What’s your experience with Nikon support?

Generally, they've been excellent. The times I've had trouble with them have generally been when a camera/lens is either brand new (released under 2 months, so parts/expertise are still hard to come-by) or over a decade old (parts are again hard to come by). Those difficulties can greatly increase the time it takes them to get parts in stock. Otherwise it's on the way back to me within the week. If it isn't an emergency repair, I always try to make sure I have three weeks that I won't be using the equipment just to have the cushion.

My D4s had an electrical connection fault that required four trips back to fix, but that is the only camera that i've had that needed more than a single trip. That was a very odd problem, so I can understand that it eventually ended up taking a trans-pacific trip to fix.

As to their warranty service, they've been extremely good at repairing covered products. They do try to get out of it sometimes, but any company would (if it's really impact damage, then yes, that's something the user is responsible for). If there's one thing that's annoying about the entire repair process, it's that they always say "receipt not provided" even if you tape a copy of the receipt to the lens. It always requires a call and emailing them a second copy.

Also, since they have changed their lens warranty period, you've had to call them on legacy lenses that are still under 5 year warranty. With the current submission site there's no way to remind them that their previous commitment still stands when the lens is over a year old.

As for recalls without an immediate problem for my camera, I'll let them ride for awhile before sending it in. I assume that the first month they'll be swamped and have parts in short supply. Even if it's a recall on a different camera body, i'll still try not to send anything in during the initial time because they'll be stressed and overworked.

I must admit that I used to live around 2 hours from Melville and would drop-off my equipment when there was a problem. I really miss that, because there is more of a disconnect now that i'm dealing with online/phone support.
 
Today's Nikon support (aka Melville), makes it a habit to blame the user for manufacturer defects. I've had an experience where a screw was missing UNDER the rubber grip and instead of repairing it for free under warranty (yes, within a year), they charged me instead.

If you do a search, you'll see good and bad support. But I've noticed that in the present, they have an agenda in getting paid during warranty support.
That is one thing that's happened a few times.

There's a similar screw related problem that happens with the 180-400 and similar lenses, where the screws under the tripod collar will come loose and stop the collar from spinning freely. Each time they've tried to charge us for the repair, even though it's a known problem and isn't caused by the user.

Luckily most of these lenses were covered by the extended coverage term, because it's a $600+ repair estimate.
 
Last edited:
In light of recent events with purchasing a Z body and experiencing prolific dropping of the ball and atrocious customer service on my end, I’m curious what your experiences have been with Nikon USA support.

[...]

The goal is to get a sense of what your experiences have been, what issues you’ve run into, how they could have handled things differently, etc.
The goal will not be met; the feedback will be invalid, because the most aggrieved people are the most vocal, and the most satisfied usually silent. Also because these fora are used by / read by a microscopic fraction of Nikon's customer base.
Spot on!
If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
Not here, see my previous note, and Nikon doesn't read these fora anyway.

Having said all of that, my experiences with Nikon support - Canada - are very good to excellent.
Completely satisfied with Nikon USA too.

My only complaint is dropping support for older obsolete products, but that is commonplace in most industries.
 
My experience summed up, but these experiences are 10 years old now:

-communications: terrible. Nikon is bad at updating customers with the status of anything relating to a repair. When I sent in a lens, any reply to ANY online question I asked was at least overnight.

-quality of service: seems OK, but I've heard a lot of 'I sent in a problem lens and Nikon said it was within spec so sent it back unchanged.'

-warranty issues: There are many reports, too many to ignore, of people sending in defective equipment under warranty and having Nikon claim 'impact damage' and not honoring the warranty.

My personal experiences were perhaps typical in many ways. The first one was for an 18-70 kit lens that stopped autofocusing at about the 1-year-old point. I sent it in to Nikon's west coast facility, and they repaired it under warranty and sent it back. I had a few emails from them giving status, but all seemed slow to come to me. I got the lens back in my hands before I got an email saying they had fixed it and were sending it back.

The second experience was for an 18-200 lens I dropped and quit autofocusing at certain focal lengths. I sent that one in and ... waited and waited. No communication of any kind from Nikon. I initiated a set of email inquiries and received several replies, always delayed at least to the following day. Nikon would request info from me, I'd send it, and they would not reply for 24 hours. I think their repair service communications are batched overnight.

