Collective Project 52 for 2025 (3)

I am a little late "this week" (my apologies). I took this last Monday (9/15) as I stopped on my way home from a business meeting. It is always good to have some "P52" motivation and it is fun to look back on the previous P52 images. Like a diary. A nice afternoon!

Terminal 5
Terminal 5
 
Last edited:
...a simple Memorial, Our Lady of the Pillar Cemetary, Half Moon Bay, CA

0143a58194424692a7d7e2d89603ffb0.jpg
 
I am a little late "this week" (my apologies). I took this last Monday (9/15) as I stopped on my way home from a business meeting. It is always good to have some "P52" motivation and it is fun to look back on the previous P52 images. Like a diary. A nice afternoon!

Terminal 5
Terminal 5
Am I mistaken, or is this another amazing lens?

--
Some of my work is at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/, including a portfolio at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/portfolio/ and my Project 52 at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/projet-52/. You may also visit https://500px.com/p/BratPix?view=photos .
 
I am a little late "this week" (my apologies). I took this last Monday (9/15) as I stopped on my way home from a business meeting. It is always good to have some "P52" motivation and it is fun to look back on the previous P52 images. Like a diary. A nice afternoon!

Terminal 5
Terminal 5
Am I mistaken, or is this another amazing lens?
Well... yes and no! :-) A long story and a long reply. I think it is a very good lens (although my copy is a little soft on the left side). I sent it to Nikon in Los Angeles a few years ago, for them to take a look and maybe adjust as needed, but it came back just the same. I really like the 80-400 zoom versatility and it is fairly portable (in my backpack, it fits in the same slot as the 70-200). This picture is 5 handheld vertical frames stitched (and then cropped quite a bit) with the "left side" being on the bottom (which helps with IQ in this instance). If there is some "fuzziness" in the overlap (i.e., landscape orientation with slight softness on the left side) things are not as sharp in some areas when the final composite is created. So, if I stitch with the 80-400, I typically do it in portrait mode. The slight wind and choppy water also helps... because stitching a water scene when the waves are slow/gentle is problematic. But even apart from the water, with these types of scenes, you have to "think" and "time it" to some extent. For example, the crane movements. In this picture, I got lucky with the "far" crane (call it number 3) whereby the cab and trolley/spreader (and the container/box) turned-out "pretty good" since there is always SOME movement and this element was captured in both frames 3 & 4. The stitching software (PTGui) did a fine job. However, you can see that the cab on crane #2 moved slightly (frames 1 & 2) which PTGui couldn't quite figure out. If you look at the 3 cabs, you can see that the middle one is elongated a bit. But I didn't notice until I had done a whole bunch of fiddling... so it is what it is. Still... credit to the software engineers! It is amazing and I am very appreciative. Sometimes, if PTGui is having trouble, I use ICE - and between the two programs, I usually end-up with something usable. The "tele-pano" approach was initially just a fun undertaking "for the heck of it" but it has grown on me and I like the creative challenge - capture and processing. It started when I had the D300 (12 MP) and another DPR poster that I interacted with back then got the D800 (in 2012). Well... OK! I'll just shoot 3 frames and stitch! Voila! 36 MP. :-) LOL. It was all in good fun. :-)
 
That picture really captures the mood. Solitude and introspection. Also... Half Moon Bay. I was busy with work last week and didn't reply to the "Princeton" picture, but now, after some poking around on Google Maps... I see that "Princeton" (according to Google) is right there at Pillar Pont Harbor by the marina and airport? Were you out for a drive/visit or are you in the Half Moon Bay area on a regular basis? Looking at the map, via CA 92, it is not that far from from "The Bay" (only 6 miles from 280 as the bird flies) -- but it seems like it is a world away? :-)
 
As I mentioned to RBIV, last week was filled-up with work and not much else. I'm thinking... a water reservoir of some sort. I like the 90 degree parabolic arc.
 
I am a little late "this week" (my apologies). I took this last Monday (9/15) as I stopped on my way home from a business meeting. It is always good to have some "P52" motivation and it is fun to look back on the previous P52 images. Like a diary. A nice afternoon!

