My new A2 AS is intermitently blinking and may need to be retunred.
But of my good photos taken side by side:
A1 at 5 mp very, very close to 8 mp. Very slightly better
resolution printed at 8 1/2 by 11. I do not have a larger printer
but I do have 2 good printers--Canon 830 and HP 7960.
On screen, also very similar but I can crop in further on the A2.
Color -to me-a bit different between the cams. I like the A1 color
better. It seems a bit truer.
WB better on the A2. EVF better on the A2.
Writes to card faster than I would have expected.
No expert--but I see no CA or PF on any of my A2 shots-nor any
banding or other odd colors. Just-a problem with the AS on this
unit :-(.
I will definitely be exchanging it but for the price, the A1 is an
incredible value. My A1 is soooo good I think I must be really a
perfectionist to even consider selling it.
I paid $999 for the A1 just this past October, 2003...Paid $1099
but then Minolta dropped the price $200 and the dealer rebated it
to me.
I paid $934 for the A2 because J & R matched the Dell sale last
week. I have offers for my A1 from $550 to $650 with warranty. So,
I guess it is up to you to decide the price and pixel differences,
etc.
Whichever you chose--you can't go wrong. I bought an extended
warranty and that is one thing I would highly recommend. You can
get one from J & R even if you didn't buy the camera from them and
you can use Minolta service if you need it.
Good luck.
Linda
I have never used raw but am shooting in super fine.
I did a search of this forum and did not find any treads offering
comparisons or advice for someone considering the A1 or A2. I have
a 7i now and am considering an upgrade. I do not need the 8MP
images but like the idea of a better EVF, (bad eyes ... it sucks
getting old).
Anyway I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has evaluated the
two cameras. Either would be a significant upgrade to my 7i, (which
I love by the way). Should I spend the extra bucks on the A2 or
pick up an A1 at a bargain price? Maybe I should just wait for the
A3 or A4. What do you all think.
Bob
Seems to cme down to the following pluses for each model:
A1+ Image Noise/CA less when viewed 100%. The less dense sensor on
thw A1 has the edge over the A2 in many people's opinion. When the
A2 images are printed or downsampled this advantage may well go
away.
A1+ Price
A1+ Battery life... very clightly longer from the specs. I've
upgraded from a D7 so both are wonderful as far as I'm concerned
A1+ Burst mode better. 5 shot burst in RAW and shorter times
between takes with JPEG.
A2+ Ultra High Speed shooting mode. Only 640x480 but 7 frames a
second for about as long as you keep the shutter release pressed.
A2+ Resolution 8MP/5MP - Some suggest that you may not be able to
get 100% benefit of all of those extra pixes though due the, albeit
excellent, aging GT lens.
A2+ EVF. Four times the resolution and much smoother.
A2+ Movie mode has higher resolution at, I think, a higher rate.
A1+ Movie mode takes longer sequences
A2+ Depth of Field preview. Possibly only of real use in Macro
shooting given teh large DOF of this type of camera.
A2+ 3:2 aspect ratio available... always leave the best till last
eh ;-)
I think that's about it... anyone got any more.
FWIW I have the A2 but ideally would like to see a combination of
the two. I am resigned to a Hi model appearing with a larger buffer
real soon :-(
daveR