$4500 or £2500 for basic *istD system?

Alan Owen

Member
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Location
London, UK
Hi,

I've been looking at a Pentax *istD system for my wife as she needs a camera / lens solution that is not too heavy. Can you help me to confirm that the following is an OK solution for someone that is interested in an all round reach solution (We can't stretch to the Pentax 80-200 2.8 etc) with the emphasis on portrait / group / holiday landscape and general photography (not too specialist) shots taken during good light / night light conditions.

My wife is switching from film (good photographer, not an intensive user and first time digital user - can cope). Please help as this is a serious inquiry - my money.

Proposed configuration:

*ist D + Battery Grip + 1GB Microdrive + AF360 FGZ Flashgun (£1,349)
Pentax 16-45 f4 (£325)
Sigma 55-200 f4 (£110)
Pentax 50 f1.4 (£190)
Additional 512MB (Sandisk) Ultra II Memory Card (£90)
Compact Flash Card Reader (Sandisk USB 2.0) ((£30)
Lowepro Nova 4AW Bag (£49)
Manfrotto 190CL Tripod + 141RC Pan & tilt Head + Padded Bag (£171)
Ansmann Energy 4 Traveller Charger + 8 X 2200mAh Batteries (£55)
Miscellaneous Filters (£100+)

If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any thoughts on filters would also really help.

I'm sure that the above may not be quite complete but I'd rather get the funds right now, so please don't hold back on any recommendations.

Thank you for any help and advice.

Regards,

Alan
 
If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be
found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the
weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any
thoughts on filters would also really help.
I don't know about shipping to the UK but http://www.keh.com has a couple of A70-210/4 lenses listed. This lens has not been made by Pentax for a while now so to find one locally you will be looking at used equipment most likely. I've never owned one but most of the comments I've seen have been positive with regard to image quality. However, as the lens is an older manual focus model, it is one the heavy side weighing in at almost 700g.

As far as filters go, I'd go with Pentax SMC filters when you can. The SMC coating makes a world of difference in handling flare. Again, when you can find them, KEH usually has really good pricing on these filters, especially in BGN condition. They are also available new but generally they are a special order item in most camera stores.

--
John

Fuji S7000Z, Fuji 2600Z,
Pentax *ist-D, Pentax ZX-M, Oly Stylus
http://www.pbase.com/jglover
 
Hi,

I've been looking at a Pentax *istD system for my wife as she needs
a camera / lens solution that is not too heavy. Can you help me to
confirm that the following is an OK solution for someone that is
interested in an all round reach solution (We can't stretch to the
Pentax 80-200 2.8 etc) with the emphasis on portrait / group /
holiday landscape and general photography (not too specialist)
shots taken during good light / night light conditions.

My wife is switching from film (good photographer, not an intensive
user and first time digital user - can cope). Please help as this
is a serious inquiry - my money.

Proposed configuration:

*ist D + Battery Grip + 1GB Microdrive + AF360 FGZ Flashgun (£1,349)
Pentax 16-45 f4 (£325)
Sigma 55-200 f4 (£110)
Pentax 50 f1.4 (£190)
Additional 512MB (Sandisk) Ultra II Memory Card (£90)
Compact Flash Card Reader (Sandisk USB 2.0) ((£30)
Lowepro Nova 4AW Bag (£49)
Manfrotto 190CL Tripod + 141RC Pan & tilt Head + Padded Bag (£171)
Ansmann Energy 4 Traveller Charger + 8 X 2200mAh Batteries (£55)
Miscellaneous Filters (£100+)

If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be
found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the
weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any
thoughts on filters would also really help.

I'm sure that the above may not be quite complete but I'd rather
get the funds right now, so please don't hold back on any
recommendations.

Thank you for any help and advice.

Regards,

Alan
Alan, I must say that you have listed a very, very good kit - most comprehensive and quality gear to boot (I feel I can say that as I have 2/3rds of what you list!)

