White-breasted Nuthatch at 200mm f2.8 and at 280mm f4 with the 50-200 f2.8.

drj3

Forum Pro
Messages
14,986
Solutions
36
Reaction score
18,793
Location
Wantage, NJ, US
Today I had a chance to photograph a White-breasted Nuthatch at a relatively close distance (10.5-13.5 feet) using the 50-200 f2.8 without a TC and then with the MC14.

Unfortunately, the lighting was not the same with most of the MC14 images having lower illumination and slower shutter speed (too slow for a nuthatch) without direct sunlight, but hopefully it will be useful for those considering using the lens for birding. I would have also included images with the MC20, but the nuthatch would not cooperate.

The total depth of field for the nuthatch images varies from 0.60 to 1.32 inches, so detail will vary depending on the bird’s orientation.

The last image was included for those who might use the lens at its minimum focus distance (31 inches) for insect photography.

54308c7ab5ed4ea2bde4bc9739c10543.jpg

482dfd300cf646eca865657d6dc8c09a.jpg

a7ad14d11433414c84c5338628e17286.jpg

1c0e197fc3094df193bfee7541912f24.jpg

dd03c2e803764c9bbb10a7c969f4c532.jpg

3e2352359bd147b698ca02c8933b5c6b.jpg

37bae0a837274c5fabe02af1f5e7cef9.jpg

fc5d0e952ee04aa792385efea44b856a.jpg

0283de077b2146c2ab8bfc49d2765f20.jpg

cbe953bbe5fa490789e454a24668d0bc.jpg

e3217fd667b14891bf2688998830a1fd.jpg

--
drj3
 
Last edited:
I believe the last time I had a chance to photograph this bird was back in 2021, and I used a Nikon D500 with 300mm PF because my M43 setup (300mm + MC-14) was too long for the distance. :-)

Something I noticed in your shots is that the photos with the bare 50-200mm are all focused perfectly on the eye. The shots with the MC-14 are very sharp for in-focus areas, but the focus has missed the eye.

Not a ding against you, just something about the AF. It's very minor and only noticeable at 100%. Perhaps the autofocus is a bit slower or less reliable on this lens with the TC. This is a very small sample set, but I do not face this issue with the 300mm Pro unless it's fast action.
 
I believe the last time I had a chance to photograph this bird was back in 2021, and I used a Nikon D500 with 300mm PF because my M43 setup (300mm + MC-14) was too long for the distance. :-)

Something I noticed in your shots is that the phr otos with the bare 50-200mm are all focused perfectly on the eye. The shots with the MC-14 are very sharp for in-focus areas, but the focus has missed the eye.
I think that may have had more to do with what the bird was doing in most of the MC14 shots and why the slow shutter speed was an issue and which shots I chose to include. The bird was in almost constant motion, it wanted to get a sunflower seed through a little slot in the bottom of the feeder. I think it was just a nuthatch game, because the same bird had gone to the feeder bar a few minutes before to get a seed.

I chose shots where there was more of the bird in focus so that it better showed feather detail, I could have chosen either of the two shots right after the last MC14 shot and just part of the head would have been in focus, but the body out of focus (total DOF 0.60 inches). The only M14 image in good light.

ba0a63d72d864569b1bfc5f0c219afe0.jpg
Not a ding against you, just something about the AF. It's very minor and only noticeable at 100%. Perhaps the autofocus is a bit slower or less reliable on this lens with the TC. This is a very small sample set, but I do not face this issue with the 300mm Pro unless it's fast action.
--
drj3
 
Last edited:
I believe the last time I had a chance to photograph this bird was back in 2021, and I used a Nikon D500 with 300mm PF because my M43 setup (300mm + MC-14) was too long for the distance. :-)

Something I noticed in your shots is that the phr otos with the bare 50-200mm are all focused perfectly on the eye. The shots with the MC-14 are very sharp for in-focus areas, but the focus has missed the eye.
I think that may have had more to do with what the bird was doing in most of the MC14 shots and why the slow shutter speed was an issue and which shots I chose to include. The bird was in almost constant motion, it wanted to get a sunflower seed through a little slot in the bottom of the feeder. I think it was just a nuthatch game, because the same bird had gone to the feeder bar a few minutes before to get a seed.

I chose shots where there was more of the bird in focus so that it better showed feather detail, I could have chosen either of the two shots right after the last MC14 shot and just part of the head would have been in focus, but the body out of focus (total DOF 0.60 inches). The only M14 image in good light.

ba0a63d72d864569b1bfc5f0c219afe0.jpg
Thanks for clarifying that. This shot is bang-on target!

But I did enjoy seeing more of the nuthatch. Somehow I hadn't noticed until now that there is some colouration around their undersides near the tail.

--
Semi-reformed pixel peeper.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top