RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM.... will it ever happen?

thunder storm

Forum Pro
Messages
12,658
Solutions
7
Reaction score
5,952
I know no one has a crystal ball, but probably we could share some guesses somewhat based on reasoning and/or riming history on if an RF 85mm f/1.4 will ever happen, how much longer it will take, and if the result would be good enough to be worth the wait.

The RF mount has the stellar RF 85mm f/1.2 USM, but beside a high price it's not a very light weight lens, and the huge diameter makes it less convenient to handle.

The RF 85mm f/2.0 IS stm has very good IQ (f/2.2 is better than f/2.0 though), a nice magnification factor, stellar IS, a great contrast in back lit situations, next to no distortion, however, while an unspecified amount of users is satisfied with it's AF performance, another unspecified amount of (potential) users is not. The aperture to size (and even somewhat weigth-) ratio isn't great either. For smooth backgrounds it's not bad, but it's not the best either.

You can adapt the EF 85mm f/1.4 IS USM, which has a nice rendering and fast AF, however, on the adapter it's heavy for what it is, and the lens fringes up to f/4.0, which isn't a problem in some cases, but definitely is in other cases. The price for used copies is coming down a bit lately, however, it's still on the high side in my opinion.

While the Samyang RF 85mm f/1.4 quickly disappeared after it's release, we still haven't seen a compact fast focusing f/1.4 option with nice AF. To be fair: this lens struggled a little with AF accuracy with fast moving subjects, so it wasn't the perfect lens from that perspective either, although it still did a better job than the f/2.0 IS stm.

With the release of the new VCM lenses there's some hoping we will finally see the ideal 85mm f/1.4 VCM. Even the historical 50mm gap was finally closed by an option being useful for portraits and walk around purposes and chasing toddlers, all in one lens.

Will that happen for 85mm as well?

On the FE platform there are more options, but some gaps as well. There's no 85mm with an 0.5 times magnification for instance. There's a fast focusing 85mm GM mkII, but it's rendering is so so. The GM I has a very nice rendering, but sharpness wise and AF wise it's so so. The Sigma DN has very good IQ and weights only 560g, but sadly enough it's released with stm motors, while the following options for other focal lengths from that DN series got fast motors (VLD/VXD/whatever). It also has a huge amount of distortion, although that's not so much a problem for me in an 85mm lens.

All in all the FE situation for 85mm isn't ideal either. That said, there are some signs of 2 upcoming 85mm lenses from Viltrox, both an 85mm f/1.4 and an 85mm f/1.2. The f/1.4 version will be equipped with 2 AF motors that work beautifully in the LAB 35mm f/1.2 lens, any details on AF motors for the f/1.2 version are unknown at the time of writing this.

In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

With a kit based on the 50mm f/1.2 GM and the Tamron 35-150mm f/2.0-2.8 I could make the Canon R5 as a second body work with an RF 16-28mm f/2.8 and/or a 24mm f/1.8 IS stm.... but that's not enough. I need satisfying RF 85mm as well. For the RF f/1.2 L I'm not willing to pay a price like that if the AF isn't up to sporty tasks, the RF 85mm f/2.0 IS stm is probably too dark next to the Tamron zoom, as the Tamron does f/2.5 at 79mm and the RF IS stm needs to be at f/2.2 for best sharpness. The 105mm Art is nice but heavy. In the grand scheme of things I would actually prefer a Samyang 24mm f/1.8 over the RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm for some but not all aspects, but the stronger aspects of the Samyang are more important to me (sharpness in aps-c corners wide open, stopped down sharpness in full frame corners, compatibility with the flip up screen A7RV camera, and a considerably lower price). Comparing the 24mm VCM to the GM the GM is more affordable, weights less, and you can shoot it with distortion corrections turned off, allowing for sharper aps-c corners let alone full frame corners. Comparing the RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS stm to a Tamron 20-40mm f/2.8 the RF lens is almost double the price, will most likely give better stabilization, but I like the range of the Tamron 20-40mm in my kit better, and the Tamron weights less.