In terms of flash, have you considered the new Sigma DG500 Super? does all that the FGZ360 does (wireless, HS sync, etc.) but has a higher GN of 50, backwards compatible with recent Pentax film SLR and is cheaper

In terms of lenses I totally agree with the DA16-45 and 50/1.4 -- they are both excellent, sharp lenses (from experience - the DA has similar pincussion and barrel distortion to most zoom lenses). Reports are the that Sigma 55-200 is excellent value for money. If you were going for the best long zoom (& weight wasn't an issue) I would suggest the excellent Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX -- it is a sharper lens than the Pentax equivalent (and cheaper!) -- but a LOT to lug around.

As an alternative and saving some money you could take the Sigma 18-55 (but probably not as good & the Pnetax has some nice features) instead of the Pentax DA16-45 and if you could find one the old Pentax SMC-F 70-210/4-5.6 - the first of the autofocus Pentax long zooms and annoyingly had a rotating front element but included ED glass, is reasonably light and the sharpest of the long zooms.

Manfrotto 190 + 141 RC -- great stuff! A Classic

Check the RiData 512CF cards (see perfomance results under 'digital film' in Reviews of this site) -- represent slightly better value than SanDisc Ultra II and I'm not sure if you'll tell the speed difference in the RW.

Of course, there are a 1000 solutions but I think you are onto the right stuff, these suggestions are just alternative thoughts...

Good luck... be interested to hear the final set up.

Cheers,
Brett

 
Hi John,

Appreciate your advice on the filters.

Keh.com - What a great little site. I've marked this one for future reference. In the immediate future, we'll go with the 55-200 as the 70-210 is not the top priority for shooting purposes and it's clear that I'd have to carry the lens around all day.

Thanks so much for everything. You've helped to finalise and confirm a few of my thoughts.

Best,
Alan
If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be
found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the
weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any
thoughts on filters would also really help.
I don't know about shipping to the UK but http://www.keh.com has a couple
of A70-210/4 lenses listed. This lens has not been made by Pentax
for a while now so to find one locally you will be looking at used
equipment most likely. I've never owned one but most of the
comments I've seen have been positive with regard to image quality.
However, as the lens is an older manual focus model, it is one the
heavy side weighing in at almost 700g.

As far as filters go, I'd go with Pentax SMC filters when you can.
The SMC coating makes a world of difference in handling flare.
Again, when you can find them, KEH usually has really good pricing
on these filters, especially in BGN condition. They are also
available new but generally they are a special order item in most
camera stores.

--
John

Fuji S7000Z, Fuji 2600Z,
Pentax *ist-D, Pentax ZX-M, Oly Stylus
http://www.pbase.com/jglover
--
Alan
 
Hi,

I've been looking at a Pentax *istD system for my wife as she needs
a camera / lens solution that is not too heavy. Can you help me to
confirm that the following is an OK solution for someone that is
interested in an all round reach solution (We can't stretch to the
Pentax 80-200 2.8 etc) with the emphasis on portrait / group /
holiday landscape and general photography (not too specialist)
shots taken during good light / night light conditions.

My wife is switching from film (good photographer, not an intensive
user and first time digital user - can cope). Please help as this
is a serious inquiry - my money.

Proposed configuration:

*ist D + Battery Grip + 1GB Microdrive + AF360 FGZ Flashgun (£1,349)
Pentax 16-45 f4 (£325)
Sigma 55-200 f4 (£110)
Pentax 50 f1.4 (£190)
Additional 512MB (Sandisk) Ultra II Memory Card (£90)
Compact Flash Card Reader (Sandisk USB 2.0) ((£30)
Lowepro Nova 4AW Bag (£49)
Manfrotto 190CL Tripod + 141RC Pan & tilt Head + Padded Bag (£171)
Ansmann Energy 4 Traveller Charger + 8 X 2200mAh Batteries (£55)
Miscellaneous Filters (£100+)

If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be
found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the
weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any
thoughts on filters would also really help.

I'm sure that the above may not be quite complete but I'd rather
get the funds right now, so please don't hold back on any
recommendations.

Thank you for any help and advice.

