What would be THE things that would make you upgrade (or not) to a Z6III?

Wishful thinking. But I've been reliably informed that the Z8 is too big to fit in any human hand, and weighs far more than any mear mortal could ever hope to lift. So that's probably not an option for most Z6 buyers.
haha, as much as I like my Z6... I added a plate underneath that adds about 15mm to the height of the camera otherwise I can't fit all of my fingers.

My reference of "perfect" grip in a single grip camera is the D700, and the Z6 with the plate basically feels identical, at half the weight or thereabouts.

The Z8 is basically D700 / D850 sized and I really liked it when I handled one in a store. Few problems that definitely reduced my enthusiasm about the camera : the dials are weirdly cheap feeling (not as good as the rubberized dials on my D700 and MUCH less nice to use than the metal dials on the Z6). Not a deal breaker but I would have expected a $4k camera body to feel a little better than the used Z6 I bought for under 700€.

And second thing is : I didn't know how much I missed the haptic feel of a shutter until I did not have it. The absolute lack of haptic feedback was really a downder for my enjoyment to shoot. THe Z8 is out of my pricepoint anyway, but that definitely tamed my Z8 excitement, which is a shame cause everything else about this camera is perfect, from the size and weight to the screen design and viewfinder !
The feeling of a non-event caused by the lack of a shutter mechanism (shaking your camera while you are in the process of trying to hold it still) can be rectified by shooting in 20fps mode. The rapid-fire is addicting.
 
Last edited:
I now need stacked sensors for my work and body wise anything bigger than a Z6/7 size is too big. That's why I unfortunately had no choice other than to move to Sony last year after an enjoyable 15 years plus with Nikon, which started with the D700 and then the Z series.

To entice me back Nikon would need to offer a stacked sensor camera in the size and weight of the Z6/7 series (basically Sony sized).

I doubt the Z6III will be stacked though!

Also, whist the Z lenses are sublime, they are often big and bulky compared to the newer generation Sony equivalents. Highly notable is one of my main workhorse lenses. The 70-200mm 2.8.

The Nikkor is 1400g and the GMII Sony is 1040g. The slight problem here is that the Sony is, at the least, optically equivalent to the Nikkor (with most reviews crowning the Sony as the best on the market, which I concur with). Sony has achieved that whilst offering FAR more features on the lens. Including an aperture ring, VR on/off switch and a latch on the lens hood to control your variable ND and C-PL filters.

It's a similar story with the 24-70mm 2.8 and so on. Plus the lack of 1.4 primes with Nikkor. Lenses such as the 35mm 1.4 GM are a professional joy, yet relatively small and light.

So, to me, Nikon is too big and bulky at this time, especially if you need small stacked sensor bodies and/or a smaller size and weight of pro lenses to mount on those bodies.

However, I shoot people and use 200mm FL and below.

IF I were shooting BIF and the like I'd be on a Z9 and one of the superlative long Nikkor Z's. No question.

BUT, folk like me make up a large chunk of the market. Photojournalists, wedding photographers, press photographers, professional travel photographers and the like.

We don't shoot BIF or tolerate gear that is problematic to pack due to size and weight.

I do love Nikon and I'm always looking to see what they do next, and whether they might entice me back.

I live in hope!
 
Last edited:
Or maybe the RED deal settled and they're taking that opportunity to give it internal compressed RAW video and it's taking longer than expected
 
They either found out about the specs in the Sony A7V and said “oh shoot we better put more stuff in the Z6III” or maybe they are scared because they (don’t) know what Sony is coming out with and they rather wait to make those final changes. That’s what I think.
Or, they’ve seen the uproar that has arisen regarding Z AF “problems,” and can’t bring to market another body deficient in that area.
The Z8 and Zf are deficient?

First time I hear that.

I can understand the complaints about Z6/Z6II/Z7/Z7II autofocus issues (even if I don't agree with them), but if you complain (no no, "uproar"!) about the Z9/Z8/Zf autofocus I think you either have standards way too high or you let the camera do everything for you.

