Off The Mark
Veteran Member
In terms of VIDEO, are there many differences between the E-M1 MK II and the MK III ??? (when the E-M1 MK II is running firmware 3.0 or later).
Most reviews say the video features are the same.
Were new video features added to the MK III in later firmware that make it clearly better than the MK II?
I am less concerned about improvements / differences in terms of stills, but if someone can summarize them quickly, that would be great. Or if the user interface is significantly better, please let me kow that, too. (I personally found the menus on the E-M1 MK II a bit clunky, but I am more used to Panasonic menus).
Why I am asking:
My teenage son lost our Oly E-M1 MK II which he was MAINLY using for video (and some light stills work).
So I am looking to replace it with either:
A) Another E-M1 MK II, or
B) A small gimbal so he can just use his iPhone 14 Pro, or
C) Another camera, such as E-M1 MK III, or one of the flavors of GH5 (most likely either the original GH5 or the GH5 II)
Thanks in advance.
Most reviews say the video features are the same.
Were new video features added to the MK III in later firmware that make it clearly better than the MK II?
I am less concerned about improvements / differences in terms of stills, but if someone can summarize them quickly, that would be great. Or if the user interface is significantly better, please let me kow that, too. (I personally found the menus on the E-M1 MK II a bit clunky, but I am more used to Panasonic menus).
Why I am asking:
My teenage son lost our Oly E-M1 MK II which he was MAINLY using for video (and some light stills work).
So I am looking to replace it with either:
A) Another E-M1 MK II, or
B) A small gimbal so he can just use his iPhone 14 Pro, or
C) Another camera, such as E-M1 MK III, or one of the flavors of GH5 (most likely either the original GH5 or the GH5 II)
Thanks in advance.