Nice review of Powershot V1

I do have a camera with a larger sensor with an EVF , a bunch of lenses and some bells and whistles I will never use to compliment my compact camera. I have never photographed with a phone or ever owned a phone so I can't comment on phone photography beyond noting that phones are LED only and I don't want or need one.
 
Yes it is a nice review -but - it is a nice review for a camera without an EVF
I like that.
filmed in a location where there is no sunshine. Years ago I bought an sx230 and I really love the camera -but living in a very bright and sunny environment, I knew I would never buy another LED only camera again.
It' is impossible to make a camera that is liked by everyone.
One would think that camera makers would strive to offer features that make cameras stand out from phones.
They do.
 
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
There is no need for a lens cap - when the camera is off, the lens automatically retreats back and the glass is covered with a shutter. In other words, when the camera is off, the glass lens is not exposed - it is capped automatically.
Like other cameras with this system, it's nowhere near as effective as a lens cap.
 
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

1. Weather sealing, and how much that is compromised by the vent system

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
it's a good thing canon doesnt take your feedback, lens cap would be dumb for this camera.
Yeah of course. It'd be "dumb" to want a lens cap for a £1000 travel camera. Those little flimsy curtains that never fold back when taking in and out of a pocket, and never break, are just perfect.
 
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
There is no need for a lens cap - when the camera is off, the lens automatically retreats back and the glass is covered with a shutter. In other words, when the camera is off, the glass lens is not exposed - it is capped automatically.
Like other cameras with this system, it's nowhere near as effective as a lens cap.
I have had more than 10 cameras with that kind of automatic lens protection and never had a problem with any of them. I think I will take another chance. 😅😄

--
- M4M
“I ain't afraid of no noise.”
 
Last edited:
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
There is no need for a lens cap - when the camera is off, the lens automatically retreats back and the glass is covered with a shutter. In other words, when the camera is off, the glass lens is not exposed - it is capped automatically.
Like other cameras with this system, it's nowhere near as effective as a lens cap.
I have had more than 10 cameras with that kind of automatic lens protection and never had a problem with any of them. I think I will take a chance with one more. 😅
I can understand on cheaper (and smaller) point and shoots but not so much on this - which is an up market compact camera.

It's probably not a hill to die on but, again, when trying to think about this camera from a practical perspective, its main strength is portability and versatility. It's not a studio camera. You're going to be using in different environments, pulling it in and out of pockets. That's how dirt/dust gets in the lens, the curtains catch and so on. Accidentally turning the camera on when in a pocket extends the lens, opens the curtains, and potentially scratches the lens.

Ofc you didn't say this but I'm amazed anyone could call it "dumb" to at least query this decision. My preference would be for a lens cap on this sort of camera, like the G1Xiii. An acceptable workaround would be a third party attachment so, as I say, it's not a major issue.
 
Last edited:
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
There is no need for a lens cap - when the camera is off, the lens automatically retreats back and the glass is covered with a shutter. In other words, when the camera is off, the glass lens is not exposed - it is capped automatically.
Like other cameras with this system, it's nowhere near as effective as a lens cap.
I have had more than 10 cameras with that kind of automatic lens protection and never had a problem with any of them. I think I will take a chance with one more. 😅
I can understand on cheaper (and smaller) point and shoots but not so much on this - which is an up market compact camera.

It's probably not a hill to die on but, again, when trying to think about this camera from a practical perspective, its main strength is portability and versatility. It's not a studio camera. You're going to be using in different environments, pulling it in and out of pockets. That's how dirt/dust gets in the lens, the curtains catch and so on. Accidentally turning the camera on when in a pocket extends the lens, opens the curtains, and potentially scratches the lens.

Ofc you didn't say this but I'm amazed anyone could call it "dumb" to at least query this decision. My preference would be for a lens cap on this sort of camera, like the G1Xiii. An acceptable workaround would be a third party attachment so, as I say, it's not a major issue.
G5 x II was not much cheaper.
Btw. "Kaiser" makes push-on lens caps in many different sizes. Maybe one will fit this camera. 😉

--
- M4M
“I ain't afraid of no noise.”
 
