End of the Camera Wars

But the reality is more than obvious.

Outside of Nikon bringing up their lower end stuff to higher levels, we're now in a place where ANY camera is absolutely fantastic.
But that’s the big issue that contradicts what you say below. Nikon has not yet brought their lower end up and with no known date to do so.
This ebb and flow has been happening for years. Nikon is bringing lower cost products in shortly. Not knowing the "date" doesn't mean a thing.
I'm just saying that we're at a level now where everything is just amazingly great, both in bodies and in lenses.

Across the board you really can't go wrong and even mid level stuff is better than top tier tech from just a few years ago.
No Nikon is definitely NOT “at a level now where everything is just amazingly great” because they’re not at an elite level across the board.
LOL! Says who? Consumer and industry reaction to the Z9 and Z8 puts them at the top of many lists. The Z9 is certainly the best camera I've used and I have access to every top tier body out there.

The lenses are superb, full stop.
You said “everything … Across the board

Apparently you think Nikon must concede the war after the Z8/Z9. They can surrender now. I dispute that. Full stop.
Nikon publicly announced in April ’22 that they intend to deploy advanced features from the Z9 across the lineup, or board as you say, by 2025.
Not relevant. Nikon does things at their own pace. What can't you do with ANY of these systems at this point? They are all superb.
Perhaps then (assuming Sony/Canon doesn’t make any more significant advances) Nikon may usher in the end of the camera wars.
 
I could switch systems tomorrow and give up nothing,
I am most certainly not with you there -- the fatuous nature of the "wars" is they ignore the glass and accessories - it is in YT channel's creators interest to over blow the alleged ease to switch from Brand X to Brand Y when the truth is for any enthusiast or pro their investment in glass and accessories vastly outweighs the cost of the bodies they are using at any point in time. My 20+ lenses are Nikkor and Z-mount compatible and so are my flashes/strobes/triggers etc.
..... beyond my time with a new learning curve.
We are certainly very very very far apart here -- it takes a long time to get a good working knowledge with any system, to know how to set up a camera for success in each subject/setting and to build the muscle memory for shooting to be automatic and not fumbling about.

99% of the whining I see is from folk who are "being cheap" (using none brand batteries, cheap/low performance cards and 3rd party lenses) or more often simply have not opened the manual, reference guide or any other guide and certainly spent no time testing and learning their gear.

Yes on very rare occasions these days there is odd behaviour (and this could be a badly built model). We who have owned the Z9 and Z8 from the first days have seen a wee bit of that until we learned these cameras, pair them with the appropriate cards and adapted how we shoot to ways that work best with our cameras and subjects - not just stick to comfortable old DSLR ways. All takes much longer time and far far higher time investment than most think.
The camera wars are endless, but the hair splitting is rather absurd at this point. Whatever your needs, there are AMAZING options from every camera company. You really can't go wrong.
Agreed.
Perhaps the only issue is the cost of a fully rounded out package. You can spend 20K very quickly on a top body and a selection of quality lenses.
$100k+ because who stops with one body or a few lenses.
Beyond that little issue....I hereby declare that the "Camera wars are over!" ;-)
You the UN and absolutely no-one else - as others have said wars are more interesting that peace AND the real war is Cameras -vs- smartphones.

Based on Nikon leadership comments - Nikon hope the downward spiral DICL sales has ended and some growth is now being seen. I hope so.

I also hope this includes growth in video (not just vlogging) and related uses and technologies. Nikon took a huge step forwards with the Z8/Z9 I wait to see what emerges when Nikon's ends "looking at CINE" and starts releasing products.

AND then we get to the competition for mid/high end (so not the flagship and No 2 body) and yes this is the Z6iii and Z7iii -- given "how long" Nikon is taking to release successors to the Z6ii and Z7ii I really hope whatever they release and when ever they do these are really special and prices appropriately (appropriate for the technology these bodies contain, not just dumbed down to hit a price - that is what the Z5 is for).
 
