The REAL problem with the 300D is this.......

Most of the people who post on this forum don't know how to:

A.Take a decent photo
B. Use photoshop
C. Be patient and give there camera time so that they understand
how it works before they call it a bad camera.

Question: Why is this happening now?
Answer: The new Sony 828 is about to hit the shelves soon and is in
fact now on sale in Germany. Also the announcement of the new Nikon
has got people going also.

Whenever people hear about the new big things coming up they want
to have it and always think it will be better than what they
already have. They get sucked in to it. They are new big thing
junkies. Now they are saying that the Rebel doesn't have this or
that. I find this a challenge rather than a hinderance. Maybe some
people should have stayed with P&S.

It was hardly a secret. I bought the Rebel with my eyes wide open
and I have no qualms with what I got for my £786 in fact I am
delighted. The money I saved from not getting the 10D got me a
28-135IS and a 550EX speedlite.They more than compensate for
features that I find I don't need to get great photos.

It makes me laugh when people post on this forun as if they are a
pro and that they can't get away with the "crippled" Rebel. Pro's
don't use Rebels! How is it every review either the internet or
magazine has the Rebel as a clear winner in both photo quality and
price? The reason is because it is quite simply the best buy DSLR
in the world.

Will the Nikon be better?
Probably, but isn't that always the case? Aren't new computer
processors getting better all the time? By the time the Nikon comes
out the rebel will be old in technology terms so you would hope to
see improvements. Why not ask YOURSELF though, how can I improve as
a photographer. Take a look at yourself!

Just because new cams are coming out soon don't slag off the Rebel
. In fact take it out for the day and take some photos with it
until you know what you are doing with it. Try to see if you can
redefine the limits of the camera rather than blaming it for your
poor photos.

And finally! If you have nothing to say but negative gripes about
the Rebel don't bother posting them here. We don't want you.

Steve
Happy Rebel owner
 
if you don't like the evaluative meter, you can switch to partial
with the AEL button. is the 10D evaluative so inconsistant? I
have heard that it was much better than the 300D.
I believe with the 10D you can disconnect the metering from the focusing or as an alternative use center-weighted averaging in any mode, which makes the metering more predictable. I will study some of these features in detail when I get time.

--
Daniel
http://www.pbase.com/dvogel11
 
I doubt that the camera was designed to handle the expectations of
more demanding users. You do have to admit that compared to the
"average" targetted buyer of the DR, you're pretty far on the
proficient side.
but I have all my problems using the camera the same way point and shooters would. This camera is really not predictable in point and shoot mode, not even in Tv and Av mode.

For example, on issues like AI servo I believe
they weren't expecting novices to recompose much.
what? I think you should reconsider that one :) anyway, I hope you're wrong :)
As customers we can only vote with our dollars, and since the DR is
already selling like hotcakes it makes the likelihood of Canon
adding new features seem like wishful thinking. About the only
chance I see of Canon adding new features is if Nikon gets their
D70 out well before Canon gives us a "hardware upgrade" via a new
version of the DR, which probably means by the next PMA (which is
unlikely). I'm more optimistic about Canon fixing things like
being able to disable AI servo altogether though.
yes I have not much hope here either, but if they receive many complains...and I mean probably a lot, they might just fix somethign. Not much hope but if nobody try surely then there is 0% hope.
But since I own a DR just like you, I'd be just as happy as you
would be if they did add new features. :) I'm not holding my
breath about it, however.
no sure...you'de be dead before long. I am not holding my breath either...for now just trying to find work around. Not bad, since I started to visit this forum I have already found solution to 50% of my problem with good suggestions from people here, especialy Tom. Now I have to find work around the metering so that I can manage to take reliable exposure when it is needed fast.
--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
 
yeah..but since some people like comparing film with digital...lets be fair and compare price too.

I would not mind paying 300$ for a crippled camera...it is much more "ouch" for a 1000$ one.
 
