Why does OM1II lose focus during BIF sequences? FW Update?

SteveNunez

Senior Member
Messages
1,101
Reaction score
636
Location
Delray Beach, FL, US
Hey everyone,

I've noticed that the OM-1 II struggles with maintaining focus during bursts of birds in flight, often losing focus mid-sequence and producing blurry frames. Given that this camera is popular among nature photographers, why hasn't OM System improved the 'subject detection' tracking for birds in flight? This issue is well known but doesn't get much attention on YouTube, yet it’s a major frustration for OM-1 II users.

The OM-1 is often praised for its speed and autofocus, but it's incredibly frustrating to see it lose focus mid-burst, only to reacquire it a few frames later—making it unpredictable. I've attached a screenshot showing only 3 frames in focus in this particular set.

At this point, I’m on the verge of giving up on the OM-1 II and the OM 150-600mm. I simply can't get full sequences in focus. This isn’t user error—the focus jumps from sharp to soft at SH2, 20FPS, resulting in nearly as many throwaway shots as keepers.

Hoping for a firmware update to make the OM-1 the best it can be!



2b50ce54e87a4340803236a355c62415.jpg



--

Steve Nunez~South Florida Artist
www.stevenunez.com
OM System OM1II
 
On p. 90 of the manual for OM-1i, FW 1.7, it does say that face and eye detection are turned off when in a subject detection mode. Presumably that refers to the legacy process that is separate from the AI-based subject detection. Notably, on p. 91 it describes how you have the option to turn on or off an eye detection box when in subject detection mode. It also says that the OM-1i will select the eye of a bird (or animal) if it detects the eye. Enabling or disabling the displayed eye detection box seems to make no difference, the algorithm tries to select an eye if it can whether or not the box is shown.

In any case, it is frustrating when focus seems to be unreliable.
BUT, the OP is not asking about the OM-1 I
 
Hey everyone,

I've noticed that the OM-1 II struggles with maintaining focus during bursts of birds in flight, often losing focus mid-sequence and producing blurry frames. Given that this camera is popular among nature photographers, why hasn't OM System improved the 'subject detection' tracking for birds in flight? This issue is well known but doesn't get much attention on YouTube, yet it’s a major frustration for OM-1 II users.

The OM-1 is often praised for its speed and autofocus, but it's incredibly frustrating to see it lose focus mid-burst, only to reacquire it a few frames later—making it unpredictable. I've attached a screenshot showing only 3 frames in focus in this particular set.

At this point, I’m on the verge of giving up on the OM-1 II and the OM 150-600mm. I simply can't get full sequences in focus. This isn’t user error—the focus jumps from sharp to soft at SH2, 20FPS, resulting in nearly as many throwaway shots as keepers.

Hoping for a firmware update to make the OM-1 the best it can be!

2b50ce54e87a4340803236a355c62415.jpg
Do you have eye detect selected as well as bird subject ?

Using 20fps, SH2, I find that if the bird turns its head then I lose eye detect and also lose focus. It seems the tracking doesn't automatically revert to bird subject.
For model ii I think there’s no separate eye detect toggle. Have I missed it?
I have an OM-1 II, and have both selected.

See SCP for subject detection, select birds.
and see menu AF, page 2, scroll down to eye detection.
I don't know about the OM1.2, but for the OM-1.1, Eye Detection is automatically set to OFF when Subject Detection (eg Birds, Cars, etc) is engaged. Page 90 of OM-1.1 manual.

Mike
The OP specifically asked about OM-1 II.

Tracking for the OM-1 II is different from the OM-1 I.

Eye detection frame can be switched on/off independent of subject selected.
I quoted the menu item in my post above.
I have the eye detection frame for my camera (OM-1 II) set to "on" because "more is better", however I'm pretty sure the setting refers only to the display of the frame and not to any change in the focus algorithm.