Regards,

Alan
It's a very comprehensive solution. I might avoid buying it all in one hit. e.g. do you need the grip (I prefer the camera without), a really serious tripod, and 16-45 is a well regarded lens especially for a "one lens kit", but are the others the ideal for the work your wife does. I've got the 50mm f/1.4 and wouldn't be without it (great portrait lens on this camera), but it may not be what other people need.

If you DO walk into a camera shop with that shopping list, negoitiate a decent discount !
 
Alan, after a few swaps I ended up with almost the same kit with the addition of the 70-300 Sigma APO macro and a second hand 77LTD for portrait work. I dont own the 50 F1.7 but its a fine lens and would do as well as the LTD.

When travelling I take the 16-45 and 55-200 - a very compact combination considering it covers 24-300mm on the camera. The grip I like because I do a lot of portrait mode shooting and it does make the camera more stable. However when travelling I leave the charger and the NiMH's at home and just take a spare set of CR3Vs or two. These last such a long time (well over 1000 shots) and I dont have to worry about the charger or finding compatible socket adapters etc. This leaves me carrying everything in a Lowepro Toploader 65 AW and a small lens case.

Would advise more memory though. I hardly use microdrives any more because of the speed and energy consumption but the 1GM solid state cards are pretty cheap now. If you shoot any RAW pics you will definately want a few of those or an image tank.
Steve
Hi,

I've been looking at a Pentax *istD system for my wife as she needs
a camera / lens solution that is not too heavy. Can you help me to
confirm that the following is an OK solution for someone that is
interested in an all round reach solution (We can't stretch to the
Pentax 80-200 2.8 etc) with the emphasis on portrait / group /
holiday landscape and general photography (not too specialist)
shots taken during good light / night light conditions.

My wife is switching from film (good photographer, not an intensive
user and first time digital user - can cope). Please help as this
is a serious inquiry - my money.

Proposed configuration:

*ist D + Battery Grip + 1GB Microdrive + AF360 FGZ Flashgun (£1,349)
Pentax 16-45 f4 (£325)
Sigma 55-200 f4 (£110)
Pentax 50 f1.4 (£190)
Additional 512MB (Sandisk) Ultra II Memory Card (£90)
Compact Flash Card Reader (Sandisk USB 2.0) ((£30)
Lowepro Nova 4AW Bag (£49)
Manfrotto 190CL Tripod + 141RC Pan & tilt Head + Padded Bag (£171)
Ansmann Energy 4 Traveller Charger + 8 X 2200mAh Batteries (£55)
Miscellaneous Filters (£100+)

If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be
found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the
weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any
thoughts on filters would also really help.

I'm sure that the above may not be quite complete but I'd rather
get the funds right now, so please don't hold back on any
recommendations.

Thank you for any help and advice.

Regards,

Alan
 
Hi Brett,

Thanks for your very helpful response. I'm more than pleased to know that the set up is OK as I'm not an expert here.

You're right about there being a number of potential solutions. I'm happy with the proposed lenses as weight is a major consideration. We can always address the question of other lenses in the future as the 55-200 is a great deal.

I'll look into the Ridata 512CF and appreciate your comments. To me, the flashgun is probably of greater interest as this will be required. However, you have prompted me to think that this whole area needs a bit of thought. It's not the money; it's more a question of getting to grips with what we are buying here. I think that I need to get a better grasp of what is required from an accessories perspective and why they are required. Maybe I need to look at a good brochure or manual.

Brett, your comments have been most helpful. Appreciate your time.

Best,
Alan
Hi,

I've been looking at a Pentax *istD system for my wife as she needs
a camera / lens solution that is not too heavy. Can you help me to
confirm that the following is an OK solution for someone that is
interested in an all round reach solution (We can't stretch to the
Pentax 80-200 2.8 etc) with the emphasis on portrait / group /
holiday landscape and general photography (not too specialist)
shots taken during good light / night light conditions.

My wife is switching from film (good photographer, not an intensive
user and first time digital user - can cope). Please help as this
is a serious inquiry - my money.

