How much gear is too much when flying to other countries?

Only rules Im aware of are for forbidden items in carry on or checked bags (e.g lithium batteries, ).
Almost everything electronic has lithium batteries these days so how do they enforce that?
 
I I took more than usual on our recent trip to Europe. Generally, I'd have been fine with A7riv, 17-28 and 28-200. I took a 24/1.8 "just in case" but the ideal "case" never developed. I also took my "new" A6700 kind of as backup and to try some video. TBH, our phones would have been quite satisfactory for casual back-up and video, too.

What I think might be a problem some places is that that extensive a kit and the lighting gear, especially, might suggest a "professional" trip and might require a work permit. not a tourist visa, etc.
 
So my question. Have you ever encountered a situation where you had to explain to control why do you have so much equipment with you?
Well, I am quite a keen photographer and have been so for 60+ years but if I travel, it's not just the travelling I enjoy but the company of my friends/family with me. I don't want to hold them up while I fiddle about with lenses and so on. My rule is one camera; one lens and one flashgun. Sometimes I cheat a little and have a second point-and-shoot shirt pocket sort of additional camera.

Were I travelling because of a (paid) photographic assignment that would be a different matter and I'd have the kitchen sink with me if I thought I needed it.

Problems with airport customs/security scanners etc.? Well, once upon a time I was flying almost weekly between England and Germany on business. I am olive-skinned, bearded. I'd often be quizzed on entering Germany as to the purpose of my visit. Usually I would say "to sell drugs". I was in pharmaceutical research at the time. I thought this was a funny answer - the authorities seemed not to appreciate my humour.
 
It sounds like you are preparing yourself for every possible scenario, even though the likelihood of you needing all that gear would rarely arise. I think many of us have fallen into that trap, and once you are at your destination you find yourself wondering why you brought all that gear in the first place.

Many eventually come to grips with the reality of what is practical and they cut their weight in half by understanding that they may miss a shot or two, but those occasional shots are not worth the hassle of lugging all that gear.

If you know what you are going to be shooting 99% of the time, you can probably get it down to 1 body and 2-3 lenses. Maybe a tripod if you are going to do a lot of night work, and of course batteries and cards. etc.
 
Much less than you list. Even if the trip is primarily for photos I want to be concentrating on photography, not worrying about keeping up with gear.
Hi,

I'm not new in photography, but every time when I travel to other countries I takes more and more with me, cause I'm shooting not only landscapes but also people. So I take many lenses for all situations, I take tripod, heads, light stands, constant light, flash light, mics, laptop, drives, chargers and other small things.
How long a trip and what kind of photo opportunities do you anticipate? Will you have time and opportunities to use all that stuff? Will you miss photo chances because you're distracted by your gear?

This sounds more like a list for a film crew than a solo photographer. If you really need it, that's great. But you have to be prepared to accept the problems that come with it
Many times on airport control and customs control I get more attention than other people cause I'm traveling with big professional bags and a lot of equipment is visible on the scanner.
No surprise there, you may have to learn to live with it.
So my question. Have you ever encountered a situation where you had to explain to control why do you have so much equipment with you? Do you have any problems with that? Do you know any rules that restrict transportation of large quantities of pro photo and video equipment?
Airlines set the rules and post them on their websites.

The few times I needed to transport large amounts of equipment my company shipped it ahead. Packed it all on a freight pallet and handed it off to FedEx. It was waiting at the location when I got there. At the end of the job I packed it back on the pallet and called for a pickup.

When I'm traveling on my own by air I try to get all the essential gear into one carry-on -- including photo gear, a change of socks and underwear, and personal essentials like spare eyeglasses and prescription meds. If I have to bring lights or stands I check them. Or arrange to rent at the location.

FWIW

Gato
 
I think there are size limits - and they have x-ray scans and access to the baggage before loading.
What does that have to do with banning Lithium batteries? I was responding to this; "Only rules Im aware of are for forbidden items in carry on or checked bags (e.g lithium batteries, sharps, liquids, flammable gases etc)."
 
Last edited:
Only rules Im aware of are for forbidden items in carry on or checked bags (e.g lithium batteries, ).
Almost everything electronic has lithium batteries these days so how do they enforce that?
Li-on batteries in hold luggage are forbidden. In the cabin up to a certain size in Wh, which only would get you in trouble with very big laptops and powerbanks. Reasoning is that in the cabin overheating will be noticed sooner and the crew have training and means to deal with it. Checking is indeed done in the scan.
 