9d82850dbb934904bf7c8de7080b895d.jpg.png



--

Sherm

Sherms flickr page

P950 album

P900 album RX10iv album
OM1.2 150-600 album
 
On p. 90 of the manual for OM-1i, FW 1.7, it does say that face and eye detection are turned off when in a subject detection mode. Presumably that refers to the legacy process that is separate from the AI-based subject detection. Notably, on p. 91 it describes how you have the option to turn on or off an eye detection box when in subject detection mode. It also says that the OM-1i will select the eye of a bird (or animal) if it detects the eye. Enabling or disabling the displayed eye detection box seems to make no difference, the algorithm tries to select an eye if it can whether or not the box is shown.

In any case, it is frustrating when focus seems to be unreliable.
BUT, the OP is not asking about the OM-1 I
I was replying to Mikero, not the OP. Aside from the human subject detection feature, do you know if the AF performance of the OM-1ii is any different from the OM-1i with FW 1.7?
 
I’m using the PL100-400 with my OM-1 II. If I select all 1052 focus points active, I rarely have an issue with OOF throughout the sequence even with bursts of 50 or more images. With less than all focus points selected I have more problems. Also , if I don’t get the initial green box confirming focus lock at the very beginning… all is lost.
 
Hey everyone,

I've noticed that the OM-1 II struggles with maintaining focus during bursts of birds in flight, often losing focus mid-sequence and producing blurry frames. Given that this camera is popular among nature photographers, why hasn't OM System improved the 'subject detection' tracking for birds in flight? This issue is well known but doesn't get much attention on YouTube, yet it’s a major frustration for OM-1 II users.

The OM-1 is often praised for its speed and autofocus, but it's incredibly frustrating to see it lose focus mid-burst, only to reacquire it a few frames later—making it unpredictable. I've attached a screenshot showing only 3 frames in focus in this particular set.

At this point, I’m on the verge of giving up on the OM-1 II and the OM 150-600mm. I simply can't get full sequences in focus. This isn’t user error—the focus jumps from sharp to soft at SH2, 20FPS, resulting in nearly as many throwaway shots as keepers.

Hoping for a firmware update to make the OM-1 the best it can be!

2b50ce54e87a4340803236a355c62415.jpg
Do you have eye detect selected as well as bird subject ?

Using 20fps, SH2, I find that if the bird turns its head then I lose eye detect and also lose focus. It seems the tracking doesn't automatically revert to bird subject.
For model ii I think there’s no separate eye detect toggle. Have I missed it?
I have an OM-1 II, and have both selected.

See SCP for subject detection, select birds.
and see menu AF, page 2, scroll down to eye detection.
I don't know about the OM1.2, but for the OM-1.1, Eye Detection is automatically set to OFF when Subject Detection (eg Birds, Cars, etc) is engaged. Page 90 of OM-1.1 manual.

Mike
The OP specifically asked about OM-1 II.

Tracking for the OM-1 II is different from the OM-1 I.

Eye detection frame can be switched on/off independent of subject selected.
I quoted the menu item in my post above.
I have the eye detection frame for my camera (OM-1 II) set to "on" because "more is better", however I'm pretty sure the setting refers only to the display of the frame and not to any change in the focus algorithm.

9d82850dbb934904bf7c8de7080b895d.jpg.png


Thank you, you are correct, I was misguided.

It's all just a bit confusing especially for a beginner.
 
On p. 90 of the manual for OM-1i, FW 1.7, it does say that face and eye detection are turned off when in a subject detection mode. Presumably that refers to the legacy process that is separate from the AI-based subject detection. Notably, on p. 91 it describes how you have the option to turn on or off an eye detection box when in subject detection mode. It also says that the OM-1i will select the eye of a bird (or animal) if it detects the eye. Enabling or disabling the displayed eye detection box seems to make no difference, the algorithm tries to select an eye if it can whether or not the box is shown.