Proposed configuration:

*ist D + Battery Grip + 1GB Microdrive + AF360 FGZ Flashgun (£1,349)
Pentax 16-45 f4 (£325)
Sigma 55-200 f4 (£110)
Pentax 50 f1.4 (£190)
Additional 512MB (Sandisk) Ultra II Memory Card (£90)
Compact Flash Card Reader (Sandisk USB 2.0) ((£30)
Lowepro Nova 4AW Bag (£49)
Manfrotto 190CL Tripod + 141RC Pan & tilt Head + Padded Bag (£171)
Ansmann Energy 4 Traveller Charger + 8 X 2200mAh Batteries (£55)
Miscellaneous Filters (£100+)

If anyone in the UK can let me know where a Pentax 70-210 f4 can be
found, your help would be really appreciated. Comments on the
weight of this lens would be more than useful. Finally, any
thoughts on filters would also really help.

I'm sure that the above may not be quite complete but I'd rather
get the funds right now, so please don't hold back on any
recommendations.

Thank you for any help and advice.

Regards,

Alan
Alan, I must say that you have listed a very, very good kit - most
comprehensive and quality gear to boot (I feel I can say that as I
have 2/3rds of what you list!)

In terms of flash, have you considered the new Sigma DG500 Super?
does all that the FGZ360 does (wireless, HS sync, etc.) but has a
higher GN of 50, backwards compatible with recent Pentax film SLR
and is cheaper

In terms of lenses I totally agree with the DA16-45 and 50/1.4 --
they are both excellent, sharp lenses (from experience - the DA has
similar pincussion and barrel distortion to most zoom lenses).
Reports are the that Sigma 55-200 is excellent value for money. If
you were going for the best long zoom (& weight wasn't an issue) I
would suggest the excellent Sigma 70-200/2.8 EX -- it is a sharper
lens than the Pentax equivalent (and cheaper!) -- but a LOT to lug
around.

As an alternative and saving some money you could take the Sigma
18-55 (but probably not as good & the Pnetax has some nice
features) instead of the Pentax DA16-45 and if you could find one
the old Pentax SMC-F 70-210/4-5.6 - the first of the autofocus
Pentax long zooms and annoyingly had a rotating front element but
included ED glass, is reasonably light and the sharpest of the long
zooms.

Manfrotto 190 + 141 RC -- great stuff! A Classic

Check the RiData 512CF cards (see perfomance results under 'digital
film' in Reviews of this site) -- represent slightly better value
than SanDisc Ultra II and I'm not sure if you'll tell the speed
difference in the RW.

Of course, there are a 1000 solutions but I think you are onto the
right stuff, these suggestions are just alternative thoughts...

Good luck... be interested to hear the final set up.

Cheers,
Brett

 
There is nothing wrong with what you've selected since it is, as you say, your money. IMHO, it's far from a basic kit. Unless you get some sort of discount for buying it all at once I'd slow down and buy parts as the needs present themselves.

I have the Pentax with the 16-45mm lens for special occasions, a 50mm f/1.8 which I love, and a 135mm f/2.8 which I don't use much. I have a remote cable release which I wouldn't be without. I have a Manfrotto 724b as a carry-along tripod. That's my "basic" kit.

With higher usable ISO than I've been used to I haven't really felt compelled to get an external flash. Since I carry my camera with me as I stroll around town I haven't felt compelled to get the battery grip, either. I find portrait orientation to be very easy with this camera without the grip.

My next lens will be in the 24-90 or 28-105 range but then I simply don't need 200mm which translates to 300mm on the Pentax.
 
(snip)
As far as filters go, I'd go with Pentax SMC filters when you can.
The SMC coating makes a world of difference in handling flare.
Again, when you can find them, KEH usually has really good pricing
on these filters, especially in BGN condition. They are also
available new but generally they are a special order item in most
camera stores.
I agree that the SMC Pentax filters are very fine, but as they are hard to find I'm using B+H milticoated filters instead. These are also very fine optically and come in brass mounts which are smoother than the more common aluminum mounts. I get these at The Filter Connection http://www.2filter.com/ which keeps them in stock

--
Colormonger.
* * * * *
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
  • Edmund Burke
 
I agree that the SMC Pentax filters are very fine, but as they are
hard to find I'm using B+H milticoated filters instead. These are
I also use the B+W filters or Heliopan, if I cannot find the Pentax branded filters. The only source that seems to consistently keep SMC Pentax filters is B&H Photo. However, in the sizes not made by Pentax, B+W or Heliopan multicoated filters are the way to go.

