Jan van't Veld
Well-known member
[No message]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes! This is a great combo IMO.The 8-25/4 Pro is one of my favorite MFT lenses. Very useful focal length for travel landscape and even street photography. I often travel with the 8-25, the 40-150/4 pro and one or two fast primes. Covers most bases
I have a similar setup and use case as you, except no 12-200.The 8-25 has a near perfect range, great for street, landscape and travel.
Is it my most used lens? No, that would be the 12-200, which completely replaced the 12-40. But when I don't need that much reach, the 8-25 wins out.
I still have the smaller lens, might keep it w my E-M5 and 14-150 when I want to travel really light.
I don't have the 8-25 but it looks like a terrific lens. I have had the 12-40 f2.8 for a decade and I love it. While 12mm isn't wide enough all the time, when I need to go wider I just turn the camera into portrait and fire off three shots and stitch them later into a panorama. That's using the same lens as an ultra wide.I debated about getting that combo for the longest time. This would also make an amazing kit.Forgot. Often the 8-25 and 45-150 f4.
greg

This is a perfect example of using a quality piece of glass properly and with imagination, and I would add that it's relatively distortion free.. the bonus being, if you use HUGIN, the open source panoramic stitching app available for Linux, Windoze and Mac.... then it is also FREE!I don't have the 8-25 but it looks like a terrific lens. I have had the 12-40 f2.8 for a decade and I love it. While 12mm isn't wide enough all the time, when I need to go wider I just turn the camera into portrait and fire off three shots and stitch them later into a panorama. That's using the same lens as an ultra wide.I debated about getting that combo for the longest time. This would also make an amazing kit.Forgot. Often the 8-25 and 45-150 f4.
greg
![]()
Spoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!
I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't have a "problem" per se. I think it's a perfectly fine design "compromise" for this kind of lens where compactness while stored is desired. It just hasn't become second nature to me at this point. Maybe if I was bouncing between the 8-25/4 and 40-150/4 it would have sunk in better, but I don't have that one (yet).I’m curious what it is that people find problematic about collapsing designs. I tend to extend it once at the beginning of use and only collapse it when it’s put back in the bag. As I have the camera on a sling strap I only put it away at the end of a session or if I change lenses. I guess it could be a pain if the camera is constantly in and out of a bag.I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
![]()
It is just habit once you used the lens for a spell. Though I don't have the 8-25mm yetI’m curious what it is that people find problematic about collapsing designs. I tend to extend it once at the beginning of use and only collapse it when it’s put back in the bag. As I have the camera on a sling strap I only put it away at the end of a session or if I change lenses. I guess it could be a pain if the camera is constantly in and out of a bag.I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
![]()
For me, primarily as an extra step most noticeable when trying to start up a camera quickly to get a fleeting shot. The menu doesn't display until the lens is unparked.I’m curious what it is that people find problematic about collapsing designs. I tend to extend it once at the beginning of use and only collapse it when it’s put back in the bag. As I have the camera on a sling strap I only put it away at the end of a session or if I change lenses. I guess it could be a pain if the camera is constantly in and out of a bag.I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, I wish they didn't "block" access to the UI (almost) entirely. It makes it harder to put the camera into WiFi mode, for example (you can work around this by going into the menus, but I'm not really used to doing that). If you're just double-checking your shot settings, you'd have to click "Info" to get there. I wish the UI was still "overlaid" with the "Lens is not extended" message in the background.For me, primarily as an extra step most noticeable when trying to start up a camera quickly to get a fleeting shot. The menu doesn't display until the lens is unparked.I’m curious what it is that people find problematic about collapsing designs. I tend to extend it once at the beginning of use and only collapse it when it’s put back in the bag. As I have the camera on a sling strap I only put it away at the end of a session or if I change lenses. I guess it could be a pain if the camera is constantly in and out of a bag.I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
![]()
Personally I don't have to collapse it when I put it in the bag, so I only do it when I'm not gonna use the camera for a while, and when I just store it.Yeah, I wish they didn't "block" access to the UI (almost) entirely. It makes it harder to put the camera into WiFi mode, for example (you can work around this by going into the menus, but I'm not really used to doing that). If you're just double-checking your shot settings, you'd have to click "Info" to get there. I wish the UI was still "overlaid" with the "Lens is not extended" message in the background.For me, primarily as an extra step most noticeable when trying to start up a camera quickly to get a fleeting shot. The menu doesn't display until the lens is unparked.I’m curious what it is that people find problematic about collapsing designs. I tend to extend it once at the beginning of use and only collapse it when it’s put back in the bag. As I have the camera on a sling strap I only put it away at the end of a session or if I change lenses. I guess it could be a pain if the camera is constantly in and out of a bag.I think the problem for me is that I don't use it on a regular basis. I generally only use it while traveling or hiking, which I'm not doing much of these days, sadly.I didn't think I would but I did get used to it after a whileSpoiler Alert: You never get used to it (at least, I haven't).Once you get used to the "uncollapsing" required before you can use it (same as the 40-150 f/4), you'll love it!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I remember the first time I rented the 40-150 f/2.8 and accidentally had the focus ring pulled back (MF mode). I'd have LOVED an overlay saying "focus ring is in manual mode" back then!I wish the UI was still "overlaid" with the "Lens is not extended" message in the background.![]()
I have both as well, and go one step further and say it’s actually better optically in at least one way - the 8-25/4 exhibits way less ghosting, which is super important for me since I primarily use this kind of lens outdoors, often with the sun either in the photo or close to it.I have the 7-14 that I purchased when it came out, after the release of the 8-25, I waited almost a year, but the advantages of the lens, lighter, smaller and filter compatible, it was almost a no-brainer once I'd saved the cash. Optically, I think it is as good as the 7-14.