I don't know about you, but I find the 300D to be a very easy,
enjoyable, effective camera. That's been my experience. Maybe
your bitterness is getting in the way of your enjoyment?
oh I do enjoy it and I do like it 90% of the time. Well not now because it's broken, but eventualy we'll get it back.
The thing is I don't want to use it as a full manual camera..I want
to use mainly Tv and Av. period. that camera is inconsistant in
those mode.
Oh my goodness. Do you know how much exposure latitude black and
white film has?!?! The negative can mask all kinds of exposure
errors and sloppiness.
I would have seen it...we had our own lab at the school. other wise how can you learn anything? surely I had bad exposures, but I know it was my fault because I was deciding it..if the camera decide it..it is its fault.
The digital image can't! But you have much
flexibility to work with the digital image in your digital
darkroom.
no not really because once the highlight are blown out, they are gone. And a underexposed photo because quite noisy when lighten up.
And that is one of the wonderful things about working
with a DSLR. Don't expect exposure to be perfect.
I don't expect it to be perfect..I would accept a little range is miscalculation here and there..but not that type of inconsistancy, to the point where you simply cannot know what to expect. I have had many cameras, digital as well, but I could always get to know the camera and rely that it would behave a certain way all the time. now with the 300D, I can always rely on one thing..it is that I cannot rely on it.
Just
concentrate on fitting everything between the ends of the
histogram.
yes but that happens after you take the photo, then it's too late to correct anything for that photo. It does help for subsequent photos, as long as the lighting does not change and that you are using the manual mode..full manual mode. but with the 300D in Av mode what can you do if the meetering decide to underexposed, then you watch the histogram "damn..it is dark" you adjust the exposure compensation in + but then you take the next photo and "damn, it is overexposed"
It is just dependant on your focusing point. that is very much something I must pay attention too....much more than the histogram, before I take the photo.
Under or over exposure within the ends of the histogram
should be considered a perfectly adequate exposure with no lost
information.
I am not sure but is that accaptable then?
http://www.pbase.com/image/23374969
I tried to bring it back but it became so very much noisy.
Let go of your passionate bitterness, and put all that energy into
mastering metering and exposre and working with the digital
negative. You will enjoy things much more.
but I don't feel bitter at all...that is where most people make the mistake. I just talk about it, as I would talk about my car having break needed to be replaced...or the TV cable being too noisy..
--
I am not an English native speaker!
http://www.pbase.com/zylen
http://www.photosig.com/go/users/userphotos?id=26918