--
John

Fuji S7000Z, Fuji 2600Z,
Pentax *ist-D, Pentax ZX-M, Oly Stylus
http://www.pbase.com/jglover
 
features) instead of the Pentax DA16-45 and if you could find one
the old Pentax SMC-F 70-210/4-5.6 - the first of the autofocus
Pentax long zooms and annoyingly had a rotating front element but
included ED glass, is reasonably light and the sharpest of the long
zooms.
This is an excellent choice, no where near as heavy as the A70-210/4 and the quality is outstanding. I've owned one for years. Again, it is out of production and the best source is KEH or eBay. As far as quality goes, sharpenss and MTF wise, this lens is typically rated as the equal, or very close to the FA*80-200/2.8. And it costs MUCH less!

--
John

Fuji S7000Z, Fuji 2600Z,
Pentax *ist-D, Pentax ZX-M, Oly Stylus
http://www.pbase.com/jglover
 
Hi John,

Appreciate your advice on the filters.

Keh.com - What a great little site. I've marked this one for future
reference. In the immediate future, we'll go with the 55-200 as the
70-210 is not the top priority for shooting purposes and it's clear
that I'd have to carry the lens around all day.

Thanks so much for everything. You've helped to finalise and
confirm a few of my thoughts.
Hi Alan,

You're welcome! You'll love the *istD, it's a terrific camera and I think you will find that quality Pentax glass in the used market can be a real bargain. I suppose that is because so many people are dumping their Pentax gear so they can buy a "real" camera like a Canon or a Nikon. :) Oh well, I figure their loss is my gain.......

I've bought a lot of gear from keh.com. Very conservative grading, don;t be afraid of something in bargain "BGN" condition. I've bought almost all my used gear from KEH in BGN condition. Their grading is generally so conservative I have not a clue as to why they even grade the gear as bargain.....to me it would excellent condition anywhere else. I think you'll be happy with them, provided the shipping costs are not prohibitive.

--
John

Fuji S7000Z, Fuji 2600Z,
Pentax *ist-D, Pentax ZX-M, Oly Stylus
http://www.pbase.com/jglover
 
Hi John,

Appreciate your advice on the filters.

Keh.com - What a great little site. I've marked this one for future
reference. In the immediate future, we'll go with the 55-200 as the
70-210 is not the top priority for shooting purposes and it's clear
that I'd have to carry the lens around all day.

Thanks so much for everything. You've helped to finalise and
confirm a few of my thoughts.
Hi Alan,

You're welcome! You'll love the *istD, it's a terrific camera and
I think you will find that quality Pentax glass in the used market
can be a real bargain. I suppose that is because so many people
are dumping their Pentax gear so they can buy a "real" camera like
a Canon or a Nikon. :) Oh well, I figure their loss is my
gain.......

I've bought a lot of gear from keh.com. Very conservative grading,
don;t be afraid of something in bargain "BGN" condition. I've
bought almost all my used gear from KEH in BGN condition. Their
grading is generally so conservative I have not a clue as to why
they even grade the gear as bargain.....to me it would excellent
condition anywhere else. I think you'll be happy with them,
provided the shipping costs are not prohibitive.

--
John

Fuji S7000Z, Fuji 2600Z,
Pentax *ist-D, Pentax ZX-M, Oly Stylus
http://www.pbase.com/jglover
--
Alan
 
Jim,

Appreciate your comments. Not sure about getting the SMC Pentax filters in the UK but will certainly be looking at the B + W or Heliopan multicoated filters.

