Reading mode: Light Dark

Where is Daniella?

Go to last post
Well, if that's the case she shouldn't be here under a different handle should she.
Scott M Miller said:
Michael,
She was banned for selling her picture of the Joshua tree. (Great
pic). She changed her handle and opened a new account. As far as
I'm concerned she learned her lesson and tried to start fresh. Good
enough for me.

Scott
http://www.pbase.com/millersm
'Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from
mediocre minds.'
Click to expand...
--
Stan
Events in the Night Sky
http://www.nightskyevents.com

 
In blatant violation of the forum rules because after dozens of requests, she accepted to sell some of her prints.

You wanted to get her for something, and since you could not get her on photographic talent, you turned her in for posting a link to a photo she was selling?

Come on, get a life.
Addam said:
This 'Daniella' person is in blatant violation of the forum rules
for advertising / purposely keeping threads alive, if you didn't
see it then you are either blind or sucked into the scam.

I work in information security and we call what Daniella was doing
'social engineering' and I am glad to see the back of it, I'm sure
another account will be opened but it will ultimately get closed
again, of course I am assuming the owners of this site realized
what was going on and shut it down, if not then they should!
Click to expand...
--
http://www.malaquias.net/en/joseluis/
 
...since there are various ways to get on using different names, IPs and so forth.

That's why I think it would be better for Phil to send a person a warning and/or give them a time out period. More constructive and professional methinks.

Stan
 
Then you have a very narrow view of security.

Social Engineering can be applied to any form of manipulating another person 'socially' to achieve a desired 'engineered' outcome.

Social Engineering can be used in many forms and it certainly is not specific to network security or hacking.
Shannon Howell said:
that is not "social engineering". As a Networking professional,
"Social Engineering" means

a person using social engineering is trying to break into a
computer network and trying to gain the confidence of someone who
is authorized to access the network in order to get them to reveal
information that compromises the network's security.

Did she try to break into a network? as far as i know, no! so your
use of "social engineering" doesn't fit here.
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
 
Stan Richard said:
Well, if that's the case she shouldn't be here under a different
handle should she.
Click to expand...
as long as she has learned her lesson. Not selling is the #1 rule so her banning was legit. But she does bring much more to this forum than just blatant self promotion.

She is good at that, and it is clear she likes the limelight. But in all honesty, most of us would like our photos to be noticed. I'm certainly no exception.

The truth is, her photos are exceptional. Of course at 10000+ on her camera, you would expect some pretty good shots in there somewhere if she has half a clue (and she clearly does).

I kind of regret outing her in this thread. I hadn't realized that was why she was banned.

--
If you are a new user chances are good your question is answered in the FAQ at:
http://www.marius.org/eos300dfaq.php

For a small gallery of my photographs, see:
http://ratphoto.home.comcast.net/
See my profile for my equipment
 
I personally don't like being the victim of SPAM and Daniella was the SPAM queen, I am also not a fan of a person manipulating other people for personal gain, so don't tell me to get a life because I already have one, a greazt one.

People pay me to rid the information world of merciless leeches that manipulate people and environments for their own greedy cause. This forum should not be a tool to those seeking personal gain.
José Luís Malaquias said:
Come on, get a life.
Addam said:
This 'Daniella' person is in blatant violation of the forum rules
for advertising / purposely keeping threads alive, if you didn't
see it then you are either blind or sucked into the scam.

I work in information security and we call what Daniella was doing
'social engineering' and I am glad to see the back of it, I'm sure
another account will be opened but it will ultimately get closed
again, of course I am assuming the owners of this site realized
what was going on and shut it down, if not then they should!
Click to expand...
--
http://www.malaquias.net/en/joseluis/
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
 
She always seemed helpful and supportive to me. If they want to ban professionals from the board then so be it, but let us know that up front. If you're a professional on this board your work is bound to come up. As long as they talk about whatever the forum is about I can't see how someone asking to buy your work is a violation.

Plus with signatures and our e-mail addresses displayed, it's so easy to take that conversation offline...

My 2 cents. And I'd hate to be banned for offering 2 cents for something :)
Addam said:
I work in information security and we call what Daniella was doing
'social engineering' and I am glad to see the back of it, I'm sure
another account will be opened but it will ultimately get closed
again, of course I am assuming the owners of this site realized
what was going on and shut it down, if not then they should!
BigMike said:
I just realized that I haven't seen her posting for several days.
Maybe I just missed her doing so, but if not, any chance she is
having trouble again with her account here. I sure hope not.....
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
Click to expand...
 
I find it sad that someone with such talent was banned for such a pitiful excuse for a reason (in my opinion). True, if that was those are the rules, then fine, why not give he a warning.

I read, in a post, asking about where a certain guy went on the forums. He was repeatedly posting voyeuristic pictures, possibly of children, and he was given warnings, THEN banned.

That is the information Phil himself gave out in a post. Now, call me crazy, but somebody posting information about her pictures that people asked about, accidently breaking rules, deverses a warning more than what that guy did.

Sounds like someone was waiting for an oppertunity to make a peck at her, probably jealous etc.

I don't think the treatment was just, or fair, in compairson to the previous action taken against more serious matters (in my opinion).

--
http://shuurajou.deviantart.com/gallery/photography/
 
Bye Jaymzz ;; waves end scarcasm.
Jaymzz said:
Plus with signatures and our e-mail addresses displayed, it's so
easy to take that conversation offline...