I thought I was the only one in the world that thought that way about jpeg.
 
Hi,

May be. When Nikon came out with their first six DSLR models, your choices were Jpeg and Tiff. No Raw.

It wasn't until the seventh model they added Raw, and then it was some time before they offered software to process Raw files.

;)

Stan
 
Hi,

I have had many Nikon cameras. And plenty of non Nikon ones too. Mamiya, Contax, Pentax and Canon to name a few.

And then there were many Kodaks, both with Nikon and Canon bodies attached to the Kodak digital part.

I have never been wedded to Nikon, although the majority of all that I have had have been Nikons.

Right now, there are still two Kodaks here, one Nikon and one Canon. Plus a Pentax 645D. The only model which came from Nikon is a Df.

Next up? Maybe a Fuji GFX 100s depending on just what this new Fuji is when they announce it next month. Might drive the 100s used prices down nicely.

But I doubt my next Nikon will be any time soon. I am still waiting for a 60 MP class which was once the focus of the Z8 rumors. And I would not say No to a retro S rangefinder style. As long as it has a S mount (adapter to a Z preferred with the focusing finger wheel). I wouldn't want one that was Z mount only looking like an S. I do need to use these S mount lenses I have here. ;)

Stan
 
Way back when most users were experienced from years with film, so RAW was not needed until it got to the point that there were many new folks involved that could not figure out how to get good photos without doing the processing on a computer. :-D ;-) :-)
 
The wars will never end. People enjoy drama too much. If there is no drama, someone will create some. This is the way.
Case in point... the original post.
 
The wars will never end. People enjoy drama too much. If there is no drama, someone will create some. This is the way.
Exactly. All that will change is the ridiculousness of the differences people argue over.

I do think that for what these cameras cost, people shouldn't have to compromise on much of what they want. But that is different from saying a camera or system is flat out bad.
 
I could switch systems tomorrow and give up nothing,
I am most certainly not with you there -- the fatuous nature of the "wars" is they ignore the glass and accessories - it is in YT channel's creators interest to over blow the alleged ease to switch from Brand X to Brand Y when the truth is for any enthusiast or pro their investment in glass and accessories vastly outweighs the cost of the bodies they are using at any point in time. My 20+ lenses are Nikkor and Z-mount compatible and so are my flashes/strobes/triggers etc.
..... beyond my time with a new learning curve.
We are certainly very very very far apart here -- it takes a long time to get a good working knowledge with any system, to know how to set up a camera for success in each subject/setting and to build the muscle memory for shooting to be automatic and not fumbling about.

99% of the whining I see is from folk who are "being cheap" (using none brand batteries, cheap/low performance cards and 3rd party lenses) or more often simply have not opened the manual, reference guide or any other guide and certainly spent no time testing and learning their gear.

Yes on very rare occasions these days there is odd behaviour (and this could be a badly built model). We who have owned the Z9 and Z8 from the first days have seen a wee bit of that until we learned these cameras, pair them with the appropriate cards and adapted how we shoot to ways that work best with our cameras and subjects - not just stick to comfortable old DSLR ways. All takes much longer time and far far higher time investment than most think.
The camera wars are endless, but the hair splitting is rather absurd at this point. Whatever your needs, there are AMAZING options from every camera company. You really can't go wrong.
Agreed.
Perhaps the only issue is the cost of a fully rounded out package. You can spend 20K very quickly on a top body and a selection of quality lenses.
$100k+ because who stops with one body or a few lenses.
Beyond that little issue....I hereby declare that the "Camera wars are over!" ;-)
You the UN and absolutely no-one else - as others have said wars are more interesting that peace AND the real war is Cameras -vs- smartphones.
smartphones are having a real effect on the world of photography, but the day that I need a smartphone to do my job is the day I take up drawing.
Based on Nikon leadership comments - Nikon hope the downward spiral DICL sales has ended and some growth is now being seen. I hope so.