Best,
Alan
(snip)
As far as filters go, I'd go with Pentax SMC filters when you can.
The SMC coating makes a world of difference in handling flare.
Again, when you can find them, KEH usually has really good pricing
on these filters, especially in BGN condition. They are also
available new but generally they are a special order item in most
camera stores.
I agree that the SMC Pentax filters are very fine, but as they are
hard to find I'm using B+H milticoated filters instead. These are
also very fine optically and come in brass mounts which are
smoother than the more common aluminum mounts. I get these at The
Filter Connection http://www.2filter.com/ which keeps them in stock

--
Colormonger.
* * * * *
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.
  • Edmund Burke
--
Alan
 
Appreciate your comments. Not sure about getting the SMC Pentax
filters in the UK but will certainly be looking at the B + W or
Heliopan multicoated filters.

Best,
Alan
(snip)
As far as filters go, I'd go with Pentax SMC filters when you can.
The SMC coating makes a world of difference in handling flare.
Again, when you can find them, KEH usually has really good pricing
on these filters, especially in BGN condition. They are also
available new but generally they are a special order item in most
camera stores.
I agree that the SMC Pentax filters are very fine, but as they are
hard to find I'm using B+H milticoated filters instead. These are
also very fine optically and come in brass mounts which are
smoother than the more common aluminum mounts. I get these at The
Filter Connection http://www.2filter.com/ which keeps them in stock

--
Colormonger.
* * * * *
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.
  • Edmund Burke
--
Alan
--

For Pentax SMC filters join the Pentax Users club and order through them and get 10% discount - http://www.pentaxuser.co.uk .

I tend not to use so many filters now with digital as with film. Mainly use grey grads (great to avoid white blow out) or polariser and I tend to use Cokin P series.

For the best in CF cards readers etc http://www.ebuyer.com (1GB CF cards at well under £100)

Richard Day - 'Carpe Diem!'
Gloucester UK
 
Hi James,

You're right to start thinking about a discount. I'll have to dust off that book on negotiation.

Personally, I like to look at the big picture as I don't want to get unexpected shocks at a later stage. Hence, the full configuration. Perhaps I can talk the price down with a full configuration. I'm definitely going to get the 16-45 and the grip will be up to my wife as she'll be using the camera most of all.

In the UK, there isn't a major difference in the price of the 50 f1.4 and other lenses in this category. I thought that I'd go for better quality although some seem to feel that other lenses would suffice.

Shooting indoors is a requirement and I guess we'll be looking at different lighting conditions. There will be shots indoors, including offices, events and restaurants, pubs etc. Do you have any further comments on any other lenses that could be required or added?

Best,
Alan
It's a very comprehensive solution. I might avoid buying it all in
one hit. e.g. do you need the grip (I prefer the camera without), a
really serious tripod, and 16-45 is a well regarded lens especially
for a "one lens kit", but are the others the ideal for the work
your wife does. I've got the 50mm f/1.4 and wouldn't be without it
(great portrait lens on this camera), but it may not be what other
people need.

If you DO walk into a camera shop with that shopping list,
negoitiate a decent discount !
 
Appreciate your comments. Not sure about getting the SMC Pentax
filters in the UK but will certainly be looking at the B + W or
Heliopan multicoated filters.

Best,
Alan
(snip)
As far as filters go, I'd go with Pentax SMC filters when you can.
The SMC coating makes a world of difference in handling flare.
Again, when you can find them, KEH usually has really good pricing
on these filters, especially in BGN condition. They are also
available new but generally they are a special order item in most
camera stores.
I agree that the SMC Pentax filters are very fine, but as they are
hard to find I'm using B+H milticoated filters instead. These are
also very fine optically and come in brass mounts which are
smoother than the more common aluminum mounts. I get these at The
Filter Connection http://www.2filter.com/ which keeps them in stock

--
Colormonger.
* * * * *
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do
nothing.
  • Edmund Burke
--
Alan
--
For Pentax SMC filters join the Pentax Users club and order through
them and get 10% discount - http://www.pentaxuser.co.uk .

I tend not to use so many filters now with digital as with film.
Mainly use grey grads (great to avoid white blow out) or polariser
and I tend to use Cokin P series.