Last edited:
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
There is no need for a lens cap - when the camera is off, the lens automatically retreats back and the glass is covered with a shutter. In other words, when the camera is off, the glass lens is not exposed - it is capped automatically.
Like other cameras with this system, it's nowhere near as effective as a lens cap.
I have had more than 10 cameras with that kind of automatic lens protection and never had a problem with any of them. I think I will take a chance with one more. 😅
I can understand on cheaper (and smaller) point and shoots but not so much on this - which is an up market compact camera.

It's probably not a hill to die on but, again, when trying to think about this camera from a practical perspective, its main strength is portability and versatility. It's not a studio camera. You're going to be using in different environments, pulling it in and out of pockets. That's how dirt/dust gets in the lens, the curtains catch and so on. Accidentally turning the camera on when in a pocket extends the lens, opens the curtains, and potentially scratches the lens.

Ofc you didn't say this but I'm amazed anyone could call it "dumb" to at least query this decision. My preference would be for a lens cap on this sort of camera, like the G1Xiii. An acceptable workaround would be a third party attachment so, as I say, it's not a major issue.
G5 x II was not much cheaper.
Btw. "Kaiser" makes push-on lens caps in many different sizes. Maybe one will fit this camera. 😉
Yeah, but the top of the line G1Xiii (I presume V1 = G1 in the V line?) was the most expensive and did have a lens cap.

I say this having had this kind of problem with the G7Xiii (and now G5Xii) as a pocket camera. I think it's probably fine as the third party option is there for those who want it.
 
Last edited:
I would certainly use the camera if I had acquired it somehow, but I certainly would not buy it, especially at the $900.00 + tax price tag. I just don't believe it's a good value at that price. I suppose if i was all freaked out because of the recent scare that canon was killing power shot compacts , it might influence my rational thinking and I may consider it a bargain as a collector of relic powershots.
 
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
There is no need for a lens cap - when the camera is off, the lens automatically retreats back and the glass is covered with a shutter. In other words, when the camera is off, the glass lens is not exposed - it is capped automatically.
Like other cameras with this system, it's nowhere near as effective as a lens cap.
I have had more than 10 cameras with that kind of automatic lens protection and never had a problem with any of them. I think I will take a chance with one more. 😅
I can understand on cheaper (and smaller) point and shoots but not so much on this - which is an up market compact camera.

It's probably not a hill to die on but, again, when trying to think about this camera from a practical perspective, its main strength is portability and versatility. It's not a studio camera. You're going to be using in different environments, pulling it in and out of pockets. That's how dirt/dust gets in the lens, the curtains catch and so on. Accidentally turning the camera on when in a pocket extends the lens, opens the curtains, and potentially scratches the lens.

Ofc you didn't say this but I'm amazed anyone could call it "dumb" to at least query this decision. My preference would be for a lens cap on this sort of camera, like the G1Xiii. An acceptable workaround would be a third party attachment so, as I say, it's not a major issue.
G5 x II was not much cheaper.
Btw. "Kaiser" makes push-on lens caps in many different sizes. Maybe one will fit this camera. 😉
Yeah, but the top of the line G1Xiii (I presume V1 = G1 in the V line?) was the most expensive and did have a lens cap.
And there was also a lot of complains about that lens cap.
I say this having had this kind of problem with the G7Xiii (and now G5Xii) as a pocket camera. I think it's probably fine as the third party option is there for those who want it.
 
I would certainly use the camera if I had acquired it somehow, but I certainly would not buy it, especially at the $900.00 + tax price tag. I just don't believe it's a good value at that price. I suppose if i was all freaked out because of the recent scare that canon was killing power shot compacts , it might influence my rational thinking and I may consider it a bargain as a collector of relic powershots.
It's up to you if you want to buy it or not. 😉

I did not buy the G1 X Mark III because of the EVF hump. I waited (forever) for a version without an EVF, but that never happened. But now the V1 sounds perfect for me. The only thing I miss is a tilt screen (like the G7 X III).
 