Terminal 5
Terminal 5
Am I mistaken, or is this another amazing lens?
Well... yes and no! :-) A long story and a long reply. I think it is a very good lens (although my copy is a little soft on the left side). I sent it to Nikon in Los Angeles a few years ago, for them to take a look and maybe adjust as needed, but it came back just the same. I really like the 80-400 zoom versatility and it is fairly portable (in my backpack, it fits in the same slot as the 70-200). This picture is 5 handheld vertical frames stitched (and then cropped quite a bit) with the "left side" being on the bottom (which helps with IQ in this instance). If there is some "fuzziness" in the overlap (i.e., landscape orientation with slight softness on the left side) things are not as sharp in some areas when the final composite is created. So, if I stitch with the 80-400, I typically do it in portrait mode. The slight wind and choppy water also helps... because stitching a water scene when the waves are slow/gentle is problematic. But even apart from the water, with these types of scenes, you have to "think" and "time it" to some extent. For example, the crane movements. In this picture, I got lucky with the "far" crane (call it number 3) whereby the cab and trolley/spreader (and the container/box) turned-out "pretty good" since there is always SOME movement and this element was captured in both frames 3 & 4. The stitching software (PTGui) did a fine job. However, you can see that the cab on crane #2 moved slightly (frames 1 & 2) which PTGui couldn't quite figure out. If you look at the 3 cabs, you can see that the middle one is elongated a bit. But I didn't notice until I had done a whole bunch of fiddling... so it is what it is. Still... credit to the software engineers! It is amazing and I am very appreciative. Sometimes, if PTGui is having trouble, I use ICE - and between the two programs, I usually end-up with something usable. The "tele-pano" approach was initially just a fun undertaking "for the heck of it" but it has grown on me and I like the creative challenge - capture and processing. It started when I had the D300 (12 MP) and another DPR poster that I interacted with back then got the D800 (in 2012). Well... OK! I'll just shoot 3 frames and stitch! Voila! 36 MP. :-) LOL. It was all in good fun. :-)
Many thanks for this detailed answer.

--
Some of my work is at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/, including a portfolio at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/portfolio/ and my Project 52 at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/projet-52/. You may also visit https://500px.com/p/BratPix?view=photos .
 
As I mentioned to RBIV, last week was filled-up with work and not much else. I'm thinking... a water reservoir of some sort. I like the 90 degree parabolic arc.
This is a spillway located in Laval next to a lock on the Mayenne River. It is used to maintain a constant water level between two locks.
 
That picture really captures the mood. Solitude and introspection. Also... Half Moon Bay. I was busy with work last week and didn't reply to the "Princeton" picture, but now, after some poking around on Google Maps... I see that "Princeton" (according to Google) is right there at Pillar Pont Harbor by the marina and airport? Were you out for a drive/visit or are you in the Half Moon Bay area on a regular basis? Looking at the map, via CA 92, it is not that far from from "The Bay" (only 6 miles from 280 as the bird flies) -- but it seems like it is a world away? :-)
Many thanks M5.

I do spend some time on the coast. We live in the San Mateo Highlands which is located near the 280 /92 interchange, near the Crystal Springs Lakes. During the mid week it is an easy drive (or ride) to get to HMB. I used to enjoy breakfasts at the 3Zero Cafe located in the little HMB airport, but it didn't survive COVID. I think it's still there, but it's not a real "greasy spoon" cafe like real small airports have, it's more like a McDonalds. Or so I'm told. I suppose I should check it out.

But, yes, we like being near the water, but not on the water, and I'm guessing your residence is pretty near water as well from several of the images you have posted.
 
As I mentioned to RBIV, last week was filled-up with work and not much else. I'm thinking... a water reservoir of some sort. I like the 90 degree parabolic arc.
This is a spillway located in Laval next to a lock on the Mayenne River. It is used to maintain a constant water level between two locks.
Looking at the map is always interesting. But of course being there is the best. I see THREE locks/spillways: Écluse Avesnières, Écluse Laval, and Écluse Bootz. Very interesting! Based on the shape of the spillway and the flow, my guess is that you were standing on the east side of the river in the park area (Quai de Bootz)? Also very interesting... a lot of history in Laval. A thousand years! I need to retire and do some exploring. :-)

 
I am a little late "this week" (my apologies). I took this last Monday (9/15) as I stopped on my way home from a business meeting. It is always good to have some "P52" motivation and it is fun to look back on the previous P52 images. Like a diary. A nice afternoon!