I'm not in a hurry to get my weight reduction replacing the 105mm f/1.4 Art with the ideal 85mm lens, the 28mm f/1.4 Art with a lower weight 24mm option and/or a wide angle f/2.8 zoom lens. But I do wonder why it takes Canon so long to come up with a great 85mm VCM option. The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.

A grey market A7CII is 1550 euro, and a grey market A7CR 2150 euro. At some point I quit waiting for the lens I need. Am I the only one? I think Canon should hurry up a bit with that 85mm VCM. What do you think?
 
Buy into a system that has the lenses you want not a system you hope they build the lens you want.
 
Buy into a system that has the lenses you want not a system you hope they build the lens you want.
I remember me buying the R, december 2019, owning the EF 35mm f/2.0 IS USM, EF 50mm f/1.4 Art and the 100mm f/2.8 macro. At that point, only 10 RF lenses where released.

It was fair to expect some other lenses being released as well, and that's what actually happened:
  • RF 24–105mm f/4–7.1 IS STM
  • RF 85mm f/2 MACRO IS STM — 0.5× maximum magnification
  • RF 100–500mm f/4.5–7.1 L IS USM
  • RF 600mm f/11 IS STM — fixed-aperture lens
  • RF 800mm f/11 IS STM — fixed-aperture lens
  • RF 50mm f/1.8 STM
  • RF 70–200mm f/4 L IS USM
  • RF 100mm f/2.8 L MACRO IS USM - 1.4× maximum magnification
  • RF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM
  • RF 600mm f/4 L IS USM
  • RF 14–35mm f/4 L IS USM
  • RF 16mm f/2.8 STM
  • RF 100–400mm f/5.6–8 IS USM
  • RF 5.2mm f/2.8 L Dual Fisheye
  • RF 800mm f/5.6 L IS USM
  • RF 1200mm f/8 L IS USM
  • RF-S 18–45mm f/4.5–6.3 IS STM
  • RF-S 18-150mm f/3.5–6.3 IS STM
  • RF 15–30mm f/4.5–6.3 IS STM
  • RF 24mm f/1.8 MACRO IS STM - 0.5×maximum magnification
  • RF 135mm f/1.8 L IS USM
  • RF 24–50mm f/4.5–6.3 IS STM
  • RF-S 55–210mm f/5.0–7.1 IS STM
  • RF 100–300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
  • RF 28mm f/2.8 STM
  • RF 10–20mm f/4 L IS STM
  • RF-S 10–18mm f/4.5–6.3 IS STM
  • RF 24–105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
  • RF 200–800mm f/6.3–9 IS USM
  • RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM
  • RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye
  • RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
  • RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Z
  • RF 24mm f/1.4L VCM
  • RF 50mm f/1.4L VCM
  • RF-S 7.8mm f/4 STM Dual
  • RF 16-28mm f/2.8 IS STM
  • RF 20mm f/1.4 L VCM
  • RF-S 14-30mm f/4-6.3 IS STM PZ
  • RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6
Looking at this list it's a bit strange there's still no portable fast focusing 85mm being faster than f/2.0. Or, when we leave out the focusing speed, an 85mm being faster than f/2.0 and weighting less than 1195g....

For the FE mount there's the Sigma 85mm f/1.4 DN at 630g, and the GM mkII is 642g, There's also a Samyang FE f/1.4 at 509g, which is 12g more than the RF f/2.0, while it is a full stop faster, and for those who are willing to trade some max aperture to get weight reduction Sony has an 85mm f/1.8 at only 371g, which 25% less weight, while it's still a faster lens.

