Hope New DSLR's image will be sharper

Dave Lewis wrote:

That card door is almost laughable and having to dump the card out on the floor every time is a bit of a joke too.

Pathetic DL.

You're troubled by the door?

Sad.
 
Google?

Now there is an imaginative name. Not.

Strange that this fellow has such a limited imagination, yet writes
such drivel.
That is the most anal reply I've heard in a long time. Buy and use
a bunch of cameras and you will soon realize that the three things
that could make the *istD more competitive are a smaller more
powerful lithium battery, a good long zoom kit lens, and a little
stronger in camera sharpening. Whether you think those things are
important for you or not is really drivel. When it comes to
producing a camera that can compete, it better equal or surpass the
competition. Those are the three main areas where the *istD is
falling behind.

Sure the 16-45 zoom is a great companion, well make it such. Don't
include a cheap plastic little monster like the 18-50 lens that
everybody regards as the softest lens in the industry and expect to
compete with a $950 Rebel D. Don't come with a $900 camera that
produces softer images than the competition when you are trying to
sell it to consumers who are coming from consumer cameras with
heavily pushed sharpening parameters. The battery is a debatable
compromise, since most folks will probably prefer AA's simply
because they are familiar when lithium batteries are vastly
superior in power to size ratio and keep their idle charge much
longer.

When you come along and accuse folks of uttering drivel, you best
not back it up with obvious drivel of your own.
--
Dave Lewis
I use both the Canon 10d and the Ist D and honestly, whether it is out of loyalty to pentax or not, I prefer the Ist D, as do many canon users who cant seem to quit playing with my camera. I find none of the features you have listed as desireable to make my Ist D competitive. The Ist D is a great camera. If there is one thing Pentax could do to make thier camera more competitive with the top two, IMO it would be USM. The only reason I use the 10D over the Ist D is when I am shooting at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway (every week). You just cant match the speed and smoothness of the 70-200 2.8 USM. Sharpness wise, my Sigma 70-200 2.8 is just as sharp on the Pentax.

And as for Pentax in Camera sharpness, as anyone knows who uses this camera, it is just as sharp as everybody elses when processed. If you dont like the default settings, you can turn up to the sharpness. I do not care for the in camera sharpness of the Canon as I prefer to do my own post processing. I like having FULL control of my images, even if it takes a little more time (as do most pros).

Another comment on sharpness, you cant use a cheap lens on a digital camera and expect the image to be sharp. We go out and spend $1500 on a nice camera body and expect to get results with a $300 lens. Wont happen.

Thats my opinion, (the battery thing is really a non issue, let it die)
 
The real problem is that Phil pumps up the low noise images coming from the Canon brands and notes that the images are soft coming from those cameras (of course he minimizes the soft part on the 10D review)...

So what happens then every manufacturer (except Nikon it appears) sacrifices image sharpness for image cleaness! So now the *ist D doesn't get the same treatment and the D100 on Normal got abused for soft JPEGs (even though the 10D was softer)...

The good thing is it appears that Phil has noted this and in the D70 review he downplays the noise issue and praises the resolution of the camera (I guess it's all in how you spin it huh?).

The other issue is the fact that Noise is so hard to quantify because slight variations affect it drastically (if you look you'll find people with seriously noisy 10D and 1D MK II images because they messed up).
about *ist D image softness. Pentax should improve their image
process algorithm and in-camera software, not just try to ruin the
noise by soften the image -- it is an easy way to eliminate noise
but not an advanced way. An old DSLR, Fuji S2 pro can tell how the
images are balanced in detail, sharpness, satuation and noise
reduction.
--

'The probability that we may fall in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just; it shall not deter me.' -- Abraham Lincoln
 
My Rebel D,
though much bigger than the *istD weighs a good bit less and it has
a magnisum inner frame just like the *istD. It is the batteries
that make the Pentax heavy.
--
Dave Lewis
I dont believe the Rebel D has a magnisium internal frame. It only uses a small amt of metal reinforcement in a few critical areas. Other than that it is entirely poly carbonate. Which is not necessariy a bad thing, but would explain the lightness of the Rebel.

