For good reason, too. But that's in the past. Nikon's on a roll with a series of quality full-frame camera releases, starting with the Z9.Absolutely, it's a nice lens lineup, but before that and before Z9/Z8, a bunch of Nikon shooters moved to Sony.It depends on what you shoot. Kestrels are year-round residents where I live and winter is absolutely the best season to photograph them. They're also the smallest North American falcon. It's rare to get a photo op of a kestrel in-flight in which the bird fills the frame of a 750mm angle of view.Sure, but significantly lighter than 600/4 and 400/2.8.That would be a big lens around 125mm dia front optic.No, not for any focal lengths above 24mm.There seems to be at least 2 groups of photographers with regard to lens choice for DX bodies particularly a body designed for sports wildlife. I know the Z500 is a unicorn camera and may never be produced but if it was would you want a set of DX lenses comparable to their FF versions with regard to field of view ie instead of a 180-600 a small as possible 120-400, instead of a 70-200 a 45-135. or do you simply want to use the DX body as a quality 1.5X teleconvertor with existing FF lenses which you may already have for your FF body. I have kept the poll simple, basically yes or no.
But yes, a Z DX 10-24/4 would be nice if in a professional grade package, weather sealed etc., but that will never happen.
Nikon does not seem to view Z DX as a pro system at all any more. Times have changed since D2X.
I would be happy with the 400/4.5 on a Z500.
The perfect lens would be Z 500/4 @ 2.5 kg or so...(no PF), but it doesn't even exist for FF today.
And we might not even get one as the 400 TC, 600/6.3 PF is "overlapping".
Same with a Z 800/5.6, I doubt we will see one.
500mm is a better fit on DX than 600mm IMO, and f4 is better than the f5.6 or 6.3 lenses considering the smaller sensor size.
Though not as rare, it's still uncommon to get ops with eagles and hawks in-flight where the bird fills a 750mm angle of view.
When you consider the additional reach of a 600mm lens vs 500 or 400, plus the better low-light performance of a 600mm f/6.3 lens vs 500mm f/5.6 or 400mm f/4.5, I think the Nikkor 600mm PF would fly off the shelves (as much add any $4,800 lens can fly) as the optic of choice for bird and wildlife photographers using a hypothetical Z500.
Agreed.Unfortunately I doubt we will see a 500mm/4, and probably not a Z500 either.
Nikon sold about 200K units based on the serial numbers tracked at http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/camera.htmlThe D500 must have sold in very large numbers and made a good profit, since it was mostly same tech as the D5, so I don't get why Nikon didn't try to fill that whole earlier. The D500 was discontinued 2 years ago and as a comparison the Canon R7 (7D replacement) was released June, 2022.
It wasn't near to being their best-selling DSLR but that's not a small customer base in the current dedicated digital camera market.
Nikon's done a brilliant job through performance, pricing, and unicorn lens development of enticing their bird, wildlife & sports shooting D500 owners to buy into full-frame mirorless. (And to attract photographers from other brands.) The Z8 and Z9 deliver amazing performance. They're not inexpensive - not by any stretch - but are competitively priced in their segment.The only reason that I can see is that tech (at Nikon) haven't been good enough to make a competitive camera until lately, and of course they don't want to release a camera that can't compete wit R7, Fujifilm etc.
The D500 was released together with the D5 so the rumors of a high speed Z9 makes me dream about a deja-due double release: Z9H / Z900H before the Summer Olympics.
But what's the odds on that pipe dream?![]()
But it's Nikon's stable of Z-mount lenses that push all the right buttons. They've got ther widest and best selection of optics for wildlife and sports photogs. The 600 & 800 PF are incredibly tempting; again, not inexpensive, but really enticing considering performance and price. Shoot, the 800 PF is as good a low-light lens as a 500mm f/4 and not too far behind the 400mm f/2.8.
Trust me, I'm on board with Nikon developing and releasing a Z-mount D500 equivalent. I've been advocating for that since the first-gen Z6/Z7 were introduced. As a longtime Nikon photographer, it's the camera I've been holding out for...but that collection of lenses has me also considering full-frame options.But if you can't afford the Z8 or Z9, I don't see why getting into the Nikon Z system today, if shooting wildlife.
Competition have more compelling alternatives for those people. That's why Nikon needs a cheaper, faster camera with excellent AF and high MP, and DX seems to be a reasonable way to achieve that.
What's the old saying in photograhy; you date the camera but marry the lens. I think the current Z-mount lens lineup offers enough in the "marriage material" column to persuade customers to spend more than they'd prefer or to wait for a more affordable body to come along, before committing to another brand's lesser glass.
Nobody other than Nikon - not Canon, Sony, Fuji, nor OM-Systems - offers anything that can compete with the 500mm, 600mm or 800mm PF lenses. They're not inexpensive but, for the serious wildlife and bird photographer, they're incredibly tantalizing.
Based on the rumors about the Z6III, it appears Nikon may be developing a non-stacked sensor body that still delivers the autofocus performance a bird, wildlife or sports enthusiast would expect. It's a risky strategy. The Z6/Z7 bodies had locked-in a public perception that non-stacked sensor Z-mount bodies couldn't get the job done.
The recently released Zf has challenged that image. It's getting consistently favorable reviews for autofocus performance. If the Z6III continues that trend, Nikon will have a reasonably priced enthusiast-level full frame body that, when paired with one of the many excellent lens options (including the 180-600), can be used for a wide range of photographic genres, including wildlife and birds.
My preference, would be the introduction of a Z900 APS-C fast action body. But with Nikon's focus on full-frame as the format for serious amateurs and professionals, I'm not confident such a camera is in development.