madecov
Veteran Member
Nikon Rumors says it's to be announced tomorrow.
Im really really tempted.
Im really really tempted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I might if it's $900. But I'd probably want to try one first before committing to one (i would only get this as I don't shoot a bunch of portraits and for cost reasons, as I can't justify $2500 for the Plena given my use case).Nikon Rumors says it's to be announced tomorrow.
Im really really tempted.
im sticking with the Plena. If you want something cheap at the 135 focal range the Sigma has always been out at a much lesser cost than that of the Plena.Nikon Rumors says it's to be announced tomorrow.
Im really really tempted.
dustinabbott.net

Are the F-mount Sigmas (such as their 135) compatible with the Z system?im sticking with the Plena. If you want something cheap at the 135 focal range the Sigma has always been out at a much lesser cost than that of the Plena.Nikon Rumors says it's to be announced tomorrow.
Im really really tempted.
After using the Plena, its definitely worth the price tag. Its a lens i will own for a very long time.
Dustin has just released his Z mount version review.The Dustin Abbot deep dive review of the Sony mount version of the lens looks excellent
https://dustinabbott.net/2024/11/viltrox-lab-135mm-f1-8-vcm-review/
Weight seems to be it's only issue , it is the heaviest of the modern 135mm F/1.8 lenses
![]()
Yes, with the FTZ II. This thread caused me to put my Sigma 135 ART on my Zf yesterday. It was a pleasure to see the excellent images resulting. The lens is heavy.Are the F-mount Sigmas (such as their 135) compatible with the Z system?im sticking with the Plena. If you want something cheap at the 135 focal range the Sigma has always been out at a much lesser cost than that of the Plena.Nikon Rumors says it's to be announced tomorrow.
Im really really tempted.
After using the Plena, its definitely worth the price tag. Its a lens i will own for a very long time.
Roughly 1300g is probably fine, as i don't think you'd be able to attach a collar anyway. I mean people sling a 70-200 2.8 from their Z8 and other Z cameras without too much issue (or really, none that I've seen) and those are in the 1450g range.I liked my Sigma 135mm DG HSM Art but it was heavy. I would not use the Viltrox on my Z8 without a tripod collar.
Are the F-mount Sigmas (such as their 135) compatible with the Z system?im sticking with the Plena. If you want something cheap at the 135 focal range the Sigma has always been out at a much lesser cost than that of the Plena.Nikon Rumors says it's to be announced tomorrow.
Im really really tempted.
After using the Plena, its definitely worth the price tag. Its a lens i will own for a very long time.
Christopher Frost also just posted his a few minutes ago:The Dustin Abbot deep dive review of the Sony mount version of the lens looks excellent
https://dustinabbott.net/2024/11/viltrox-lab-135mm-f1-8-vcm-review/
Weight seems to be it's only issue , it is the heaviest of the modern 135mm F/1.8 lenses
![]()
The Dustin Abbot deep dive review of the Sony mount version of the lens looks excellent
https://dustinabbott.net/2024/11/viltrox-lab-135mm-f1-8-vcm-review/
Weight seems to be it's only issue , it is the heaviest of the modern 135mm F/1.8 lenses
![]()