Considering 20-70 + 70-200 G Duo for Landscapes

Which also makes me thing about the tamron 50-300mm f/4.5-6.3 even slower lens but more reach and actually lighter. Could be interesting combined with the 24-50 I already have
I cannot speak highly enough about the 50-300. It is not a perfect lens - and it is harder to use than the Sony 100-400 for fast moving subjects where quick and responsive AF is critical (birds) - but I use it for street and landscapes constantly and it never disappoints; and it is amazing to have such versatility at such a small size. My go everywhere kit is the 20-70G and 50-300; and I use these way more than the 16-35 GM II, 24-70 GM II and 100-400 GM I also own.

Photos taken with the 20-70G here: https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjABJaK

Photos taken with the 50-300 here: https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjBARi1
 
I got the GM2 as I generally get the best equipment however for events I have preferred the tamron 35-150 a white lens is a fist in the eye
So people might mug you in the event?

Have you considered using a skin on the lens? Maybe her a Pentax lens cap? I shoot Pentax as well as Sony, but lets be honest people hardly know the brand anymore.
The tamron lenses work well in combination and give me 20-150 at f2.8. Sony doesn’t have the wider angle covered and the 24-70 70-200 are both bulkier

not a problem on a landscape trip but harder when you need to seize the moment
My response was strictly about the white lens fist in the face. I’m not surprised a 35-150 is a good lens for events.
The white lens design is the one of the absolute worst thing in Sony, don’t know why Sony absolutely had to copy Canon… one of the things I liked back in my Nikon days, were the good old black lenses that didn’t brighten up in the landscape.
I've never used them, but aren't skins an easy solution? They seem easier to take off than to apply, and they would hide all the white, just a matter of taking some time when applying them...
Yes they sorta do but only the internal ones, but add cost and weight
https://alphagvrd.com/products/sony...oss-ii-ver-2-lens-skin?variant=40098104639626

it does not hide all the white all the buttons remain white the situation improves a little

£59 and you need to be careful applying it. I have seen people putting camo on their 200-600 for example
Which is what I indirectly referred too
I would have thought that negatively impacts the second hand price as well. I’ve certainly seen lenses that have had that done and wouldn’t touch them.


On this business of skinning, I've just skinned my 70-200mm GMII. Why?

1. My primary work is movie set stills. I wear black, my cameras are black and that's all because the golden rule is not to distract the actors during takes.

2. A white lens goes against all that ethos, as I discussed with an actor recently.

3. So, I bit the bullet and spent $50 on a skin set.

4. I'm not the most patient person, so I invested 1 hour applying it. The result is it's a micrometer out here and there. But to get it perfect would have taken a LOT longer than 1 hour.

5. Now it's done, I have a lens that is more inconspicuous. I suppose it would protect the lens somewhat too in the loner term.

6. I live in the UK, so heat thermals are not an issue. 25 Celsius literally makes the news twice a year !!!!

7. If I come to sell the lens I can remove the skin. The underlying lens should look like new.



0cf8d33824d04a548cfca50e839e4bb2.jpg
 
Not going to lie, I would buy that lens decked out like that. That looks proper...
I applied the skin on 70-200 G II (due to its retractable design), not as good as but close :-) I used the Lenscoat for 70-200 GM II however. It's really for protection not for hiding white as I really have not experienced any issues in the past. But I admit I am not a street photog so only go to tourist areas that have no issue with usualy highest security.



70-200 G II
70-200 G II



70-200 GM II
70-200 GM II



--
 
Not going to lie, I would buy that lens decked out like that. That looks proper...
I applied the skin on 70-200 G II (due to its retractable design), not as good as but close :-) I used the Lenscoat for 70-200 GM II however. It's really for protection not for hiding white as I really have not experienced any issues in the past. But I admit I am not a street photog so only go to tourist areas that have no issue with usualy highest security.

70-200 G II
70-200 G II

70-200 GM II
70-200 GM II

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55485085@N04/albums

The problem is mainly for people working in the streets and tourists wandering off the beaten track, who take it to lightly, or who is caught unaware, so It can happen in places like Paris or Rome, let’s not forget the naive US YouTuber who where relived of all his camera gear on a local train.