I used to travel between 16-states with a tool-box for medical-equipment (electronic) repair -- back BEFORE "security"-checks.

When they started (security) I ran into an inspector who opened up my box, (thus already able to "see" everything in it), but while looking at it, he asks: "Got Anything Sharp In There ???"

I commented: "If EVERYTHING in there was not sharp, it would not do me any good !!!"

I sternly refused to check-it -- and we compromised and I allowed them to put it into the cockpit, (with pilots).

Another time I flew with a (large-commercial) Ampex 1" tape-recorder in the AISLE (totally blocking it).

And if that was not enough, another time I actually had to FIX an airliner before we flew.

It was a (large) Lockheed L-1011 (similar to DC-10). It was midnight in Atlanta during a severe ICE-storm and the entire town was iced-in, so no maintenance personnel at the airport. The pilots announced he had a "red"-light that indicated a "cooling" bottle was empty -- up on the center (high) engine . He announced he could not fly with it -- and we had to "wait" for maintenance, (who was not able to get there due to the ice-weather).

The pilot explained that he could fly if we could prove it was only the switch/sensor, (then assuming the cooling-bottle was actually full).

He allowed me access to the aircraft schematics and I located the switch. There was a ladder available, and a mechanic that was at least able to open the access-hatch to the engine, (yes it was COLD 50' up there -- but I wanted to get home).

We found that water had gotten into the "switch" on the sensor and FROZEN, (thus cracking the plastic body of the switch) ... I had my meter with me and indeed confirmed the switch was bad. We re-secured the access-panels ... and I reported that to the pilot who said that was: "all I need to know".

He put on his headphones, called the tower that we had corrected the problem .. and we FLEW.

Of course -- you can't do ANY of that anymore today -- it was a different time.

(Note that I did have some "aircraft-maintenance" experience as I had previously been an Engineering Tech-Representative on radar systems for AF/NAVY aircraft.)
...ah, the days before 9/11...
 
I used to travel between 16-states with a tool-box for medical-equipment (electronic) repair -- back BEFORE "security"-checks.

When they started (security) I ran into an inspector who opened up my box, (thus already able to "see" everything in it), but while looking at it, he asks: "Got Anything Sharp In There ???"

I commented: "If EVERYTHING in there was not sharp, it would not do me any good !!!"

I sternly refused to check-it -- and we compromised and I allowed them to put it into the cockpit, (with pilots).

Another time I flew with a (large-commercial) Ampex 1" tape-recorder in the AISLE (totally blocking it).

And if that was not enough, another time I actually had to FIX an airliner before we flew.

It was a (large) Lockheed L-1011 (similar to DC-10). It was midnight in Atlanta during a severe ICE-storm and the entire town was iced-in, so no maintenance personnel at the airport. The pilots announced he had a "red"-light that indicated a "cooling" bottle was empty -- up on the center (high) engine . He announced he could not fly with it -- and we had to "wait" for maintenance, (who was not able to get there due to the ice-weather).

The pilot explained that he could fly if we could prove it was only the switch/sensor, (then assuming the cooling-bottle was actually full).

He allowed me access to the aircraft schematics and I located the switch. There was a ladder available, and a mechanic that was at least able to open the access-hatch to the engine, (yes it was COLD 50' up there -- but I wanted to get home).

We found that water had gotten into the "switch" on the sensor and FROZEN, (thus cracking the plastic body of the switch) ... I had my meter with me and indeed confirmed the switch was bad. We re-secured the access-panels ... and I reported that to the pilot who said that was: "all I need to know".

He put on his headphones, called the tower that we had corrected the problem .. and we FLEW.

Of course -- you can't do ANY of that anymore today -- it was a different time.

(Note that I did have some "aircraft-maintenance" experience as I had previously been an Engineering Tech-Representative on radar systems for AF/NAVY aircraft.)
...ah, the days before 9/11...
Yes, 9-11 was the last nail in the flying coffin. The first nail in the flying coffin was that danged D. B. Cooper!!! LoL

John
 
I used to travel between 16-states with a tool-box for medical-equipment (electronic) repair -- back BEFORE "security"-checks.