I dunno.

--
(G.A.S. and collectionnite will get my skin one day)
 
Last edited:
They either found out about the specs in the Sony A7V and said “oh shoot we better put more stuff in the Z6III” or maybe they are scared because they (don’t) know what Sony is coming out with and they rather wait to make those final changes. That’s what I think.
Or, they’ve seen the uproar that has arisen regarding Z AF “problems,” and can’t bring to market another body deficient in that area.
The Z8 and Zf are deficient?

First time I hear that.
I think MJ_Photo38 was mostly referring to the other FF cameras aside from the Z8/Z9. The Z8 and Z9 are fine, the Zf is on the fence (it's an improvement but also still shares some of the downsides that came with the Z6 series, like the slower sensor). So I think what was meant that they won't release another mid-range FF body unless it has vastly improved AF over what we have (including the Zf, not that it's bad, but the sensor is kind of holding it back too IMO). But also the Zf is a bit of a special case since the focus (no pun intended) there is on aesthetics and feel (handling) not so much performance. The improved AF was just a bonus really. Nikon probably could have just saved some cash and given it the Expeed 6 and most would probably still have gone for it anyway. It was probably also an opportunity to show potential Z6 III buyers that Nikon IS still working on the $2000 FF market, and they haven't been left out to dry competely, maybe ignored for a few years... My guess is that the Z6 III was not completely finalized and parts sourced when the Zf was released so it was also used as a measure to fill the gap temporarily (so serving two purposes really: a retro camera, and a hold-over until the Z6 III is released.
 
Wishful thinking. But I've been reliably informed that the Z8 is too big to fit in any human hand, and weighs far more than any mear mortal could ever hope to lift. So that's probably not an option for most Z6 buyers.
haha, as much as I like my Z6... I added a plate underneath that adds about 15mm to the height of the camera otherwise I can't fit all of my fingers.

My reference of "perfect" grip in a single grip camera is the D700, and the Z6 with the plate basically feels identical, at half the weight or thereabouts.

The Z8 is basically D700 / D850 sized and I really liked it when I handled one in a store. Few problems that definitely reduced my enthusiasm about the camera : the dials are weirdly cheap feeling (not as good as the rubberized dials on my D700 and MUCH less nice to use than the metal dials on the Z6). Not a deal breaker but I would have expected a $4k camera body to feel a little better than the used Z6 I bought for under 700€.

And second thing is : I didn't know how much I missed the haptic feel of a shutter until I did not have it. The absolute lack of haptic feedback was really a downder for my enjoyment to shoot. THe Z8 is out of my pricepoint anyway, but that definitely tamed my Z8 excitement, which is a shame cause everything else about this camera is perfect, from the size and weight to the screen design and viewfinder !
The feeling of a non-event caused by the lack of a shutter mechanism (shaking your camera while you are in the process of trying to hold it still) can be rectified by shooting in 20fps mode. The rapid-fire is addicting.
I guess so, but I can count on the fingers of one hand the instances where a burst rate faster than 8fps was absolutely required for me, so you can imagine that I'm not about to fire at 20fps all the time lol (also I played with it a little and it was still life less even with that little sound). As I said, to me haptic feedbck is important, I don't know hy they didn't bother to put a super small vibration motor like there is in phones : on my phone I have an haptic feedback when I take a picture, it does not shake the phone at all yet I still feel it and it works great
 
Things I don't want to see (and most are things I don't expect):
  • Another Sony IMX410 sensor inside, like the Zf; I don't want a repackaged Zf
I'm not saying it will happen... but be prepared for it to happen :D

(by the way, I don't think the Z6 has a IMX 410, that sensor has a resolution of 6064x4040 pixels while the Z6's sensor has a resolution of 6048x4024. I think that all Nikon Z cameras (exception made of the Z5) all have Nikon design produced by Sony Semicon, but those are not Sony designs and therefore not on Sony's sensor lineup)
The Z6 has an IMX410 (while the Z5 has an IMX128). The exact model code for the Z6 is IMX410BQJ (as opposed to the D780's IMX410BQT). It is a Sony sensor.

