Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both are good printers but after reading an article in Dig. Camera mag. I am going with the Epson brand. Why they are one of the few who includes a processor in the printer. HP and many others use the processor from your computer. What this means is why it's printing out that very high quality print you are going to be bogged down from doing much else.Have recently purchased an Olympus 2020Z. Am looking at photo quality
printers for home use and would like opinions on the HP1000/1100 vs the
Epson 900. Also, does anyone have experience with the Olympus 300/330 or
other dye sublimation printers in the $300-$500 price range.
Thanks for your help
--
Jim
Gee Wiz!!!Both are good printers but after reading an article in Dig. Camera mag. I
am going with the Epson brand. Why they are one of the few who includes
a processor in the printer. HP and many others use the processor from
your computer. What this means is why it's printing out that very high
quality print you are going to be bogged down from doing much else.
Gee Wiz!!!Both are good printers but after reading an article in Dig. Camera mag. I
am going with the Epson brand. Why they are one of the few who includes
a processor in the printer. HP and many others use the processor from
your computer. What this means is why it's printing out that very high
quality print you are going to be bogged down from doing much else.
How does Dig. Camera mag. explain the fact that the HP P1000/P1100
can print images without the computer even being turned on, much
less being "bogged down from doing much else"?
My P1000 does a great job, with and without the computer. Rest
assured, it never "bogs down".
Dave
John
Gee Wiz!!!Both are good printers but after reading an article in Dig. Camera mag. I
am going with the Epson brand. Why they are one of the few who includes
a processor in the printer. HP and many others use the processor from
your computer. What this means is why it's printing out that very high
quality print you are going to be bogged down from doing much else.
How does Dig. Camera mag. explain the fact that the HP P1000/P1100
can print images without the computer even being turned on, much
less being "bogged down from doing much else"?
My P1000 does a great job, with and without the computer. Rest
assured, it never "bogs down".
Dave
I have an HP2000C and an Epson Stylus Photo 1200.Have recently purchased an Olympus 2020Z. Am looking at photo quality
printers for home use and would like opinions on the HP1000/1100 vs the
Epson 900. Also, does anyone have experience with the Olympus 300/330 or
other dye sublimation printers in the $300-$500 price range.
Thanks for your help
I have an HP2000C and an Epson Stylus Photo 1200.Have recently purchased an Olympus 2020Z. Am looking at photo quality
printers for home use and would like opinions on the HP1000/1100 vs the
Epson 900. Also, does anyone have experience with the Olympus 300/330 or
other dye sublimation printers in the $300-$500 price range.
Thanks for your help
If I want print speed, ink economy and the ability to print
satisfactorily on a wider variety of photo papers, I'll use the HP.
If I want to print exceedingly well with no visible dots, I'll use the
Epson with Epson paper. In other words, if I want quality, I use the
Epson. I use it, too, when I want a big (up to 13"x 19" or 13"x 44"
panoramas) prints.
This hardly warrants a response. However, the printer is always set for HP Photo Paper and Best print quality when printing photos. FWIW, the printer includes Kodak Image Enhancements.I'm sorry,the HP2000c must be a office printer.Try taking it off econo
when you are printing photos. The HPP1000 prints better than the Epsons.
After using both an HP870Cse and Epson (Stylus Photo 750), the Epson produces a far better print.This hardly warrants a response. However, the printer is always set forI'm sorry,the HP2000c must be a office printer.Try taking it off econo
when you are printing photos. The HPP1000 prints better than the Epsons.
HP Photo Paper and Best print quality when printing photos. FWIW, the
printer includes Kodak Image Enhancements.
The Epson Stylus Photo 1200 will produce a better looking print every
time.
This hardly warrants a response. However, the printer is always set forI'm sorry,the HP2000c must be a office printer.Try taking it off econo
when you are printing photos. The HPP1000 prints better than the Epsons.
HP Photo Paper and Best print quality when printing photos. FWIW, the
printer includes Kodak Image Enhancements.
The Epson Stylus Photo 1200 will produce a better looking print every
time.
OK, so Epson photo printers print photos far better than HP non-photoAfter using both an HP870Cse and Epson (Stylus Photo 750), the Epson
produces a far better print.
I have an Epson 800 printer and like it very much. With the paper I've
tried so far, only Epson brand produces good prints. It uses a lot of
computer CPU time while printing (80% of a Pentium 133). I'm a HP fan,
but the Epson produced better prints than the HP printers I compared
about a year ago.
I bought an HP1000 10 days ago to go with my new C2020Z and I think it is outstanding. I can't imagine anything printing better photos than this so I'm not going to worry whether or not I should have got an Epson! It's fast, it's quiet, it's easy to setup and use, it looks good and I don't even need to use the PC to print my photos.Have recently purchased an Olympus 2020Z. Am looking at photo quality
printers for home use and would like opinions on the HP1000/1100 vs the
Epson 900. Also, does anyone have experience with the Olympus 300/330 or
other dye sublimation printers in the $300-$500 price range.
Thanks for your help
--
Jim
I borrowed an HP 970 in view of getting one, because its does real photos, quiet, fast and easy to maintain if the heads clog. I compared my prints to a colleague of mine who swears by the Epson 750, while my prints were very good on their own, the Epson had closer to real life skin color and it didnt have any dots in the sky (viewed from the same distance and same picture). I tried Photo Ret on and off, all sorts of paper but nothing came close. I thought I made the right decision but in the end its a compromise. If you want a fast car get a Porche, but dont expect it to be quiet, comfortable or cheap to maintain. The HP is just an all-rounder, the Epson is the best for only one thing PHOTOS.Have recently purchased an Olympus 2020Z. Am looking at photo quality
printers for home use and would like opinions on the HP1000/1100 vs the
Epson 900. Also, does anyone have experience with the Olympus 300/330 or
other dye sublimation printers in the $300-$500 price range.
Thanks for your help
--
Jim
I borrowed an HP 970 in view of getting one, because its does realHave recently purchased an Olympus 2020Z. Am looking at photo quality
printers for home use and would like opinions on the HP1000/1100 vs the
Epson 900. Also, does anyone have experience with the Olympus 300/330 or
other dye sublimation printers in the $300-$500 price range.
Thanks for your help
--
Jim
photos, quiet, fast and easy to maintain if the heads clog. I compared my
prints to a colleague of mine who swears by the Epson 750, while my
prints were very good on their own, the Epson had closer to real life
skin color and it didnt have any dots in the sky (viewed from the same
distance and same picture). I tried Photo Ret on and off, all sorts of
paper but nothing came close. I thought I made the right decision but in
the end its a compromise. If you want a fast car get a Porche, but dont
expect it to be quiet, comfortable or cheap to maintain. The HP is just
an all-rounder, the Epson is the best for only one thing PHOTOS.
I'm glad HP is getting better. The problem on the HP printers I used a
year ago was grainy appearance (particularly in flesh tones). Can you see
grain in the 1100 prints? I'm looking for a next generation printer and
would rather buy HP if it truly matches Epson print quality.
John
Gee Wiz!!!Both are good printers but after reading an article in Dig. Camera mag. I
am going with the Epson brand. Why they are one of the few who includes
a processor in the printer. HP and many others use the processor from
your computer. What this means is why it's printing out that very high
quality print you are going to be bogged down from doing much else.
How does Dig. Camera mag. explain the fact that the HP P1000/P1100
can print images without the computer even being turned on, much
less being "bogged down from doing much else"?
My P1000 does a great job, with and without the computer. Rest
assured, it never "bogs down".
Dave