Eventually Nikon admitted that they lost the lens in their California facility. They had to admit receiving it as I had sent it in as a register packaged and had a receipt acknowledgement. They then sent me a new one.

In general, over the years, I've heard more horror stories coming out of California than the Melville NY facility. And, in general, I've heard that Nikon communications regarding repairs are poor. I think all the problems have gotten worse over the past 20 years.
 
In light of recent events with purchasing a Z body and experiencing prolific dropping of the ball and atrocious customer service on my end, I’m curious what your experiences have been with Nikon USA support.

[...]

The goal is to get a sense of what your experiences have been, what issues you’ve run into, how they could have handled things differently, etc.
The goal will not be met; the feedback will be invalid, because the most aggrieved people are the most vocal, and the most satisfied usually silent. Also because these fora are used by / read by a microscopic fraction of Nikon's customer base.
Spot on!
DPReview has the largest photo fora and this forum is likely the largest Nikon Z forum around, although some FaceBook groups seem to be very big as well. My experience with the web is that the loudest people are of course those who have complaints. I do interact with Nikon repair once in a while and indeed my personal experience seems to be better than a lot of those complaints I read.

Concerning Nikon USA, they have had some very deep layoffs 2, 3 years ago. The overall quality of support may be affected by that.
If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
Not here, see my previous note, and Nikon doesn't read these fora anyway.

Having said all of that, my experiences with Nikon support - Canada - are very good to excellent.
Completely satisfied with Nikon USA too.

My only complaint is dropping support for older obsolete products, but that is commonplace in most industries.
 
it has always been excellent. ive never had issues with support or repair. you may get someone that is not as knowledgable and just need to politely ask to transfer to a more experienced person with that piece of equipment.
 
OK it helps if one is both a very long term NPS member and know / work with the head of NPS and the core team quite regularly for over 3 decades.
And it should not be that way (period).

Every customer should get same quality level of support from Nikon.
It's certainly true that every customer deserves competent support from Nikon, or any other company. Nikon USA (not necessarily other Nikon regions) hasn't met what I would call a realistic standard for reasonable quality customer service since 1994, when the company made drastic cost cuts in its operations in response to serious cost pressures (mostly currency related).

But no company in the world treats every customer the same. That's just a fact. 99% of us are objectively not as important to Nikon's bottom line as, say, the FBI or Reuters or some prominent individual photographers with high PR value to a camera company.

In every sector and industry, very important customers do get better service. Your bank is not giving you the same service as it gives customers with $25 million in their accounts. Your car dealer is not giving you the same service as they give to the guy who's bought a new car from them every spring for the last 10 years. Microsoft does not give you the same support that it gives to Boeing.

I don't see how it's reasonable to expect Nikon to do what essentially no other company does.
 
In light of recent events with purchasing a Z body and experiencing prolific dropping of the ball and atrocious customer service on my end, I’m curious what your experiences have been with Nikon USA support.

Why? I’ve managed to escalate my particular situation to someone high up on the food chain at Nikon corporate, with direct ties to the Japanese executive side.

I’ve read quite a few stories here and on other forums about generally apathetic, atrocious, unhelpful, you name it - customer service.

The goal is to get a sense of what your experiences have been, what issues you’ve run into, how they could have handled things differently, etc.

I don’t work for Nikon but my recent experience has left me quite dumbfounded and generally blown away by how the majority of their CX reps even operate and maybe there’s a way to wake them up a bit for everyone involved here.

If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
What issue are you having specifically? I have mixed opinions on support. Calling them is a nightmare, but getting warranty service (where I didn't have to deal with a live person, ie. do it online) was a breeze and nearly effortness and painless (other than the time I have to go without a piece of gear).

The only "complaint" I will give is that I never got an email telling me that my Z8 was being sent back after the mount repair, so I had to ask them the status and they gave me a tracking number (got the camera the very next day though so it was likely in transit for a bit until I contacted them). So no correspondence or even acknowledgement that they received it from Nikon directly (only figured that part out when I checked UPS's site to make sure it was received).
 
