May 2024 Part 1 — This Month Through Your Adapted Lens

So, thanks to Simple Joy and relative low cost of getting into this branch of the ahm hobby I found myself interested in Enlarging Lenses which got me attracted to a Fujinon-e 50mm I covered in a previous post, mainly with the belief that if it comes from Fuji - it will do something good for me. And it did, the colors are great, and the overall performance at the size and at the price are great. It happened that the vendor agreed to add another lens he had in the store - Beslar 75/3.5. Before I asked for a discount, I looked everywhere for samples - nada. I figured out what it is and decided that it’s ok to spend $10 as an intro to the brand, the lens seemed to be quite clean, and the vendor agreed. I had fairly low expectations as this appeared to be not far from the market price.

I got it finally on the camera today, and while it did not blow my mind, it had proven to behave quite nicely. It also flares with a rainbow - no idea why - and time to time produces rainbow bokeh balls. Whether I just happened to have the bubbly opportunities today, or the lens is indeed a bubble maker, it did quite well and I consider it to be another tiny EL gem that performs far above what one may expect. I spent most of today’s walk with it, it was getting hot and bright.

1
1

2 too bad this guy was in the shade, I think the lens could have shined here stopped down a bit
2 too bad this guy was in the shade, I think the lens could have shined here stopped down a bit

3 I am going backwards, I started with the last pictures, this was just before leaving park, great showcase of bokeh stopped down. With rounded blades I don’t find it unpleasant at all
3 I am going backwards, I started with the last pictures, this was just before leaving park, great showcase of bokeh stopped down. With rounded blades I don’t find it unpleasant at all

4 And here is wide open, I like it
4 And here is wide open, I like it

5 Close up it can be dreamy
5 Close up it can be dreamy

6 And sharp if you need it
6 And sharp if you need it

7
7

8 and somewhat sculpty
8 and somewhat sculpty

9 and (still going backwards) this is the second time where I figured that this is a keeper, I really enjoyed what I could do with water drops. It is likely that the other ELs would be just as good, maybe there could be better color nuances but this is a great outcome by my standards :-)
9 and (still going backwards) this is the second time where I figured that this is a keeper, I really enjoyed what I could do with water drops. It is likely that the other ELs would be just as good, maybe there could be better color nuances but this is a great outcome by my standards :-)

10 Now, this is where I started zooming in on the bubbles. They seem to have some message on the border. Can bokeh talk to you? :-)
10 Now, this is where I started zooming in on the bubbles. They seem to have some message on the border. Can bokeh talk to you? :-)

seriously any idea what is causing the sort of double border and seems like some writing on it? Is it fungus? The lens was reasonably clean but I did not look with a magnifier, looks like I should.

11 this is where I actually saw the message in the bokeh ball :-)
11 this is where I actually saw the message in the bokeh ball :-)

12 - an eclectic bunch. Some of the fellows are again with this peculiar border
12 - an eclectic bunch. Some of the fellows are again with this peculiar border

13 - bubble in bubble in bubble
13 - bubble in bubble in bubble

14 - one would say the lens is prone to flare. I would say the lens also has a great flare :-)
14 - one would say the lens is prone to flare. I would say the lens also has a great flare :-)

15 - when you’d like it to flare ;-)
15 - when you’d like it to flare ;-)

16
16

17 - one of the first shots wide open - where I realized first time this is better than expected
17 - one of the first shots wide open - where I realized first time this is better than expected

18 - this was a second shot where I saw the bubbles and that it can do sharp
18 - this was a second shot where I saw the bubbles and that it can do sharp

 19 - Actually this was the first shot and although it was hard to get the flower sharp in the shadow wide open, I liked what it produced and knew it was a keeper from the first shot.
19 - Actually this was the first shot and although it was hard to get the flower sharp in the shadow wide open, I liked what it produced and knew it was a keeper from the first shot.



--
https://500px.com/bc-foto
 
Last edited:
As far as I know, this is basically an old Elmar 5 cm in everything but name. While I don't like it as much as the longer focal length Voort 9.5 cm, it is a very nice lens capable of the typical look for older Leitz lenses.

cfdeec16eebf4398b7225cd363a60b42.jpg

d7534339c938415898fec97ca8fa382e.jpg

49692d3c2c0a4b199945487c00c50cc3.jpg

5315bb9743124175b45af637100f5092.jpg

6fa2d7e2a0cd4132acfe22ccc8169a2c.jpg

058ed266ab1b4061b497569037ddc5e7.jpg

It's quite hard to get this lens to focus to infinity... but then again, I don't think it will likely produce anything meaninful there.

Here's a (cross view) stereo image:

599dd46f24db49f18d7647e4e27c10e4.jpg

--
Experimenting manual lens enthusiast.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/
Don’t know whether it is the way you processed colors in this series but somehow they look very pleasant, vintagy and understated a bit, in a nice way. Quite Leica-like from the time period - natural and story telling in a way.

--
 
I've not used this one a lot - something about the 135 mm focal length just doesn't seem to click with me... but as expected for a Meyer lens it actually is a really nice one.

Life always finds a driveway

Life always finds a driveway


81e54dddfe8f4d72b0ace7f7b3d1e1fb.jpg

5828ef3eb02f482fb347e1f29d5032e7.jpg

1fb252c9e8aa4379b989712c255389db.jpg

And the first one as stereo (cross view):

4feee5e39ef043baaa3ce18c34f9da0c.jpg







--
Experimenting manual lens enthusiast.
 
