Hike Pics
Veteran Member
D3200 vs D5100
I guess this question has probably come up many times over the years. I have been reading a bit on the two concerning their features and user's thoughts. I know they are older cameras but I'm more concerned in staying with a rather tight budget for this. Currently the D3200 used comes in around $100 and the D5100 at around $120. I'm going to be using the 55-200 DX VR almost always.
Years ago I was given the 55-200mm DX (non-VR) lens from a friend. Since I didn't have a Nikon I looked around and picked up a D60. I used that setup for a while (I have posted photos with it on the forum) but traded it a couple years ago for an E-M1. Now I am wanting another Nikon and would like a little step up from D60. These days I just shoot snaps of whatever I find interesting. I don't print much.
I like the idea of the articulating screen on the D5100 for shooting macro down low to the ground. But the slightly less weight and size of the D3200 is also an interest.
Thoughts.....
I guess this question has probably come up many times over the years. I have been reading a bit on the two concerning their features and user's thoughts. I know they are older cameras but I'm more concerned in staying with a rather tight budget for this. Currently the D3200 used comes in around $100 and the D5100 at around $120. I'm going to be using the 55-200 DX VR almost always.
Years ago I was given the 55-200mm DX (non-VR) lens from a friend. Since I didn't have a Nikon I looked around and picked up a D60. I used that setup for a while (I have posted photos with it on the forum) but traded it a couple years ago for an E-M1. Now I am wanting another Nikon and would like a little step up from D60. These days I just shoot snaps of whatever I find interesting. I don't print much.
I like the idea of the articulating screen on the D5100 for shooting macro down low to the ground. But the slightly less weight and size of the D3200 is also an interest.
Thoughts.....