If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
Best of luck shaking things up. I don't mean that sarcastically -- I hope you can make an impact. Nikon USA does have markedly disappointing customer service, overall.

However, they won't change unless they believe they will make more money by improving their customer service than they can save by spending the minimum on it. And the vast majority of customers do not factor customer service into their camera buying decisions very much or at all. On the other hand, the biggest factor in their camera buying decisions, taken as a whole, is price. That's a dilemma for a consumer electronics company.

Put another way, companies do not lose very many sales by having poor customer service. But they do lose sales by having higher prices, and they will have to charge more if they spend more on their service system. We don't reward them for good customer service, and we punish them for spending too much on it and raising prices to cover the cost.

In the 1970s, 80, and early 90s, Nikon USA had by far the best service and support system in the US camera industry. Anybody who worked in the industry then would tell you that. Canon was widely considered the worst.

But Canon had the biggest market share for much of the period from 1974 on. And from 1988-1994, they overwhelmed the US market, achieving a high degree of dominance. Nikon USA learned a big lesson from that: having clearly superior customer service didn't matter much to camera buyers. So, in 1994, they cut their service system drastically, and used the savings to try to compete with Canon on price. (Conditions in the industry were very tough overall then, plus Canon was price-warring the entire industry into oblivion at the time.)

So that's the challenge. Customers have to vote with their wallets, or none of the camera companies will pay much attention. My own experience (started managing a camera store in 1987) tells me this is a very uphill battle.
 
Last edited:
But this particular person had already posted that he received a refurbished camera body that looked to be well used, and that Nikon had agreed to a refund and ok'd sending the camera back. What more could a customer ask for? You can't expect them to send you a brand new camera, so if they refund your full expenditure, you can either order another refurb, or choose to do whatever you want with your money. But the poster says that the unsatisfactory camera has not yet been sent back to Nikon.??
 
it has always been excellent. ive never had issues with support or repair. you may get someone that is not as knowledgable and just need to politely ask to transfer to a more experienced person with that piece of equipment.
That is a valid point.

I know from really world experience with other products that support, especially with phone support, the first person to take your call probably knows less than you do and is doing nothing more than reading from the same manual that came with your product.

This is actually the way it should be too, because most calls to customer support are from consumers that are too lazy to read the manual themselves, so let the upper tiers do the work while level one hold hands with the person that doesn't know what ISO is.

There are usually three to four tiers off in the structure of remote customer support. If you feel that the person that answered your call is not capable, ask to be escalated to the next level.

Nikon phone support may be different, but I doubt it. I really don't know for sure because when I have an issue, I usually do the research and if I can't resolve it then off to the local camera shop and let their service people deal with Nikon.

Maybe that is why I have never had any problems with getting my equipment serviced.
 
After 3 camera recalls and 1 warrantee repair over some 15 years, I can say my experience has been positive. The longest part has always been transportation. The 1st 2 recalls (Melville & Signal Hill) got slowed by snowstorms. The last, UPS managed to lose the camera for a couple of days and then it simply didn't move on weekends.

The warrantee repair was handled through my dealer. They confirmed the problem and handled shipping and contact with Nikon. The camera worked when it got back.
 
I thought you previously stated that they agreed to you returning the camera for refund or replacement?
Returning it is not an issue. That’s a consumer right. It’s the games they’ve been playing with respect to a “replacement” including financial games, some solid A+ lies, misleading statements, pricing differences, you name it. Almost like dealing with a rug salesman in a bazaar. It’s comical but it’s also beyond words

Can’t say more for now until I get it resolved. But will definitely report back.
Depending on outcome, how bad situation is, whether you are fed-up; you may be faced with decision as to throwing in towel and moving on.

From experience it is easier to sell a brand-new, still in a factory box, camera; than one which has barely been used.

Regardless, best of luck!
Do what I do. Just ebay / craigslist or whatever the "broken" thing you are trying to get them to fix, and of course be honest that it is defective. Someone will buy. Then just buy a brand new one. It's a waste of life dealing with these companies for months over stupid things that they seem so incompetant to fix. This is my opinion anyway, but of course YMMV.
 
Last edited:
If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
Best of luck shaking things up. I don't mean that sarcastically -- I hope you can make an impact. Nikon USA does have markedly disappointing customer service, overall.

