ISO400.
the first "Re: Dom-in-denial" post (because that's the sub-thread
we are in.)
Quote:
You left this one out Dom -- from the same batch:
http://www.pbase.com/image/30576370
SHOT AT ISO 800!!!For the photo mentioned above it says:Here is the exact text written under the photo:
1/3000s f/5.6 at 300.0mm iso800 (and the full exif agrees.)
But anyway all of the same points apply to both images (e.g.
resizing, Adobe CS processing, etc.)
--
Erik
Peace: Jarvic7
'Blessed are those drowsy ones: for they shall soon nod to sleep'.
http://www.pbase.com/jarvic7
--http://www.pbase.com/image/30438817
This was taken with a 10D!.....Yes Jarvic7,...a Canon 10D!!!...and
look at the noise!!!
AAAAARGH.....Nutella alert!!!,....Nutella alert!!!!
And how a Sigma version looks:
http://sigmasd10.fotopic.net/p4950796.html
IMO, a VERY convincing arguement to buy a Sigma!
I did not leave anything out cause I did not repond to any of your recent stuff, I was not even close to a PC with internet access while this whole mess got started.You left this one out Dom -- from the same batch:
So should you.(check your facts)
Would you mind pointing me to "my" submissions? I can't see what you are talking about, since I did not submit anything except the snapshots in the camping thread recently.And wow dominic: that 3D sharpness was mind-blower on the (hyper
selected) shots you submitted.
--John,
You may be all over the place on the run up, but when you come to
the point, you come to the point.
"Don's in denial!"
You're smarter than you thought.
--
Laurence
There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/root
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/root
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd10
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd9
http://www.beachbriss.com (eternal test site)
--Would you mind pointing me to "my" submissions? I can't see whatAnd wow dominic: that 3D sharpness was mind-blower on the (hyper
selected) shots you submitted.
you are talking about, since I did not submit anything except the
snapshots in the camping thread recently.
--
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/dominic_gross_sd10
![]()
Er, thats some mistake!....I mean since when does 'Da' look like 'Don?'....Or 'Sigma' look like 'Groß?'.Seriously -- Sorry Dominic.
DaSigmaGuy is was the focus of my recent posts here -- and elsewhere.
Fog or war, friendly fire -- jarvic7 is guilty as charged.
I gotta go and rename my pbase section.
(I owe you one)
http://www.pbase.com/jarvic7/mymistake
--(and let's remember: I have a good number of images -- that I
rather like -- that were shot with the SD9)
--John,
You may be all over the place on the run up, but when you come to
the point, you come to the point.
"Don's in denial!"
You're smarter than you thought.
--
Laurence
There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/root
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/root
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd10
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd9
http://www.beachbriss.com (eternal test site)
Peace: Jarvic7
'Blessed are those drowsy ones: for they shall soon nod to sleep'.
http://www.pbase.com/jarvic7