This was one of my first vintage lenses, one of my oldest and surprising me with its results considering how vintage it looks. I too struggle a bit with 135s - they are too long and too short at the same time. That said I adjust after spending some time but last weekend I had too much fun with the little Beslar and had little time left to get into the mood with the Triotar..

d24af430f6554d2c8a2760dad0d63948.jpg

c9b1a308ee1a47a09102e2683cfefdb0.jpg

ede8e5610fab489b9fb3951fbc30be6c.jpg

68fb7f1b14f74d2d8ce32dc7c76b61eb.jpg

10e373ba9faf4fe6946e3f16c0815bd2.jpg



--

 
Lilies at my front yard are all in bloom and I had an opportunity to shoot a bit more with the same lens, going straight to 135mm I felt much better getting into framing at 135mm.

62dcd1ceeae04e49925868a97ac9c073.jpg

80ec7071bcca490ea7fd8a2a2f43c74e.jpg

--
https://500px.com/bc-foto
very nice looking shots! Certainly looks like you got the hang of it. 👍

--
Experimenting manual lens enthusiast.
 
T-Rex Mark wrote: Lo
ts of perspective! Great images all around!​
Thanks! I think the perspective thing was me exploring the consequences of the swivelable screen on the (new to me) RP. Waist-high shooting simplified but getting the screen comfortably balanced over my wrist ended up with it being set at a different angle to where the lens was pointed which was interesting if at times disconcerting. Sort of homebrew tilt/shift.
 
Some experiments with the Helios 44 in evening light (they are not full size because I transferred them to my ipad via bluetooth only)

323efc43068c4ae7825f40de246e4283.jpg



5bd6e9846a4d49859a3e9d98db5fdcd9.jpg



7871066a325e4dbc8da96ed22e478d42.jpg



3a721e49db7848a69d8393a682f1bf9a.jpg



07a98b0c33ba4c6db28d2be7fd38a374.jpg
 
Some experiments with the Helios 44 in evening light (they are not full size because I transferred them to my ipad via bluetooth only)

7871066a325e4dbc8da96ed22e478d42.jpg

07a98b0c33ba4c6db28d2be7fd38a374.jpg
Great shots - I loike these two in particular! Love the light.

I feel like I never had great success with my Helios 44 (even though the sample doesn't look bad or anything) - just doesn't seem to be "my kind of lens". However the (overall similar) Helios-77M-4 I got recently seems more up my alley, so I'm looking forward to using that some more.

--
Experimenting manual lens enthusiast.
 
Thanks a lot! Coming from you this means a lot to me. I admire your work for quite a while.

I started taking pictures with adapted lenses only recently. I was given some manual stuff from elderly family members who had it tucked away somewhere at the back of a cabinet. Then by chance I came across this Soviet Zenith camera with this Helios lens for small price at a local thrift shop. It took me a while before I had figured out the right kind of adapter but now ever works very nicely. I really like the kind of pictures it produces.
I hope you are going to enjoy the Helios 77.
 
I've mentioned this lens in my thread on scanner lenses (which I think is one option for a possible application of this lens). Someone suggested it might also have been used in an Oscillo-camera, which is a good guess as well.

Here I've used it with a DIY filter (made of cartboard), which can be used due to its big slot for waterhouse aperture discs.

Ouch!

Ouch!


Down for some bread?

Down for some bread?


... and here's a double exposure (this is not the lens btw, but another great Rodenstock lens with a slot for custom aperture shapes!)

Capturing light

Capturing light




--
Experimenting manual lens enthusiast.
 
With a few posts here recently on 135mm, after using the Triotar, I decided to spend a morning exclusively with two 135mm (thanks to Bosun’s recent post on the quality price ratio my 135mm choices got expanded :-)

I generally am a bit challenged with the framing in this focal length, especially when moving from 50-75mm to 135mm. I think my main challenge is the minimum focal distance, I suppose I am predisposed somehow to macro-ish shots.

anyway, here are a few comparison shots of the same subject - first in each pair is Nippon Kogaku NIKON Nikkor-Q Auto 135mm f/2.8 (thanks Bosun and a great seller agreeing to my offer :-),, and SMC Pentax 135mm f2.5. I must say that Nikon is build like a tank. Although the lenses are different, build wise Nikon somehow feels compared to Pentax in this case, like a 1980 Helios compared to 1955-ish Biotar. And I think it’s somewhat like that in images, there is some refinement, softness while still being sharp in Pentax wide open.

although I stayed within 135mm, I still struggled a bit with framing. I don’t like all the shots below but they show these two side by side. Perhaps an unfair comparison since Pentax is quite pricey compared to the Nikon but I believe Nikon held ground greatly. I will add more pictures for each separately.

8716052606434127a2ed14f58adbe9bf.jpg

de5858b1e03c40cfa156c87e04489278.jpg

d279e7d6cc7d4a79b19f609becc0b6f5.jpg

39cab807b198411285c8792e09550e11.jpg

b978ed4081924ed6a868c5586ad1a232.jpg

cd11a44e92824f9b98194a891aca8667.jpg

cbc6daaf805149ee90d3756a32d17793.jpg

9303dae8edde4c29a784216f8d708069.jpg

I extended both lenses at some point but at 27mm extension getting things in focus got a bit harder when wide open.


--
https://500px.com/bc-foto
 
Last edited:

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top