So it happens in tourist places as well, it tend to happen especially for the naive and unaware tourists who isn’t used to navigate the place they are in, having visible gear make you a far more likely target … these people will follow you, even take a train or place an air tag on you… I always put my camera in a bag never hanging from my shoulders, because its not uncommon seeing them being snatched, being followed for km, placing a map over it if you placed it on a coffee table in front of you…

Americans are forgetting that europe there countries that are very rich and some that are the opposite, with open borders between those it creates this particular issue in tourist spots, they are especially targeting Americans… police also won’t do a thing about it…

But yeah wrapping it up also for protection is always a good idea, although I used white lenses in tourist places in Europe, the worst places I typically prefer less expensive looking glass or wrap it up at the bare minimum.



The security in tourist areas in Europe is close to nonexistent compared to basically everywhere else
 
Not going to lie, I would buy that lens decked out like that. That looks proper...
I applied the skin on 70-200 G II (due to its retractable design), not as good as but close :-) I used the Lenscoat for 70-200 GM II however. It's really for protection not for hiding white as I really have not experienced any issues in the past. But I admit I am not a street photog so only go to tourist areas that have no issue with usualy highest security.

70-200 G II
70-200 G II

70-200 GM II
70-200 GM II
The problem is mainly for people working in the streets and tourists wandering off the beaten track, who take it to lightly, or who is caught unaware, so It can happen in places like Paris or Rome, let’s not forget the naive US YouTuber who where relived of all his camera gear on a local train.

So it happens in tourist places as well, it tend to happen especially for the naive and unaware tourists who isn’t used to navigate the place they are in, having visible gear make you a far more likely target … these people will follow you, even take a train or place an air tag on you… I always put my camera in a bag never hanging from my shoulders, because its not uncommon seeing them being snatched, being followed for km, placing a map over it if you placed it on a coffee table in front of you…

Americans are forgetting that europe there countries that are very rich and some that are the opposite, with open borders between those it creates this particular issue in tourist spots, they are especially targeting Americans… police also won’t do a thing about it…

But yeah wrapping it up also for protection is always a good idea, although I used white lenses in tourist places in Europe, the worst places I typically prefer less expensive looking glass or wrap it up at the bare minimum.

The security in tourist areas in Europe is close to nonexistent compared to basically everywhere else
Thanks for your advise. Trust me as I have heard enough such incidents or even worse in US and some EU cities :-) Depend on in which area really. In Lisbon, Portugal (or almost entire country where I have visited many places) where I live now, I feel very safe to be honest, almost as in Iceland or Switzerland. But certainly I cannot assume such in Rome, Milan, Paris etc. I was in very preemptively defensive alert mode when I took photos in Manhattan for example in last several years. I always look around and didn't let any suspicious persons even closing to me that is the key. As I said in the other threads, I even resort to jump to the street when I saw suspicious someone approaching me on the pavements :-) I assumed I'd be attacked in those places. I wrapped camera bag in my leg when I'm eating in restaurant. I only wrap camera on my neck or cross shoulder. Although I am getting old now, I am still moving fast and pretty nimble :-)

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55485085@N04/albums
 
Last edited:
Not going to lie, I would buy that lens decked out like that. That looks proper...
I applied the skin on 70-200 G II (due to its retractable design), not as good as but close :-) I used the Lenscoat for 70-200 GM II however. It's really for protection not for hiding white as I really have not experienced any issues in the past. But I admit I am not a street photog so only go to tourist areas that have no issue with usualy highest security.

70-200 G II
70-200 G II

70-200 GM II
70-200 GM II
The problem is mainly for people working in the streets and tourists wandering off the beaten track, who take it to lightly, or who is caught unaware, so It can happen in places like Paris or Rome, let’s not forget the naive US YouTuber who where relived of all his camera gear on a local train.

