Oct 16 came and went... and no announcements

I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
 
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
Don't hold your breath, I don't see it coming.
 
Am I the only one here checking the rumors site for news about the Q3 Mono? I thought there would be more interest than that.

Rey

P.S. I know, I know... the Q2 Mono is still awesome.
That's the problem with supposition, conjecture and rumer........... they all leave you waiting.
 
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
Same here
 
Last edited:
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
This is a well worn subject and one I've gone back and forth on... a few times. I had a Q2m and sold it to finance something bigger and better only to find out that the grass wasn't much greener on the other side of that fence.

For me, I almost always end up with a b&w image and so I don't give up much trading in color for monochrome exclusively. But what I did find was insane levels of sharpness that didn't looked forced by software and total ISO freedom. I like to shoot manual aperture and shutter speed. Never - and I mean never - having to worry about the ISO floating up into the stratosphere is liberating.

Also, and this is the massively subjective part: I like the constraint. For me, it makes composing, seeing, and post-processing much easier. And I have found that to be helpful.

That's what's in it for me.

Thanks,

Rey
 
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
Don't hold your breath, I don't see it coming.
Why not? Seems natural that they would follow on with a Q3m. They have the body. They have the sensor. They have idiots like me, i.e., the market. Seems like a no brainer.

Rey
 
Am I the only one here checking the rumors site for news about the Q3 Mono? I thought there would be more interest than that.

Rey

P.S. I know, I know... the Q2 Mono is still awesome.
That's the problem with supposition, conjecture and rumer........... they all leave you waiting.
Agree. But the rumor sites tend to be more right than wrong so I got all whipped up. I've had a Q2m in my cart forever. I just don't want to push buy right before the new model comes out. First world problem, I know.

Rey
 
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
Don't hold your breath, I don't see it coming.
Why not? Seems natural that they would follow on with a Q3m. They have the body. They have the sensor. They have idiots like me, i.e., the market. Seems like a no brainer.

Rey
I think what Steve is referring to is there's not many, if any at all, side by side examples showing a real improvement/advantage to the dedicated monochrome sensor. Which is what I was referring to.

--
... Mike
... https://www.flickr.com/photos/198581502@N02/
 
Last edited:
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
I have both M10 Monochrom and M10-R. I've been using them pretty much interchangeably (modulo wanting color vs B&W photographs of course) for over two years now, and have logged about 4000 exposures with the M10 Monochrome vs 2000 photos with the M10-R (I bought the M10-R about a year after the M10 Monochrom). I use the same lenses on both cameras.

I've been rendering digital color exposures, captured in JPEG or raw image formats, to monochrom since about 1995, and have both won recognization in exhibits with them and sold a LOT of B&W photos (probably around 5000, from all different kinds of cameras).

Yes, there is a significant improvement going to the monochrome body IF your goal is the best B&W photographs. The differences are: improved sensitivity; greater dynamic range (and consequent exposure latitude); lower noise at elevated ISO settings; and improved resolving power at the same sensor resolution.

I can get similar dynamic range in color work to the M10 Monochrom by switching to the 50 Mpixel Hasselblad 907x/CFVII 50c.

The downside to working with a monochrome body is that you have to work the camera in much the same way as you work a film camera loaded with B&W film ... That is, you have to understand the spectral sensitivity of the sensor, visualize what kinds of results you want in the transformation from a color scene to a B&W photograph and use the appropriate B&W filtering to achieve your goals. In other words, pre-visualization of your goals and knowing the behavior of your camera and lens intimately is where you will see the benefits, you will likely NOT see a difference in casually snapping photos and just tweaking sliders around to get a monochrome rendering in your favorite image processing app.

You can feel free to disagree ... I don't care, I know what I see with my own eyes in my photos. I have a lot of experience using these cameras as well as others.

If you want to understand how a monochrome camera sees the world differently from a color camera, and how it responds with different filters and different lighting, you must test your equipment and analyze the results. Here is a pair of charts of some of my basic testing with a controlled light source and an Xrite Color Checker with my M10 Monochrom, and the five B&W filters (Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, and Blue) that I use with it. It should give you a reasonable idea of how the sensor responds.