Then you should either take a photography course, or go back to a
point and shoot. Digital SLR photography is something that does
take a little skill and practice.
say that to Canon:

http://www.canoneos.com/digitalrebel/operation/index.html

maybe you should do a course in marketing to see how this type of advertizing will affect people perception of the camera?
I may be an inexperienced whiner, but I beleive I would take a
greater % of good photos with a 10D and definitly more whith a 1Ds.
Don't be so sure. People often think that more expensive cameras
will give them better results.
one thing is sure..a better camera will not make a poor photopgraher great..but a better camera will be able to expose properly in Tv or Av mode. period.

so the subject or the composition might suck yes..but at least the poor photographer will have a properly exposed photo.

That was so in the film world, and
it is so in the digital world. I remember reading of people going
out and buying an F5 or F100 professional camera, and asking, "Why
are my pictures out of focus?" or "Why are my pictures too dark?"
That's because no matter how expensive and advanced a camera is, a
lot still depends on the photographer.

The best investment you can make is getting a good book on metering
or photography skills or take a good photography course.
I already did a photography course...done with a fully manual camera and with balck and white film mostly. that does not solve my problem with the inconsistant metering of the 300D.

The thing is I don't want to use it as a full manual camera..I want to use mainly Tv and Av. period. that camera is inconsistant in those mode.

--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
 
..that all of you talk too much in this tread about camera, not about photography and only make bigger server problems for Phil Askey !

Piggy
 
RATPhoto wrote:
hypnosteve wrote:
The screaming banshee is here now i've done it! Only joking.
Ca va
Steve
---- Yeah, she would be your worst nightmare, eh? Someone who can take
---- great pictures and still point out the flaws of the camera.
----
---- Yeah, she's complaining because of user error right?
You just lost what slight shred of credibility you might have had
right there.
--
Steve Mattan
http://www.stevem.smugmug.com
English is my first language and I still screw it up!
 
the balance is coming from the one end going too far already, as calling users crippled? it just hit the bottom and then now is the bouncing back :)

but he is wright. After you get pass the infatuation or "exitement" period...all those inconsistancies and limitationis really start to get on your nerves some how.

and it is omnipresent..it is everywhere. in all modes you have limitations. Even with manual you have limitation because you are still stuck with AI focus, unless you use manual exposure and manual focus..but then why pay so much money for a camera that can only work properly in full manual? in manual you only have center weighted metering..so you are still limited. it's like giving people wings but putting them in cages, so yes they can fly..from pole to pole.
 
maybe you should do a course in marketing to see how this type of
advertizing will affect people perception of the camera?
I don't know about you, but I find the 300D to be a very easy, enjoyable, effective camera. That's been my experience. Maybe your bitterness is getting in the way of your enjoyment?
I already did a photography course...done with a fully manual
camera and with balck and white film mostly. that does not solve
my problem with the inconsistant metering of the 300D.

The thing is I don't want to use it as a full manual camera..I want
to use mainly Tv and Av. period. that camera is inconsistant in
those mode.
Oh my goodness. Do you know how much exposure latitude black and white film has?!?! The negative can mask all kinds of exposure errors and sloppiness. The digital image can't! But you have much flexibility to work with the digital image in your digital darkroom. And that is one of the wonderful things about working with a DSLR. Don't expect exposure to be perfect. Just concentrate on fitting everything between the ends of the histogram. Under or over exposure within the ends of the histogram should be considered a perfectly adequate exposure with no lost information. We applied the same criteria when reading a negative or a slide. You should really do the same with the digital negative!

Let go of your passionate bitterness, and put all that energy into mastering metering and exposre and working with the digital negative. You will enjoy things much more.
 
If you can buy a better camera at a better price, do it!
you're right I cannot, for now..but I can complain about it..and I will.

That's
what competition is all about. But I think we are going to find it
difficult for other vendors to even MATCH the 300D's
performance/price package.
that we'll have to see.

The D70 is going to be just like the
300D. The problem, I think, is that buyers of such cameras don't
have enough experience, so they blame the camera.
here we go again..on what fact you base this comment? what exectly experience is needed...read this and you will get a better view of the situation here:

http://www.canoneos.com/digitalrebel/operation/index.html

enjoy!