John
 
You really should read up before you open your mouth and make a fool of your self. There are reasons why they use them and good reasons. Just ask the guys with the new MK ii's that get 1100 to 1200 shots on a charge.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0406/04060601pentax900dslr.asp
Let's hope the new DSLR's image will be sharper than the very soft
*ist D image, and use a Li-ion battery and come with a good, 4x kit
D lens.
Who knows why Canon decided to stay with that dated and very
expensive battery in the MKII. Who knows why they chose to use
Lythium batteries in almost every other camera they produce. State
of the art in batteries now is the Lythium battery. It doesn't
require conditioning, it doesn't get extremely hot during charging
and discharging. It retains its idle charge far far longer than
NiMH batteries do. Supporting the use of a particular component
just because an outrageously expensive product uses it is an old
falacy. You should recognize that.

--
Dave Lewis
 
Dave Lewis

We met before.

I wasnt talking to you, nor would I normally wish to.
Kindly shut the f* up.
Well, you weren't really talking to Google either, and with this post you really aren't talking very nicely either.
--
Dave Lewis
 
.............And, may I add, that my experience is probably in
excess of yours, so off.
Well good. Then why not respond to my post rather than issue another anal attack.
--
Dave Lewis
 
I use both the Canon 10d and the Ist D and honestly, whether it is
out of loyalty to pentax or not, I prefer the Ist D, as do many
canon users who cant seem to quit playing with my camera. I find
none of the features you have listed as desireable to make my Ist D
competitive. The Ist D is a great camera. If there is one thing
Pentax could do to make thier camera more competitive with the top
two, IMO it would be USM. The only reason I use the 10D over the
Ist D is when I am shooting at the Las Vegas Motor Speedway (every
week). You just cant match the speed and smoothness of the 70-200
2.8 USM. Sharpness wise, my Sigma 70-200 2.8 is just as sharp on
the Pentax.
And as for Pentax in Camera sharpness, as anyone knows who uses
this camera, it is just as sharp as everybody elses when processed.
If you dont like the default settings, you can turn up to the
sharpness. I do not care for the in camera sharpness of the Canon
as I prefer to do my own post processing. I like having FULL
control of my images, even if it takes a little more time (as do
most pros).
Another comment on sharpness, you cant use a cheap lens on a
digital camera and expect the image to be sharp. We go out and
spend $1500 on a nice camera body and expect to get results with a
$300 lens. Wont happen.

Thats my opinion, (the battery thing is really a non issue, let it
die)
Actually I probably didn't make it all that clear. What I was mainly thinking of was the cheaper version Pentax is coming out with. My point was that folks coming to that camera will probably be coming from consumer cameras that have a lot of in camera sharpening and they will expect the same from that camera. The biggest criticism of the Rebel D from new users it its softness. DSLR softness has been a hot topic from the beginning. Like you, I have no problem with it.

My point was that Pentax needs to be aware of the competition when they come with the entry camera. I'm sure they were well aware of the competition when they came with the *istD. Like you, I have a 10D and think the *istD is very close to the 10D in performance but a much more fun camera, at least for me.

I agree that they will never equal the focusing speed till they develop in lens focusing motors. That is another generation. I would think a little company like Pentax will be reluctant to put themselves too much on the line in drastic development. They should probably stick with what they have. Offering a cheaper camera is a good choice. I will buy it if it is plastic and super light. The lythium battery would help a whole lot in that regard.
--
Dave Lewis
 
I'm curious about how many DSLR's you've owned and compared the
*istD to.
This means,

"I've had more experience than you!"

Big deal DL.
J2D2, I'd like to buy you a beer. I'll bet you're a really nice fellow when you aren't hiding behind that keyboard.

Actually, I think owning and using a bunch of different cameras does indeed give you a better handle on similarities and differences. Picking one up in a camera store just doesn't cut it. You have to spend the money, make the commitment, and live with the consequences. I've told you the cameras I have. I can make comparisons with them. I told you also I couldn't make comparisons with Nikon or Fuji. I haven't owned them. If the poster hasn't owned any other DSLR's then his ability to compare is greatly lessened. That is why I asked. That would be hard for even you to debate, wouldn't it.

I'll buy the first beer.
--
Dave Lewis
 
My Rebel D,
though much bigger than the *istD weighs a good bit less and it has
a magnisum inner frame just like the *istD. It is the batteries
that make the Pentax heavy.
--
Dave Lewis
I dont believe the Rebel D has a magnisium internal frame. It only
uses a small amt of metal reinforcement in a few critical areas.
Other than that it is entirely poly carbonate. Which is not
necessariy a bad thing, but would explain the lightness of the
Rebel.