So it happens in tourist places as well, it tend to happen especially for the naive and unaware tourists who isn’t used to navigate the place they are in, having visible gear make you a far more likely target … these people will follow you, even take a train or place an air tag on you… I always put my camera in a bag never hanging from my shoulders, because its not uncommon seeing them being snatched, being followed for km, placing a map over it if you placed it on a coffee table in front of you…

Americans are forgetting that europe there countries that are very rich and some that are the opposite, with open borders between those it creates this particular issue in tourist spots, they are especially targeting Americans… police also won’t do a thing about it…

But yeah wrapping it up also for protection is always a good idea, although I used white lenses in tourist places in Europe, the worst places I typically prefer less expensive looking glass or wrap it up at the bare minimum.

The security in tourist areas in Europe is close to nonexistent compared to basically everywhere else
Thanks for your advise. Trust me as I have heard enough such incidents or even worse in US and some EU cities :-) Depend on in which area really. In Lisbon, Portugal (or almost entire country where I have visited many places) where I live now, I feel very safe to be honest, almost as in Iceland or Switzerland. But certainly I cannot assume such in Rome, Milan, Paris etc. I was in very preemptively defensive alert mode when I took photos in Manhattan for example in last several years. I always look around and didn't let any suspicious persons even closing to me that is the key. As I said in the other threads, I even resort to jump to the street when I saw suspicious someone approaching me on the pavements :-) I assumed I'd be attacked in those places. I wrapped camera bag in my leg when I'm eating in restaurant. I only wrap camera on my neck or cross shoulder. Although I am getting old now, I am still moving fast and pretty nimble :-)

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55485085@N04/albums
Portugal is very safe, I’ll say the problem is mostly felt in the worst tourist areas of Italy, Spain, France and England but can also happen in tourist hot spots like Athens, Santorini and Amsterdam. In places like Portugal and Croatia I rarely seen or heard about it, I shot night scenery on my own and people were generally just curious in a polite way. But even in italy not all is bad, Puglia again were very safe, so in my experience it very much depends on concentration of tourists and especially what type of tourists, because it attracts the wrong type of people as well. Why Paris, London, Rome, Barcelona, Firenze, Venice etc. are as bad as those places are, all are unfortunately been hit by well organised, often east European criminals, while they won’t physically hurt you (very uncommon in Europe) they will distract you, bump into you, play like they are tourists and ask for directions while an accomplice will relieve you of your belongings.



there reason why you hear on basically all European trains “ please take care of your belongings and never leave them out of your sight”
 
The problem is mainly for people working in the streets and tourists wandering off the beaten track, who take it to lightly, or who is caught unaware, so It can happen in places like Paris or Rome, let’s not forget the naive US YouTuber who where relived of all his camera gear on a local train.

So it happens in tourist places as well, it tend to happen especially for the naive and unaware tourists who isn’t used to navigate the place they are in, having visible gear make you a far more likely target … these people will follow you, even take a train or place an air tag on you… I always put my camera in a bag never hanging from my shoulders, because its not uncommon seeing them being snatched, being followed for km, placing a map over it if you placed it on a coffee table in front of you…

Americans are forgetting that europe there countries that are very rich and some that are the opposite, with open borders between those it creates this particular issue in tourist spots, they are especially targeting Americans… police also won’t do a thing about it…

But yeah wrapping it up also for protection is always a good idea, although I used white lenses in tourist places in Europe, the worst places I typically prefer less expensive looking glass or wrap it up at the bare minimum.