M10 Monochrom - Graphs

M10 Monochrom - Swatch comparison

Beyond that, you have to do a lot of shooting in different lighting situations with different subject types to fully understand both how to get the most out of a monochrome camera and how to expose properly with it.

If you don't understand these things, and develop the skills and the approach to using it to its limits properly, then using a color camera and developing monochrome images by rendering down that camera's captures will net pretty similar results. And they can be very good results ... but they are simply, clearly not the same.

Good luck! :D

--
Godfrey
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto
 
Last edited:
I understand, but I’m still waiting for someone to convince me there is a real tangible improvement of the monochromes vs the color sensors processed in monochrome. I’m intrigued by the M versions but just not sure it’s worth the sacrifice of giving up the color option.
This is a well worn subject and one I've gone back and forth on... a few times. I had a Q2m and sold it to finance something bigger and better only to find out that the grass wasn't much greener on the other side of that fence.

For me, I almost always end up with a b&w image and so I don't give up much trading in color for monochrome exclusively. But what I did find was insane levels of sharpness that didn't looked forced by software and total ISO freedom. I like to shoot manual aperture and shutter speed. Never - and I mean never - having to worry about the ISO floating up into the stratosphere is liberating.
Thanks for the reply and insight. It's very appreciated. But what I was referring to above is that there are plenty of people with experience with the monochrome sensors and they almost universally love them. But I would really like to see someone demonstrate it. Actually, show side-by-side examples of both sensors to see what difference there is.
Also, and this is the massively subjective part: I like the constraint. For me, it makes composing, seeing, and post-processing much easier. And I have found that to be helpful.
When I shoot monochrome I almost always set the camera for monochrome jpg's + raw. Like you said I like seeing the monochrome image in the Visoflex or reviewing the image on the rear screen. And at least 50% of the time I use the monochrome jpg out of the camera. I rarely take an image that was intentionally shot in color and convert to monochrome.
That's what's in it for me.

Thanks,

Rey
 
It is embarassing site. The comment section is completely broken and reports incorrectly. Oct 16! Then silence and no reference to it.
 
I have both M10 Monochrom and M10-R. I've been using them pretty much interchangeably (modulo wanting color vs B&W photographs of course) for over two years now, and have logged about 4000 exposures with the M10 Monochrome vs 2000 photos with the M10-R (I bought the M10-R about a year after the M10 Monochrom). I use the same lenses on both cameras.
I've been rendering digital color exposures, captured in JPEG or raw image formats, to monochrom since about 1995, and have both won recognization in exhibits with them and sold a LOT of B&W photos (probably around 5000, from all different kinds of cameras).

Yes, there is a significant improvement going to the monochrome body IF your goal is the best B&W photographs. The differences are: improved sensitivity; greater dynamic range (and consequent exposure latitude); lower noise at elevated ISO settings; and improved resolving power at the same sensor resolution.

I can get similar dynamic range in color work to the M10 Monochrom by switching to the 50 Mpixel Hasselblad 907x/CFVII 50c.

The downside to working with a monochrome body is that you have to work the camera in much the same way as you work a film camera loaded with B&W film ... That is, you have to understand the spectral sensitivity of the sensor, visualize what kinds of results you want in the transformation from a color scene to a B&W photograph and use the appropriate B&W filtering to achieve your goals. In other words, pre-visualization of your goals and knowing the behavior of your camera and lens intimately is where you will see the benefits, you will likely NOT see a difference in casually snapping photos and just tweaking sliders around to get a monochrome rendering in your favorite image processing app.

You can feel free to disagree ... I don't care, I know what I see with my own eyes in my photos. I have a lot of experience using these cameras as well as others.

If you want to understand how a monochrome camera sees the world differently from a color camera, and how it responds with different filters and different lighting, you must test your equipment and analyze the results. Here is a pair of charts of some of my basic testing with a controlled light source and an Xrite Color Checker with my M10 Monochrom, and the five B&W filters (Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, and Blue) that I use with it. It should give you a reasonable idea of how the sensor responds.