In any case, it is frustrating when focus seems to be unreliable.
BUT, the OP is not asking about the OM-1 I
I was replying to Mikero, not the OP. Aside from the human subject detection feature, do you know if the AF performance of the OM-1ii is any different from the OM-1i with FW 1.7?
I don't know anything for sure.

There are so many variables, and I keep getting confused. I don't think there is any one answer for every subject.
 
No camera tracks 100percent. I find it varies with light conditions but is usually only 2-3 frames out of focus before refocus. Shooting at 25fps seldom do I not get a good shot so I don't see it as a problem. For me speed of acquisition is much more important and my OM1 shines here.
 
I’m using the PL100-400 with my OM-1 II. If I select all 1052 focus points active, I rarely have an issue with OOF throughout the sequence even with bursts of 50 or more images. With less than all focus points selected I have more problems. Also , if I don’t get the initial green box confirming focus lock at the very beginning… all is lost.
Agreed.

I am finding all focus points preferable for my Oly 100-400mm, and also my Oly 75/1.8.
 
I’m using the PL100-400 with my OM-1 II. If I select all 1052 focus points active, I rarely have an issue with OOF throughout the sequence even with bursts of 50 or more images. With less than all focus points selected I have more problems. Also , if I don’t get the initial green box confirming focus lock at the very beginning… all is lost.
Agreed.

I am finding all focus points preferable for my Oly 100-400mm, and also my Oly 75/1.8.
I think there are two parts to the process

a. The focus area for the initial focus acquisition

b. The focus area for subsequent shots in the burst - That can be set to either the initial focus area or the full sensor, based on the menu entry AF2/C-AF. That seems to be the equivalent of a Tracking on/off toggle.

Currently, I use Mid or Large for the initial area, and Full Sensor for the subsequent area.

--

Sherm

Sherms flickr page

P950 album

P900 album RX10iv album
OM1.2 150-600 album
 
My recommendations.. use IS-2 (vertical IS only), set the camera to shot even if not in focus, focus sensitivity to the default (0) position
Yes, Release Priority set to ON is the default when C-AF is selected, and what I would choose. Why change OMDS's recommendation?

I believe I read somewhere (but I can't say for sure) that with Release Priority set to OFF (where it will check focus) that only applies to the first frame in a burst. So it wouldn't help stop odd frames in a burst being out of focus.

I've not found sensitivity makes much difference when using Subject Detection, so I leave it set to zero.

Mike
Release Priority set to OFF works only for the first frame in SH2 mode but works for all images in normal burst mode. I do however keep it set to ON for both modes and setting it to OFF will not help if the camera is focusing on something other than the target. It could be more useful for a single bird with a sky background.

--
drj3
 
Last edited:
Steve,

One more thought. The autofocus works just fine with a picture of a bird. I found it very useful to stand a framed bird picture on a table and see how the initial and subsequent captures worked with various backgrounds as I moved the camera around while shooting.

--

Sherm

Sherms flickr page

P950 album

P900 album RX10iv album
OM1.2 150-600 album
 
Hi Steve,

Seems like there are some good suggestions in the comments to explore. I will just add some examples from outings with the OM1mkII where I saved JPG's in long bursts then walked through them frame by frame to watch what the camera is actually doing during a burst sequence. Generally speaking subjects up against a busy background will make the camera work harder trying to separate feathers from foliage at 25-50fps.

First example was at 300mm which is just too short for these flight patterns. The heat coming off the rocks was causing a lot of atmospheric riffles as well.





Second example was 800mm on a cloudy day which presents its own challenge keeping shutter speed high. Birds were large and low.





Third example was 800mm as well. Very small, very fast bird.





I realize all of these are shot with TC's so native bare lens would probably do better. This experience is pretty normal for me and I am happy with the results. I also have a R5 and A1 but much prefer the OM1's for birds and wildlife.

Be sure and report back if anything helps or worsens the problem. Good luck!
 
Great tip! I am going to play with this after done posting.
 