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

1. Weather sealing, and how much that is compromised by the vent system

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
it's a good thing canon doesnt take your feedback, lens cap would be dumb for this camera.
Yeah of course. It'd be "dumb" to want a lens cap for a £1000 travel camera. Those little flimsy curtains that never fold back when taking in and out of a pocket, and never break, are just perfect.
I have been using small cameras with folding lens curtains and no lens cap for over ten years (Sony RX100's, Canon G's). I have never had an issue. Could you cite even one instance where something went wrong that a lens cap would have solved? Not, of course, that that one instance would represent the actual importance of the problem.

Not needing a lens cap is one of the nice features of these cameras - caps get lost, they are an added annoying step in shooting (take them off), and they can come off in some instances when the lens is actually stressed.

Btw, my father shot with a rangefinder film camera, and took lots of shots with the cap on. I am not a fan of lens caps.
 
Last edited:
I'd be interested to know about two practical aspects.

1. Weather sealing, and how much that is compromised by the vent system

2. Why no lens cap given extra size compared to smaller Gx series? I wouldn't want to use this camera for travel without an optional lens cap.
it's a good thing canon doesnt take your feedback, lens cap would be dumb for this camera.
Yeah of course. It'd be "dumb" to want a lens cap for a £1000 travel camera. Those little flimsy curtains that never fold back when taking in and out of a pocket, and never break, are just perfect.
I have been using small cameras with folding lens curtains and no lens cap for over ten years (Sony RX100's, Canon G's). I have never had an issue. Could you cite even one instance where something went wrong that a lens cap would have solved?
Yes, of course. I already have.
Not needing a lens cap is one of the nice features of these cameras - caps get lost, they are an added annoying step in shooting (take them off), and they can come off in some instances when the lens is actually stressed.

Btw, my father shot with a rangefinder film camera, and took lots of shots with the cap on. I am not a fan of lens caps.
 
Although my sx230 is always in a protective case, I managed to accidentally bend one of the protective blades in a bike fall. It became jammed but I was able to straighten the bent blade out with an xacto blade and a very small set needle nose pliers. I think this may be quite common with people that actually use the camera a lot.
 
Canon has removed the astrophotography features from the SCN mode.

No more:

Star Portrait

c185b1d488ae40f681048c3038d1c561_G0179887.gif


Star Nightscape

a56beca3606e4365bf6ac3fb412607f6_G0163837.gif


Star Trails

03bf3a8a37014f01a4fe39acf913b14e_G0163835.gif


Star Time-Lapse Movie

a41c42d11cd147f080e32921e5857c4e_G0179592.gif


 
Last edited:
WHAT? OMG! I have to cancel my pre-order right away. 😂

--
- M4M
“I ain't afraid of no noise.”
 
Last edited:
WHAT? OMG! I have to cancel my pre-order right away. 😂
The sarcasm is baffling.

Once again, this is an all-in-one camera. Fewer features = bad.
 
WHAT? OMG! I have to cancel my pre-order right away. 😂
The sarcasm is baffling.

Once again, this is an all-in-one camera. Fewer features = bad.
Fewer? That depends on what you compare to.

Also many added features = good.

--
- M4M
“I ain't afraid of no noise.”
 
Last edited:
WHAT? OMG! I have to cancel my pre-order right away. 😂
The sarcasm is baffling.

Once again, this is an all-in-one camera. Fewer features = bad.
Fewer? That depends on what you compare to.
Yes, fewer. By not including the astro SCN modes, Canon has given the V1 fewer desirable features than it could've reasonably had as an all-in-one camera.

The comparison is obvious btw: Powershot cameras that had these features.

Whatever the reason, removing auto features that existed on the G7Xiii and G5xii screams "crppl hammer".

Again, looking at this as a social media machine, the ability to have a readymade star trail JPEG or 4K astro timelapse is a great option re: time/effort vs. result.

AFAIK, the above is not something a smartphone can do. The auto astro SCN modes were also much quicker and easier than creating a timelapse or star trail photo through post processing. It's the sort of feature a beginner really appreciates. It also hurts the V1 as a travel and holiday camera where the option is either phone or phone + small/pocket camera. People travel to see the northern lights, or may want to take an opportunistic photo or video of a dark sky scene. Those auto astro modes were ideal for letting the camera take care of those scenarios (far harder to nail focus and everything else on a small camera without an EVF or manual focus ring).

It may be a small feature but it's still worth mentioning. Why exclude it?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top