The security in tourist areas in Europe is close to nonexistent compared to basically everywhere else
Thanks for your advise. Trust me as I have heard enough such incidents or even worse in US and some EU cities :-) Depend on in which area really. In Lisbon, Portugal (or almost entire country where I have visited many places) where I live now, I feel very safe to be honest, almost as in Iceland or Switzerland. But certainly I cannot assume such in Rome, Milan, Paris etc. I was in very preemptively defensive alert mode when I took photos in Manhattan for example in last several years. I always look around and didn't let any suspicious persons even closing to me that is the key. As I said in the other threads, I even resort to jump to the street when I saw suspicious someone approaching me on the pavements :-) I assumed I'd be attacked in those places. I wrapped camera bag in my leg when I'm eating in restaurant. I only wrap camera on my neck or cross shoulder. Although I am getting old now, I am still moving fast and pretty nimble :-)
Portugal is very safe, I’ll say the problem is mostly felt in the worst tourist areas of Italy, Spain, France and England but can also happen in tourist hot spots like Athens, Santorini and Amsterdam. In places like Portugal and Croatia I rarely seen or heard about it, I shot night scenery on my own and people were generally just curious in a polite way. But even in italy not all is bad, Puglia again were very safe, so in my experience it very much depends on concentration of tourists and especially what type of tourists, because it attracts the wrong type of people as well. Why Paris, London, Rome, Barcelona, Firenze, Venice etc. are as bad as those places are, all are unfortunately been hit by well organised, often east European criminals, while they won’t physically hurt you (very uncommon in Europe) they will distract you, bump into you, play like they are tourists and ask for directions while an accomplice will relieve you of your belongings.
I went to the southern Spain in last Nov, no issues at all, feel very safe too. But very careful on potential pickpocketing especially in Seville. But I had nothing valuable to carry with except camera sets. I usually leave passport and even camera bag in hotel and walk out in one set hanging on my neck and another set crossing shoulder. Cellphone in pocket but with a rope crossing shoulder. I even didn't carry cash but just one credit card in a deep pocket and tried to pay everything via apps in cellphone. Plan to visit Barcelona and Madrid and nearby in Oct. My friend and his wife had a bad experience in Barcelona however. Their bag with passports got stolen just outside the airport when they arrived. He put the bag on the luggage and was distracted when picking up a call. I'd never do such but camera bag wrapped in my shoulder and pay every attention in such crowded area and don't let any suspicious persons even closing to me and I'd not be distracted easily with such tacit such as keep a distance ever in talking :-)
there reason why you hear on basically all European trains “ please take care of your belongings and never leave them out of your sight”
Sure about. I wrapped camera bag in arm or even in leg. I even never put camera bag on overhead luggage layer but in person securely wrapped on body. I even don't trust wife to safeguard but carry camera bag in person to the rest room as I heard enough :-)
 
my best friend had a small backpack stolen in Barcelona, unfortunately w/ almost everything of value he had. He had just rented a car at airport, put his bags in the back seat (closed door) and turned his back for 30 sec to push cart to the side

I had no problems for 2 weeks in Madrid, Toledo, Seville, Cordoba, and Granada
 
my best friend had a small backpack stolen in Barcelona, unfortunately w/ almost everything of value he had. He had just rented a car at airport, put his bags in the back seat (closed door) and turned his back for 30 sec to push cart to the side
Yah that 'fatal' 30 seconds, too long for stealers ;-) Barcelona is notorious for such things. Closed door is not enough, at least to lock the doors or better just to wrap the bag crossing shoulder in public places unless that bag is super big/heavy. I carried camera bag into restaurants and never leave in car especially in such notorious cities.
I had no problems for 2 weeks in Madrid, Toledo, Seville, Cordoba, and Granada
Southern Spain seems safe, no issues in Seville, Randa, Granada and Cordoba during my visit in last Nov. Plan to visit Barcelona, Madrid, Toledo and another one or two smaller cities nearby in this Oct. I will take extreme defensive cautions especially in Barcelona and Madrid. Since I am still working in full time (remote tele work), I only can visit one area at one time. Next time northern Spain coast and another time Mediterranean Sea coast area :-) It's much closer and cheaper to fly between EU cities, huge advantage than crossing the Atlantic in the past :-)
 
Not going to lie, I would buy that lens decked out like that. That looks proper...
I applied the skin on 70-200 G II (due to its retractable design), not as good as but close :-) I used the Lenscoat for 70-200 GM II however. It's really for protection not for hiding white as I really have not experienced any issues in the past. But I admit I am not a street photog so only go to tourist areas that have no issue with usualy highest security.

70-200 G II
70-200 G II

70-200 GM II
70-200 GM II
The Lenscoat is a far easier solution to “apply” 😎 The reason I went for a wrap over this solution is that I want to see the zoom ring FL and aperture etc!
 