I think it was reasonable in 2019 to expect an 85mm getting released within 3 years which was truly geared towards portraits and portability in stead of a lens being quite dark for a portrait focal length, more geared towards flowers and landscapes. It's a good landscape lens, it has a very minimal distortion (whereas some expensive more landscape focal length RF lenses have a lot of distortion), stellar IS which is nice for lenses being used stopped down, it has a great contrast, even in back lit situations.... but it's not geared so much toward portraits. I don't care if it's 500 or 600 or even 800g, but I think 1195g and 3500 euro as the only true portrait 85mm option is not what was reasonable to expect in 2019, when there where only 10 RF lenses released anyway.

Let's face it: For any mount there should be an 85mm available being faster than f/2.0 and weighting less than 1195g, and if that lens ever comes for the RF mount, it comes too late to the party. Canon has released a lot of lenses since 2019 being less important than such a basic need. The same is true for the late arrival of the 50mm VCM, however, that one at least came at some point, whereas it's still uncertain for that 85mm.
 
“Canon has released a lot of lenses since 2019 being less important than such a basic need”

That may be true for you but for lots of us an 85 of any speed is of no need.

Canon knows its customers base and what it sells the most of at the greatest profit. They obviously know that an 85 - 1.4 isn’t a big money maker or they would’ve made one.
 
“Canon has released a lot of lenses since 2019 being less important than such a basic need”

That may be true for you but for lots of us an 85 of any speed is of no need.

Canon knows its customers base and what it sells the most of at the greatest profit. They obviously know that an 85 - 1.4 isn’t a big money maker or they would’ve made one.
Quite. I really want a fast RF 100mm and can easily do without any of Canon's five fast 85mm lenses. Ok, the three EF ones have gone now, but so has the sole fast EF 100mm.
 
Last edited:
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.

It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard


even your 35-150 looks better at 35 than the tamy 20-40 at 35

if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard
corners isn't crazy important, it's more about aps-c corners.
of course
if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
yeah, but I don't want to bring a Sony for the 50GM + a Canon for the wide zoom and a second Sony for the 85mm DM. Three cameras is a bit much. Zo the wide zoom / 24mm and the 85mm should be at the same platform.
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard
corners isn't crazy important, it's more about aps-c corners.
of course
if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
yeah, but I don't want to bring a Sony for the 50GM + a Canon for the wide zoom and a second Sony for the 85mm DM. Three cameras is a bit much. Zo the wide zoom / 24mm and the 85mm should be at the same platform.
the classic two camera, two prime setup on the same platform is a 35 + 85. Many pros shoot with this combo

you have 61 mpxl so your 50 f1.2 is also like having a 75

since you have 50 f1.2 on 61 mpxl, I'd skip the 85

the other guideline for primes, is 50 mm apart and zoom with your feet

you have the 50 f1.2 and 105 f1.4 = 50 mm apart combo

zoom with your feet = less is more

4 lenses (two primes and two zooms) and two bodies: 16-28, 35-150, 50, 105 - but that is me, I don't like wide, ultra wide primes
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard
corners isn't crazy important, it's more about aps-c corners.
of course
if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
yeah, but I don't want to bring a Sony for the 50GM + a Canon for the wide zoom and a second Sony for the 85mm DM. Three cameras is a bit much. Zo the wide zoom / 24mm and the 85mm should be at the same platform.
the classic two camera, two prime setup on the same platform is a 35 + 85. Many pros shoot with this combo
Yes, but I don't like 35mm so much. So it has to be 24/28+50+85mm. If I desperately would need to go with 2 lenses I would go 28-45mm f/1.8 + 85mm f/1.4,
you have 61 mpxl so your 50 f1.2 is also like having a 75
That's too drastic. I'm not shooting a 61Mp sensor to drop to 26Mp. I think it's o.k. to do mild crops (28mm from 24mm for instance) but I don't want to overdo it.
since you have 50 f1.2 on 61 mpxl, I'd skip the 85
Sometimes I want the compression of 85mm. Not a whole lot of shots generally, just a few.
the other guideline for primes, is 50 mm apart and zoom with your feet
That's what I like about shooting 50mm over 35mm: it forces you to step back.
you have the 50 f1.2 and 105 f1.4 = 50 mm apart combo