They don't know
how to properly meter a scene, whether for flash or for ambient
exposure.
oh but then why put a Av mode or Tv mode if it cannot do the job right? Please tell me how should I use the Tv and Av mode to get a proper exposure?

They just expect the camera to do it perfectly for them.

duh..yes..that is why there are creative modes no? I would not have paid 1000$ for a camera that can only be used in manual mode.
The camera can only take a calculated guess, but it won't get it
right all the time.
some do a better job at it though. Never had a single probelm with my cheapo point and shoots.

The 300D probably has as good metering as most
film SLR cameras, but with film you didn't get to see the exposure
inconsistencies because it all gets ironed out by the processing
machine when you drop off your film at the lab. But try using
slide film, which has no exposure latitude, and you will see that
SLR cameras, even high end SLR cameras, are just as error prone as
the 300D.
well then that solve it...I was shooting mostly with slide films..never had a problem. Here is one of my vaforite with Velvia film and the Canon EOS rebel:



With digital film, you are basically seeing all the
exposure inconsistency that SLR cameras have always had, but you
never noticed it before. Put the image into Photoshop, and a minor
levels adjust is all you need.
I find the photos become quite noisy when you try to correct too much an underexposed photos..of course an overexposed photo is jut lost.

What was once done by the
processing machine with film, now you have to do on your own.
Understand that and you'll be fine. Good luck!
--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
 
What a bitter, sad person you are appearing to be! Everything is limitations and problems and crippling and can't-do-this-can't-do-that with you! You must be a wonderful person to be around! We are all enjoying your presence immensely. With all your "I see the world as bleak and grey" energy you are applying to this camera (and maybe other things as well), it's a wonder that you have time to take pictures at all. Enjoy your camera. Don't go into a hissy fit over every little detail. The there is tremendous flexibility in the digital negative that as long as you have recorded the detail within the range of the digital negative, it is quite simple to make adjustments later. Why do you think most high-end users of high-end DSLR cameras primarily shoot in RAW? Because it allows you the most flexibility to fix exposure errors that are common amongst even the most expensive DSLR cameras. I personally use JPEG's, but I have accumulated some fanstistic Photoshop Actions to make excellent adjustments to image exposure. Oh, and did I mention I use a 10D!
 
I don't know about you, but I find the 300D to be a very easy,
enjoyable, effective camera. That's been my experience. Maybe
your bitterness is getting in the way of your enjoyment?
oh I do enjoy it and I do like it 90% of the time. Well not now because it's broken, but eventualy we'll get it back.
The thing is I don't want to use it as a full manual camera..I want
to use mainly Tv and Av. period. that camera is inconsistant in
those mode.
Oh my goodness. Do you know how much exposure latitude black and
white film has?!?! The negative can mask all kinds of exposure
errors and sloppiness.
I would have seen it...we had our own lab at the school. other wise how can you learn anything? surely I had bad exposures, but I know it was my fault because I was deciding it..if the camera decide it..it is its fault.

The digital image can't! But you have much
flexibility to work with the digital image in your digital
darkroom.
no not really because once the highlight are blown out, they are gone. And a underexposed photo because quite noisy when lighten up.

And that is one of the wonderful things about working
with a DSLR. Don't expect exposure to be perfect.
I don't expect it to be perfect..I would accept a little range is miscalculation here and there..but not that type of inconsistancy, to the point where you simply cannot know what to expect. I have had many cameras, digital as well, but I could always get to know the camera and rely that it would behave a certain way all the time. now with the 300D, I can always rely on one thing..it is that I cannot rely on it.

Just
concentrate on fitting everything between the ends of the
histogram.
yes but that happens after you take the photo, then it's too late to correct anything for that photo. It does help for subsequent photos, as long as the lighting does not change and that you are using the manual mode..full manual mode. but with the 300D in Av mode what can you do if the meetering decide to underexposed, then you watch the histogram "damn..it is dark" you adjust the exposure compensation in + but then you take the next photo and "damn, it is overexposed"

It is just dependant on your focusing point. that is very much something I must pay attention too....much more than the histogram, before I take the photo.

