Google?
Now there is an imaginative name. Not.
Strange that this fellow has such a limited imagination, yet writes
such drivel.
That is the most anal reply I've heard in a long time. Buy and use
a bunch of cameras and you will soon realize that the three things
that could make the *istD more competitive are a smaller more
powerful lithium battery, a good long zoom kit lens, and a little
stronger in camera sharpening. Whether you think those things are
important for you or not is really drivel. When it comes to
producing a camera that can compete, it better equal or surpass the
competition. Those are the three main areas where the *istD is
falling behind.
Sure the 16-45 zoom is a great companion, well make it such. Don't
include a cheap plastic little monster like the 18-50 lens that
everybody regards as the softest lens in the industry and expect to
compete with a $950 Rebel D. Don't come with a $900 camera that
produces softer images than the competition when you are trying to
sell it to consumers who are coming from consumer cameras with
heavily pushed sharpening parameters. The battery is a debatable
compromise, since most folks will probably prefer AA's simply
because they are familiar when lithium batteries are vastly
superior in power to size ratio and keep their idle charge much
longer.
When you come along and accuse folks of uttering drivel, you best
not back it up with obvious drivel of your own.
--
Dave Lewis