zoom with your feet = less is more

4 lenses (two primes and two zooms) and two bodies: 16-28, 35-150, 50, 105 - but that is me, I don't like wide, ultra wide primes
I want to end up with two bodies + 24+50+85mm for primes, and 35-150mm as a zoom as the basic kit. I might add the Viltrox 16mm sometimes. I will still use the 105mm Art sometimes, but that's outside of the basic kit. Just 3 primes and one zoom. A Tamron 20-40mm or a Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 could somewhat replace the 24mm prime, some give and take for aperture vs range there. But I'm leaning towards a 24mm prime.
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard
corners isn't crazy important, it's more about aps-c corners.
of course
if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
yeah, but I don't want to bring a Sony for the 50GM + a Canon for the wide zoom and a second Sony for the 85mm DM. Three cameras is a bit much. Zo the wide zoom / 24mm and the 85mm should be at the same platform.
the classic two camera, two prime setup on the same platform is a 35 + 85. Many pros shoot with this combo
Yes, but I don't like 35mm so much. So it has to be 24/28+50+85mm. If I desperately would need to go with 2 lenses I would go 28-45mm f/1.8 + 85mm f/1.4,
you have 61 mpxl so your 50 f1.2 is also like having a 75
That's too drastic. I'm not shooting a 61Mp sensor to drop to 26Mp. I think it's o.k. to do mild crops (28mm from 24mm for instance) but I don't want to overdo it.
since you have 50 f1.2 on 61 mpxl, I'd skip the 85
Sometimes I want the compression of 85mm. Not a whole lot of shots generally, just a few.
the other guideline for primes, is 50 mm apart and zoom with your feet
That's what I like about shooting 50mm over 35mm: it forces you to step back.
you have the 50 f1.2 and 105 f1.4 = 50 mm apart combo

zoom with your feet = less is more

4 lenses (two primes and two zooms) and two bodies: 16-28, 35-150, 50, 105 - but that is me, I don't like wide, ultra wide primes
I want to end up with two bodies + 24+50+85mm for primes, and 35-150mm as a zoom as the basic kit. I might add the Viltrox 16mm sometimes. I will still use the 105mm Art sometimes, but that's outside of the basic kit. Just 3 primes and one zoom. A Tamron 20-40mm or a Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 could somewhat replace the 24mm prime, some give and take for aperture vs range there. But I'm leaning towards a 24mm prime.
After seeing the 20-40 in comparison to the 16 - 28, I wouldn't buy the 20-40

if your adapter works with the 105, no reason to stay with Canon imo, unless you get the 16-28 imo
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard
corners isn't crazy important, it's more about aps-c corners.
of course
if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
yeah, but I don't want to bring a Sony for the 50GM + a Canon for the wide zoom and a second Sony for the 85mm DM. Three cameras is a bit much. Zo the wide zoom / 24mm and the 85mm should be at the same platform.
the classic two camera, two prime setup on the same platform is a 35 + 85. Many pros shoot with this combo
Yes, but I don't like 35mm so much. So it has to be 24/28+50+85mm. If I desperately would need to go with 2 lenses I would go 28-45mm f/1.8 + 85mm f/1.4,
you have 61 mpxl so your 50 f1.2 is also like having a 75
That's too drastic. I'm not shooting a 61Mp sensor to drop to 26Mp. I think it's o.k. to do mild crops (28mm from 24mm for instance) but I don't want to overdo it.
since you have 50 f1.2 on 61 mpxl, I'd skip the 85
Sometimes I want the compression of 85mm. Not a whole lot of shots generally, just a few.
the other guideline for primes, is 50 mm apart and zoom with your feet
That's what I like about shooting 50mm over 35mm: it forces you to step back.
you have the 50 f1.2 and 105 f1.4 = 50 mm apart combo