My 2 cents. And I'd hate to be banned for offering 2 cents for
something :)
Addam said:
I work in information security and we call what Daniella was doing
'social engineering' and I am glad to see the back of it, I'm sure
another account will be opened but it will ultimately get closed
again, of course I am assuming the owners of this site realized
what was going on and shut it down, if not then they should!
BigMike said:
I just realized that I haven't seen her posting for several days.
Maybe I just missed her doing so, but if not, any chance she is
having trouble again with her account here. I sure hope not.....
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
--
http://shuurajou.deviantart.com/gallery/photography/
 
KirkWatts said:
I find it sad that someone with such talent was banned for such a
pitiful excuse for a reason (in my opinion). True, if that was
those are the rules, then fine, why not give he a warning.
Click to expand...
You (and others) are assuming that she was kicked out without prior warning. Do you know that is the case? Maybe she was warned.

We should not make unjustified assumptions.
 
How do you know it's a her?

Just because the name Daniella was used?

In my experience when someone is manipulating a forum for personal gain they are typically misrepresenting themselves in other ways, there is every chance that Daniella is Male - aged 39 - balding and with bad breath.

However, there is also a chance she is a genuine sweety but I wouldn't count on it. Social manipulators are merciless in their activity when it comes to $$$.
KirkWatts said:
I find it sad that someone with such talent was banned for such a
pitiful excuse for a reason (in my opinion). True, if that was
those are the rules, then fine, why not give he a warning.

I read, in a post, asking about where a certain guy went on the
forums. He was repeatedly posting voyeuristic pictures, possibly of
children, and he was given warnings, THEN banned.

That is the information Phil himself gave out in a post. Now, call
me crazy, but somebody posting information about her pictures that
people asked about, accidently breaking rules, deverses a warning
more than what that guy did.

Sounds like someone was waiting for an oppertunity to make a peck
at her, probably jealous etc.

I don't think the treatment was just, or fair, in compairson to the
previous action taken against more serious matters (in my opinion).

--
http://shuurajou.deviantart.com/gallery/photography/
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
 
Addam said:
I personally don't like being the victim of SPAM and Daniella was
the SPAM queen, I am also not a fan of a person manipulating other
people for personal gain, so don't tell me to get a life because I
already have one, a greazt one.
Click to expand...
Now I'm not Daniella's advocate, and I think she's powerfull enough to speak for herself if she want's to, but I think you need to backup what you are saying, or else keep your mouth closed.

Read the rules:

Be civil - anyone being abusive, calling names or generally trying to stir up trouble will not be tolerated. If you think someone is wrong it may be because they are new, don't jump on them, think first. If you are repeatedly abusive you will be banned from these forums.

Flame / Attacks - We do not tolerate abusive, malicious, personal attacks or self-promoting messages. See first rule.

--
Regards,
Tom



http://clik.to/tomcee
Canon 300D FAQ: http://www.marius.org/fom-serve/cache/3.html
 
If that was the case why would she create another account, only to not post the thing that got her banned, for doing only once.

From what I can see, she only ever created one thread about it. So, IF warned, she should have been warned about that. Then, she never created another thread along those 'evil' lines, what's the reason for banning her? She did it once, got a warning, never did it again - then was banned?

That's the only sense I can make if she ever WAS issued a warning. Just not logical, if she was warned, then she wouldn't have created another account to just do what she was doing with the old account when she got banned (not posting against the rules - after she was 'warned').

Hopefully you can know what I mean with this.
d-og said:
KirkWatts said:
I find it sad that someone with such talent was banned for such a
pitiful excuse for a reason (in my opinion). True, if that was
those are the rules, then fine, why not give he a warning.
Click to expand...
You (and others) are assuming that she was kicked out without prior
warning. Do you know that is the case? Maybe she was warned.

We should not make unjustified assumptions.
Click to expand...
--
http://shuurajou.deviantart.com/gallery/photography/
 
Addam said:
Just because the name Daniella was used?

In my experience when someone is manipulating a forum for personal
gain they are typically misrepresenting themselves in other ways,
there is every chance that Daniella is Male - aged 39 - balding and
with bad breath.

However, there is also a chance she is a genuine sweety but I
wouldn't count on it. Social manipulators are merciless in their
activity when it comes to $$$.
KirkWatts said:
I find it sad that someone with such talent was banned for such a
pitiful excuse for a reason (in my opinion). True, if that was
those are the rules, then fine, why not give he a warning.

I read, in a post, asking about where a certain guy went on the
forums. He was repeatedly posting voyeuristic pictures, possibly of
children, and he was given warnings, THEN banned.

That is the information Phil himself gave out in a post. Now, call
me crazy, but somebody posting information about her pictures that
people asked about, accidently breaking rules, deverses a warning
more than what that guy did.

Sounds like someone was waiting for an oppertunity to make a peck
at her, probably jealous etc.

I don't think the treatment was just, or fair, in compairson to the
previous action taken against more serious matters (in my opinion).

--
http://shuurajou.deviantart.com/gallery/photography/
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
Click to expand...
--
Stan
Events in the Night Sky
http://www.nightskyevents.com

 
I have seen repeated trolling by some very flamable defenders of other camera makers (ya know, the N...) and they keep up showing again and again, with more of the same thing and not posting even two cents worth of useful info. And they dont get banned. If the Joshua Tree thing was the reason for bannin Daniella, I would think is rather harsh... But we dont know for sure, so I hope she comes back with another alias and share with us her useful experience and beautiful pics.>

--
EOS Fan
Still learning
 
Look at all this attention and praise she is getting out of it and all she had to do was make up a new name.

Greg
 
My perception of what HE or SHE did :-

1. Persistently creating/replying to threads and creating messages to build up trust and increase popularity, the purpose behind this being to develop a trusted position on the forum and gain followers / visitors to HIS / HER website.

2. Frequent references to 'her' website that sells prints.

My analysis :-

Manipulating the forum for personal $$$ gain.

Is that clear?
Stan said:
..this is interesting.

Stan
Click to expand...
--
Adam
http://www.inviplex.com/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top