I also hope this includes growth in video (not just vlogging) and related uses and technologies. Nikon took a huge step forwards with the Z8/Z9 I wait to see what emerges when Nikon's ends "looking at CINE" and starts releasing products.

AND then we get to the competition for mid/high end (so not the flagship and No 2 body) and yes this is the Z6iii and Z7iii -- given "how long" Nikon is taking to release successors to the Z6ii and Z7ii I really hope whatever they release and when ever they do these are really special and prices appropriately (appropriate for the technology these bodies contain, not just dumbed down to hit a price - that is what the Z5 is for).
 
Now that I've had my Z9 for a bit, and also shot with other Canon and Sony top level stuff, I can see where things have landed.

The Z9/Z8 are, in my view, two of the best cameras at any price. I prefer the Z9 to top offerings from Canon and Sony for a variety of reasons that matter to "me."

But the reality is more than obvious.

Outside of Nikon bringing up their lower end stuff to higher levels, we're now in a place where ANY camera is absolutely fantastic. And you can make a case for owning ANY of th top systems without looking back. I could switch systems tomorrow and give up nothing, beyond my time with a new learning curve.

The camera wars are endless, but the hair splitting is rather absurd at this point. Whatever your needs, there are AMAZING options from every camera company. You really can't go wrong.

Perhaps the only issue is the cost of a fully rounded out package. You can spend 20K very quickly on a top body and a selection of quality lenses.

Beyond that little issue....I hereby declare that the "Camera wars are over!" ;-)

Robert
Yes I think thats a very good point, perhaps if your at the bleeding edge of performance in any one area there maybe significant differences but really I think for 95% of users there is not very much between Nikon, Canon and Sony now.

I would argue these days probably the main thing to consider would be lens selection each brand offers.
95% of the users don't even use 30% of what almost any camera available is capable of.
Probably because they don't have to! 😉
 
We've been arguing about ford vs chevy for over a century, and 99% of drivers use them to get from a to b. Don't think there's an end in sight.

After all, this is a nikon forum and people can't even stop arguing about the brand they own.
Of course.

I'm just saying that we're at a level now where everything is just amazingly great, both in bodies and in lenses.

Across the board you really can't go wrong and even mid level stuff is better than top tier tech from just a few years ago.

I prefer my Nikon stuff, but I have nothing bad to say about Canon or Sony that is meaningful or practical. It's all amazing gear.

Robert
Hi!

I also think that no camera makers make bad cameras today. Sure, there are differencies and this famous "high end dx Z gap" that has been discussed. And some brands offer different models/solutions than others. Heck, pick the one that ticks most boxes you need and/or camera you are comfortable with...

It's not all roses though. I am using perhaps too many systems right now (for different purposes). I sould get rid of some of them. Namely the ones that I use least.

A s l a



Climbing (and cleaning while you climb). Took with Z5 while hanging on the wall.

Climbing (and cleaning while you climb). Took with Z5 while hanging on the wall.
 
Now that I've had my Z9 for a bit, and also shot with other Canon and Sony top level stuff, I can see where things have landed.

The Z9/Z8 are, in my view, two of the best cameras at any price. I prefer the Z9 to top offerings from Canon and Sony for a variety of reasons that matter to "me."

But the reality is more than obvious.

Outside of Nikon bringing up their lower end stuff to higher levels, we're now in a place where ANY camera is absolutely fantastic. And you can make a case for owning ANY of th top systems without looking back. I could switch systems tomorrow and give up nothing, beyond my time with a new learning curve.

The camera wars are endless, but the hair splitting is rather absurd at this point. Whatever your needs, there are AMAZING options from every camera company. You really can't go wrong.

Perhaps the only issue is the cost of a fully rounded out package. You can spend 20K very quickly on a top body and a selection of quality lenses.