zoom with your feet = less is more

4 lenses (two primes and two zooms) and two bodies: 16-28, 35-150, 50, 105 - but that is me, I don't like wide, ultra wide primes
I want to end up with two bodies + 24+50+85mm for primes, and 35-150mm as a zoom as the basic kit. I might add the Viltrox 16mm sometimes. I will still use the 105mm Art sometimes, but that's outside of the basic kit. Just 3 primes and one zoom. A Tamron 20-40mm or a Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 could somewhat replace the 24mm prime, some give and take for aperture vs range there. But I'm leaning towards a 24mm prime.
After seeing the 20-40 in comparison to the 16 - 28, I wouldn't buy the 20-40
Well, it depends. Wide open it's good up to 24mm. It's also usable up to 40mm, just not wide open.
if your adapter works with the 105, no reason to stay with Canon imo, unless you get the 16-28 imo
Resale value of the R5 will be around 2000 euro. At that price I keep it.

The irony of the 105mm f/1.4 Art: it's so heavy even the 40mm Art can be used to get some weight reduction. I can shoot the 40mm Art on the R5 in the middle, and switch between 24GM and 85mm DN on the Sony. Disadvantage: You can't use the 24GM next to the Tamron 35-150mm.

Compared to that RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm + 85mm f/1.4 VCM would be ideal, as with that setup you can combine both 35-150mm and 50mm with 24mm, and I don't have to buy another Sony body.
 
The first VCM prime was released just one year ago, almost exactly. In that time, Canon has released 4 VCM primes (and a bunch of other lenses). I'd say that's a pretty fast pace of release. I would say there's no need to despair just yet. Maybe if it hasn't happened in another couple of years, we can start asking "will it ever happen?", but right now I'd say patience is warranted. I have two of the VCMs, the 24 and 50. Both are superb. I'm definitely happy to wait for an 85 VCM.
 
In Canon land there's still a total silence on an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM release. Canon is rushing out a 35,50,24 and even 20mm VCM in no time, and if they would have released that 50mm some years earlier my second body would have been a Canon too in stead of a Sony, but it is what it is now.

The prioritizing is.... weird imo. So weird it makes me wonder if we will see an 85mm VCM at all. It's a bit like the situation after the release of the EF 24+28+35mm IS USM lenses.... everyone was expecting a sharp wide open 50mm IS USM lens, but it simply never happened. The Sigma 50mm Art was the first lens being sharp at wider apertures, and it's actually IBIS that is stabilizing 50mm primes up today, still not ILIS.
My guess is, they'll let RF 85 F1.2 run its course
Yes, of course. And it works. The price of used RF 50mm f/1.2 L lenses dropped since the release of the 50mm VCM. If Canon would have released that 50mm VCM earlier they would have sold less f/1.2 lenses....
and the 1.4 VCM may never happen, or if it does happen, it would be many years down the roadmap. It took until November 2017 to release the EF 85 F1.4 IS and even then it was flawed with fringing.
Yeah, there's a serious risk it won't happen, and if it happens it might be too late or not good enough or both.
It took until September 2018 to develop the great m32 f1.4.

They'll not cannibalize their own stuff and they have the IP to protect from 3rd party

the tamy 20-40 and the 61 mp A7CR sound great to go with your other best in class stuff!
I think I prioritize a 24mm prime over the 20-40mm, either the Samyang 24mm f/1.8 or the GM (and that won't be an easy decision). The Tamron has soft aps-c corners wide open at 28mm and longer. I think I prefer a sharp wide open 24mm prime.

I don't need the weight reduction very urgently. It can be just before summer 2026, but it can also be even later.

