As for dSLRs... D2H is better than Canon 1D. Now that 1D Mk 2 is
coming, it's going to blow D2H out of the water, and that's not
just wishful thinking.
D70 - Canon 300D is still going to rule supreme for some time yet,
until the Nikon is out, and even then will Nikon have to reduce the
price to match Canon's offering (I believe it will go down as far
as $700 for the kit at MSRP).
D2X - when it comes out, Canon will have 1Ds replacement. Fuji will
probably have S3. Kodak may have DCS-14n replacement. Kodak have
left the MF back market, and their 38x38 back is vastly superior to
1Ds sensor, although its resolution is "only" 10.67 megapixels, so
on par with Canon 1Ds, but the quality is superior. But Kodak are
not behind in R&D, so if Canon releases a 22 megapixel follow-up to
the 1Ds, Kodak will do that as well in a Nikon body (this will
warrant using F5 as reference body), and perhaps using full frame
transfer instead of interline transfer meaning it will have higher
quality. Nikon can have problems here as well, especially if their
D2X is below 10 megapixels - as far as the megapixel race goes,
these are full frame sensors which are not plagued by noise as much
as smaller ones are.
When Nikon introduces a follow-up to the D100, Canon will have 10D
updated.
Nikon seems to be lagging behind in every segment.
Then, there's Pentax and Minolta. They will both have new SLRs this
year, and they will compete with Nikon quality.
And there are sales. Canon sells most cameras in all dSLR segments.
Period.
I started this phrase when the d2h came out . and Now i think i can
repeat it again with confidence , , not a gimmiky leader but a well
thought and planned camera leader who takes its time before coming
out with the next item, obviously the dx line is here to stay for
the forseeble future ,and why not , the FF might come out but who
will really need it , The professionals who need very big files and
very sophisticated peripheral gear that go with it ,,,,, LF
printers etc,,
I am ready now for DSLR..
--
avis
--
What is true liberty, I ask you.
Is it the right of any individual to do anything they wish,
trespassing on the liberty of other people, or is it the right of
any individual to be sure his liberty shan't be trespassed upon? I
assure you, this is the true meaning of true liberty.
What is free speech, then?