Here is a picture of the Z6's (left) and D780's (right) sensor. Note the labels at the top (left image) and Left (right image).

e365d0d4105f4cce8f58c08103dc8377.jpg.png

Nikon (and Sony) often mask edge pixels and don't use them directly for imaging, which is why you'll see small variances between things like "Effective pixels" and "Total pixels" (and also why Nikon claims a sensor size of 35.9 x 23.9mm rather than 36 x 24). Exact pixel counts are not a reliable indicator of sensor model number.

The Z6 has 25.28MP total pixels and 24.5MP effective pixels: https://www.nikonusa.com/p/z-6/1595/overview#tech-specs
Oh okay, that's nice to know. Thanks for the info.
  • U1/U2/U3/PASM type controls
It's not going to be a pro grade camera like the Z8/9 are. So expect to see the same mode dial again.
Define "pro grade." The Z6 will likely sport an Expeed 7, with AF capabilities on par with the flagship Z9 or Z8. The processor will also allow for internal video improvements I listed above, again on par with the flagship Z9 or Z8. It will probably have a deep enough buffer. Dual slots (CFE & SD). The only part questionable would be the blackout, which will depend on the sensor; and if they go stacked sensor, it will be blackout-free.
So what about any of this isn't "pro grade"?
Never said it couldn't be used for pro stuff. I'm talking about the "pro control layout" that Nikon has been using ever since the D1 came out in 1999 :

"pro" cameras don't have a mode dial but 3 (later 4) buttons where the mode dial is supposed to go. This is the control structure you'd see in camera bodies sold at a higher pricepoints, either for pros or prosumers :

D1, D1H, D1X, D2H(s), D2X(s), D200, D300(s), D3(s), D3X, D700, D800, D810, D850, D4(S), D5, D6, D500, Z8, Z9

And for every other camera, they had the traditional PSAM mode dial on top. Even cameras with pro feature and used by pros like the D750, D780, D600, Z6 and Z7 have this layout.

This is what Nikon do. The Z6III is a mid range full frame camera, not a prosumer or pro camera in the eyes of Nikon so it will 99% of chances to have the PSAM dial like the Z6 has.
There's no rule that says Nikon must use the PASM dial. Nikon switched some cameras to the PASM dial in a different era, when lower-end cameras were booming and Nikon wanted to dumb down cameras to try to appeal to the mass market. See the D700 vs D750. That part of the market has fizzled.
The D750 isn't the successor to the D700.

The D800 is the successor to the D700 while the D750 is the successor to the D610. Nikon's naming scheme is a bit confusing sometimes.
It should be noted that the Z7 was another first (as opposed to the Z6); where Nikon would have been expected to offer it with a mode section rather than PASM dial, since in their own marketing they were comparing it to a D850 and the Z6 to a D750. But this body difference made a perceptual difference to customers, seeing the Z7 as being dumbed down and a step backwards. Nikon tried to partially correct some of this in the ii models by adding grip contacts and dual slots--and notably, they kept consistency between the Z6 & Z7. The Z9 & Z8 "returned" to the mode layout.

The Z30 & Z50 are in similar boats: they have dual control wheels and consistent interface as Nikon's Z6 & Z7, unlike the D3500 and D5600 DSLRs, which had single wheels and a dedicated point-and-shoot type interface (with animations depicting the aperture, for example).

It turns out that times change. And unlike the past, Nikon are are now trying to appeal to a higher-end market.

And notably, Nikon could always release a Z5ii with a PASM dial for those who want it.