However, they won't change unless they believe they will make more money by improving their customer service than they can save by spending the minimum on it. And the vast majority of customers do not factor customer service into their camera buying decisions very much or at all. On the other hand, the biggest factor in their camera buying decisions, taken as a whole, is price. That's a dilemma for a consumer electronics company.

Put another way, companies do not lose very many sales by having poor customer service. But they do lose sales by having higher prices, and they will have to charge more if they spend more on their service system. We don't reward them for good customer service, and we punish them for spending too much on it and raising prices to cover the cost.

In the 1970s, 80, and early 90s, Nikon USA had by far the best service and support system in the US camera industry. Anybody who worked in the industry then would tell you that. Canon was widely considered the worst.

But Canon had the biggest market share for much of the period from 1974 on. And from 1988-1994, they overwhelmed the US market, achieving a high degree of dominance. Nikon USA learned a big lesson from that: having clearly superior customer service didn't matter much to camera buyers. So, in 1994, they cut their service system drastically, and used the savings to try to compete with Canon on price. (Conditions in the industry were very tough overall then, plus Canon was price-warring the entire industry into oblivion at the time.)

So that's the challenge. Customers have to vote with their wallets, or none of the camera companies will pay much attention. My own experience (started managing a camera store in 1987) tells me this is a very uphill battle.
I know where this is going but let's be frank. It costs nothing to hire people with basic organisational and comprehensive ability! Improve things all begins with the whole system, from the customer service rep on the phone, to the system / process involved to keep the customer informed, the tech handling the device, the ethos of quality instilled in the workforce. They'd (nikon) do well to read a book by Joseph Juran. If you read through this thread you can see what the problem is very clearly. A lot of it can be fixed without much more expense. When they send things back multiple times and clearly don't read things - you got a big problem there.
 
Last edited:
Today's Nikon support (aka Melville), makes it a habit to blame the user for manufacturer defects. I've had an experience where a screw was missing UNDER the rubber grip and instead of repairing it for free under warranty (yes, within a year), they charged me instead.

If you do a search, you'll see good and bad support. But I've noticed that in the present, they have an agenda in getting paid during warranty support.
That is one thing that's happened a few times.

There's a similar screw related problem that happens with the 180-400 and similar lenses, where the screws under the tripod collar will come loose and stop the collar from spinning freely. Each time they've tried to charge us for the repair, even though it's a known problem and isn't caused by the user.

Luckily most of these lenses were covered by the extended coverage term, because it's a $600+ repair estimate.
My screw in question was under the rubber grip that I could not get to nor knew it existed. This was a mishap at the factory, yet they charged me.
 
In light of recent events with purchasing a Z body and experiencing prolific dropping of the ball and atrocious customer service on my end, I’m curious what your experiences have been with Nikon USA support.

[...]

The goal is to get a sense of what your experiences have been, what issues you’ve run into, how they could have handled things differently, etc.
The goal will not be met; the feedback will be invalid, because the most aggrieved people are the most vocal, and the most satisfied usually silent. Also because these fora are used by / read by a microscopic fraction of Nikon's customer base.
Seems like plenty vocal in this thread saying service was good so perhaps your summisation is incorrect...
If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
Not here, see my previous note, and Nikon doesn't read these fora anyway.
Don't be so sure, you have zero evidence for that,
Having said all of that, my experiences with Nikon support - Canada - are very good to excellent.
See - there you go proving my point.
 
Last edited:
I know where this is going but let's be frank. It costs nothing to hire people with basic organisational and comprehensive ability!
Not sure what you mean here, but obviously it costs something to hire people.

Nikon USA's customer service operation (consumer relations + service) is poor because it's under-resourced. (Same for all other camera companies, with the partial exception of Canon.) That starts with being understaffed and staffed by relatively lower-wage employees. They make mistakes because they've got too few people doing too much work under too little supervision with too little training and support.

So Nikon USA could hire more people, and pay higher wages and benefits for higher quality, more experienced people, and spend a lot more time training them in depth. That by itself would improve things quite a bit. But it all does cost significant amounts of money. That's a 100% fact.

I believe that most of these services are outsourced by Nikon USA now, contracted to companies whose main value proposition is to lower their clients' costs.

