Reading mode: Light Dark

z70-200, z100-400, z600 PF - Same foot/threads?

Go to last post
V

viper699

Senior Member
Messages
1,675
Reaction score
251
Do the above three lenses have the same foot from Nikon, specifically the thread size of the 2 holes on the foot, and of course the distance from the screw holes? Would be nice to own only one plate for all 3.

Nikon doesn't list thread sizes on their tech section of their lens webpage.

I know the z180-600 has 2 different thread sizes on the foot- I own that lens

Thanks
 
Last edited:
I've replaced the Nikon foot on all three lenses with the same RRS LCF-21 foot, so it's a fair bet that the Nikon foot is common to these lenses.

I'm not sure where I put the old feet and which lens I took them off, so can't easily check.
 
However I can speak to the hole sizes and I have always found it a bit odd that they are Imperial instead of Metric. BTW, Imperial means Inches.

The standard for the camera tripod screw is a worldwide standard and the thread is 1/4-20. Why it's not Metric in a mainly Metric world I just don't understand. However it dates back to the early 20th century so perhaps post WWI the world decided to let the American's lead the way in regards to camera's. As for why that happened I suspect it was Kodak.

The standard thread for mounting a tripod head to the tripod itself is another worldwide standard and the thread size is 3/8-16.

I expect that if there are two mounting holes of different size in your tripod foot they are 1/4-20 for the small one and 3/8-16 for the larger size.
 
ajr images said:
I've replaced the Nikon foot on all three lenses with the same RRS LCF-21 foot, so it's a fair bet that the Nikon foot is common to these lenses.

I'm not sure where I put the old feet and which lens I took them off, so can't easily check.
Click to expand...
Thanks- From pictures they SEEM the same, but those are only pictures.
 
monte12345 said:
However I can speak to the hole sizes and I have always found it a bit odd that they are Imperial instead of Metric. BTW, Imperial means Inches.

The standard for the camera tripod screw is a worldwide standard and the thread is 1/4-20. Why it's not Metric in a mainly Metric world I just don't understand. However it dates back to the early 20th century so perhaps post WWI the world decided to let the American's lead the way in regards to camera's. As for why that happened I suspect it was Kodak.

The standard thread for mounting a tripod head to the tripod itself is another worldwide standard and the thread size is 3/8-16.

I expect that if there are two mounting holes of different size in your tripod foot they are 1/4-20 for the small one and 3/8-16 for the larger size.
Click to expand...
Yes, i'm aware of the above, but it doesn't answer my question, thanks anyway
 
I just found the three original Nikon feet and they are identical in all respects, so I think that answers your question.
 
Solution
I would be really surprised if Nikon had two threaded holes in a mounting foot with one being something other than 1/4-20. But. I've been surprised by many things before.
 
ajr images said:
I just found the three original Nikon feet and they are identical in all respects, so I think that answers your question.
Click to expand...
Thank you very much!! VERY HELPFUL!
 
All 3 are the same, as well as the 400 4.5. The only one I don't have is the 600, but it's listed as being the same foot.
 
ajr images said:
I just found the three original Nikon feet and they are identical in all respects, so I think that answers your question.
Click to expand...
Here's a follow up question, do you think using an adapter plate that screws into only one screw hole is enough? The camera would be supported by a strap, or mounted in a monopod.

I don't own these lenses, so I don't have a lot of experience with them.
 
Definitely not. You risk the plate rotating and coming loose. I’ve always used 2 screws if using a plate but I’ve changed the foot to the RRS foot on all my telephotos except for my 180-600 where I’m using the Kirk collar. I normally handhold all my Z telephoto including the 400TC and 800 so I’m normally using the foot just as a carrying handle.
 
viper699 said:
Here's a follow up question, do you think using an adapter plate that screws into only one screw hole is enough? The camera would be supported by a strap, or mounted in a monopod.

I don't own these lenses, so I don't have a lot of experience with them.
Click to expand...
If you're investing a replacement plate, most if not all (Leofoto, Kirk, RRS) have an ArcaSwiss dovetail that removes the need for a QR adapter plate. Not only the 1/4 and 3/8 holes but you also gain the QD release system for strap attachment with some. Why Nikon has never done this is beyond me.
 
TonyNC said:
TonyNC said:
Here's a follow up question, do you think using an adapter plate that screws into only one screw hole is enough? The camera would be supported by a strap, or mounted in a monopod.