I think there's a 50/50 shot. I wouldn't be surprised if Nikon took either route. And I wouldn't be surprised if I don't buy a Z6iii if it has the top dial and is missing all of those extra buttons there instead (and banks).
It should be noted that nikon is a brand that tend to stay in their way. I see no reason for them to not include a mode dial.
  • Inconsistent button layout compared to Z8
I cannot think of a single Nikon camera that has the exact same button layout as another (except Z5/6 and 7, because they have teh same body). Eveerytime Nikon changed th body design of a camera, the button layout changed as well, so expect this also.
The Z6 & Z8 already have similar button layouts, with only a handful of differences:
  • The play button is bottom right corner on the Z8 and top left on the Z6. The top left button on the Z8 is lock / Fn3. This doesn't exist on the Z6
  • The drive mode button is bottom right on the Z6 and top/mode on the Z8
  • The Z8 has a dedicated front AF/MF switch and 4 top mode buttons; while the Z6 has no dedicated AF/MF switch and a PASM dial instead of these 4 buttons
So in this picture, the only differences are the top left button and bottom right button:

30c03bf81f1244d299fd78e0288db88d.jpg.png

Other than that, the layouts are already similar, but just different enough to make switching between dual bodies annoying. They have the same locations for:
  • Fn1
  • Fn2
  • Movie Record
  • ISO
  • Metering
  • Trash
  • DISP / Movie / Stills
  • AF-On
  • Thumbstick
  • information menu
  • D-Pad
  • Zoom In
  • Zoom out
  • Menu
For other examples, just off the top of my head:
  • The Z9 & Z8 have similar button layouts.
  • The Z5 and Z6/Z7 and Z6ii/Z7ii are different bodies and all have similar layouts. (The Z5 is different from a Z6/Z7 in internal sensor, top dial location/LCD, and build materials; but the Z6 and Z7 are identical bodies; and the Z6ii & Z7ii are identical except with the additions of dual slots and contact points for a grip).
  • The D5, D500, & D850 had similar layouts.
  • The D7200 & D750 had similar layouts.
Yeah I was talking about Z bodies. D series cameras were pretty consistent.
Times change. And it would be an improvement for Nikon to offer consistency between bodies to allow people to easily switch between bodies. Consistency between bodies doesn't matter for people who use a single camera at a time. It would give this part of the market--which is the part Nikon is focusing on--more offerings: A 25MP, 45MP (gripped Z9 or not Z8); and maybe 100MP (Z7iii).

The other thing these improvements would do is signal (in a marketing / perceptual sense) to people who think in simpler terms that the Z6iii is moving up and is therefore more capable and "better" and more valuable. And it leaves plenty of numbers below for the PASM crowd, including Z5, which would be now better differentiated.
I still think it won't happen looking at Nikon's releases in the last 15 years. I guess we'll get back to this post when the Z6III is released and I'm proven wrong lol (wou;dn't be the first time)

--
(G.A.S. and collectionnite will get my skin one day)
 
Last edited:
Or, they’ve seen the uproar that has arisen regarding Z AF “problems,” and can’t bring to market another body deficient in that area.
The Z8 and Zf are deficient?

First time I hear that.
For starters, let me direct you to this thread: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67673448. Also, see recent threads by @horshack documenting serious Eye AF problems in the Z8.
I can understand the complaints about Z6/Z6II/Z7/Z7II autofocus issues (even if I don't agree with them), but if you complain (no no, "uproar"!) about the Z9/Z8/Zf autofocus I think you either have standards way too high or you let the camera do everything for you.
I don't think my standards are too high, but I do like the intended subject to be in focus!
 
I have the OG Z6 and have been using it more and more frequently as my main camera, simply because… well I love the native Z 24-120, but also 24mp files are *just right* for much of the work I do, where 36-47mp is a little bit of a lift for both retouching and long term archival.

But for me to upgrade to the Z6III instead of the Z8 (or more likely… in addition to) would be simply: Z8 or better AF; internal 10-bit 4:2:2 video at up to 60 or 120fps, log or Nraw.
What is an "OG" Z6?
 
Wishful thinking. But I've been reliably informed that the Z8 is too big to fit in any human hand, and weighs far more than any mear mortal could ever hope to lift. So that's probably not an option for most Z6 buyers.
haha, as much as I like my Z6... I added a plate underneath that adds about 15mm to the height of the camera otherwise I can't fit all of my fingers.