When I first became aware of Nikon USA's service system, in the 1980s, the company had 4 company owned and operated repair stations (Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, New York), with many dozens of repair technicians (most from Japan), all Nikon employees, with the full range of benefits typical of a reputable US corporation in the 1980s. I think there were around 40 repair techs in Los Angeles alone.

And Nikon USA had a full consumer relations staff, all long-term Nikon employees with full wages and benefits etc., all trained to a similar level as Nikon's field representatives.

The repair system was cut in half in 1994, then cut in half again in the early 2000s, with most repair operations outsourced to lower cost providers. The US consumer relations department was closed and outsourced sometime in the 2000s, I believe. Meanwhile, Nikon had gone from selling around 2-3 million cameras in the US per year to selling around 5-6 million per year in the US. So Nikon USA cut their in-house service resources by around 75% at the same time they increased sales by around 200%. There's a mountain of trouble in that math, which Nikon USA tried to climb with, for the most part, outsourcing.

All of this was done to trim costs and stay price competitive. If it wasn't a lot cheaper, they would never have done it.
 
I know where this is going but let's be frank. It costs nothing to hire people with basic organisational and comprehensive ability!
Not sure what you mean here, but obviously it costs something to hire people.
I would have thought it is quite clear what I mean; hiring staff that can follow basic instruction, read, reply to the customer, be competant at answeing emails etc. These are all basic things in 2023 and these people don't necessarily cost more. There seems to be a bit of a cultural problem at many nikon repair centres and they just seem at least 50% useless. It feels like a 50:50 chance of possible success when sending something in to them. Heck, this thread is even playing out that 50:50 theory almost...
Nikon USA's customer service operation (consumer relations + service) is poor because it's under-resourced. (Same for all other camera companies, with the partial exception of Canon.) That starts with being understaffed and staffed by relatively lower-wage employees. They make mistakes because they've got too few people doing too much work under too little supervision with too little training and support.

So Nikon USA could hire more people, and pay higher wages and benefits for higher quality, more experienced people, and spend a lot more time training them in depth. That by itself would improve things quite a bit. But it all does cost significant amounts of money. That's a 100% fact.

I believe that most of these services are outsourced by Nikon USA now, contracted to companies whose main value proposition is to lower their clients' costs.

When I first became aware of Nikon USA's service system, in the 1980s, the company had 4 company owned and operated repair stations (Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, New York), with many dozens of repair technicians (most from Japan), all Nikon employees, with the full range of benefits typical of a reputable US corporation in the 1980s. I think there were around 40 repair techs in Los Angeles alone.

And Nikon USA had a full consumer relations staff, all long-term Nikon employees with full wages and benefits etc., all trained to a similar level as Nikon's field representatives.

The repair system was cut in half in 1994, then cut in half again in the early 2000s, with most repair operations outsourced to lower cost providers. The US consumer relations department was closed and outsourced sometime in the 2000s, I believe. Meanwhile, Nikon had gone from selling around 2-3 million cameras in the US per year to selling around 5-6 million per year in the US. So Nikon USA cut their in-house service resources by around 75% at the same time they increased sales by around 200%. There's a mountain of trouble in that math, which Nikon USA tried to climb with, for the most part, outsourcing.

All of this was done to trim costs and stay price competitive. If it wasn't a lot cheaper, they would never have done it.
 
Last edited:
If you’d rather keep things private, feel free to send a PM, but I’m gonna shake things up a bit here.
Not here, see my previous note, and Nikon doesn't read these fora anyway.
Assuming Nikon doesn't read these; Nikon is playing Ostrich.

Serious mistake is listening only to those who applaud you; politely known as "Yes men". Leading to self-fulfilling failure.
 
Not great honestly.

Had to get 2 lenses cleaned for mold it was originally estimated to take 2 weeks. Received a call after 3 days saying that one of the lenses also needed an element to be replaced while the other one could be cleaned.

4 weeks pass. Status of lenses on Nikon's website still says 'in-repair'. Got the first lens ready after 2 months and the 2nd one after 3 months. And no real updates when you call their service center too, no ETAs, nothing. Just tell you to check the status through the website or wait for their call.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top