Okay folks....

Shutter. said:

Well, frankly, absolutely there is. Many have said that it's not
any worse than what they've seen in other cameras and thus parade
examples from 1ds' and 717's and say "See!". That's denial.

Click to expand...

Well if the person HAS an 828 and says that, I have to give them the benefit of the doubt. Although I haven't yet seen a full WA and full tele shot of backlit trees (with the trees in the corners) yet that doesn't show a pretty nasty PF problem. I am hoping to at least get some amelioration to the PF on my last copy.

Shutter. said:

But everyone seems to be missing my point...

Click to expand...

Probably. Let me see if you reiterate your point again -- I think I saw another post by you with the title "my point". After I put this reply on the net I'll see if I can track it down and get a bit more of a clue.

--
my favorite work: http://www.pbase.com/sdaconsulting/featured_art&page=1

I was kind of thinking the same thing the other day but, didn't want to stir things up anymore by posting the message... especially now that I'm only a 300D owner

I was REALLY looking forward to this F828 release to buy as a second cam for easy carrying..... I'll wait till I can put one in my hands and play iwh it!

M

Mark J

Shutter. wrote: