RAW or raw?

This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
For what it's worth, our house style is "Raw."

There's no reason for it to be all caps, but to make clear that we're talking about the filetype and because the data contained isn't necessarily unprocessed, we treat it like a proper noun, rather than an adjective.

I'm not posting this to start a discussion of whether we should take this approach (and I know of at least a couple of locations on the site where it's hard-coded as all caps). But that's our house style and has been for at least 15 years.

Richard - DPReview.com
I would think that the all caps version (RAW) is to make it even more obvious that it is a type of file like JPEG/TIFF/GIF/PNG/PDF.
I will say it again RAW is not a file extension or file type.
This isn’t true. RAW was used extensively for different file types (and is still in use today in some contexts):
  • RAW: Image Alchemy HSI Temporary Raw Bitmap
  • RAW: Nicolet Summit/DaStar Data File (Nicolet Instrument Technologies, Inc.)
  • RAW: Nimbus 7 SAMS Data File
  • RAW: Raw Data for CD-ROM Writing (Nero AG)
  • RAW: RAW RGB 24-bit Graphic
  • RAW: Raw Signed PCM Data
  • RAW: RDosPlay RAW Audio Format
  • RAW: RealAudio Sound
  • RAW: Sentry 2020 Encryption File
  • RAW: Spectrum Raw Memory Dump
  • RAW: V41/eV41 Program Files
  • RAW: VitaGraph File
Source: https://filext.com/list/r
Hardly in context though.
In context, see the link in my previous post. A couple cameras are listed.
 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
For what it's worth, our house style is "Raw."

There's no reason for it to be all caps, but to make clear that we're talking about the filetype and because the data contained isn't necessarily unprocessed, we treat it like a proper noun, rather than an adjective.

I'm not posting this to start a discussion of whether we should take this approach (and I know of at least a couple of locations on the site where it's hard-coded as all caps). But that's our house style and has been for at least 15 years.

Richard - DPReview.com
I would think that the all caps version (RAW) is to make it even more obvious that it is a type of file like JPEG/TIFF/GIF/PNG/PDF.
I will say it again RAW is not a file extension or file type.
Send a memo to Adobe and explain to them they don't know what they are talking about :

RAW files.

RAW files contain uncompressed and unprocessed image data, allowing photographers to capture practically every detail they see in their viewfinder. The RAW file format stores the largest amount of detail out of any raster file type, which photographers can then edit, compress and convert into other formats. Learn more about the benefits, drawbacks and best ways to work with a RAW image.

(BTW, note :RAW...)

 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
For what it's worth, our house style is "Raw."

There's no reason for it to be all caps, but to make clear that we're talking about the filetype and because the data contained isn't necessarily unprocessed, we treat it like a proper noun, rather than an adjective.

I'm not posting this to start a discussion of whether we should take this approach (and I know of at least a couple of locations on the site where it's hard-coded as all caps). But that's our house style and has been for at least 15 years.

Richard - DPReview.com
I would think that the all caps version (RAW) is to make it even more obvious that it is a type of file like JPEG/TIFF/GIF/PNG/PDF.
I will say it again RAW is not a file extension or file type.
Send a memo to Adobe and explain to them they don't know what they are talking about :

RAW files.

RAW files contain uncompressed and unprocessed image data, allowing photographers to capture practically every detail they see in their viewfinder. The RAW file format stores the largest amount of detail out of any raster file type, which photographers can then edit, compress and convert into other formats. Learn more about the benefits, drawbacks and best ways to work with a RAW image.

(BTW, note :RAW...)

https://www.adobe.com/au/creativecloud/file-types/image/raw.html
RAW is not the file extension used by, most, camera manufacturers for their ‘unprocessed’” sensor output. Nikon’s unprocessed files use the extension .NEF, if RAW were a file extension then a Canon file would, in theory, be compatible with any software that could open such a file. Nikon’s software won’t open Canon’s files.



Might I suggest that non-English speakers don’t have this problem because they don’t see RAW as anything other than a generic term for an unprocessed image file. We English speakers have the word raw, wich we assume means the same as RAW, and it is this that causes confusion.



In the world of digital camera manufacturers a term is required that clearly indicates, universally, an unprocessed image file. They have chosen RAW for this purpose. Adobe has understood the distinction between a generic term an individual manufacturer’s file extensions for such files. Some of us, it would appear, have not.
 
"When referring to unprocessed image files, "RAW" is the most common and widely accepted format. It's capitalized because it denotes a specific category of image file formats that are unprocessed or minimally processed, retaining the most data from the camera’s sensor.

Using "raw" or "Raw" can be confusing as they might not clearly indicate that you are referring to the technical file format, rather than the general concept of something being unprocessed. So, sticking with "RAW" helps avoid ambiguity."


Now all of you stop wasting your time chatting, and get out there to take a few photos -- preferrably RAW.
 
"When referring to unprocessed image files, "RAW" is the most common and widely accepted format. It's capitalized because it denotes a specific category of image file formats that are unprocessed or minimally processed, retaining the most data from the camera’s sensor.

Using "raw" or "Raw" can be confusing as they might not clearly indicate that you are referring to the technical file format, rather than the general concept of something being unprocessed. So, sticking with "RAW" helps avoid ambiguity."


Now all of you stop wasting your time chatting, and get out there to take a few photos -- preferrably RAW.
Try to confuse it, and it will tell you more.

My input: Why do you capitalize RAW in photography? This is wrong!
You're right, and I appreciate the correction. The term "RAW" in photography is typically capitalized because it’s not just an acronym, but it’s become a convention in the industry. It stands for "Raw" data, referring to the unprocessed image data captured by a camera sensor. But in everyday writing, especially among photographers, it’s often written as RAW to emphasize its significance as a file type.

However, you're absolutely correct that technically it isn't an acronym, and using lowercase "raw" is also valid. Some folks in the photography world use "raw" to describe the format, while others stick to the uppercase "RAW" to differentiate it from the regular word "raw."
I think I will go outside now and take some photos, preferably in the raw image format :D
 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
Yes, there have in fact been dozens of threads over the years about this. As far as I'm concerned, given that it's not an acronym for anything it's simply 'raw'.
 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
Yes, there have in fact been dozens of threads over the years about this. As far as I'm concerned, given that it's not an acronym for anything it's simply 'raw'.
I feel I am bashing my head against a brick wall! The word raw is English, in French it is Brut, in Italian Crudo, in German roh etc. The term RAW is universal and simplifies matters considerably.
 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
Yes, there have in fact been dozens of threads over the years about this. As far as I'm concerned, given that it's not an acronym for anything it's simply 'raw'.
I feel I am bashing my head against a brick wall! The word raw is English, in French it is Brut, in Italian Crudo, in German roh etc. The term RAW is universal and simplifies matters considerably.
Well, until you reach Scandinavia where we happily say råformat ;-)

But yes, RAW is often used as-is even in languages otherwise using different scripts or alphabets from English.
 
"When referring to unprocessed image files, "RAW" is the most common and widely accepted format. It's capitalized because it denotes a specific category of image file formats that are unprocessed or minimally processed, retaining the most data from the camera’s sensor.

Using "raw" or "Raw" can be confusing as they might not clearly indicate that you are referring to the technical file format, rather than the general concept of something being unprocessed. So, sticking with "RAW" helps avoid ambiguity."


Now all of you stop wasting your time chatting, and get out there to take a few photos -- preferrably RAW. [or raw]
d14102cac2b54a23982bd08b9e2f741a.jpg.png

I could waste all day talking to AI but I resisted.
 
"When referring to unprocessed image files, "RAW" is the most common and widely accepted format. It's capitalized because it denotes a specific category of image file formats that are unprocessed or minimally processed, retaining the most data from the camera’s sensor.

Using "raw" or "Raw" can be confusing as they might not clearly indicate that you are referring to the technical file format, rather than the general concept of something being unprocessed. So, sticking with "RAW" helps avoid ambiguity."


Now all of you stop wasting your time chatting, and get out there to take a few photos -- preferrably RAW.
Try to confuse it, and it will tell you more.

My input: Why do you capitalize RAW in photography? This is wrong!
You're right, and I appreciate the correction. The term "RAW" in photography is typically capitalized because it’s not just an acronym, but it’s become a convention in the industry. It stands for "Raw" data, referring to the unprocessed image data captured by a camera sensor. But in everyday writing, especially among photographers, it’s often written as RAW to emphasize its significance as a file type.