Under or over exposure within the ends of the histogram
should be considered a perfectly adequate exposure with no lost
information.
I am not sure but is that accaptable then?

http://www.pbase.com/image/23374969

I tried to bring it back but it became so very much noisy.
Let go of your passionate bitterness, and put all that energy into
mastering metering and exposre and working with the digital
negative. You will enjoy things much more.
but I don't feel bitter at all...that is where most people make the mistake. I just talk about it, as I would talk about my car having break needed to be replaced...or the TV cable being too noisy..

--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
 
Most of the people who post on this forum don't know how to:

A.Take a decent photo
B. Use photoshop
C. Be patient and give there camera time so that they understand
how it works before they call it a bad camera.

Question: Why is this happening now?
Answer: The new Sony 828 is about to hit the shelves soon and is in
fact now on sale in Germany. Also the announcement of the new Nikon
has got people going also.

Whenever people hear about the new big things coming up they want
to have it and always think it will be better than what they
already have. They get sucked in to it. They are new big thing
junkies. Now they are saying that the Rebel doesn't have this or
that. I find this a challenge rather than a hinderance. Maybe some
people should have stayed with P&S.

It was hardly a secret. I bought the Rebel with my eyes wide open
and I have no qualms with what I got for my £786 in fact I am
delighted. The money I saved from not getting the 10D got me a
28-135IS and a 550EX speedlite.They more than compensate for
features that I find I don't need to get great photos.

It makes me laugh when people post on this forun as if they are a
pro and that they can't get away with the "crippled" Rebel. Pro's
don't use Rebels! How is it every review either the internet or
magazine has the Rebel as a clear winner in both photo quality and
price? The reason is because it is quite simply the best buy DSLR
in the world.

Will the Nikon be better?
Probably, but isn't that always the case? Aren't new computer
processors getting better all the time? By the time the Nikon comes
out the rebel will be old in technology terms so you would hope to
see improvements. Why not ask YOURSELF though, how can I improve as
a photographer. Take a look at yourself!

Just because new cams are coming out soon don't slag off the Rebel
. In fact take it out for the day and take some photos with it
until you know what you are doing with it. Try to see if you can
redefine the limits of the camera rather than blaming it for your
poor photos.

And finally! If you have nothing to say but negative gripes about
the Rebel don't bother posting them here. We don't want you.

Steve
Happy Rebel owner
 
Yes, balance Daniella. I know you have had some bad experiences with two bad cameras in a row. But frankly I think that has soured you beyond what is strictly rational about this camera.

This camera does have limitations. But honestly, it can still take very very good pictures.

I know I have gotten some really nice pictures in exactly the sorts of situations you complain about (like the AI-servo mess). Sure I would prefer it had fewer limitations. Who wouldn't if it could still come with the same price in the same size package.

But it still takes some very very good pictures.

Honestly I see the limitations as far less important than the QC issues (which you certainly have had abundant legitimate problems with).

I'm not a fan boy but neither am I blind to this cameras limitations and problems.

--
If you are a new user chances are good your question is answered in the FAQ at:
http://www.marius.org/eos300dfaq.php

For a small gallery of my photographs, see:
http://ratphoto.home.comcast.net/
See my profile for my equipment
 
yeah..but since some people like comparing film with digital...lets
be fair and compare price too.

I would not mind paying 300$ for a crippled camera...it is much
more "ouch" for a 1000$ one.
You're making the wrong comparisons. Here are how the digital cameras match up to their film equivalents:

Canon EOS 300V (Rebel Ti) = Canon EOS 300D (Digital Rebel)
Canon EOS 30 (Elan 7) = Canon EOS 10D
Canon EOS 1V = Canon 1D/1Ds

The EOS 300V (Rebel Ti) is a crippled version of the EOS 30 (Elan 7), just like the EOS 300D is a crippled version of the EOS 10D. Right now, you are all bent out of shape over this because you have no other entry-level, sub-$1000 DSLR cameras to compare the EOS 300D to. But if you compare the EOS 300V film camera to other entry-level film cameras in its class, you would realize that it's basically the same as other cameras in its class. As for the price difference between the 300V (Rebel Ti) and the 300D (Digital Rebel), rip out all the digital components, toss out the digital CMOS sensor, cut out the color LCD screen, toss the memory buffer, toss out the charger and its rechargable battery, downgrade the 1/200 flash sync down to 1/90, downgrade the 1/4000 shutter speed to 1/2000, and then you'll have a $200 300V.