The problem is mainly for people working in the streets and tourists wandering off the beaten track, who take it to lightly, or who is caught unaware, so It can happen in places like Paris or Rome, let’s not forget the naive US YouTuber who where relived of all his camera gear on a local train.

So it happens in tourist places as well, it tend to happen especially for the naive and unaware tourists who isn’t used to navigate the place they are in, having visible gear make you a far more likely target … these people will follow you, even take a train or place an air tag on you… I always put my camera in a bag never hanging from my shoulders, because its not uncommon seeing them being snatched, being followed for km, placing a map over it if you placed it on a coffee table in front of you…

Americans are forgetting that europe there countries that are very rich and some that are the opposite, with open borders between those it creates this particular issue in tourist spots, they are especially targeting Americans… police also won’t do a thing about it…

But yeah wrapping it up also for protection is always a good idea, although I used white lenses in tourist places in Europe, the worst places I typically prefer less expensive looking glass or wrap it up at the bare minimum.

The security in tourist areas in Europe is close to nonexistent compared to basically everywhere else
Thanks for your advise. Trust me as I have heard enough such incidents or even worse in US and some EU cities :-) Depend on in which area really. In Lisbon, Portugal (or almost entire country where I have visited many places) where I live now, I feel very safe to be honest, almost as in Iceland or Switzerland. But certainly I cannot assume such in Rome, Milan, Paris etc. I was in very preemptively defensive alert mode when I took photos in Manhattan for example in last several years. I always look around and didn't let any suspicious persons even closing to me that is the key. As I said in the other threads, I even resort to jump to the street when I saw suspicious someone approaching me on the pavements :-) I assumed I'd be attacked in those places. I wrapped camera bag in my leg when I'm eating in restaurant. I only wrap camera on my neck or cross shoulder. Although I am getting old now, I am still moving fast and pretty nimble :-)
Portugal is very safe, I’ll say the problem is mostly felt in the worst tourist areas of Italy, Spain, France and England but can also happen in tourist hot spots like Athens, Santorini and Amsterdam. In places like Portugal and Croatia I rarely seen or heard about it, I shot night scenery on my own and people were generally just curious in a polite way. But even in italy not all is bad, Puglia again were very safe, so in my experience it very much depends on concentration of tourists and especially what type of tourists, because it attracts the wrong type of people as well. Why Paris, London, Rome, Barcelona, Firenze, Venice etc. are as bad as those places are, all are unfortunately been hit by well organised, often east European criminals, while they won’t physically hurt you (very uncommon in Europe) they will distract you, bump into you, play like they are tourists and ask for directions while an accomplice will relieve you of your belongings.
I went to the southern Spain in last Nov, no issues at all, feel very safe too. But very careful on potential pickpocketing especially in Seville.
Seville ain’t bad, neither is Granada, Cordoba, Valencia, white cities etc. there is of course the usual pickpockets, as you will find in any decent sized city across the globe, but beyond that, I’ll say those regions are safe.

It’s not Barcelona and Madrid
But I had nothing valuable to carry with except camera sets. I usually leave passport and even camera bag in hotel and walk out in one set hanging on my neck and another set crossing shoulder. Cellphone in pocket but with a rope crossing shoulder. I even didn't carry cash but just one credit card in a deep pocket and tried to pay everything via apps in cellphone.
I never carry cash, not really worth it in europe with the availability of places taking credit and apps…, I honestly never had an issue with having my smartphone in my front pocket, I even do it like that in slums in Asia… basically what most Europeans have… but we are used too it… so

I’ll never have a visible camera, always in bag or shoulder bag/sling never had an issue doing it like that… even in paris… or poor areas in Asia, Africa but then my bags are very worn and most look nothing like a camera bag
Plan to visit Barcelona and Madrid and nearby in Oct. My friend and his wife had a bad experience in Barcelona however. Their bag with passports got stolen just outside the airport when they arrived. He put the bag on the luggage and was distracted when picking up a call.
Feel bad for him, but also a bit of a rookie mistake, never loose eye contact with your luggage at any airport and for sure don’t place your passport and credit in it. Certainly not at the airport and definitely in Barcelona of all places.
I'd never do such but camera bag wrapped in my shoulder and pay every attention in such crowded area and don't let any suspicious persons even closing to me and I'd not be distracted easily with such tacit such as keep a distance ever in talking :-)
yeah always be aware of your surroundings, this is very important, dos not matter where on the globe you are, as it is the fundamental of not loosing your stuff
there reason why you hear on basically all European trains “ please take care of your belongings and never leave them out of your sight”
Sure about. I wrapped camera bag in arm or even in leg. I even never put camera bag on overhead luggage layer but in person securely wrapped on body. I even don't trust wife to safeguard but carry camera bag in person to the rest room as I heard enough :-)