My reference of "perfect" grip in a single grip camera is the D700, and the Z6 with the plate basically feels identical, at half the weight or thereabouts.

The Z8 is basically D700 / D850 sized and I really liked it when I handled one in a store. Few problems that definitely reduced my enthusiasm about the camera : the dials are weirdly cheap feeling (not as good as the rubberized dials on my D700 and MUCH less nice to use than the metal dials on the Z6). Not a deal breaker but I would have expected a $4k camera body to feel a little better than the used Z6 I bought for under 700€.

And second thing is : I didn't know how much I missed the haptic feel of a shutter until I did not have it. The absolute lack of haptic feedback was really a downder for my enjoyment to shoot. THe Z8 is out of my pricepoint anyway, but that definitely tamed my Z8 excitement, which is a shame cause everything else about this camera is perfect, from the size and weight to the screen design and viewfinder !
The feeling of a non-event caused by the lack of a shutter mechanism (shaking your camera while you are in the process of trying to hold it still) can be rectified by shooting in 20fps mode. The rapid-fire is addicting.
I guess so, but I can count on the fingers of one hand the instances where a burst rate faster than 8fps was absolutely required for me, so you can imagine that I'm not about to fire at 20fps all the time lol (also I played with it a little and it was still life less even with that little sound). As I said, to me haptic feedbck is important, I don't know hy they didn't bother to put a super small vibration motor like there is in phones : on my phone I have an haptic feedback when I take a picture,
it does not shake the phone at all yet I still feel it
You do realize this statement is not possible, right?

Regardless, no the camera doesn't need extra weight, cost and complexity; just for the old-time feels. Shoot with it for a week or two and you'll be amazed at how cumbersome it seems to wait for the shutter assembly to close, blacking out the screen, just so it can open, then close, then open again. To take a single picture.
 
I have the OG Z6 and have been using it more and more frequently as my main camera, simply because… well I love the native Z 24-120, but also 24mp files are *just right* for much of the work I do, where 36-47mp is a little bit of a lift for both retouching and long term archival.

But for me to upgrade to the Z6III instead of the Z8 (or more likely… in addition to) would be simply: Z8 or better AF; internal 10-bit 4:2:2 video at up to 60 or 120fps, log or Nraw.
What is an "OG" Z6?
I assume the original Z6, i.e. the first version announced on 23 August, 2018.
 
New faster sensor - I tend to keep cameras 4-6 years and I will not buy a 6+ year old sensor

Much improved AF system - at least as good as the Z8 / Zf and preferably better

Expeed 7 - a given I’m certain. But the current delay is so long, Expeed 8 would be nice.

Improved EVF - minimal to virtually no blackout.

Improved IBIS - a minimum of what the Zf has.

Dual card slots - probably a given, I’d expect the same as the Z8

Same body size/weight as the current Z6 - must be significantly smaller than the Z8

I’d pay up to $2500 for this, but only for a new faster sensor.

Bonus:

A new 24MP Stacked Sensor with no shutter - In essence a lower resolution Z8.

I’d pay up to $3000 for this. And with this Z6iii Nikon would certainly grow both their volumes and their revenues as per their new Financial Forecasts regarding the mid- / high-end bodies.
A shutterless Z6III with a stacked 24MP sensor released at $2500 would for sure be a shock to the industry.
I would agree, but I predicted $3000 above.
Sure, but it wouldn't sell for 3000.
Not sure if you read my post carefully, but what I described is in essence a Z8 with a 24 MP Sensor.
The mid range full frame market is really competitive, with cameras like the R6II doing 40fps electronic with a pretty fast sensor at 2500 USD.

The A7IV is only doing 10/11fps, but with 33MP

If Nikon wants to sell a camera at 3000, it needs to considerably outperform the R6II both in burst rates and autofocus (which I don't think it will), or have a few advantages (like slightly better rolling shutter performance) at the same price.