When they started (security) I ran into an inspector who opened up my box, (thus already able to "see" everything in it), but while looking at it, he asks: "Got Anything Sharp In There ???"

I commented: "If EVERYTHING in there was not sharp, it would not do me any good !!!"

I sternly refused to check-it -- and we compromised and I allowed them to put it into the cockpit, (with pilots).

Another time I flew with a (large-commercial) Ampex 1" tape-recorder in the AISLE (totally blocking it).

And if that was not enough, another time I actually had to FIX an airliner before we flew.

It was a (large) Lockheed L-1011 (similar to DC-10). It was midnight in Atlanta during a severe ICE-storm and the entire town was iced-in, so no maintenance personnel at the airport. The pilots announced he had a "red"-light that indicated a "cooling" bottle was empty -- up on the center (high) engine . He announced he could not fly with it -- and we had to "wait" for maintenance, (who was not able to get there due to the ice-weather).

The pilot explained that he could fly if we could prove it was only the switch/sensor, (then assuming the cooling-bottle was actually full).

He allowed me access to the aircraft schematics and I located the switch. There was a ladder available, and a mechanic that was at least able to open the access-hatch to the engine, (yes it was COLD 50' up there -- but I wanted to get home).

We found that water had gotten into the "switch" on the sensor and FROZEN, (thus cracking the plastic body of the switch) ... I had my meter with me and indeed confirmed the switch was bad. We re-secured the access-panels ... and I reported that to the pilot who said that was: "all I need to know".

He put on his headphones, called the tower that we had corrected the problem .. and we FLEW.

Of course -- you can't do ANY of that anymore today -- it was a different time.

(Note that I did have some "aircraft-maintenance" experience as I had previously been an Engineering Tech-Representative on radar systems for AF/NAVY aircraft.)
...ah, the days before 9/11...
Yes, 9-11 was the last nail in the flying coffin. The first nail in the flying coffin was that danged D. B. Cooper!!! LoL

John
The incidents I described happened between 1973 and 1976, (airplanes were being hijacked to Cuba).
 
Last edited:
At home in the UK on holiday or just days out dedicated to photography. I will choose from my Nikon DSLR/lens selection depending on likely subject and weather conditions. When going abroad I've got used to only taking my Sony RX100 mark I. This remarkable little camera, for me at least. can do everything really well
 
So my question. Have you ever encountered a situation where you had to explain to control why do you have so much equipment with you? Do you have any problems with that? Do you know any rules that restrict transportation of large quantities of pro photo and video equipment?
In wildlife use-cases such as safari in Africa, one might be flying in small indie charter planes between wildlife parks, sometimes between countries. Those outfits often have extremely stringent weight restrictions. One must do their advance research very carefully.

As for general travel, I'm a believer in the one-camera/one-lens philosophy, but liberalize this somewhat in practice. If traveling by air with a FF camera it'll be one body and two small primes. OTOH, I might take two small APSC or m43 cameras with either a small prime glued onto each, or a small standard-range zoom glued onto one and the smallest possible fast prime glued onto the other.

Light and mobile is a glorious way to roll, and optimizes creativity in recognizing and pursuing shot opportunities.
 
I once got stopped for a hex wrench in my bag when flying out of Delhi, India as it was a ‘seen as a tool’. Did get it through in the end after a short polite chat though!
I've flown with entire tool sets before. The rule was, I can't remember for sure but if the tools are more than 6" long they have to be checked in. Of course sharps need check-in regardless of size. Just inquire beforehand! It probably varies by airline too.

John
Carrying tools onto planes was/is prohibited in India. Local rules apply. Yes, it surprised me too but wise to also check the rules of the country you are returning from! Subsequently, I put them in checked luggage (though I rarely travel with checked baggage on business trips).
 
I used to travel between 16-states with a tool-box for medical-equipment (electronic) repair -- back BEFORE "security"-checks.

When they started (security) I ran into an inspector who opened up my box, (thus already able to "see" everything in it), but while looking at it, he asks: "Got Anything Sharp In There ???"

I commented: "If EVERYTHING in there was not sharp, it would not do me any good !!!"

I sternly refused to check-it -- and we compromised and I allowed them to put it into the cockpit, (with pilots).

Another time I flew with a (large-commercial) Ampex 1" tape-recorder in the AISLE (totally blocking it).