John
Yes, it has the frame. That was discussed a while back on the Rebel D forum. I think the Canon site has a cutaway picture showing it somewhere. It really is light, though.
--
Dave Lewis
 
You really should read up before you open your mouth and make a
fool of your self. There are reasons why they use them and good
reasons. Just ask the guys with the new MK ii's that get 1100 to
1200 shots on a charge.
Well tell us about those reasons, then. Tell us too how a similar sized lythium battery would provide lesser performance. I'm listening. Tell me. I already admitted I don't know why Canon stuck with the NiMH battery when they went to lythium in everything else. If you know why tell me.
--
Dave Lewis
 
That's amazing! And he wrote a whole artical on how people who don't agree with his "facts" are basically jerks. What a complete ass. I always suspected such was the case, but this confirms it...

(Compare and contrast Norman Koren's fabulous site, I have never met Norman, I almost consider him a close friend! http://www.normankoren.com )

I hate rich people who think their opinion is worth something solely on the basis of the amount of money they have! (Particularly when they are truly ignorant individuals...)

Done ranting....thanks!

--
Ed

If everyone in the world were a Texan, it would be EVEN HARDER to find a descent Croissant!
 
Do both of them (*ist and Rebel) creak when you hold it tightly?
Yes, it has the frame. That was discussed a while back on the Rebel
D forum. I think the Canon site has a cutaway picture showing it
somewhere. It really is light, though.
--
Dave Lewis
 
Yes, it has the frame. That was discussed a while back on the Rebel
D forum. I think the Canon site has a cutaway picture showing it
somewhere. It really is light, though.
--
Dave Lewis
Ha, ha, I've heard folks suggest that about the Rebel D. I'm rather deaf so can't hear creaks. I do know the Pentax feels more solid to me.
--
Dave Lewis
 
Dave Lewis wrote:

That card door is almost laughable and having to dump the card out
on the floor every time is a bit of a joke too.

Pathetic DL.

You're troubled by the door?

Sad.
We'll talk about that over a beer, J2.

I'm curious, J2, do you have an *istD? How do you get the card our of yours. I'm looking for a better way. Remember, the first beer is on me.
--
Dave Lewis
 
Dave has a legit concern over the flimsey door. I've always been paranoid about breaking it off while trying to get the card out. Especially when I was busy shooting and had to change cards fast. The *ist D is a great camera, but like all others, it has shortcomings and the door and card st are big shortcomings. And ones that are easily fixed. You can bet a paycheck the next DSLR from Pentax will have a much improved card slot design.

And while we are griping about the door, I wish pentax would do a firmware update (if possible) to show the ISO in the viewfinder or in the least, on the LCD panel. And while they are at it, make ISO changeble on the fly.
Dave Lewis wrote:

That card door is almost laughable and having to dump the card out
on the floor every time is a bit of a joke too.

Pathetic DL.

You're troubled by the door?

Sad.
We'll talk about that over a beer, J2.

I'm curious, J2, do you have an *istD? How do you get the card our
of yours. I'm looking for a better way. Remember, the first beer is
on me.
--
Dave Lewis
--
Frank from Phoenix
Canon 1D Mk2 and Pentax D*ist DSLR
 
Yes DL, you are right, I am a nice chap.

Beleive me though, when I say that I dont hide behind a keyboard. Anyone who knows me will tell you that I am much more aggressive in "real" life.
Thank you for the offer of a beer, but I dont drink.
 
And another thing.

You keep using the word "anal". Now, I'd like to see you define it. I feel you dont really know what it means.

On the subject of the ISTD, 10D and photography in general, I'd like to say that this obsession with trivia and detail is irrelevant. No one has, or ever will, make the perfect camera. Use what you have, and be happy.

If your pictures suck, then you are the problem. If you cant get the card out, then YOU are in need of a little thing called flexibility in learning.

You say you are a "craftsman", yet cant take a little card out of a stiff slot???

Go away, learn something new. Take some better pictures. Dont talk to me.
 
my husband put a small piece of tape on his card, folded the end back onto itself (sticky side to sticky side) so he has a non-sticky tab and uses this tab to pull the card out.

karen
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top