M10 Monochrom - Graphs

M10 Monochrom - Swatch comparison

Beyond that, you have to do a lot of shooting in different lighting situations with different subject types to fully understand both how to get the most out of a monochrome camera and how to expose properly with it.

If you don't understand these things, and develop the skills and the approach to using it to its limits properly, then using a color camera and developing monochrome images by rendering down that camera's captures will net pretty similar results. And they can be very good results ... but they are simply, clearly not the same.

Good luck! :D
Thank you for this perspective and detail. Most helpful.
 
It is embarassing site. The comment section is completely broken and reports incorrectly. Oct 16! Then silence and no reference to it.
Bummer. Many of the other rumor sites are pretty good and quite accurate. Maybe it’s a function of Leica as a company; perhaps they are more buttoned down.
 
I have the Q3 43 and then bought the M11-D to further enhance my photographic experience (not necessarily the result). This, after 15 years of shooting Sony. I keep telling myself my next body will be the M12M, knowing there is even more forward-thinking and visualizing required to get a desired outcome with a B&W sensor vs. use of post-shot and/or AI tech to toggle around various outcomes of a particular shot. I still go back and forth in my head whether I would find hopping between different colored filters pre-shot enjoyable, and/or would this effort be more rewarding when a “money shot” is produced? Currently, the camera equipment forcing me to be out amongst people and nature is what I most enjoy. My slowly, but ever improving photographic results really are secondary for me.
 
I have the Q3 43 and then bought the M11-D to further enhance my photographic experience (not necessarily the result). This, after 15 years of shooting Sony. I keep telling myself my next body will be the M12M, knowing there is even more forward-thinking and visualizing required to get a desired outcome with a B&W sensor vs. use of post-shot and/or AI tech to toggle around various outcomes of a particular shot. I still go back and forth in my head whether I would find hopping between different colored filters pre-shot enjoyable, and/or would this effort be more rewarding when a “money shot” is produced? Currently, the camera equipment forcing me to be out amongst people and nature is what I most enjoy. My slowly, but ever improving photographic results really are secondary for me.
I went down the path of monochrome sensor only and it often delighted and also frequently frustrated me. I moved on from it but regretted it almost instantly. This time, I'm going to give it a solid 12 months before I do anything rash. I think it will be good for me to embrace the frustrations, choosing to shoot with my ever capable iPhone when I want color.

For me, the epiphany came when I began to understand that I'm shooting with a proper (and expensive) camera because I want to create something different, something unique, something I CANNOT do with a phone.

Rey
 
The announcement came, no US announcement, per Leica Rumors. So I guess this is a rumor that there is no rumor… understanding the initial rumor has been driven since February, generating a lot of clicks for the rumor website. It feels like a government psyop.
 
The announcement came, no US announcement, per Leica Rumors. So I guess this is a rumor that there is no rumor… understanding the initial rumor has been driven since February, generating a lot of clicks for the rumor website. It feels like a government psyop.
I would consider it operations as usual for Leica. Just like Sony and Apple and most companies, they may let some fur fly for a while but there won't be any reveal until they decide it's time to let the cat out of the bag.

They tease you until they please you.

--
It's just my educated opinion. Don't get bent out of shape.
Steve
 
Last edited:
I have a Q2M. Something I don't see discussed much, and perhaps of importance to you, is using color filters on an M. I bought a deep yellow thinking it would improve darkening of blues skies; I could barely tell the difference. I then went with a deep red and it's doing what I would have thought the yellow would do. Having gotten used to tweaking the color sliders in LR and PS and getting dramatic results, if desired, the switch to the monochrome sensor has been a bit disappointing in that regard. Having said that, I love the results I'm getting with the cam, beautiful tones, low noise etc.. My next Leica, that I will be added to my gear, is the Q3 43. An M version would be very interesting, but adding color capability I feel is a good plan for me. But no way could anyone wrestle the Q2 M from my hands, it's that good.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top