Whatever the camera though, it needs to be price competitive, otherwise it won't sell. And at 3000, one could ask themseves why not save 300 bucks and buy a refurb Z8 for 3300.
I disagree with your “Whatever” because that ignores what the camera will actually end up being. If it’s a new non-stacked sensor with a traditional shutter then yes I agree $2500 is more likely the price as I stated originally.

However if it has a new stacked sensor without a shutter with the Z8 viewfinder then I can see enough differentiation to see $3000 MSRP. But, and this is key, it would eventually sell for $2500 or so just as the current Z8 is perpetually discounted.
Nikon has taken an habit of releasing products that are overdelivering comparative to their pricepoint : on release, the Z9 was $1000 cheaper than both the A1 and R3, then the Z8 was basically the same camera but still much cheaper than the competition, even after Canon agressively reduced the price of the R3 from $6500 to $5500.

I could see Nikon doing the same thing with a stacked 24MP Z6III. After all, if they managed to make a 45MP top of the line shutter less sensor fit into a $4000 Z8 and make it economically viable, I don't think that a stacked 24MP sensor with the same kind of burst rates as the Z8 would be so out of reach for a $2500 camera.

Just my 2 cents tho.
 
Last edited:
I have the OG Z6 and have been using it more and more frequently as my main camera, simply because… well I love the native Z 24-120, but also 24mp files are *just right* for much of the work I do, where 36-47mp is a little bit of a lift for both retouching and long term archival.

But for me to upgrade to the Z6III instead of the Z8 (or more likely… in addition to) would be simply: Z8 or better AF; internal 10-bit 4:2:2 video at up to 60 or 120fps, log or Nraw.
What is an "OG" Z6?
I assume the original Z6, i.e. the first version announced on 23 August, 2018.
Thank you. I did not think of that.
 
New faster sensor - I tend to keep cameras 4-6 years and I will not buy a 6+ year old sensor

Much improved AF system - at least as good as the Z8 / Zf and preferably better

Expeed 7 - a given I’m certain. But the current delay is so long, Expeed 8 would be nice.

Improved EVF - minimal to virtually no blackout.

Improved IBIS - a minimum of what the Zf has.

Dual card slots - probably a given, I’d expect the same as the Z8

Same body size/weight as the current Z6 - must be significantly smaller than the Z8

I’d pay up to $2500 for this, but only for a new faster sensor.

Bonus:

A new 24MP Stacked Sensor with no shutter - In essence a lower resolution Z8.

I’d pay up to $3000 for this. And with this Z6iii Nikon would certainly grow both their volumes and their revenues as per their new Financial Forecasts regarding the mid- / high-end bodies.
A shutterless Z6III with a stacked 24MP sensor released at $2500 would for sure be a shock to the industry.
I would agree, but I predicted $3000 above.
Sure, but it wouldn't sell for 3000.

The mid range full frame market is really competitive, with cameras like the R6II doing 40fps electronic with a pretty fast sensor at 2500 USD.

The A7IV is only doing 10/11fps, but with 33MP

If Nikon wants to sell a camera at 3000, it needs to considerably outperform the R6II both in burst rates and autofocus (which I don't think it will), or have a few advantages (like slightly better rolling shutter performance) at the same price.

Whatever the camera though, it needs to be price competitive, otherwise it won't sell. And at 3000, one could ask themseves why not save 300 bucks and buy a refurb Z8 for 3300.

Nikon has taken an habit of releasing products that are overdelivering comparative to their pricepoint : on release, the Z9 was $1000 cheaper than both the A1 and R3, then the Z8 was basically the same camera but still much cheaper than the competition, even after Canon agressively reduced the price of the R3 from $6500 to $5500.

I could see Nikon doing the same thing with a stacked 24MP Z6III. After all, if they managed to make a 45MP top of the line shutter less sensor fit into a $4000 Z8 and make it economically viable, I don't think that a stacked 24MP sensor with the same kind of burst rates as the Z8 would be so out of reach for a $2500 camera.

Just my 2 cents tho.
Currently the price in Switzerland for a Z8 is 3200 chf. I ordered a Z8 yesterday for 3000, special price and cancelled today while reading the Z6iii rumors again.