I don't own these lenses, so I don't have a lot of experience with them.
Click to expand...
If you're investing a replacement plate, most if not all (Leofoto, Kirk, RRS) have an ArcaSwiss dovetail that removes the need for a QR adapter plate. Not only the 1/4 and 3/8 holes but you also gain the QD release system for strap attachment with some. Why Nikon has never done this is beyond me.
Click to expand...
Thanks- no that's not the case at all. I'd never buy a plate that didn't have the proper fittings.

I THOUGHT the z100-400, and z600 had the same foot, ie screw thread sizes as the 180-600 (I own the 186). As I rented/received those 2 lenses last night, I THOUGHT my plate would be fine until I checked last night. I was asking to see if I could avoid buying parts for lenses I do not own. However, it seems I will have to do this. It's a PITA, as I have limited time to receive a delivery.

Thanks for that info though. good to know as I move forward for the next rental ugh.
 
I use this on my 100-400 70-200 and 400 4.5. It's inexpensive enough that I went ahead and bought 3. I think it's just as durable and strong as the OE Nikon foot, except it has the dovetail for an arca swiss mount.

Amazon.com : Haoge LF-Z72 Lens Replacement Foot for Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Lens (z-Mount), z100-400mm Collar Tripod Mount Ring Built-in Arca Type Quick Release Plate on Nikon Z6ii z7ii Z7 Z6 Z5 Camera : Electronics

Amazon.com : Haoge LF-Z72 Lens Replacement Foot for Nikon NIKKOR Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S Lens (z-Mount), z100-400mm Collar Tripod Mount Ring Built-in Arca Type Quick Release Plate on Nikon Z6ii z7ii Z7 Z6 Z5 Camera : Electronics
www.amazon.com
 
viper699 said:
Do the above three lenses have the same foot from Nikon, specifically the thread size of the 2 holes on the foot, and of course the distance from the screw holes? Would be nice to own only one plate for all 3.

Nikon doesn't list thread sizes on their tech section of their lens webpage.

I know the z180-600 has 2 different thread sizes on the foot- I own that lens
Click to expand...
Leofoto NF-05N Arca compatible foot replacement fits all three lenses. It features a QD socket in addition to screw holes.

I got the lower priced Veledge Z 2.8 replacement foot. Its description specifies the Z 70-200 f/2.9 S lens, I got the other two lenses and it fits perfectly. The Haoge is 29mm high, 3mm less than Leofoto. This is great for use with my Jobu Junior small gimbal head, as it puts the center of gravity of 600 PF + Z8 just below the fulcrum of the the gimbal for stable frictionless operation.
 
Last edited:
Bernard Delley said:
viper699 said:
Do the above three lenses have the same foot from Nikon, specifically the thread size of the 2 holes on the foot, and of course the distance from the screw holes? Would be nice to own only one plate for all 3.

Nikon doesn't list thread sizes on their tech section of their lens webpage.

I know the z180-600 has 2 different thread sizes on the foot- I own that lens
Click to expand...
Leofoto NF-05N Arca compatible foot replacement fits all three lenses. It features a QD socket in addition to screw holes.

I got the lower priced Veledge Z 2.8 replacement foot. Its description specifies the Z 70-200 f/2.9 S lens, I got the other two lenses and it fits perfectly. The Haoge is 29mm high, 3mm less than Leofoto. This is great for use with my Jobu Junior small gimbal head, as it puts the center of gravity of 600 PF + Z8 just below the fulcrum of the the gimbal for stable frictionless operation.
Click to expand...
Thanks!

I tend to prefer plates with 2 QD slots, but I have plates with one or two
 
Last edited:
Not sure that I am following the discussion accurately. I had the original Nikon foot on a 100 to 400 foot. The quick disconnect quick disconnected while on a boat and nearly lost the camera and lens to the ocean. I bought a Wimberly foot which is solid, but rather short. I cannot get my fingers between the foot and the lens, so cannot use it as a carry handle. For the 600 I got the Hejner foot, as it is taller from the les to base. I can use the foot for a handle. I will not use a lens with a quick disconnect foot in the future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Nikon Z100-400 and teleconvertors
2 3
Replies
41
Views
51
Brandon birder
B
NacMacFeegle
  • Question Question
Replacement screws for Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S tripod-foot block?
Replies
14
Views
98
Intrepid24
I
B
  • Question Question
600mm f/6.3 Loose Screws
Replies
4
Views
61
M_garrett
M
F
Comparison: Nikon 19mm PCE and Laowa 20mm Zero D
Replies
8
Views
1K
fishguy
F
R
2025 - I still want a Z80. Here's why...
5 6 7
Replies
131
Views
2K
chambeshi
C

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top