FLASH DECISION - Sigma 500DG i think $189 at BH or 420ex

maxrulez

Forum Enthusiast
Messages
374
Reaction score
0
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly appreciated.
 
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
I shot a wedding yesterday using the Sigma EF-500 DG Super. I would NOT have wanted to do it without the exposure compensation that flash offers (and the 420 does not).

I also used a Sto-fen Omni-bounce. It is no cure-all but it is a useful tool.

--
If you are a new user chances are good your question is answered in the FAQ at:
http://www.marius.org/eos300dfaq.php

For a small gallery of my photographs, see:
http://ratphoto.home.comcast.net/
See my profile for my equipment
 
I am buying the sigma to get the extra power... I would also definitely pick upi the stofen omnibounce... it produces a more subtle flash effect and is great a reducing the harsh highlights produced by the reflections of the flash on you subjects.

-Jordan
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
--
-Jordan, CP5700
 
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
--

I have both flashes and I would say get the DG Super. It throws a brighter, farther flash. It also has the built in 17mm diffuser panel which the 420 does not. And like the other guy said the built in flash compensation is a life saver. The flash will also allow you to control other flashes wirelessly, or it can be a slave flash.

The 420 does none of that, needs another flash to control it for slaving, and it has no manual controls at all. It is full auto all the time and can't be over ridden.

The DG Super is more comperable to the 550EX anyway and costs less than the 420. Good luck.

Michael Scott
 
Wow - a Best Buy clerk that knows what he's talking about? Where do you live? Oz? DG Super is a great flash (especially for the $$) and the Stofen makes it close to perfect in situations where ETTL has problems. In other words, although the DG Super does have FEC (and a good thing it is) many times the Stofen compensates enough so that FEC isn't needed. It usually moves my histogram to the right when mounted. All in all, good advice from Best Buy imho. ~ m²
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
--

'Brothers and sisters, we've learned that there's some bad bokeh going around out there. So like, just be careful man, alright?' (If Wavy Gravy emceed PMA) http://rhodeymark.instantlogic.com

 
Do you use the "Type C" omni-bounce product for the Sigma EF-500? At B&H, they don't say which of the omni-bounce products work with the Sigma 500, but the Sto-fen page seems to indicate the Type C. Just checking.

Thanks

Doug
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
I shot a wedding yesterday using the Sigma EF-500 DG Super. I would
NOT have wanted to do it without the exposure compensation that
flash offers (and the 420 does not).

I also used a Sto-fen Omni-bounce. It is no cure-all but it is a
useful tool.

--
If you are a new user chances are good your question is answered in
the FAQ at:
http://www.marius.org/eos300dfaq.php

For a small gallery of my photographs, see:
http://ratphoto.home.comcast.net/
See my profile for my equipment
 
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
Yes and yes. I got it from B&H, for the price.. it is a great deal. If you're deciding between the 420 and the 500DG, i'd say go for the DG. They're about the same cost, but you get a lot more with the 500. The B&H site lists an omnibounce that works in conjunction w/ the 500DG, but the listing of that omnibounce doesn't list it as a compatable flash. It does fit.

I hope that helps.
 
Do you use the "Type C" omni-bounce product for the Sigma EF-500?
At B&H, they don't say which of the omni-bounce products work with
the Sigma 500, but the Sto-fen page seems to indicate the Type C.
Just checking.
On the B&H page, the Sigma 500 lists the 'C' model as an accessory. I got mine a couple of days ago and it was a very tight fit. Another poster mentioned that he heated it up and stretched it to fit.

Darren
 
Mine's (OM-C) quite tight as well so that's a good tip. I'm assuming he used a hair dryer and not the oven. ~
On the B&H page, the Sigma 500 lists the 'C' model as an accessory.
I got mine a couple of days ago and it was a very tight fit.
Another poster mentioned that he heated it up and stretched it to
fit.
--

'Brothers and sisters, we've learned that there's some bad bokeh going around out there. So like, just be careful man, alright?' (If Wavy Gravy emceed PMA) http://rhodeymark.instantlogic.com

 
Can you tilt the DG Super down for macro photography ?
Trying to de3cide between the two. Also Guy at Best Buy told me to
get the omni bounce also? Suggestions abd comments greatly
appreciated.
--
'Brothers and sisters, we've learned that there's some bad bokeh
going around out there. So like, just be careful man, alright?'
(If Wavy Gravy emceed PMA) http://rhodeymark.instantlogic.com

 
I believe "slightly" yes - I'm not with the cam right now but it does dip below 90° if I remember correctly. Hopefully someone has theirs handy and can give you the exact degree. ~ m²
Can you tilt the DG Super down for macro photography ?
--

'Brothers and sisters, we've learned that there's some bad bokeh going around out there. So like, just be careful man, alright?' (If Wavy Gravy emceed PMA) http://rhodeymark.instantlogic.com

 
I already have 420EX ... now thinking of getting an additional 500DG. My question is will 500DG (as master) trigger 420EX (as slave) in wireless mode?
I have both flashes and I would say get the DG Super. It throws a
brighter, farther flash. It also has the built in 17mm diffuser
panel which the 420 does not. And like the other guy said the built
in flash compensation is a life saver. The flash will also allow
you to control other flashes wirelessly, or it can be a slave flash.

The 420 does none of that, needs another flash to control it for
slaving, and it has no manual controls at all. It is full auto all
the time and can't be over ridden.

The DG Super is more comperable to the 550EX anyway and costs less
than the 420. Good luck.

Michael Scott
 
Yeah, seriously, most of the time if I go to bestbuy, I'll just go pickup the stuff, and head off to cashier. I mean, I usually do research on the product b4hand, and majority of them don't seem to be knowledgable.
Wow - a Best Buy clerk that knows what he's talking about? Where do
you live? Oz? DG Super is a great flash (especially for the $$) and
the Stofen makes it close to perfect in situations where ETTL has
problems. In other words, although the DG Super does have FEC (and
a good thing it is) many times the Stofen compensates enough so
that FEC isn't needed. It usually moves my histogram to the right
when mounted. All in all, good advice from Best Buy imho. ~ m²
--
I love Michelle Kwan
 
I have a 550ex and I am planning to buy either a 550ex,420ex or a Sigma 500DG.

For the money my selection would be to buy a Sigma500DG. My questions are what will be the benefits between 500DG and 420EX using them as slaves and being control by a maSTER 550EX.

Would I have the same degree of control with a slave Sigma550DG as slave of 420ex?

Power output control, ratio,Slave ID etc with Sigma ?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top