You’re all amazing—thank you so much for the responses! I’ll take my time going through the comments and adjust the settings as suggested. I hope this thread can help others experiencing similar issues. I really appreciate the feedback—thanks again- happy shooting everyone.
 
...I also have a R5 and A1 but much prefer the OM1's for birds and wildlife.
Please explain why you prefer the OM-1's.
 
I too would like to know why someone would choose an OM1ii over an A1, R5 or Z8? I’m aware of the size/heft penalties of using full frame but the benefits are very compelling: please tell!
 
I too would like to know why someone would choose an OM1ii over an A1, R5 or Z8? I’m aware of the size/heft penalties of using full frame but the benefits are very compelling: please tell!
In the course of choosing to go with the OM1m2 a few months ago I came across these. I did want the Pro-capture feature, which Oly has had for years.

https://mcaughtry.photo/om1-vs-r5-a1-and-z8-comparison/

https://mcaughtry.photo/om1-for-birds-in-flight-better-than-the-a9/

https://smallsensorphotography.com/m-zuiko-150-600-hands-on-review

and this one, which was not so positive

https://www.mu-43.com/threads/om1-m...-worst-a-real-field-experience-report.123107/

--

Sherm
Sherms flickr page

P950 album

P900 album RX10iv album
OM1.2 150-600 album
 
Last edited:
I too would like to know why someone would choose an OM1ii over an A1, R5 or Z8? I’m aware of the size/heft penalties of using full frame but the benefits are very compelling: please tell!

--
Steve Nunez~South Florida Artist
www.stevenunez.com
OM System OM1II
Versus the Z8/Z9:
  • Faster focus acquisition (might be related to lower f stop of the M43 lens versus full frame equivalent)
  • Pre-capture raw
  • Low minimum focus distance of the 150-400: The best photos are often opportunistic ones when the birds get really close
  • PF lenses are temperamental--they lose contrast with light in the frame, so I personally think of them as lighter lenses for when you already have good lighting
  • Lighter lenses allow better panning; I was dead the one day I tried panning the whole day on the 800 PF
  • ISO advantage mitigated by IBIS
If you're shooting in Florida, herons and ibises are pretty damn big and slow. I think even my old Fuji XT4 would have been fine.

A lot of my list is premised on the expensive 150-400. If you're using the 150-600, you could use the same lens on a Sony body and have more cropping latitude. Maybe a 100-400 for the boardwalks where the birds are so tame they land three feet in front of you, and a Sigma 500mm for the osprey flying high in the air. Technically you could use a Panasonic body too, but the S1RII looks to have a very small buffer.



Some of the birds in Florida are so tame and used to humans you can probably use manual focus
Some of the birds in Florida are so tame and used to humans you can probably use manual focus



Will be very different than trying to shoot a warbler that might land on a branch nearby you and fly away in under two seconds
Will be very different than trying to shoot a warbler that might land on a branch nearby you and fly away in under two seconds



--
 
I too would like to know why someone would choose an OM1ii over an A1, R5 or Z8? I’m aware of the size/heft penalties of using full frame but the benefits are very compelling: please tell!
 
I’m using the PL100-400 with my OM-1 II. If I select all 1052 focus points active, I rarely have an issue with OOF throughout the sequence even with bursts of 50 or more images. With less than all focus points selected I have more problems. Also , if I don’t get the initial green box confirming focus lock at the very beginning… all is lost.
Agreed.

I am finding all focus points preferable for my Oly 100-400mm, and also my Oly 75/1.8.
I think there are two parts to the process

a. The focus area for the initial focus acquisition

b. The focus area for subsequent shots in the burst - That can be set to either the initial focus area or the full sensor, based on the menu entry AF2/C-AF. That seems to be the equivalent of a Tracking on/off toggle.

Currently, I use Mid or Large for the initial area, and Full Sensor for the subsequent area.
As an OM1 Mk1 user, I am lost with your suggestion above. Can you explain, or is it something extra on Mkii?

thanks

tom
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top