Hi Morris,
thanks for your explanations but I still doubt... ;-)
Best Regards
Lothman
thanks for your explanations but I still doubt... ;-)
nothing against fill flash but I can't see any effect in this special pic. I think the great distance you have on such shots and the closed aperture you choosed make the flash invisble on the pic, at least on such bright sunshine.Hi Lothman,
Excellent questions and of cause I have my reasons. I use fill
flash in bright sun in an attempt to get catch eye which did not
happen in this case. It also fills in the shadow areas but leaves
them less exposed than the sun making for nice even light.
Remember that fill flash is flash that is the secondary light
source and I tend to use about 1.5 stops less flash than the sun is
providing.
You are right on moving objects but on these three pics the tigers sit still so there would have been sufficient time for your cam to focus on main object, blurr the background and improve the fillflash effect.As for the aperture choice, I’m using a long lens at
the minimum focus distance and DOF is very narrow. These animals
are moving and I don’t want to miss perfect focus. The background
is very close and would not be very far out of focus even at f 2.8.
Best Regards
Lothman
Morris,
nice pics but I can't see the effect of the fill flash on the tiger
in bright sunshine.
Why didn't you use a wider aperture in order to blurr the background?
Regards
Lothman