Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2. Jacques, you are wrong when you jump all over Champa just
because he or she gives you a drop of your own medicine. Correct
the dosage on the latter and behave. If I ever catch you talking to
him or her again like that here, I'll personally pull the plug in
the dikes myself. Then you'll see what the Zuider See sees.
Jacques, you know you have been one of our leading trolls here. You
cannot expect everyone to get all excited when you actually propose
something sane.
As to your image, it is as good or as cräppy as some of those by
meine Wenigkeit. These are matters of taste, and I have told you
personally that I think your body of work is very interesting. It
is a lot easier to discuss that with you when the fuse is a little
longer.
That has to be just about the first sane thing I have read fromIt ain't about technic it's about perception.
As long as it's about technical aspects, it ain't about photographing.
your keyboard in this forum.
--
There is a tide in the affairs of men,
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.
Laurence
http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/sd9_images
http://www.pbase.com/sigmasd9/root
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd10
http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/sd9
http://www.beachbriss.com (eternal test site)
Hi Dominic,
Just out of topic one of my grandfathers had the name Domincus.
The posting I made isn't about you all communicating about the SD9
and SD10, just go on, as it realy is a very interesting technical
devellopment, but just ment to be an ivitaion to S&G forum. In
whiche I realy do hope and wish the technical meerits of th ecamera
are of no importance, but the way you look at scenes is the axe
it's turning around.
Please don't see this as kind of flame, just as an invitation,
jacques.
The subject and the opening sentences, yes to have been the intention to be provocative, but not in the way you think. It ain't a provoaction on the aspects of Foveon sensors at all, just about there is more than just th etechnical aspects of your camera.A bit of analysis for jacques' behaviour:
Involved a lot in Samples & Galleries Forum, occasional
contribution to others.
First, the title: Best of Bayer for ...
Then, the content: go beyond three layers of conductors
Further on:
It ain't about technic it's about perception.These last statements are really provocative, and I would add, areAs long as it's about technical aspects, it ain't about photographing.
judgemental indeed.
There are a lot of Canonians, Nikkon addicts, users of points and shoots, posting their work on S&G, but there seems hardly anyone with a SDx.Have to know that photography has to deal with many aspects, it is
multi-faceted indeed, including science, arts, craftmanship and
such and such. Boasting one aspect without acknowledging and
respecting others could be problematic, at least I see being
attacked by others, especially when others' dignity being intruded.
Said to be meant to be an invitation, it may be analyzed from aMent to be an invitation for SD9/SD10 photographers to show their real photographic emotions in th eS&G gallery, as there seems not to be any of you over there,
psychological point of view. Motive behind may be guessed from the
words that jacques used. As I said, the title, then the first
paragraph, all meant to be something related to have some kind of
hidden meaning. Why is that so? Can you see jacques posting his
invitation to other forums? If this has something to do with
inviting photographers in general the importance of paying
attention to image itself rather than the equipment, he may need to
do so to at least most of others to prove himself his intention
being as such. So it should not be directed to Sigma SLR Talk
Forum members. It should extend to others, and including the film
users as well. So he may try to post it to the well-known
photo.net where there are lots of people willing to judge gallery
photos.
Barry Thompson replied as such:
I would rather not say so unless I take the meaning behind theThat really is a great shot and conveys in an admiable way the speed and power of the event.
sentence so written as being opposite. The people seem jumping
from height to the ground rather than dashing to work. A
horizontal panning technique would be more appropriate to show the
speed and power of the people. So I would rather think that is
camera shake, or a deliberate not paying attention to what one
wants to convey. A casual shot of such can be produced by any
other without knowledge of photography (as ding1 said, a point and
shoot camera can also achieve that).
Actually this Sigma SLR Talk is designed for us to communicate on
its usage. The fact that Sigma SLR Talk members seldom post
message to the Samples & Galleries Forum doesn't automatically
equate to their lack of concern towards image's artistic aspect.
We may choose to post in other forums or sites (such as the pbase,
photosig, etc), we may choose to print out large and hang on the
wall, we may choose to show the real pictures to our friends to
appreciate, or we may do whatever way to achieve the same goal.
I see many Sigma owners posting their pictures out of courtesy for
others, such as this:
http://www.pbase.com/lmatson/sd9_images
Are these Samples? Yes, I would say so. Are these Galleries?
Yes, I would say so.
So, have they not posted to Samples & Galleries? No, I wouldn't
say so. The only difference from jacques' view is that it is not
in the dpreview site only.
Canonians also have their site:
http://www.canonians.com/
where there are also galleries. Why aren't they reminded to visit
more to the Samples & Galleries Forum? Left to all others to think.
Anyway, I wish my interpretation of jacques' motive is incorrect.
Or maybe jacques can make himself clear to us what he really means
in order to lessen the misunderstanding.
LP
