Mark Henninger
Active member
The S2 is an excellent choice for shooting people, skin tones are indeed rendered with unusual fidelity by the S2. What are annoyances to you are real problems for me, I don't need the high resolution; for most of my shooting I need small RAW files sizes and fast card writing, areas where the D70 wins hands down. If I worked in a studio, I'd have kept the S2.
Since my shots aren't going to be in a gallery (most likely they end up in magazines) the D70 suits me just fine.
Since my shots aren't going to be in a gallery (most likely they end up in magazines) the D70 suits me just fine.
Now I'm left trying to envision which hand your D70 was spanking
your S2 with....
--The resale value. I dumped my Fuji 12 hours after getting a Nikon
D70. The Fuji may squeeze a bit more detail out of each shot,
especially when using a sharp lens in the f/8-11 range...but the
D70 takes the Fuji S2 out to the shed in back and gives it a good
spanking in almost every other category.
Will I miss firewire? Not much, I hardly ever used it. USB 2.0 is
pretty fast. Will I miss a PC socket for flash? Not at all. How
about moire? I ran tests. If the D70 exhibits moire in a scene, so
does the S2. Oh well.
Things I will not miss: the batteries, Fuji RAW converter EX, lack
of review during card writes, 12+ megapixel RAW files, shutter
release dependent camera wake-up, short battery life, the cable
release, "track pattern" noise, "needling" artifacts in diagonal
lines, the crappy LCD, the tiny histogram, 7 second per RAW file
write times, the green cast.
I hope the Fuji S3 is a nice camera. If it is I'll probably buy
one. For now the Nikon D70 is just too much camera for the dollar
to feel good about owning a Fuji S2. Thankfully Fuji kept the price
of the S2 high, so I was able to sell it, and make a profit
switching to the D70.
http://www.mantarayarts.com