T
Truelight
Guest
PSG's SVCD format has always played just fine in my $30 wonder - an Apex AD1000 DVD player from Walmart. My newer AD1011 also plays 'em fine. Apex rocks!
- Rick
MOTV vs. PSG2
I did some panning and resolution tests using Canon ESO 10D 6mg
images and resolution charts. The final output was a DVD viewed on
both progressive scan and interlaced scan on a RCA 38” US TV.
Images were pasted together side-by-side to produce long images
like you would have with panoramic stitched images.
With MemoriesOnTV I used the native encoder and also encoded with
various setting with TMPGEnc including 2-pass VBR. In all cases
the images were as sharp when zoomed in for a full screen view, as
they would be with a single image with no zoom. However, when the
slide was zoomed to full screen size and panned linearly across the
slide from left to right across the images that were paste
together, the panning was very jerky. It was somewhat better when
the time of the pan was longer, but still jerky.
With Proshow Gold 2 (1524) I used the default encoder and also
tried to changing the preferences from 800x600 to 1600x1200. The
results were the same. When zoomed in, the pictures were fuzzy and
not sharp at all. However, the panning was perfectly smooth.
The results indicate that there is no clear winner. They both
excel and fail in different areas.
If you use PSG2, keep zooming to lower levels and pan at any speed.
With MOTV zoom in as much as you want but do very slow panning.
MOTV is better if you include panoramic stitched photos in your
slide shows and PSG@ is better for standard slides with all panning
and minor zooming.