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55485085@N04/albums
Overhead luggage layer is only for stuff you can afford to lose. I have no problem with letting my bag lay loosely on a passenger seat, but access to it is in that case blocked, if not I have my arm on it

I use public transportation weekly so I know how to place stuff, but its equally important acting naturally, calm and relaxed, acting tense and nervous, showing sign your not accustomed with public transport can also be a tell sign your carrying something of value and make you a target in the wrong area.

its just as important not advertising for it, so taking care of your stuff should be done so it look natural and relaxed.

it is a balanced act

The problem once were not bad, even in places like paris, but due to massive increase in tourists where several have never been outside their country before, EU opening their internal borders wide open have made it a free haven for cross border crimes that found it attractive to target tourists who are easy prey, we even for awhile so a drastic increase in burglaries especially near highways
 
Last edited:
I realised that the 50-400 is really heavy thought it is not a heavy lens for what i want to do and now considering the following

Sony 70-300 to pair with 24-70

Tamron 70-300 older model as above

Tamron 50-300 seems very interesting to pair with tamron 20-40

Views?

the tamron 50-300 is much lighter than the 70-200 and would provide more reach without tc but will be slower and of course less sharp
Midterm I was contemplating to use Sony 16-35mm PZ and Tamron 50-300mm for dedicated nature trips. Don't mind the small gap.

Right now I have Tamron 28-200mm and 16-35mm PZ.
I find the combination of 28-200mm and 16-35mm much more useable than a pair of lenses that switch in 50-70mm range. This would make me change lenses constantly, even when at one location.
 
I realised that the 50-400 is really heavy thought it is not a heavy lens for what i want to do and now considering the following

Sony 70-300 to pair with 24-70

Tamron 70-300 older model as above

Tamron 50-300 seems very interesting to pair with tamron 20-40

Views?

the tamron 50-300 is much lighter than the 70-200 and would provide more reach without tc but will be slower and of course less sharp
Midterm I was contemplating to use Sony 16-35mm PZ and Tamron 50-300mm for dedicated nature trips. Don't mind the small gap.

Right now I have Tamron 28-200mm and 16-35mm PZ.
I find the combination of 28-200mm and 16-35mm much more useable than a pair of lenses that switch in 50-70mm range. This would make me change lenses constantly, even when at one location.
Certainly a good choice to many. However Tamron 28-200 is a variable-aperture lens, f5.6 at tele side. Then it doesn't support TC so capped to 200mm reach. Also limited to 15fps and not sure its AF-C performance, that also compromised in sport/wildlife shooting on A1/A9-series. You also could team 16-35 PZ (or GM) with 70-200 G II. The gap between 35 and 70mm is not that a big deal which you can crop a bit from 35mm on A7r IV/V and A1/II. Personally since I always carry 14 GM, so now I leave 16-35 PZ in home most time but carry 20-70 G instead that has a much more useful FL range especially in outdoor landscape/cityscape, that used mostly 70~90%. Then only pull out 70-200 G II or Loxia 85 (that is a substitute for city trips as 85mm usually is long enough and it has much more pleasing sunstars for evening lights) when needed.

--
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55485085@N04/albums
 
Last edited:
I realised that the 50-400 is really heavy thought it is not a heavy lens for what i want to do and now considering the following

Sony 70-300 to pair with 24-70

Tamron 70-300 older model as above

Tamron 50-300 seems very interesting to pair with tamron 20-40

Views?

the tamron 50-300 is much lighter than the 70-200 and would provide more reach without tc but will be slower and of course less sharp
Midterm I was contemplating to use Sony 16-35mm PZ and Tamron 50-300mm for dedicated nature trips. Don't mind the small gap.