Beyond that little issue....I hereby declare that the "Camera wars are over!" ;-)

Robert
if someone had a Canon, Sony or Nikon top level camera and couldn't pretty much nail everything that might come along, be it animals, people, landscapes or events, it is now officially the user that is at fault. NOT the camera. I owned the top Canon and Sony cameras and lenses over the last 4 years. They were great. But now I also have the Z9 and feel I have absolutely NO limitations on whatever I need or want to be shooting. Whether I'm getting paid or it's for fun, it ALL comes out perfectly. I can't ask more than that. I don't care what Sony or Canon come out with at this point. Any improvements are beyond splitting hairs for what I'll ever shoot which is already making the grade.
Exactly.

I did a jewelry shoot for a friend and then used the Z9 for auditions for our upcoming film. I've also used it more casually shooting kids and candids in all kinds of light.

The results are 100% spot on. If something goes wrong, it's ME. I've experienced this sort of AF accuracy with Sony stuff, but this camera is at least as good and I prefer it in other ways that put it well ahead for me.

Now, if my whole system was built around Sony A1's, would I switch to Nikon? Nope! That Sony is also amazing and both systems have killer glass.

These are pretty amazing times for cameras.

Robert
I worked in the Jewelry industry for over 20 years. I also photographed 2 companies' catalog and website photographs for their line. I used a Canon 1D and dual flashes with a lightbox. Worked out great. This is back in 2002. So once again, I'll blame the photographer NOT the camera for weaknesses in their results. There are far too many whiners in these forums these days that either don't want to master their art, or can't grasp the mechanics of their gear properly. Sorry but truth can hurt
 
I worked in the Jewelry industry for over 20 years. I also photographed 2 companies' catalog and website photographs for their line. I used a Canon 1D and dual flashes with a lightbox. Worked out great. This is back in 2002. So once again, I'll blame the photographer NOT the camera for weaknesses in their results. There are far too many whiners in these forums these days that either don't want to master their art, or can't grasp the mechanics of their gear properly. Sorry but truth can hurt
The truth is Jewelry doesn't move unless somebody is pulling a Heist. Meanwhile Wildlife is erratic at best. So yes, the truth can hurt.
 
…to ease the summer doldrums. 😉
Not sure how saying that ALL top tier cameras are about equal these days is provocative.

My sense is that you can buy a top level SonyNikonCanon without worry. You know you have a camera you can enjoy for many years.

My Z9 has removed all shooting anxiety. It's the bomb, the cats pajamas, pie-in-the-sky....a awesome camera superb on all fronts. Canon and Sony have there own killer cams. The grass isn't really greener anywhere at this point.

Robert
 
if someone had a Canon, Sony or Nikon top level camera and couldn't pretty much nail everything that might come along, be it animals, people, landscapes or events, it is now officially the user that is at fault. NOT the camera.
Most folks that say that, don't shoot the most challenging things, much less even think of what is.

Go out today and trying shooting in Free Space, and not hovering over something, a Dragon Fly and or Butterfly. Find that one lonely Swallow, also flying in Free Space, not just landing to feed it young and or leaving the nest.

And or when Wildlife is hidden between a variety of obstacles. Even the best of the best Gear, can and Will fail, without the user being the problem.
That is when the skill of the photographer is called upon. I don't care much for all the automation and subject detection AF.
 
if someone had a Canon, Sony or Nikon top level camera and couldn't pretty much nail everything that might come along, be it animals, people, landscapes or events, it is now officially the user that is at fault. NOT the camera.
Most folks that say that, don't shoot the most challenging things, much less even think of what is.

Go out today and trying shooting in Free Space, and not hovering over something, a Dragon Fly and or Butterfly. Find that one lonely Swallow, also flying in Free Space, not just landing to feed it young and or leaving the nest.

And or when Wildlife is hidden between a variety of obstacles. Even the best of the best Gear, can and Will fail, without the user being the problem.
That is when the skill of the photographer is called upon. I don't care much for all the automation and subject detection AF.
If it's a 1 in a Lifetimes type shot, I really don't care how I get the shot. Nor do most others. Overriding the AF of any camera that allows it, I do that all the time. However it never hurts to have a stellar AF system for those times when needed. Many times, even the very BEST Pros, need that.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top