And if that was not enough, another time I actually had to FIX an airliner before we flew.

It was a (large) Lockheed L-1011 (similar to DC-10). It was midnight in Atlanta during a severe ICE-storm and the entire town was iced-in, so no maintenance personnel at the airport. The pilots announced he had a "red"-light that indicated a "cooling" bottle was empty -- up on the center (high) engine . He announced he could not fly with it -- and we had to "wait" for maintenance, (who was not able to get there due to the ice-weather).

The pilot explained that he could fly if we could prove it was only the switch/sensor, (then assuming the cooling-bottle was actually full).

He allowed me access to the aircraft schematics and I located the switch. There was a ladder available, and a mechanic that was at least able to open the access-hatch to the engine, (yes it was COLD 50' up there -- but I wanted to get home).

We found that water had gotten into the "switch" on the sensor and FROZEN, (thus cracking the plastic body of the switch) ... I had my meter with me and indeed confirmed the switch was bad. We re-secured the access-panels ... and I reported that to the pilot who said that was: "all I need to know".

He put on his headphones, called the tower that we had corrected the problem .. and we FLEW.

Of course -- you can't do ANY of that anymore today -- it was a different time.

(Note that I did have some "aircraft-maintenance" experience as I had previously been an Engineering Tech-Representative on radar systems for AF/NAVY aircraft.)
...ah, the days before 9/11...
Yes, 9-11 was the last nail in the flying coffin. The first nail in the flying coffin was that danged D. B. Cooper!!! LoL

John
The incidents I described happened between 1973 and 1976, (airplanes were being hijacked to Cuba).
Yes, Cooper was in 71. THAT's when they started toi install metal detecters!

Because of all the hyjakings is when they started to use x-ray!

After 911 they created TSA and the rest is history!!!

John
 
I've been flying for work and holidays for over 30 years and never had any problems bringing a camera bag loaded with 2 bodies and a couple of lenses as a carry on - I fly mostly Air Canada. However, I have have since learned that just because you can bring it on board doesn't mean you should. Our last trip was a tour of historic Greece - and pretty much all of the sites were either up hills or on top of mountains and required a lot of climbing. Cameras and lenses get pretty heavy in the heat and I stuck to one camera and a zoom lens - a lesson I had painfully learned in Death Valley years prior. Everyone else I saw was using a cell phone and seemed pretty happy with their photos.
 
Only rules Im aware of are for forbidden items in carry on or checked bags (e.g lithium batteries, ).
Almost everything electronic has lithium batteries these days so how do they enforce that?
I guess you don’t fly much or haven’t checked the TSA / airline restrictions when you have checked in. Might be worth a few minutes of your time. Even carrying a bottle of water through security is restricted currently.
 
We have kids with us when we travel so photography is always secondary. I typically bring one body with a wide fast Zoom and one body with a long telephoto zoo. That way depending on where we are, I can just grab whichever camera has the right focal length on it and get a shot, since zooming with my feet often isn't practical with kids, and forget about having time to move around to frame a shot the way you want with a prime.

I will usually bring a small Enthusiast camera as well just to have with me for those times when I can't bring the gear out of the hotel room. Or if we're going somewhere not well lit like a museum, having a 1-in sensor and f1.8 can be very helpful at times like that.
 
Only rules Im aware of are for forbidden items in carry on or checked bags (e.g lithium batteries, ).
Almost everything electronic has lithium batteries these days so how do they enforce that?
I guess you don’t fly much or haven’t checked the TSA / airline restrictions when you have checked in. Might be worth a few minutes of your time. Even carrying a bottle of water through security is restricted currently.
I haven't flown since 2006.
 
Hello,

As many others, I, for convenience, usually carry one body (FX DSLR) and two or three lenses on longer trips. If two, for example a 24-120 zoom and a 35 prime.


But my problem regards the size of the carry-on load on planes. Flying in Europe, I usually use a Thule backpack as a carry-on, which also holds a laptop an iPad and some other stuff. It measures 30 x 22 x 52 cm (11.8 x 8.7 x 20.5 in). I’m now deciding on the larger Mindshift Rotation 34, which is 34 x 58 x 26 cm (13.4” x 22.8” x 10.2). But I’m afraid that would stretch the limits for carry-on. Any experiences or thoughts about what usually works when you are entering the plane?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top