Right now I have Tamron 28-200mm and 16-35mm PZ.
I find the combination of 28-200mm and 16-35mm much more useable than a pair of lenses that switch in 50-70mm range. This would make me change lenses constantly, even when at one location.
Certainly a good choice to many. However Tamron 28-200 is a variable-aperture lens, f5.6 at tele side. Then it doesn't support TC so capped to 200mm reach. Also limited to 15fps and not sure its AF-C performance, that also compromised in sport/wildlife shooting on A1/A9-series. You also could team 16-35 PZ (or GM) with 70-200 G II. The gap between 35 and 70mm is not that a big deal which you can crop a bit from 35mm on A7r IV/V and A1/II.
Agree, I considered carrying my small and light 50mm f/2.8 Macro to fill the gap, and to have additional macro capability.
 
I have already 16-35 GMII 24-70GMII and 70-200GMII as well as 24-105G

I am considering the 20-70 G + 70-200 G II for those situations where image quality is not paramount and I do not need f/2.8

Does anyone have experience (not reviews or google knowledge please) on using those two lenses especially on two different bodies for hiking and landscapes?
I recommend carrying 16-35GMii and 70200GMii (the gap between 35-70mm, isnt much to miss, and 35 can be extended to 52mm in ASPC mode).


The off center sharpness of GMs comes in handy, so would not bother buying new lenses when you already have the best (weight savings are moderate, not worth buy new gear)



 
I’ve traveled to Spain a few times using this guide https://gowithguide.com/spain and found it to be quite safe, even in busy areas. Of course, like any major tourist destination, you need to stay aware, but I never had any issues. I think having a local guide really helps avoid sketchy situations. Have you ever had a close call with pickpockets while traveling?
 
I’ve traveled to Spain a few times using this guide https://gowithguide.com/spain and found it to be quite safe, even in busy areas. Of course, like any major tourist destination, you need to stay aware, but I never had any issues. I think having a local guide really helps avoid sketchy situations. Have you ever had a close call with pickpockets while traveling?
There really few true sketchy areas in Europe, the so called “sketchy” areas are absolutely water in comparison to those found in South America, Africa, India, USA and SEA, in other words there is an incredible low chance anything will happen to you even if you wander into one… this is not the favela, slum or the dusky gun crime ridden neighbourhoods in USA after all

The problem I described is caused mainly by border crossings organised criminals targeting tourists and secondary social issues and those most of it happens were the tourists are, alongside freeways (burglary and car break ins), those your in fact more safe outside those areas then in them! There is of course other types of crimes but don’t really effect you unless you stupid enough to get involved with the gangs, as it mainly revolve around drug sales and money laundering etc., people who aren’t involved with dusky activities are at worst going to experience petty theft and burglary in europe.

Violence and assault is so incredible low in europe that you have to be incredibly unlucky or incredibly stupid to run into it, and mostly happen in the night life, so mostly effect young men who seek it out. For most others its mainly just petty theft, but its not like they draw a gun or knife at you like basically everywhere else in the world to relieve you of your possession. Sure it can happen, but the odd chance is about as large as you winning the lottery and the reason simply is Police take that seriously and the fact many countries have high degree of solving of that sort of crimes.
 
Last edited:
I have already 16-35 GMII 24-70GMII and 70-200GMII as well as 24-105G

I am considering the 20-70 G + 70-200 G II for those situations where image quality is not paramount and I do not need f/2.8

Does anyone have experience (not reviews or google knowledge please) on using those two lenses especially on two different bodies for hiking and landscapes?
While not an owner myself, I have used these two lenses from my fellow shooters. He prefers weight to faster lenses. I did use 20-70 extensively in one trip and its sharpness blew me away. You have also to notice that Sony's so called 20mm in not 20mm. It is much much wider so that you can crop off distorted sides and vignetting in LR. Practically the F4 is one pair, esp if you have already bought A7CR.

However, I still love my GM II duos...and I wish to add 16-35 GM II sooner than later.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top