If you think $900 (not $1000) is "ouch" for a 6mp DSLR camera, then I guess I can't interest you with Canon's $1500 6mp DSLR camera, which up until recently was the cheapest 6mp DSLR on the market. (The Nikon D100 was $1700, and only recently dropped to $1500. The newly introduced Pentax -IST D is also $1700.)
 
sure he got use to the limitations, because there are no such
limitations...this was taken with a Sony 717..got it? :)))))

I have to admit that the Sony 717 is a great camera....
Were you the Canon soldier a month ago whenever people saying 707 had some nice features that 300D didn't have?

What makes you change your mind so fast?
 
well that is because people like you obviously only see the negative things that I say and not the positive things.

I did post recently, monday, 2 threads with photos taken with the 300D..not mine but a borrowed one.. so not all my posts are negative. I also defend the 300D when I see things posted that are not true.

I see nothing bitter as to talk about problems..it is the only way to solve them. No complains in those posts..that was my last weekend trip. As you can see I do not always complain..and I do enjoy the camera. But I will not burry my head in the ground and not talk about problems.

Here are my 2 recent posts and my recent photos..here is my vaforite recent photo:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=6801281

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=6801081


What a bitter, sad person you are appearing to be! Everything is
limitations and problems and crippling and
can't-do-this-can't-do-that with you! You must be a wonderful
person to be around! We are all enjoying your presence immensely.
With all your "I see the world as bleak and grey" energy you are
applying to this camera (and maybe other things as well), it's a
wonder that you have time to take pictures at all.
that's how YOU see it..but not how I feel about it. I feel that when I complain about this, it is not bleak and grey energy, but somethign that will lead to something constructive at the end... that's our different perspective on it.

You are welcome to have your own thoughts..but don't try to think for me or say how I feel..I think I know much better than you what I think or how I feel.

Enjoy your
camera. Don't go into a hissy fit over every little detail.
no hissing fit..just reporting problems as I encounter them. will always do that BTW..so if you think that it is a waste of time for me to complain about the camera crippling because Canon will not listen to me...I can tell you that it is a major waste of time to complain about my complaining because I will not change that.

The
there is tremendous flexibility in the digital negative that as
long as you have recorded the detail within the range of the
digital negative, it is quite simple to make adjustments later.
Why do you think most high-end users of high-end DSLR cameras
primarily shoot in RAW? Because it allows you the most flexibility
to fix exposure errors that are common amongst even the most
expensive DSLR cameras. I personally use JPEG's, but I have
accumulated some fanstistic Photoshop Actions to make excellent
adjustments to image exposure. Oh, and did I mention I use a 10D!
ok lets trade then :) I will give you my wonderfull 300d and you give me your 10D, ok?

--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
 
sure..like I said, I like to tell the trut... if someone says somethign wrong about the 300d I will correct them..but I will not burry my head and ignore that problems. I call Canon soldiers the people who only want to hear the good things and always ignore the bad things.

I can recognize the good things in the camera, as well as the bad things. Some people have real problem with this. for me it is just another technical discussion..I don't see it as negative or positive..I only see it as a logical technical discussion...I don't have feelings about the camera...it is only a tool.
sure he got use to the limitations, because there are no such
limitations...this was taken with a Sony 717..got it? :)))))

I have to admit that the Sony 717 is a great camera....
Were you the Canon soldier a month ago whenever people saying 707
had some nice features that 300D didn't have?

What makes you change your mind so fast?
--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top