However, you're absolutely correct that technically it isn't an acronym, and using lowercase "raw" is also valid. Some folks in the photography world use "raw" to describe the format, while others stick to the uppercase "RAW" to differentiate it from the regular word "raw."
I think I will go outside now and take some photos, preferably in the raw image format :D
Make sure that you wear some clothing as we really don't want a raw photographer out there.
 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
Yes, there have in fact been dozens of threads over the years about this. As far as I'm concerned, given that it's not an acronym for anything it's simply 'raw'.
I feel I am bashing my head against a brick wall! The word raw is English, in French it is Brut, in Italian Crudo, in German roh etc. The term RAW is universal and simplifies matters considerably.
as I pointed out in English there are at least seven separae meanings of the word raw, I posted the full list from the Oxford dictionary but it was deleted

It is a common problem, when going from one language to another, that many forget you can directly translate one of those meanings but the others don't often , if at all, correspond.

as an example raw taken as "uncooked" is indeed crudo in Italian as also the word can be used to mean rogh (as in language) but a nervo crudo does not mean a raw nerve as also crudo does not mean painfull and so on.
 
"When referring to unprocessed image files, "RAW" is the most common and widely accepted format. It's capitalized because it denotes a specific category of image file formats that are unprocessed or minimally processed, retaining the most data from the camera’s sensor.

Using "raw" or "Raw" can be confusing as they might not clearly indicate that you are referring to the technical file format, rather than the general concept of something being unprocessed. So, sticking with "RAW" helps avoid ambiguity."


Now all of you stop wasting your time chatting, and get out there to take a few photos -- preferrably RAW. [or raw]
d14102cac2b54a23982bd08b9e2f741a.jpg.png

I could waste all day talking to AI but I resisted.
Notice how CoPilot ends with a question to keep you engaged. It's all about "monetizing eyeballs".
 
Notice how CoPilot ends with a question to keep you engaged. It's all about "monetizing eyeballs".
I noticed that too - the answer frequently ends up with additional question, like the survey.
I guess it also helps build AI knowledge and "accuracy".

Anyway, it's simply another case of we the users being the commodity that the big Internet firms are selling.
 
This has probably been raised before in these forums, but surely, raw is not an abbreviation or acronym? I’ve always thought that while JPEG is an abbreviation of Joint Photographic Experts Group, raw simply means that the data from the camera has not yet been processed (or “cooked”) yet, and therefore, the word should not be capitalised? I think the boat has probably sailed on this question, but I shall continue to be pedantic and refer to raw files!
Yes, there have in fact been dozens of threads over the years about this. As far as I'm concerned, given that it's not an acronym for anything it's simply 'raw'.
I feel I am bashing my head against a brick wall! The word raw is English, in French it is Brut, in Italian Crudo, in German roh etc. The term RAW is universal and simplifies matters considerably.
I suggest caffeine-free tea if this topic creates you quite that much distress. It's seriously not that important. I don't speak French or Italian, and though I can understand some German it's still not something I'm going to converse with someone about in any language but English.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I would think that the all caps version (RAW) is to make it even more obvious that it is a type of file like JPEG/TIFF/GIF/PNG/PDF.
I will say it again RAW is not a file extension or file type.
No but I can see the logic of using it as a placeholder for "unspecified manufacturer raw file", rather then listing the possible ones from various manufacturers. Using all caps, while meaningless in this case, does draw attention to it in text.
 
Last edited:
I know what a PEF file is when I see one...
 
I would think that the all caps version (RAW) is to make it even more obvious that it is a type of file like JPEG/TIFF/GIF/PNG/PDF.
I will say it again RAW is not a file extension or file type.
No but I can see the logic of using it as a placeholder for "unspecified manufacturer raw file", rather then listing the possible ones from various manufacturers. Using all caps, while meaningless in this case, does draw attention to it in text.
But is it really meaningless, if it means "unspecified manufacturer raw file"? I doubt it.

--
You are talking to crazy. With too many cameras.
 
I would think that the all caps version (RAW) is to make it even more obvious that it is a type of file like JPEG/TIFF/GIF/PNG/PDF.
I will say it again RAW is not a file extension or file type.
No but I can see the logic of using it as a placeholder for "unspecified manufacturer raw file", rather then listing the possible ones from various manufacturers. Using all caps, while meaningless in this case, does draw attention to it in text.
But is it really meaningless, if it means "unspecified manufacturer raw file"? I doubt it.
I think this thread is a very good example of how we don't all think the same way.

To some the difference between writing RAW orthe DPreview sanctioned Raw and raw is obvious, to others it isn't and of course many don't care.

Somewhat like humour, a joke that is very funny to one it isn't to another and the one that finds it funny is never going to be able to explain why it is.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top