Buying an RF 85mm f/1.4 VCM + RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm would be the best solution economically, but that 85mm VCM should appear in time.
hmm, now that you mention it, the tamy 20-40 looks soft in corners and the canon RF 16-28 looks superior in this regard
corners isn't crazy important, it's more about aps-c corners.
of course
if it were me, and I like zooms better than primes at these wider focal lengths, the RF 16-28 is a winner, I need to add to my bucket list
yeah, but I don't want to bring a Sony for the 50GM + a Canon for the wide zoom and a second Sony for the 85mm DM. Three cameras is a bit much. Zo the wide zoom / 24mm and the 85mm should be at the same platform.
the classic two camera, two prime setup on the same platform is a 35 + 85. Many pros shoot with this combo
Yes, but I don't like 35mm so much. So it has to be 24/28+50+85mm. If I desperately would need to go with 2 lenses I would go 28-45mm f/1.8 + 85mm f/1.4,
you have 61 mpxl so your 50 f1.2 is also like having a 75
That's too drastic. I'm not shooting a 61Mp sensor to drop to 26Mp. I think it's o.k. to do mild crops (28mm from 24mm for instance) but I don't want to overdo it.
since you have 50 f1.2 on 61 mpxl, I'd skip the 85
Sometimes I want the compression of 85mm. Not a whole lot of shots generally, just a few.
the other guideline for primes, is 50 mm apart and zoom with your feet
That's what I like about shooting 50mm over 35mm: it forces you to step back.
you have the 50 f1.2 and 105 f1.4 = 50 mm apart combo

zoom with your feet = less is more

4 lenses (two primes and two zooms) and two bodies: 16-28, 35-150, 50, 105 - but that is me, I don't like wide, ultra wide primes
I want to end up with two bodies + 24+50+85mm for primes, and 35-150mm as a zoom as the basic kit. I might add the Viltrox 16mm sometimes. I will still use the 105mm Art sometimes, but that's outside of the basic kit. Just 3 primes and one zoom. A Tamron 20-40mm or a Canon RF 16-28mm f/2.8 could somewhat replace the 24mm prime, some give and take for aperture vs range there. But I'm leaning towards a 24mm prime.
After seeing the 20-40 in comparison to the 16 - 28, I wouldn't buy the 20-40
Well, it depends. Wide open it's good up to 24mm. It's also usable up to 40mm, just not wide open.
if your adapter works with the 105, no reason to stay with Canon imo, unless you get the 16-28 imo
Resale value of the R5 will be around 2000 euro. At that price I keep it.
it is still a great body
The irony of the 105mm f/1.4 Art: it's so heavy even the 40mm Art can be used to get some weight reduction.
:)
I can shoot the 40mm Art on the R5 in the middle, and switch between 24GM and 85mm DN on the Sony. Disadvantage: You can't use the 24GM next to the Tamron 35-150mm.
got it
Compared to that RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm + 85mm f/1.4 VCM would be ideal, as with that setup you can combine both 35-150mm and 50mm with 24mm, and I don't have to buy another Sony body.
got it - be patient, that VCM will be expensive though, if it happens
 
The first VCM prime was released just one year ago, almost exactly. In that time, Canon has released 4 VCM primes (and a bunch of other lenses). I'd say that's a pretty fast pace of release.
Fair point.
I would say there's no need to despair just yet.
Given the speed of VCM releases an 85mm VCM should happen within 12 months, if Canon is planning to do that lens.
Maybe if it hasn't happened in another couple of years, we can start asking "will it ever happen?", but right now I'd say patience is warranted. I have two of the VCMs, the 24 and 50. Both are superb.
I like the 50mm VCM. The fast AF is promising. I have been thinking to go 50 VCM in the middle on the R5 and 24mm GM and Sigma DN on the Sony, but I'm not willing to part with the 50mm f/1.2 GM.
I'm definitely happy to wait for an 85 VCM.
For me it matters if a lens arrives when your kid is 7, 12 or 17. When the kids plan their own holidays all I need is two slow zooms and a tripod. I need my fast portrait primes before my R5 is outdated, and before I'm outdated. I have the 105mm Art for best rendering and the 630g Sigma FE 85mm f/1.4 DN as a compact option to get me over, but I think it's about time Canon comes up with their own 700g f/1.4 85mm. I'm shooting RF for 5 years now. There where 10 lenses released when I got the R. Now there are 59 lenses released. 49 more lenses, no fast portable 85mm.

