Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
--I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
---
It might be useful if you described some of the problems with the G3 that you find intolerable. Perhaps someone can actually help you with them, if they are not merely the product of unmet expectations. I bought a G3 recently just to get back into photography and I'm having a great time with it.I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
don't you understand the term "freedom of speech"?
--I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
--I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.---
Doc Geoff
Why would you want to discourage those who may find the G3 to be a
wonderful camera? A camera that exceeds expectations? I am glad I
didn't find a post such as your before I bought my G3. I would not
trade it for ten SLR's or digital cameras. It is better than I
imagined. Light years ahead of the digital I replaced.
Anyway, good luck returning to film. I hope you are very happy
tpgether.
DocGeoff
--It might be useful if you described some of the problems with theI've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
G3 that you find intolerable. Perhaps someone can actually help
you with them, if they are not merely the product of unmet
expectations. I bought a G3 recently just to get back into
photography and I'm having a great time with it.
Roger
The trouble is, all of a sudden, we are all experts in the field of digital cameras. G3 has bad this, wrong that, could be improved......Personally, if I were Brian, I would've kept his post in his other
discussion thread, instead of starting a new one just to say this.
Still, I don't see anything wrong w/ showing some disappointment in
the G3 (and more importantly, the current generation of non-SLR
digicams). The G series is not the cheapest thing in the world
afterall, and there are flaws w/ it that really should've been
addressed in the G5, if not the G3. They may be the best for the
$$$, but still far from perfect really even if you discount Brian's
main disappointment w/ the high DoF of these digicams.
I like my G3 quite well, but know it's flawed nonetheless and also
cannot do certain things at all. And while it's light years ahead
of my previous digicam, I too yearn for a DSLR. But the technology
is still maturing and good DSLRs are very expensive, and I don't
want to wait forever. Maybe in a couple years, good DSLRs will
come down into G series price range. We shall see...
MarekM wrote:
----I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
http://www.pbase.com/brianl
----I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
REM
Ah, but you have to admit that Canon should've done better w/ the G5 given that it followed the G3. There was basically zero progress from G3 to G5 -- 1 extra MP w/ the quality tradeoffs is not progress. To me, clearly, the manual focus interface should've been improved to make it more useable/effective. With the way the G5 is, Canon could've released it when they released the G3.The trouble is, all of a sudden, we are all experts in the field of
digital cameras. G3 has bad this, wrong that, could be
improved......
Off course it could , this is what progress is all about. On the
other hand, no camera is everything to everybody.
I've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
MarekM wrote:Ah, but you have to admit that Canon should've done better w/ the
G5 given that it followed the G3. There was basically zero
progress from G3 to G5 -- 1 extra MP w/ the quality tradeoffs is
not progress. To me, clearly, the manual focus interface should've
been improved to make it more useable/effective. With the way the
G5 is, Canon could've released it when they released the G3.
Anyway, I do agree it's probably the best value in digicams right
now, but flaws are flaws -- and it's not like other camera makers
haven't done better in certain areas. Anyhoo...
--Really nothing you can do about that w/ current non-SLR digicams.
Might be other flaws he doesn't like.
Actually, if I already owned a decent film SLR, I might be tempted
to return my G3 also when I found out the various flaws/weaknesses.
It all depends...
Man
--It might be useful if you described some of the problems with theI've had enough problems with G3... and decide to sell it on ebay.
I am going to stick with my S230 and Nikon SLR and wait for the
next generation of digicam.
G3 that you find intolerable. Perhaps someone can actually help
you with them, if they are not merely the product of unmet
expectations. I bought a G3 recently just to get back into
photography and I'm having a great time with it.
Roger
Baseball as a metaphor for life?
Well, 'luck is a residue of design.' --Bill Dickey--
email: [email protected]
gallery: http://www.pbase.com/mandnwong
And what flaws/weaknesses did you find, Man?He's mostly disappointed w/ the high DoF, ie. can't easily blur
backgrounds, based on his other recent thread.
Really nothing you can do about that w/ current non-SLR digicams.
Might be other flaws he doesn't like.
Actually, if I already owned a decent film SLR, I might be tempted
to return my G3 also when I found out the various flaws/weaknesses.
It all depends...
Man
Yes, I know what you're saying and certainly know how to blur background w/ my G3, BUT there's a big difference between what you can do w/ a non-SLR vs an SLR in most any given situation. They are simply totally different beasts in terms of DoF at this point in time. Maybe that will change in the not too distant future, but that's just how it is right now.I'm not sure I understand this. I totally disagree with the
"nothing you can do about that w/current non-SLR digicams. I have
taken some beautiful photos with blurred backgrounds, and I am
using a G2. It takes some experimentation with Aperture to get the
background you want, but my point is - the DoF is not severely
limited with the G3. Just an understanding of exposure and aperture
can provide wonderful results with this camera!
Yes, I agree that the G3 is one of the best values for digicam, but that won't stop anyone from wanting better next year -- well, actually, this already is "next year" for the G3.I agree with everyone when you said he should have listed his
problems with the G3, and maybe asked for some help - it is a great
camera for the money, without spending $1500 for a 10D or D100 -
the next step.