Terminal 5
Terminal 5
Am I mistaken, or is this another amazing lens?
Well... yes and no! :-) A long story and a long reply. I think it is a very good lens (although my copy is a little soft on the left side). I sent it to Nikon in Los Angeles a few years ago, for them to take a look and maybe adjust as needed, but it came back just the same. I really like the 80-400 zoom versatility and it is fairly portable (in my backpack, it fits in the same slot as the 70-200). This picture is 5 handheld vertical frames stitched (and then cropped quite a bit) with the "left side" being on the bottom (which helps with IQ in this instance). If there is some "fuzziness" in the overlap (i.e., landscape orientation with slight softness on the left side) things are not as sharp in some areas when the final composite is created. So, if I stitch with the 80-400, I typically do it in portrait mode. The slight wind and choppy water also helps... because stitching a water scene when the waves are slow/gentle is problematic. But even apart from the water, with these types of scenes, you have to "think" and "time it" to some extent. For example, the crane movements. In this picture, I got lucky with the "far" crane (call it number 3) whereby the cab and trolley/spreader (and the container/box) turned-out "pretty good" since there is always SOME movement and this element was captured in both frames 3 & 4. The stitching software (PTGui) did a fine job. However, you can see that the cab on crane #2 moved slightly (frames 1 & 2) which PTGui couldn't quite figure out. If you look at the 3 cabs, you can see that the middle one is elongated a bit. But I didn't notice until I had done a whole bunch of fiddling... so it is what it is. Still... credit to the software engineers! It is amazing and I am very appreciative. Sometimes, if PTGui is having trouble, I use ICE - and between the two programs, I usually end-up with something usable. The "tele-pano" approach was initially just a fun undertaking "for the heck of it" but it has grown on me and I like the creative challenge - capture and processing. It started when I had the D300 (12 MP) and another DPR poster that I interacted with back then got the D800 (in 2012). Well... OK! I'll just shoot 3 frames and stitch! Voila! 36 MP. :-) LOL. It was all in good fun. :-)
Amazing. Five vertical frames to get one horizontal. And it works! But, yes, I can see that it requires some skill and practice.

Sometimes i think my career at Ilford impacted my own photography. Having a pro-lab background when I joined Ilford I was mostly on the other end of the process, not taking pictures, but making sure that once the negatives were exposed, they were processed and printed well. While I called on the West Coast big names, I never tried to compete in picture taking, but I could hold my own in picture making.

Then, I got transferred into the press segment, and I called on all the major newspapers and "hung out" with several various press shooters. Some in the fine art community considered press shooters "hacks," but I found many who could work miracles from 35mm B/W and more and more came to love "snap shots" and good photo journalism.

Digital imaging just increased that desire. Modern DSLRs are point 'n shoot perfection. :-D Anyway, it's a great pastime, and it has been interesting to see how cell phones have impacted the discipline. I rarely take images with mine, but I've viewed some great images others have taken. Change..... I'll stop here. Thanks for reading.
 
As I mentioned to RBIV, last week was filled-up with work and not much else. I'm thinking... a water reservoir of some sort. I like the 90 degree parabolic arc.
This is a spillway located in Laval next to a lock on the Mayenne River. It is used to maintain a constant water level between two locks.
Looking at the map is always interesting. But of course being there is the best. I see THREE locks/spillways: Écluse Avesnières, Écluse Laval, and Écluse Bootz. Very interesting! Based on the shape of the spillway and the flow, my guess is that you were standing on the east side of the river in the park area (Quai de Bootz)? Also very interesting... a lot of history in Laval. A thousand years! I need to retire and do some exploring. :-)

https://www.google.com/maps/@48.066...try=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MDkxNy4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw==
You did more research than I did!. I guess this is Écluse Laval.
 
The straight pin is included for reference.

From an old cellphone.  DOF is razor thin.
From an old cellphone. DOF is razor thin.
 

Attachments

  • e6a568b23ab34108a3188e123a80befd.jpg
    e6a568b23ab34108a3188e123a80befd.jpg
    3.6 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
2bf6812eca9c4a109f5e107d90d0a020.jpg

This lighthouse was originally erected in 1881 and located in Wellfleet, on Cape Cod, Massachusetts as the Mayo Beach Lighthouse.

In 1925 it was disassembled and transported to the West Coast, eventually reassembled and located at Point Montara, south of San Francisco in 1928 where it remains.

It is believed to be the only Lighthouse to have served on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of America.
 
2bf6812eca9c4a109f5e107d90d0a020.jpg

This lighthouse was originally erected in 1881 and located in Wellfleet, on Cape Cod, Massachusetts as the Mayo Beach Lighthouse.

In 1925 it was disassembled and transported to the West Coast, eventually reassembled and located at Point Montara, south of San Francisco in 1928 where it remains.

It is believed to be the only Lighthouse to have served on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of America.
Nice picture, fascinating story and superb title.

--
Some of my work is at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/, including a portfolio at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/portfolio/ and my Project 52 at https://bratpix.wordpress.com/projet-52/. You may also visit https://500px.com/p/BratPix?view=photos .
 
Last edited:
2bf6812eca9c4a109f5e107d90d0a020.jpg

This lighthouse was originally erected in 1881 and located in Wellfleet, on Cape Cod, Massachusetts as the Mayo Beach Lighthouse.

In 1925 it was disassembled and transported to the West Coast, eventually reassembled and located at Point Montara, south of San Francisco in 1928 where it remains.

It is believed to be the only Lighthouse to have served on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of America.
Nice picture, fascinating story and superb title.
Many thanks BratPix for your comments, and occasional suggestions. As I was framing this, my mind kept saying, "don't tilt that camera too much or BP will suggest more attention to perspective control" These comments do help.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top