I think that's weird.
 
Compared to that RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm + 85mm f/1.4 VCM would be ideal, as with that setup you can combine both 35-150mm and 50mm with 24mm, and I don't have to buy another Sony body.
got it - be patient, that VCM will be expensive though, if it happens
But worth it, as it will most likely pair fast AF to great IQ, and it saves me the purchase of another Sony body. A7CR is nice, but the R5 is more complete of course with a better viewfinder, full mechanical shutter, 1/8000th max shutter speed.

I'm used to the ergonomics of the M50 + Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 Art, so A7CR + Tamron 35-150mm will be doable as well, however, the R5 has better ergonomics of course. The R5 and the A7RV are for me equal when it comes to ergonomics, but with the A7CR the compactness and lower price are not a free lunch of course.
 
Compared to that RF 24mm f/1.8 IS stm + 85mm f/1.4 VCM would be ideal, as with that setup you can combine both 35-150mm and 50mm with 24mm, and I don't have to buy another Sony body.
got it - be patient, that VCM will be expensive though, if it happens
But worth it, as it will most likely pair fast AF to great IQ, and it saves me the purchase of another Sony body. A7CR is nice,
I'm jealous I don't have a 61 mp light weight travel camera

I'm jealous I don't have a great 50 f1.2
but the R5 is more complete of course with a better viewfinder, full mechanical shutter, 1/8000th max shutter speed.
a 61 mp travel camera with your great 50 f1.2 would be a special great
I'm used to the ergonomics of the M50 + Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 Art, so A7CR + Tamron 35-150mm will be doable as well, however, the R5 has better ergonomics of course. The R5 and the A7RV are for me equal when it comes to ergonomics, but with the A7CR the compactness and lower price are not a free lunch of course.
with all the options available to you I'd probably afix for the most part the 50 f1.2 to the A7CR
 
The first VCM prime was released just one year ago, almost exactly. In that time, Canon has released 4 VCM primes (and a bunch of other lenses). I'd say that's a pretty fast pace of release.
Fair point.
I would say there's no need to despair just yet.
Given the speed of VCM releases an 85mm VCM should happen within 12 months, if Canon is planning to do that lens.
Maybe if it hasn't happened in another couple of years, we can start asking "will it ever happen?", but right now I'd say patience is warranted. I have two of the VCMs, the 24 and 50. Both are superb.
I like the 50mm VCM. The fast AF is promising. I have been thinking to go 50 VCM in the middle on the R5 and 24mm GM and Sigma DN on the Sony, but I'm not willing to part with the 50mm f/1.2 GM.
I'm definitely happy to wait for an 85 VCM.
For me it matters if a lens arrives when your kid is 7, 12 or 17. When the kids plan their own holidays all I need is two slow zooms and a tripod. I need my fast portrait primes before my R5 is outdated, and before I'm outdated. I have the 105mm Art for best rendering and the 630g Sigma FE 85mm f/1.4 DN as a compact option to get me over, but I think it's about time Canon comes up with their own 700g f/1.4 85mm. I'm shooting RF for 5 years now. There where 10 lenses released when I got the R. Now there are 59 lenses released. 49 more lenses, no fast portable 85mm.

I think that's weird.
Different people have different priorities. You can't cater to everyone all the time. If they'd already released an 85 VCM, which would have been a third (or fourth, depending on how you count) 85mm, there would have been someone else complaining that it was weird that Canon released 3 (or 4) 85s, before releasing the lens they wanted.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top