In my normal shop the XT5 is 1800 EUR today. Of course it can be bought cheaper online, or used. But give it some time, and the XT50 will go down as well. The XT50 is a much better camera compared to the previous XT30II, so I was expecting a price raise. Same for XS20, which is dearer at launch compared to the XS10. If I were interested in the XT50, I would 6 months or 1 year, and buy it cheaper.
It's 1760€ right now in France, with regular sales under 1700. Launch price in France was 1999€. I agree with the "buy later" part but the X-T5 price will also continue to drop as time goes on. My issue is not with the price itself, but with the lack of separation with the X-T5. and a lightly used X-T5 off MPB is already cheaper than the X-T50's launch price.
Lack of price separation? Sure, but again you are comparing launch price for a new camera versus price of a camera that has been around for 3 years. In 3 years time how much the XT50 will cost?
Even comparing launch price in the US : 1400 vs 1700. That's only a $300 difference, while it used to be 700 to 800. The X-T5 didn't increase in price compared to the X-T4 while the X-T50 is $500 more than the X-T30.
Sure, we can check the prices in 3 years, but the price of the X-T5 will continue to drop also.
European pricing is pretty funny when this is what Google gets you :
In that line of thought, those who want to upgrade from X100 series to ILC in the Fuji ecosystem, will see the XT50 as a natural progression. They even share the sensor and batteries.
Yes, that's my point exactly. They're really putting down the film sim argument harder and harder.
Also, I wouldn't consider the X-T50 a step-up to the X100VI. More like an ILC side grade for people that couldn't get one. An upgrade would men not leaving anything that the X100 has, becised the OVF. EVF is worse, no weather sealing, cheaper build are enough things to make me consider an X-T50 not as a X100VI upgrade.
I can see people that have X100 series camera to be hooked on Fuji, and then wanting a Fuji ILC. The XT50 can be such a camera. The X100VI is also not weather sealed. How do you know the XT50 has cheaper build?
X-Tx0 cameras always had cheaper builds than the X-T series, as well as the X100 series. Generally, thinner metal panels, a bit more plastic used. It seems to still be the case according to reviews I've seen. Also, much lower end EVF, and lower res back panel play a part imho.
Also, both the X100V and X100VI are weather sealed on the body. The front of the lens isn't but you can seal the camera by putting a filter on the lens to seal it. According to Fujifilm the weather sealing on the X100VI's body is about as weather resistant as the X-T5.
It will probably find its public with the people that wanted to buy an X100VI but couldn't due to the long wait times.
The increase in size between XT3 and XT4 is minimal, they were able to accommodate the new battery.
It was not "minimal". The X-T4 was the largest X-T body to date (even compared to the X-T5)
I have used XT3 and XT4, no real difference in use. As your comparison below illustrates, hardly noticeable.
I noticed it quite a bit when I used them