For the best in CF cards readers etc http://www.ebuyer.com (1GB CF cards
at well under £100)

Richard Day - 'Carpe Diem!'
Gloucester UK
--
Alan
 
Hi Steve,

Many thanks for your remarks. Yes, weight is an important consideration here. How do you find the 55-200? Do you experience camera shake at all or use a tripod?

I have a feeling that my wife will go for the grip as she does shoot in portrait mode. I liked your comment about CRV3 batteries. To be honest, I forgot about these and was pleased for you to remind me. They seem to be about £7.50 each??? Also, you're absolutely right about the Microdrive.

On a final note, as I said elsewhere, there is a need to shoot indoors (and outdoors at night) when there will be a need to shoot small and large groups plus individuals in varying light conditions. Have you any thoughts on whether I am missing a lens or need to consider an alternative?

Thanks once again.

Best,
Alan
Alan, after a few swaps I ended up with almost the same kit with
the addition of the 70-300 Sigma APO macro and a second hand 77LTD
for portrait work. I dont own the 50 F1.7 but its a fine lens and
would do as well as the LTD.
When travelling I take the 16-45 and 55-200 - a very compact
combination considering it covers 24-300mm on the camera. The grip
I like because I do a lot of portrait mode shooting and it does
make the camera more stable. However when travelling I leave the
charger and the NiMH's at home and just take a spare set of CR3Vs
or two. These last such a long time (well over 1000 shots) and I
dont have to worry about the charger or finding compatible socket
adapters etc. This leaves me carrying everything in a Lowepro
Toploader 65 AW and a small lens case.
Would advise more memory though. I hardly use microdrives any more
because of the speed and energy consumption but the 1GM solid state
cards are pretty cheap now. If you shoot any RAW pics you will
definately want a few of those or an image tank.
Steve
 
Hi Patrick,

Thanks for your comments. Yes, I did have tongue in cheek when I wrote the word 'basic'. Still, I like to get the big picture on this as I don't like £1,000 surprises. I'll be looking into the possibility of getting a discount.

With regard to lenses, the 16-45 is a done deal and hence the 24-90 hasn't been considered. It seems a shame that there isn't a Nikon 18-70 equivalent. My wife seems to be keen on a flashgun but I was interested to read that you didn't see the need at present to get a flash as the ISO 800 results have been so good.

As with a couple of my other posts, have you any thoughts on whether I'm missing a lens given the need to take portrait / group shots indoors in varying light conditions? Also, can I ask you when / why you use the cable release so often?

I was interested in your choice of tripod. What do you use with it?

Thanks once again for your help.

Best,
Alan
There is nothing wrong with what you've selected since it is, as
you say, your money. IMHO, it's far from a basic kit. Unless you
get some sort of discount for buying it all at once I'd slow down
and buy parts as the needs present themselves.

I have the Pentax with the 16-45mm lens for special occasions, a
50mm f/1.8 which I love, and a 135mm f/2.8 which I don't use much.
I have a remote cable release which I wouldn't be without. I have a
Manfrotto 724b as a carry-along tripod. That's my "basic" kit.

With higher usable ISO than I've been used to I haven't really felt
compelled to get an external flash. Since I carry my camera with me
as I stroll around town I haven't felt compelled to get the battery
grip, either. I find portrait orientation to be very easy with this
camera without the grip.

My next lens will be in the 24-90 or 28-105 range but then I simply
don't need 200mm which translates to 300mm on the Pentax.
 
Richard,

I'm definitely getting the 16-45 but noticed that you thought the Tamron 17-35 f2.8/4 Di was good. Have you compared these lenses?

Also, as my wife is looking for lenses to cover indoor (and outdoor) shots of individuals, groups of people when sometimes the lighting is not great or a typical event, pub, indoor office situation, have you any thoughts on the best combination of lenses. For example, would the 16-45 + 50 f1.4 + flash cover these requirements?

The 55-200 was chosen purely for the additional reach and flexibility.

Appreciate any comments on offer.

Best,
Alan
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top