I totally agree with you, if Nikon wants to sell any Z6iii it has to be positioned price wise lower than a Z8.

R6 ii, sells for an average of 2300, currently. Z7ii is being sold for 2800. Z6iii will for sure be somewhere in between. I assume it will start at a 2600 CHF price tag and like the Z6ii got down to 2400 after 3-4 month.
 
I haven't long sold off my Z6iis. For the longest time they were only being used for Video and Z8/9 have taken over. I still love my 7ii though for most travel and hiking. For me a Z6iii is unlikely to be of interest but a Z7iii might be interesting.
 
Wishful thinking. But I've been reliably informed that the Z8 is too big to fit in any human hand, and weighs far more than any mear mortal could ever hope to lift. So that's probably not an option for most Z6 buyers.
haha, as much as I like my Z6... I added a plate underneath that adds about 15mm to the height of the camera otherwise I can't fit all of my fingers.

My reference of "perfect" grip in a single grip camera is the D700, and the Z6 with the plate basically feels identical, at half the weight or thereabouts.

The Z8 is basically D700 / D850 sized and I really liked it when I handled one in a store. Few problems that definitely reduced my enthusiasm about the camera : the dials are weirdly cheap feeling (not as good as the rubberized dials on my D700 and MUCH less nice to use than the metal dials on the Z6). Not a deal breaker but I would have expected a $4k camera body to feel a little better than the used Z6 I bought for under 700€.

And second thing is : I didn't know how much I missed the haptic feel of a shutter until I did not have it. The absolute lack of haptic feedback was really a downder for my enjoyment to shoot. THe Z8 is out of my pricepoint anyway, but that definitely tamed my Z8 excitement, which is a shame cause everything else about this camera is perfect, from the size and weight to the screen design and viewfinder !
The feeling of a non-event caused by the lack of a shutter mechanism (shaking your camera while you are in the process of trying to hold it still) can be rectified by shooting in 20fps mode. The rapid-fire is addicting.
I guess so, but I can count on the fingers of one hand the instances where a burst rate faster than 8fps was absolutely required for me, so you can imagine that I'm not about to fire at 20fps all the time lol (also I played with it a little and it was still life less even with that little sound). As I said, to me haptic feedbck is important, I don't know hy they didn't bother to put a super small vibration motor like there is in phones : on my phone I have an haptic feedback when I take a picture,

it does not shake the phone at all yet I still feel it
You do realize this statement is not possible, right?
with high end haptic motors, yes it is. Wasn't possible a few years ago.
Regardless, no the camera doesn't need extra weight, cost and complexity; just for the old-time feels. Shoot with it for a week or two and you'll be amazed at how cumbersome it seems to wait for the shutter assembly to close, blacking out the screen, just so it can open, then close, then open again. To take a single picture.
I don't need to shoot with a Z8 specifically, I've shot plenty with electronic shutter with both my Z6 and the Fujifilm cameras I was using before, when I didn't want to make any noise during event shootings.

And no it doesn't feel like the mechanical shutter is less cumbersome, however it feels like the shutterless camera is lifeless.

Personal preference I guess, you won't make me change my mind on this matter.
 
I disagree with your “Whatever” because that ignores what the camera will actually end up being. If it’s a new non-stacked sensor with a traditional shutter then yes I agree $2500 is more likely the price as I stated originally.

However if it has a new stacked sensor without a shutter with the Z8 viewfinder then I can see enough differentiation to see $3000 MSRP. But, and this is key, it would eventually sell for $2500 or so just as the current Z8 is perpetually discounted.
Yes I can see how such a camera could be worth 3000. But as I said, whatever the camera, it's not what nikon needs and it won't sell at that price, no matter how good it is.

Nikon don't need a 24MP Z8, they need a Z6II replacement.

The discounted price is not really an argument : a 2500 MSRP camera would find itself discounted the same way.
 
Make it DX format. Or at least make it with enough resolution to allow use of DX mode at a resolution equal to or greater than Z30, 50, fc.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top