Intro:
"For a photographer it is to be understood not simply the philosophy and the camera Design of an enterprise, which manufactures otherwise outstanding products in the audio video world. In order to write an objective report, I must be concerned therefore in the coming days with the camera, its possibilities and all attitudes more near. In particular I wish myself better weather.
The today's fog was to be discovered however nearly already ideally around the "notorious" noise of this camera. On it already so much was reported. On the question, how strong the noise is, how the noise affects the image quality and how one can avoid it, I in the coming days will answer. Anyhow I wish myself in this week radiating sunshine.
New contribution with photographs with ISO 64-800."
Caption above jacket shots:
"If you click on one of the pictures stated down, the admission in originalgroesse appears. They may load themselves the pictures on your own computer around itself own opinion to the quality to form. For the photographs further pictures will follow, among them also in the RAW format."
Caption under jacket shots:
"In the Sony forum with
http://www.dpreview.com meanwhile an interesting debate was inflamed. One does not want to believe simply that we could already attest the F828. One required proofs. During the publication of the first photographs one spoke there of a duck: surely, we had some ducks in the zoo also made a blueprint... however none of the newspaper. Then one wanted to fool into believing me that a pilot lot camera was used, since no ISO 64 was published picture. Well, now I issue evenly still some ISO 64 photographs. And slowly I have also no more desire and in particular no time, in order to convince the disbelieving forum participants further; I there rather continue with new tests."
Caption above printer box:
"Low light conditions. Hereby I follow still another request: Photographs under bad light conditions. Simple 60 W a bulb in the otherwise dark area. The intoxication debate does not want to end probably? Whereby seems inconsequential with this camera class. With security one can say: the picture is not bad, and who will take with this camera photographs beyond A4-Format? But there are other cameras! With 20 x 30 cm the image quality is outstanding. I would even say, the sharpness am above average good."
Caption below printer box:
"Sharpness/distortion
Since one meanwhile already compares with one another pictures of the EOS 300D and F828, I have same photograph situations of both cameras regarding sharpness and distortion compared. The F828 becomes still gesture constant from me. Before I can come to a final evaluation, still some comparison photographs regarding sharpness and distortion as well as photographs with flashlight follow."
Following after the shots of 2 men (suspect one of the men is the author
:
"With JPEG photographs 4 series photographs are possible; when TIF dissolution or RAW dissolution series photographs are not possible.
Nightshot functions only in the p-mode, i.e. manual change of screen or exposure time is not possible.
Still two data for delay in storing:
RAW: 45 seconds; TIF: 55 seconds.
Video-Aufzeichnung on 1 GB IBM micro drive:
Quality standard: 49 minutes 17 seconds.
Quality Fine: 13 minutes 41 seconds.
With video photographs a zoom is possible, the camera focused and exposed automatic. Dimension of picture area to 640 x 480, excellent picture and sound qualities, the autofocus is however slow thereby.
Thank you for the review!
first review of 828 is now translated in german.
I'm shure that you can translated this review from german to all
languages.
http://www.e-fotografija.com/artman/publish/article_158.shtml
http://www.e-fotografija.com/artman/publish/article_159.shtml
zgoljo,
Slovenia
